Conference Session

AERO 1: Rocketry and Space Education

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Juhyun Kim, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Timothy Plomin, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Heather Ruth Arnett, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Luisa-Maria Rosu, I-STEM, (Illinois Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics) Education Initiative; Joshua Rovey, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace Division (AERO)

space propulsion. He received BS, MS, and PhD degrees from the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor, and was a research engineer at Starfire Industries LLC before returning to academia as an assistant professor of aerospace engineering at the Missouri University of Science and Technology. In 2017 he joined the faculty of aerospace engineering at the University of Illinois. He has published over 150 journal and conference papers on space propulsion and he regularly teaches 200 students a year in his senior-level aerospace propulsion course. He was recipient of the University of Illinois Provost Award for Excellence in Under- graduate Teaching in 2023. ©American Society for Engineering

Conference Session

Aerospace Division (AERO) Technical Session 2

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Glen Roderic Coates, Pennsylvania State University; Alyson G. Eggleston, Pennsylvania State University; Robert J. Rabb P.E., Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace Division (AERO)

Research Council [5-6].New pedagogical approaches to EC include an increasing focus on topic-specific proceduralwriting; engineering-specific templates and citations; and highly structured assignments withclear applications and a team-based component. Studies have shown that engineering students inparticular respond best and perform better in technical writing tasks with clear deadlines,expectations, peer review phases, and rubric-based assessments [5].EC pedagogy is also changing as a result of the overall importance of engineering technical workrises in industry. Calling it the Communication Coefficient (CC) method, researchers advocatethat engineering students’ experiences in the communication classroom can be improved if theyare advised in