Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying all 4 results
Conference Session
Architectural Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Craig Baltimore, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Allen C. Estes, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Architectural
Design for an Integrated ProjectDelivery Studio. Proceedings of the 46th ASC International Conference. Omaha, Nebraska, 2011.8 Vanasupa, L., K.E. McCormick, C.J. Stefanco, C. J., R.J. Herter, & M. McDonald. Challenges in Transdisciplinary,Integrated Projects: Reflections on the Case of Faculty Members’ Failure to Collaborate. Journal of InnovativeHigher Education. 37/3, 2011.9 Estes, A.C. and Baltimore, C. “Using K’nex to Teach Large Scale Structures to Architects and ConstructionStudents.” Paper 2014-9826. 2014 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, ASEE, Indianapolis,2014.10 ARCE Magazine, “K’nex Connection: Students Play with Toys, Learn About Structures.” Department ofArchitectural Engineering, California Polytechnic
Conference Session
Architectural Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Beth Huffman, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Kelsey Lee Reker; Mary Ann Frank, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Architectural
undergraduatecourses that build upon pre-requisite content, course-based practice minimizes repetitivetreatment of previous material. Mayo (2004) advocates a balance of fundamental coursetheory with active, case-based instruction so that students not only reflect upon pastexperience to construct new learning, they also share knowledge in a social construct. Thisapproach was a benefit to students in this case study as they learned collaboratively, buildingthe depth of their design aptitude.Readers are encouraged to extrapolate the process and steps of this case study for theirdiscipline specific content areas. While the experiences and projects of this case study maybespecific for design students, the application of exposing students to projects from inception
Conference Session
Architectural Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Scott Gerald Shall, Lawrence Technological University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Architectural
have developed a need for patronage, as well asthe related reliance upon idiosyncratic terms and isolated practices can be found in MargaretCrawford’s writing, “Can Architects Be Socially Responsible?” Similar trends, often morepronounced, can be found within the processes used by engineers. SOURCE? MargaretCrawford, “Can Architects Be Socially Responsible?” in Out of Site: A Social Criticism ofArchitecture, edited by Diane Ghirardo (Seattle: Bay Press, 1990): 27-45.ix Jerome Bruner, Toward a Theory of Instruction (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966),82-83.x Bruner, 25-26.xi Bruner, 72 (emphasis mine).xii “If this meaning is at once accepted, there is no reflective thinking, no genuine judgment.Thought is cut short
Conference Session
Architectural Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Charlie Setterfield, Sinclair Community College; Chad R. Bridgman, Sinclair Community College
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Architectural
assigned to mentor the student through the semester.The academic component of the internship includes the preparation of various reports thatdocument the student’s role in the company, how they are leveraging networking and growthopportunities and reflection on the internship experience itself.The student is required to coordinate an on-site, face-to-face meeting with their immediatesupervisor and faculty advisor to discuss their progress throughout the internship. The studentintern is required to take meeting notes to document the conversation with a focus onaccomplishments and continuous improvement areas. The faculty advisor uses a preparedgrading rubric for each assignment, reviews and grades the report and reports the correspondinggrades