. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A Comparison of Learning Outcomes and Learner Satisfaction in a CADD Course With Flexible and Rigid DeadlinesAbstractAn introductory computer aided drafting and design (CADD) course has been offered in aflipped format for six years. The course syllabus details the schedule of topics, assignments andassessments. Because of the volume of material, a rigid course schedule was kept (i.e., no latework allowed). This model is adequate for the majority of learners. However, some students, fora variety of reasons, fall behind by not watching lecture material or missing assignmentdeadlines. Given the obvious advantages of a flipped classroom for self-paced learning, we askedthe
and graduateteaching assistant. Student reflections are a selection of comments submitted anonymously viathe university’s end-of-term Student Evaluation of Instruction surveys.Instructor reflection:The transition of this thermodynamics course to online learning went surprisingly well. Coursecontents (e.g., syllabus, schedule, PowerPoint files, assignments, and other resources) werealready well organized within the university’s Canvas-based Learning Management System(LMS). The course also already used a McGraw Hill eTextbook with adaptive e-Learningreading comprehension questions (LearnSmart) and online AI-graded homework sets (McGrawHill Connect); these features were particularly helpful for the newly online course deliverysystem. Students
Engineering Education, 2021Systems Thinking Tools in a Graduate Biological Engineering Class - A Work in Progress Author and AffiliationsAbstractWhen technological challenges involve complex systems that include interactions with othercomponents or agents, the system can exhibit unexpected and counterintuitive behavior. Systemsthinking is useful in such cases but is rarely taught in engineering courses that do not explicitlyinclude ‘systems’ or ‘systems dynamics’ in the syllabus. This work-in-progress describes anapplication of systems thinking concepts in an undergraduate and a graduate course inAgricultural Waste Management at North Carolina State University. Two specific systemsthinking tools were introduced to help