Conference Session

"Best" of BED

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Idalis Villanueva, University of Maryland, College Park; Rachel L. Manthe, Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park; Kevin M Knapstein, Bioprocess Scale-Up Facility, Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

section contained anequal number of teams tackling one of the two bioengineering areas (biofuels orbiopharmaceuticals). During the first week of class, the instructor provided students with anInstitutional Review Board (IRB) knowledge pre-survey to gage the developed workshopcontent, as well as consent forms to use their curricular material for this paper. Thisinvestigation reflects findings from students that completed the consent forms.In the following weeks, students were taught about the scientific method using conceptual Page 23.413.5mapping strategies to help them identify explanatory variables, shortcomings, and expected

Conference Session

Experiential Learning in BME

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michele Wabler, Clemson University; Estefania Alvarez, Clemson University; John DesJardins, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

encourages student success, monitors the CreativeInquiry undergraduate teams. This interactive environment engages students, faculty, andcommunity in discovery, enriching the lives of each constituency, and provoking higher-orderthinking, reflection on learning, and connection experiences to traditional engineeringcoursework as well as the successful publication of abstracts, posters, and papers based onCreative Inquiry research2-6. Page 15.561.2The Clemson University Retrieval of Explants Program in Orthopaedics (CU-REPO) is one suchCreative Inquiry group that was developed by Dr. John D. DesJardins in the Department ofBioengineering. Now entering

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Molly Y. Mollica, University of Washington; Heather A. Feldner, University of Washington; Anat Caspi P.E., University of Washington ; Katherine M. Steele, University of Washington; Dianne Grayce Hendricks, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

and do not necessarily reflect the views of the federal government.References[1] Oakes, W., Duffy, J., Jacobius, T., Linos, P., Lord, S., Schultz, W. W., & Smith, A. (2002). Service-learning inengineering. In Frontiers in Education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32nd Annual (Vol. 2, pp. F3A-F3A). IEEE.[2] Duffy, J., Tsang, E., & Lord, S. Service-learning in engineering: What why and how? ASEE Annual Conference 2000.[3] Eyler, J., & Giles Jr, D. E. (1999). Where's the Learning in Service-Learning? Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult EducationSeries.[4] Sax, L. J., Astin, A. W., & Avalos, J. (1999). Long-term effects of volunteerism during the undergraduate years. Thereview of higher education, 22(2), 187-202.[5] National Academy of Engineering

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hannah Timbers Yssels, University of California, Davis; Marina Crowder, University of California, Davis; Ozcan Gulacar, University of California, Davis; Jennifer H. Choi, University of California, Davis

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

detail todevelop a model that accurately reflects why and how students have difficulty with problemsolving in biomedical engineering design and (2) determine correlations between knowledgeretention and metacognitive awareness with problem solving success.The following research questions will be addressed: 1. How are problem solving schemas developed and used by students in biomedical engineering? How do these schemas differ for high and low performing students? 2. How do students’ problem solving abilities change during and throughout STEM courses? 3. How are students’ misconceptions related to knowledge retention and their mistakes with connecting different parts in problem schemas? 4. How is a students’ metacognitive

Conference Session

Assessment of Learning in BME

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leann Dourte Segan, University of Pennsylvania; Emily R Elliott, Center for Teaching and Learning, University of Pennsylvania

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

mechanics to a mathematicaldescription. These kinesthetic/tactile activities can be directly connected to deeper thinking aboutthe how and why of the results.14,15 This type of activity reflects a fundamental aspect of theengineering modeling process where an engineer observes a physical phenomenon, e.g.mechanical behavior of a material, and develops ways to quantify the behavior to use in apredictive manner in the future. It is important to note that in this paper we use the termkinesthetic learning or hands-on activities to mean a physical activity that is meant to teach aconcept and develop a deeper understanding of the material, not just the performance of a skill orobservation of a phenomenon.The scope of this paper focuses on the conceptual

Conference Session

BME Laboratory Courses and Experiences

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Timothy Allen, University of Virginia; Jeffrey Saucerman, University of Virginia; Jason Papin, University of Virginia; Shayn Peirce-Cottler, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

learning. The “communication” score reflected the students’ ability toexplain what they did in lab and in the post-lab modeling and analysis, as well as how clearlyand crisply they defined terms and techniques. “Knowledge” was determined by their commandof the relevant background information and modeling approaches. The score for “answeringquestions” reflected not only whether a first answer to a question was correct, but also how wellthe students were able to “think on their feet” when we asked follow-up questions and attemptedto guide them to a greater understanding of a concept if they were initially deficient.“Accomplishment” reflected the overall level of effort and work that went into their modelingand analysis over the module (assuming the

Conference Session

BME Curriculum Development

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ann Saterbak, Rice University; Michele Follen, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center; Rebecca Richards-Kortum, Rice University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

process (4.1); readiness for more demanding research (4.0);understanding the research process (4.0); skill in how to give an effective oral presentation (4.4);learning to work independently (4.1). Students also had very favorable comments about theirfaculty mentors. Some students acted as peer mentors. One student reflected, “I was placed incharge of a college freshman and a high school freshman. I found this to be extremelychallenging because I had to manage my time between doing my own work, assigning work tomy mentees, ensuring they understood what they were doing and did a good job, and teachingthem when needed. All in all, this summer was extremely rewarding in that I helped two peoplegain a better understanding of science and research and

Conference Session

BME Curriculum Development

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Larry Howard, Vanderbilt University; Robert Roselli, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

taken by the student in the problem solution is instrumented by the eLMS delivery platform,students and instructors can easily review the module to support reflection. This approach alsofrees teaching assistants from the necessity of grading homework, most of which is workedcorrectly, and allows them to spend time with the students who most need their help.Many educators recognize the value of such modules, but designing, constructing and debuggingdiagnostic learning modules using CAPE can be very time consuming. Educators will readilyuse modules designed by someone else, but claim to be too strapped for time to design their owndiagnostic modules. The design environment that arises from this infrastructure provides a richset of features and

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeannie S Stephens, University of Delaware; Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Delaware; Elisa S. Arch, University of Delaware; Jill Higginson, University of Delaware

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

university, we use a DesignManifesto to guide the students through the four-phase design process. The manifesto outlinesthe deliverables for each of the phases and the phase subcomponents. Two of the clinicalprojects, Otolaryngology and Anesthesiology & Pharmacy, were more experimental-focusedproject than design focused project. By experimental focused project we mean the projectrequired more experimental design and analysis rather than the building of a prototype. Toaddress a new design manifesto (Research Manifesto) was written to reflect procedure forexperimental-based approach verses design-based approach. The honors students on theseprojects, five of the eight students, were tasked with writing the new research manifesto as theirhonor

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margo Cousins, University of Texas, Austin; Lynda K. Gonzales, University of Texas, Austin; Erin Dolan, University of Texas, Austin; Kathryn E. Flowers, Texas 4000 for Cancer; Courtney Becker, Texas 4000 for Cancer; Laura Suggs, University of Texas, Austin; Mia K. Markey, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

cards. The program sent all thecards together in a package ahead of the riders, so they would receive them when they stoppedfor lodging.Social media interactions between BME CUReS REU participants and current Texas 4000 ridersThe Texas 4000 students on the bike ride post photos and notes to the Texas 4000’s websitethrough a social media aggregator. Similarly, the BME CUReS REU participants post to theREU program’s website through a blog with photos and commentary. Blog post content variesfrom reflections on research and the impact of cancer, to letters to the Texas 4000 student riders,to fun photos from local social trips. The program shares this blog and relevant postings with theTexas 4000 throughout the 10 weeks.Adoption of Texas 4000

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mikayle A. Holm, Arizona State University; Sarah E. Stabenfeldt, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

aortic valve dis- ease. Currently, she is investigating cyber-based student engagement strategies in flipped and traditional biomedical engineering courses. She aspires to understand and improve student attitude, achievement, and persistence in student-centered courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Work in Progress: Evaluation of the Concept Mapping in a Student-centered Biomaterials CourseIntroductionConcept mapping is a reflective technique used for teaching practices in science and engineeringclassrooms. It requires students, either individually or part of a team, to create an intellectualframework that shows major ideas and emphasizes their

Conference Session

New Tools in Teaching and Learning Biomedical Engineering Concepts

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael VanAuker, University of South Florida; Joel Strom, University of South Florida; William Lee, University of South Florida

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

will come from the Asia/Pacificregion and the Latin-American region, which are expected to grow significantly by 20107. Interms of all medical devices, the U.S. market was estimated to be approximately $86 billion by2006 (close to $220 billion worldwide), with a projected 10% annual growth rate for the nearfuture8. The U.S. medical device industry employs more than 411,400 individuals, about 1/3 ofall biotech jobs8. Cardiovascular devices are a significant part of this market; Table 1 lists someof the dominant technologies. As one example of a specific product, the worldwide market forstents is estimated to be about $8 billion by 2008, with this growth reflecting advances in drug-eluting stents9.Dominant cardiovascular pharmaceutical companies

Conference Session

Communication and Professional Skills in BME

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Willis Tompkins, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Naomi Chesler, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Walter Block, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Kristyn Masters, University of Wisconsin-Madison; William Murphy, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Mitchell Tyler, University of Wisconsin-Madison; John Webster, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

self team evaluation 6 Reflection paper 6 Design notebook 12 Oral design review meeting 72 Written progress report 84 Patent disclosure x Human studies protocol x Table: Number of times a BME student experiences each type of professional communication during the six-semester BME design course sequence.To insure consistency across the

Conference Session

Experiential Learning and Globalization in BME

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barbara Burks Fasse, Georgia Institute of Technology; Paul Benkeser, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

journals linked Georgia Tech to the students allowing us to remotely monitor theiradjustment and safety in real-time in the event that emergency intervention might be required.The prompts also provided a therapeutic tool for the students as a neutral place to vent theirfrustrations, share their triumphs, and distill their experiences.   Student L: Thanks for having us do these journal updates. It’s been nice to have someone to talk to (and sometimes vent to as well). Student D: the journal entries… did help me reflect on my trip in a way I wouldn't have been able to do alone.Students were told to conceptualize the journal as a personal conversation with the first author ofthis paper in the form of an informal

Conference Session

BME Laboratory and Project Experiences

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jamie Lynn Brugnano, Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University; Kevin Andrew Richards, Purdue University; Marcia A. Pool, Purdue University; Allison L. Sieving, Purdue University; Juan Diego Velasquez, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sherry L. Voytik-Harbin, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ann E. Rundell, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

perceptions relating to the aspects of the course that they liked and that should beaddressed in the future. First order themes indicate the main ideas that students took away fromthe course related to each of the main topic areas. In certain instances, first order themes arefurther broken down into second order themes to better communicate the students’ experiences.4.3 Reflections on Assignment Design with Respect to Bloom’s TaxonomyTo determine if the assigned activities required the students to engage in and practice higherorder thinking skills, the assignments were assessed based upon the Bloom’s taxonomy scale.We created a rubric with keywords6 that described each level of Bloom’s taxonomy. Threereviewers (chosen from the instructors of the

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Denny C. Davis, Washington State University; Howard P Davis, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

documenting data used in risk assessmentand reduction, including: deriving a risk score, defining an action plan, revising the risk score,and specifying an outcome measure. During the class time, teams perform an initial riskassessment for a few hazards in their design, determine if these risks justify redesign, propose Page 23.1394.4design changes, and re-assess the risk. They then reflect on the importance of Prevention throughDesign and its value to themselves, their employers, and society in the future. The lesson endswith a quiz to determine how this lesson has affected individual students’ attitudes andunderstanding of Prevention through

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey A. LaMack, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Charles S. Tritt, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

are able to propose validapproaches to measuring or estimating fluid mechanical behavior in physiological systems.Students will also be surveyed on the extent to which they feel they are able to evaluate differentengineering approaches before and after the course, and senior design instructors will be asked toassess students’ abilities to conduct proper analysis to make decisions based on thoroughevaluation, rather than trial and error, in their respective design projects. The developers of thelaboratory expect to see increased evaluation and synthesis skills of students following thecourse and hope this is reflected in their ability to make informed design decisions in theircapstone design course. [1] Splitt, F. G. “The Challenge to Change

Conference Session

Pedagogical Developments in BME

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mia Markey, University of Texas, Austin; Kathy Schmidt, University of Texas, Austin; Wonsoon Park, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

the Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2009 American Society for Engineering Educationdesigning and delivery of courses. Now that we have offered courses at a distance, we are able toscrutinize and reflect on these courses.Purpose of the Study In our survey of faculty and students that was conducted before we began regularly offering distance learning courses7 we learned that students and faculty were most concerned about how interactions would be supported in

Conference Session

Integrating Design into the BME Curriculum

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Larry Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Chris Yoder, University of Pittsburgh; Phil Weilerstein, National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance; Angela Shartrand, National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

describe their process. The teams were asked tofirst select those elements/activities that they actually used in their process and then arrange themtemporally to reflect the team’s design and product development process. The resultant mapswere then analyzed through a series of comparisons between the two sets of design teams. Bothgroups were compared relative to their utilization of the elements, and which elements they hadclassified as being critical, time-consuming and/or problematic to the design process. Followingthis comparison, a path analysis was conducted to determine if teams approached process designactivities in a similar manner. We provide a description of the overall approach, our analysis andresults; and suggest how process maps

Conference Session

Integrating Design into the BME Curriculum

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Patricia Mellodge; Brad Deschenes

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

detailing all of the work that they hadaccomplished during the semester. Each group was required to address the overall project andhow their particular subsystem fit into it. Drawings, schematics, and computer code for allhardware and software were included. As with the presentations, grades were given on a groupbasis.Student grades were individualized using attendance and peer evaluation. Attendance wasrequired and any absences negatively affected grades. Students were expected to be in classparticipating and contributing to the project. Lack of participation was reflected in the peerevaluations given at the end of the semester. Students had the opportunity to assess thecontributions of every other student, not just members of their own group. For

Conference Session

Using Technology and Research-based Instructional Practices in BME

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University; Sarah E. Stabenfeldt, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

complement the scientificliteracy portion of the SLIGS. Creation of a direct assessment, such as a concept quiz orassessment of class assignments, will allow for another means to assess improvement inscientific literacy without the chance for self-reporting bias seen by others.5 It is still importantfor the students to reflect on their own learning through the SLIGS. Studies have shown thatreflection allows for students to practice “scaffolding” which is the process of linking currentlearning to previous knowledge, an important skill for all students, especially engineers.6 Page 26.412.13 12Another

Conference Session

Innovations in Pedagogy

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mansoor Nasir, Lawrence Technological University; Joseph Seta, Lawrence Technological University; Eric G. Meyer, Lawrence Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

prosthetics is a popular entry point intoBME for many high school students. The technology used to restore mobility to amputees andthe advancements in biorobotics makes this area of study more accessible and relevant to newstudents. It is also easier to communicate some of the future job opportunities where BME areimproving outcomes for people. The Experimental Biomechanics Lab is equipped with a Viconmotion capture system and the topic was initially presented through the historical use of suchsystems in gait analysis and automobile accident research. One student was prepared for 3Dmotion analysis by attaching 39 retro-reflective markers to the body segments defined by theVicon “Plug-in Gait” biomechanical model (Fig. 1). After calibration, a number

Conference Session

Experiential Learning and Globalization in BME

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jonathan Sanghoon Lee, University of Virginia; Shing Wai Yam, University of Virginia; William H. Guilford, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

female than male students reported havinglaboratory experiences. The most significant predictors were the correlate KSA scores betweenlabs and what students wanted to learn (p = 0.14), student preference to work alone or in teams(p = 0.14), and student desire to work with live animals or perform animal surgery (p = 0.16).Each of these makes intuitive sense in a BME lab setting. A better match between laboratory andstudent interests, at any educational level, lends itself to success. Given that most researchlaboratory settings are inherently team-based, a desire to work in teams rather than alone alsomakes sense. That a student desire to work with live animals was a negative predictor may either(a) reflect the fact that the majority of

Conference Session

Design in BME Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alyssa Taylor, University of Virginia; Katelyn Mason, University of Virginia; A. Leyf Peirce Starling, The Fletcher School; Timothy Allen, University of Virginia; Shayn Peirce, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

encompass a variety of benefits a senior undergraduatestudent can receive as a result of their Capstone design experience. Besides benefiting thestudent in terms of advancing their careers, building their resumes, and preparing them for post-undergraduate endeavors such as graduate school, the success metrics examined in this study (i.e.grant applications and publications) also benefit the advisors, department, company, etc. Perhapsan outcome more immediately relevant to undergraduate students would be the end-of-yearevaluation score of their design project, which is reflected by their spring semester grade. Thus,we examined the end-of-year grades to determine whether any trends in advisor demographics orteam formulation were discernable.The

Conference Session

Research in Biomedical Pedagogy

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David W. Gatchell PhD, Northwestern University; Robert A. Linsenmeier, Northwestern University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

wereasked to rate these courses using a three-point scale: 1, this course should not be required of allundergraduate bioengineers; 2, it is uncertain as to whether this course should be required; 3,this course should be required. Responses from industry are shown by open bars, and thosefrom academia by gray bars. There were no differences (p ≥ 0.05 in all ten cases) in the meanratings of these courses by academia and industry. Another point of some interest is whether tracks are useful in the curriculum. Hereopinions varied widely, as shown in Table 4. Many individuals strongly supported the value oftracks, but others did not, reflecting the split within the actual programs. Table 4. Perceived value of tracks in BME undergraduate

Conference Session

Assessment of Learning in BME

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Rivale, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

the problem. Research has shown that this technique prepares studentsfor future learning allowing them to learn more from subsequent lectures or reading. 4,17,18However, during the first implementation of this new curriculum, students were prompted togenerate ideas about the problem solution using from the following two questions: What do youknow that will help you solve this problem? What do you need to know to solve this problem?Surprising to us, students were giving answers in paragraph form rather than using morecommon problem solving approaches. This prompted the biomedical engineering domain experton the team to reflect on his own problem solving method for transport problems. From thisexplicit reflection, the domain expert made his own

Conference Session

New Tools in Teaching and Learning Biomedical Engineering Concepts

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vikki Hazelwood, Stevens Institute of Technology; Arthur Ritter, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

research with biomedical companies;one student felt the experience helped him gain entry into medical school. Participants performedwell on the quiz and reported favorably regarding the experience.Conclusion: Training effectiveness was reflected in the exit survey results, job offers andgraduate school opportunities for students, and student conduct. Student motivation is reflectedin the self reported gain in interest and confidence in clinical research, in the low attrition rate,and in the increased activity levels of all groups. Page 12.7.2BackgroundExperiential education has been demonstrated to be effective in medical and nursing

Conference Session

Design in BME

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey Thomas La Belle, Arizona State University; Aldin Malkoc, Arizona State University ; Mackenzie Honikel, Arizona State University, Biological and Health Systems Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

  Science  and  Biomedical  Engineering  Courses.  2016.    2.     Betebenner  D.  Norm-­‐and  criterion-­‐referenced  student  growth.  Educ  Meas   Issues  Pract.  2009;28(4):42–51.    3.     Tam  M.  University  impact  on  student  growth:  a  quality  measure?  J  High   Educ  Policy  Manag.  2002;24(2):211–218.    4.     Carberry  A,  Krause  S,  Ankeny  C,  Waters  C.  “Unmuddying”  course  content   using  muddiest  point  reflections.  IEEE;  2013.  p.  937–942.    5.     Cohen  GS,  Blumberg  P,  Ryan  NC,  Sullivan  PL.  Do  final  grades  reflect   written  qualitative  evaluations  of  student  performance?  Teach  Learn  Med   Int  J.  1993;5(1):10–15.    6.     Allen  JD.  Grades  as

Conference Session

Innovations in Upper-level Biomedical Engineering Courses

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lindsey Taylor Brinton, University of Virginia; Colleen T. Curley, University of Virginia; Kimberly Kelly, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

. It has been suggested that advanced courses should begin by reviewing the informationfrom other courses that students will need and that instructors should design the course to“retroactively reinforce the consolidation of knowledge accumulated in previous courses.”6 Aspart of the poll conducted mid-semester by the TRC, students explained that the instructorsassumed they had more background knowledge than they did for certain graphs and equations.We recommend figuring out the essential pieces of background information and incorporating areview of them into the course.Student evaluations did not reflect quality of presentations. In an effort to help students paycloser attention to their peers’ presentations and provide peer feedback to

Conference Session

Education Programs in BME

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Breanne Przestrzelski, Clemson University; John D DesJardins, Clemson University; Carson Mackenzie Ida Brewer, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

techniques,such as team building, design-thinking, ethnography, empathy, observation, technologyvaluation, professional interactions, interviewing skills, videography and clinical etiquette.Students were trained to document observed clinical problems by way of four multi-modal tools:These included (1) Written logbook documentation, followed by reflection and compilation ofthese notes; (2) Clinical video interviews that further pressed the initial observations madeduring the shadowing and allowed the students to gain greater insight into the problems theywere observing; (3) A mind-mapping process (MindMeister: mind mapping software (Munich,Germany)), through which the students organized their observations and clinical contacts as ateam, and (4) The