l B radius l C viscosity ml-1t-1 DStudents start by guessing which variables might affect blood flow, such as tube radius, tubelength, fluid viscosity, and the pressure gradient. They might also include variables which do notfactor into Poiseuille’s Law, such as temperature. In this way, they learn that any extra variablesshould drop out of the equation at the end.The exact relationship is unknown, so coefficients are used for the exponents as shown inEquation 9.(Eq 9) FLOW (l3 t-1) = f (pressureA, lengthB, radiusC, viscosityD) = (ml-1t-2)A (l)B (l)C ( ml-1t-1)DExponents can be equated for each
cycle. Educational research review. 14(2015), pp. 47-61. 4. Barron B, Darling-Hammond L. Teaching for Meaningful Learning: A Review of Research on Inquiry-Based and Cooperative Learning. Book Excerpt. George Lucas Educational Foundation. 2008. 5. Kuhlthau CC, Maniotes LK, Caspari AK. Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century: Learning in the 21st century. ABC-CLIO; 2015 Oct 13. 6. Hmelo-Silver CE. Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational psychology review. 16(2004), pp. 235-266. 7. De Jong T., van Joolingen W.R. Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains, Review of Educational Research, 68 (1998), pp. 179-202 8. Blumenfeld P
statistically significant change from Year 1 based on two-tail z-test at 95% confidence.References1. Sinatra, G. M. “The “worming trend” in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 40, issue 2, pp. 107-115, 2005.2. Farnsworth, C. B., R. W. Welch, M. J. McGinnis, G. Wright, “Bringing Creativity into the Lab Environment,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013.3. Ramos, R. F., “Introduction of Active Learning Techniques Increases Student Learning in a Systems Physiology Laboratory Course,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014.4. Sieving, A. L., M. Pool, S. A. Jewett, T. Eustaquio, R. Madangopal, A. Panitch, K. Stuart, A. E. Rundell
and Applied Sciences at Columbia University. This course was targeting the higher levels oflearning as described by Bloom’s taxonomy. At the end of the course, we aimed for the students to be: a. Able to define nanobiotechnology in the context of modern science and engineering, b. Capable of understanding and interpreting concepts such as intermolecular bonds, adsorption and binding/unbinding processes, nanoscale transport mechanisms, and degradation mechanisms at the nanoscale, c. Comfortable in estimating orders of magnitude of objects that relate to engineering, d. Capable of comparing and evaluating research papers related to nanobiotechnology with a critical mind, e. Able to take a position towards an
, we have provided a framework to develop engineering problems with globalcontext through a unique collaboration between biomedical engineering faculty and students anda campus-based global service-learning organization. Considering not all students have theopportunity to engage in experiential learning abroad, these problems allow instructors to exposemore students to global applications of engineering design directly in the classroom.AcknowledgementsWe thank Christopher Kitson, Natalie Muneses, and Tiange Zhang for their assistance indeveloping the problems.References[1] ABET, “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2018-2019” [Online]. Available: www.abet.org [Accessed Jan. 26, 2018][2] B. K. Jesiek and K. Beddoes, “From
andmotivated to attempt answering the quiz questions. The average score in all the onlinequizzes was 54% and varied without trend during the semester (Fig. 1B), suggesting that thequizzes were sufficiently challenging and that watching the online lessons alone was notsufficient for the students to answer all the quiz questions satisfactorily. Figure 1: average participation (left, A) and average score (right, B) for the 14 online quizzesThe rate of participation in the online quizzes for each student was significantly andpositively correlated with the student score in the in-class quizzes, the midterm exam score,and the overall course score (Table 1). Likewise, the students’ score in the online quizzes wasstrongly correlated with their
Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, 1991.[2] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103–120, 2005.[3] D. Jonassen, J. Strobel, and C. B. Lee, “Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 139–151, Apr. 2006.[4] P. Fonseca, P. Pedreiras, P. Cabral, J. N. Matos, B. Cunha, and F. Silva, “Motivating first year students for an engineering degree,” in 2016 2nd International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE), 2016, pp. 1–7.[5] T. Knapp, B. Fisher, and C
troubleshooting processthat they would follow to identify and repair common failure modes for the device covered.Control (students completing standard pre-lab assignments, n=12) and experimental (studentscompleting the modified pre-lab assignments, n=12) groups were compared in terms of (a)laboratory team report grades, (b) an end of semester quiz that focused on troubleshootingclinically-relevant equipment not covered in the lab, and (c) a qualitative survey to assess howeach course assignment contributed to the process-knowledge gained in the lab. All studentscompleted all assessments. The quiz was graded blindly by both instructors separately, emphasizing the process andnot the correctness of the answers for each one of the troubleshooting
microcontroller platform and present their results to the restof the class. (a) (b) (c)Figure. Design and real-time implementation of an IIR filter used as a preprocessor for acardiotachometer. (a) DigiScope design panel showing the amplitude and phase responses,impulse response, pole-zero plot, and transfer function for a student-designed filter. (b)DigiScope signals panel showing an ECG input signal in the top trace and the output of the IIRfilter in the bottom trace. (c) Oscilloscope screenshot showing real-time implementation of filterusing the Nucleo microcontroller. Top trace is a normal ECG generated by the
Course for First-year Engineering Students in Microsystems and Nanomaterials. Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia.Lambeth, M. C., McCullough, M. B., & Aschenbrenner, M. H. R. (2015). Creating a Pipeline into Biomedical Engineering. Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington.Madihally, S., & Maase, E. (2006). Introducing Biomedical And Biochemical Engineering For K 12 Students. Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois.Martinez, A. W., Phillips, S. T., Whitesides, G. M., & Carrilho, E. (2010). Diagnostics for the developing world: microfluidic paper-based analytical devices
institutions do not have an occupational therapy major.References[1] B. Ankenman, J. Colgate, P. Jacob, R. Elliot, and S. Benjamin, “Leveraging rehabilitation needs into freshman engineering design projects,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/1166[2] T. McBride, V. Bergel, and J. Fullerton, “Community-based projects by first-year engineering students,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) 2005 Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR, 2005. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/14212[3] D. R. Waryoba, L. Demi, and A. Fatula, “A
the President. 2. Brass LF, Akabas MH, Burnley LD, Engman DM, Wiley CA, Andersen OS. Are MD– PhD programs meeting their goals? An analysis of career choices made by graduates of 24 MD–PhD programs. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2010 Apr;85(4):692. 3. Chan LS. Building an Engineering-Based Medical College: Is the Timing Ripe for the Picking?. Medical Science Educator. 2016 Mar 1;26(1):185-90. 4. Dalkey N, Helmer O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management science. 1963 Apr;9(3):458-67. 5. Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research &
://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2002.803606 6. Whitaker International Program. (n.d.). Retrieved 2017, from http://www.whitaker.org/ 7. Seely, B. E. (1999). The Other Re-engineering of Engineering Education, 1900– 1965. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(3), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.1999.tb00449.x 8. ABET Accreditation Program. (2017). Retrieved 2017, from http://www.abet.org/ 9. Abu-Faraj, Z. O. (2008). Career development in Bioengineering/Biomedical Engineering: A student’s roadmap. In 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (pp. 1564–67). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4649469 10. Ebrahiminejad, H. (2017). A Systematized Literature
Paper ID #22471The DMVP (Detect, Measure, Valuate, Propose) Method for Evaluating Iden-tified Needs During a Clinical and Technology Transfer Immersion ProgramMiss Hannah Lynn Cash, Clemson University Hannah Cash is pursuing her PhD in Bioengineering with a focus on Engineering and Science Education. Working with students through the engineering design process, Hannah has been encouraged to aid in outreach opportunities to bring Bioengineering and Design to younger students and teachers throughout the Upstate of South Carolina through work with the Perry Initiative and Project Lead the Way. The Perry Initiative works to
and professional-topics surveys to assess: (a) their ability to apply a systematic approach to identify design inputs and outputs, and to verify the attainment of design requirements in the final prototype; (b) their ability to develop a functional prototype appropriate for the level of challenge associated with the project; (c) their ability to apply appropriate research and analyses tools to arrive at their engineering solutions; (d) their ability to work functionally as a team and resolve team conflicts; (e) their ability to stay continuously engaged in and remain enthusiastic about their project; (d) their perceived knowledge and recognition of importance of professional design topics
-term gains in learning (retention), responses to a single final exam question oncalculating equivalent resistance of a vascular network were compared between spring 2017 andspring 2016 students (Appendix B). Spring 2016 students did not participate in the lab modulebut received the same lecture by the same instructor on the concepts. Final exams were notreturned to students, reducing the chance that spring 2017 students knew the question in advance.Non-traditional sophomores (who took the course out of sequence in our curriculum) wereexcluded from analysis. Demographic analysis confirmed that the two populations were similarin composition (Table 1). Specifically, the average grade in the prerequisite course(Quantitative Cellular Physiology
. Robinson, “Is it time for academic preparation of future regulatory affairs professionals?,” J Med Device Reg, pp. 18-23, May 2006.[2] K. Cardinal, “A case-study based course on ‘Device Evaluation and FDA Approval’,” in Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA , USA, 2008, pp. 13.10.1-13.10.6.[3] R. H. Allen, S. Acharya, C. Jancuk, and A. A. Shoukas, “Sharing best practices in teaching biomedical engineering design,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1869-1879.[4] B. Perlmann and R. Varma, “Teaching engineering ethics,” in Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2008, pp. 6.940.1 – 6.940.11.[5] H. Miller, “The blessings and benefits of using
Underrepresented Students in Engineering," ed: ASEE PEER, 2017.[17] V. Svihla, J. Marshall, A. Winter, and Y. Liu, "Progress toward Lofty Goals: A Meta-synthesis of the State of Research on K-12 Engineering Education (Fundamental)," ed: ASEE PEER, 2017.[18] E. Barnes, N. Lenzi, and K. Nelson, "Synthesis of K-12 outreach data on women in engineering," ed: ASEE PEER, 2017.[19] J. C. Carroll et al., "Lessons Learned in K-12 Engineering Outreach and Their Impact on Program Planning ", ed: ASEE PEER, 2017.[20] B. Bogue, E. Cady, and B. Shanahan, "Professional Societies Making Engineering Outreach Work: Good Input Results in Good Output," ASCE, Leadership and Management in Engineering, vol. 13, no. 1, 2013.[21] M. Prince
Paper ID #23272Work in Progress: Project Tadpole - A Student-led Engineering Service ClubMartin Li, Duke University I am a Junior Biomedical and Electrical and Computer Engineering Student at Duke University. I am co-president of Project Tadpole, a service organization at Duke.Brianna Loomis, Duke University I am a recent graduate of Duke University with majors in Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Computer Engineering. I am co-president of a service organization at Duke called Project Tadpole which switch modifies toys for children with disabilities.Prof. Kevin Caves, Duke University Kevin Caves is an
Paper ID #23663Work in Progress: Designing an Introduction to Biomedical Engineering CourseAround a Design ChallengeJennifer Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Dr. Jennifer Bailey is a Senior Lecturer of Biomedical Engineering at Rochester Institute of Technology, where she has taught since January of 2014. She previously taught at the University of Illinois and the University of Southern Indiana after graduating from Purdue University. Bailey’s passion is lab course development and improving student learning through enhancing lab and other hands-on experiences.Christine Dobie, Rochester Institute of TechnologyDr
Paper ID #22962Work in Progress: Problem-based Learning in a Flipped Classroom Appliedto Biomedical Instrumentation TeachingMr. Jorge E Bohorquez, University of Miami Dr. Jorge Boh´orquez received his bachelor degrees in Physics and Electrical engineering in 1984 and his Ph.D. degree in Biomedical Engineering in 1991. Currently Dr. Boh´orquez works as an Associate professor of Professional Practice at the Department of Biomedical Engineering of the University of Miami. His research interests are Engineering Education, Neural Engineering, Biosignal Processing and Instrumentation. c American Society
Paper ID #23026Evolution of Biomedical Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Problem Solv-ing and Instruction Strategies During a Challenge-Based Instruction CourseMr. John R Clegg, University of Texas, Austin John R. Clegg is a Ph.D. candidate and NSF Graduate Research Fellow in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. He received his B.S. in 2014 and M.S.E in 2016 from the University of South Carolina and University of Texas at Austin, respectively, both in Biomedical Engineering. He received an M.A. in STEM Education from the University of Texas at Austin in 2018. His
Paper ID #22986An Engineering Design-Oriented First Year Biomedical Engineering Cur-riculumDr. Kay C. Dee, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Kay C. Dee received a B.S. degree in chemical engineering from Carnegie Mellon University, and M.Eng. and Ph.D. degrees in biomedical engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. After completing her graduate work, Kay C joined the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Tulane University in New Orleans, Louisiana. She later joined the faculty at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She served as the founding Director of the Rose-Hulman Center for the Practice and Scholarship
-founder and VP Business Development for the design and manufacturing company EG-Gilero. Andrew worked for Alaris Medical Systems (now BD’s CareFusion) as a design engineer and project manager. He is Business Advisor and Speaker for the Wallace H. Coulter Foundation, an advisor to the NIH C3i Program, Director of Duke NeuroInnovations, and on the planning team for BME IDEA. He holds a BS in Physics, English Literature, and Secondary Education from UNC Charlotte, an MS in BME from UNC Chapel Hill’s Medical School, and a Ph.D. from the UNC/NCSU BME Department.Mr. James McCall, NCSU James McCall is currently a BME PhD student at North Carolina State University.Dr. Hatice O. Ozturk, North Carolina State University Dr
. This prototype design challenge will continue to be used in future course offerings. We plan to include team-building activities earlier in the course to enable effective teamwork from the start. We also intend to work together with other faculty members in our department to incorporate design projects in more of our engineering courses. Acknowledgments This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (EEC # 1544233). References1. J. Burgher, D. Finkel, O. Adesope, and B. Van Wie, “Implementation of a Modular Hands-on Learning Pedagogy: Student Attitudes in a Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer Course,” Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, vol. 16, issue 4, pp. 44-54, Oct-Dec. 2015. (1)2. M. Oden, Y
Engineering Programs, 2018 – 2019 | ABET. N.p., Apr. 2017. Web. 02 Feb. 2018.2. Kai, J. C., & Turpin, A. “Improving Students' Technical Writing Skills: Abstracts in Introductory Solid Mechanics.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (2015), Seattle, WA.3. Trellinger, N. M., Essig, R. R., Troy, C. D., Jesiek, B. K., & Boyd, J. “Something to Write Home(work) About: An Analysis of Writing Exercises in Fluid Mechanics Textbooks.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (2015), Seattle, WA.4. Timmerman, B. E. C., Strickland, D. C., Johnson, R. L., & Payne, J. R. “Development of a ‘universal’ rubric for assessing undergraduates’ scientific reasoning skills using scientific writing
": Adapting doctoral trainee career preparation for broad career paths in science," PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 5, p. e0177035, May 2017.[9] M. Roach and H. Sauermann, "The declining interest in an academic career," PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 9, p. e0184130, Sep. 2017.[10] R. J. Daniels, "A generation at risk: Young investigators and the future of the biomedical workforce," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 313- 318, Jan. 2015.[11] M. Levitt and J. M. Levitt, "Future of fundamental discovery in US biomedical research," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 114, no. 25, pp. 6498-6503, Jun. 2017.[12] B. Alberts, M. W. Kirschner, S. Tilghman, and H. Varmus, "Rescuing
autumn 2016 Biomechanics lab offering [10].A t-test analysis was performed between thetwo groups using JMP Statistical Software to identify whether team-based notebook keepingimpacted student performance.Peer and Self-Evaluation AnalysisBoth quantitative (Likert-scale ranking) and qualitative open-ended response data were collectedvia survey from each student enrolled in either the autumn 2017 or the spring 2018 lab course(n=52). The open-ended responses from the post-course peer evaluation surveys (n=52) werescored by totaling the number of instances that positive or negative behaviors characterized werementioned [9], [11]. A B
documented online at https://www.bucknell.edu/news-and-media/current-news/2016/august/follow-bucknell-engineers-on-an-educational-adventure-through-chile. 8As part of the trip, the students and faculty stayed in a Ruka (a large round, traditionalChilean structure) where they engaged in a Sustainable Development Challenge for fourdays. The format was similar to the Senior Capstone and K-WIDE described above, withone notable exception; The Ruka was out of cell phone range, did not have internetaccess and the nearest source of building materials was approximately 50 kilometersaway. Appendix B contains the two pre-assignments used to prepare students for
stronglikelihood that the senior design data is under-powered and a larger sample size may reveal astatistical differences. In conclusion, both the junior and senior design phase 1 reports show anincreased use of engineering standards as students gain more exposure to engineering standards. 2.85 2.54 2.67 2 2 ** Use of Engineering Standards Use of Engineering Standard a. Jr Design b. Sr. DesignFigure 1. Assessment of the use of engineering standards in (a) junior design (b) senior design.Grey – Cohort 1, Blue – Cohort 2, Yellow