Conference Session

ABET and Curriculum-Level Assessments

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karyn L. Biasca, University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point; Steve Hill, University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

pulp variability and reaction to refining. The report gives important parameters for duplication of the study as well as pointing out inconsistencies in the data. (Student No. 3)This description sets the artifact as an example of work satisfying ABET outcome b, a programoutcome that is not included in the outcomes for this course. Clearly the student is not aware ofall the ABET outcomes for our program since the artifact was presented as an example ofachievement of outcome k. Some students attempted to provide artifacts in support of theirachievement of the other five ABET outcomes, but it was clear that they did not have a solidunderstanding of what was expected. For example, one student who had participated in a designproject at

Conference Session

Business and Professional Literacy Within Chemical Engineering

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Dayoung Kim, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Alison J. Kerr, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Paper ID #33204Chemical Engineers’ Experiences of Ethics in the Health Products IndustryMs. Dayoung Kim, Purdue University at West Lafayette Dayoung Kim is a Ph.D. Candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her current research interest centers on engineering ethics and social responsibility, and she is specifically interested in cul- tural influences on engineers’ moral formation. She earned her B.S. in Chemical Engineering at Yonsei University (Seoul, South Korea) in 2017 and M.S. in Chemical Engineering at Purdue University (West Lafayette, USA) in 2021.Dr. Alison J. Kerr, University of Illinois Urbana

Conference Session

Project-Based, Inquiry Guided, and High Performance Learning Environments: Effective Approaches

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Syed Helmi Syed Hassan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Mohammad Zamry Jamaludin, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Nor Farida Harun, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

teaching and learning method was changed to CPBL. As shownin Figure 4, nearly 66% of the class received A and A-, and the percentage of failure (D andbelow) was less than 5%. The average final grade was an A-, while the average grade for thewritten final examination was a B+ and the average grade for the overall final examination(written + final problem) was also a B+. The slightly lower average of the final examinationmarks compared to the overall grade is understandable, since some students tend to panic andwere not really able to perform well in examination halls. Although the coursework assessmentwas worth 50% (of which 15% was for two written tests) as given in Table 3, significant learningoccurred while students complete the assessment tasks

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Pedagogy

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Charles E. Baukal Jr. P.E., John Zink Co. LLC

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

graduate students (3.3%). The overall participants’ age range and genderdistribution is given by frequency (Figure 2a) and percentage (Figure 2b). The percentages ofparticipants by gender and age range were comparable. (a) (b)Figure 2 Overall participant distribution by age and gender: (a) frequency and (b) percentage (N = 179).The ethnicity distribution was as follows: 3 African American (1.6%), 46 Asian (25.0%), 91Caucasian/White (49.5%), 9 Hispanic/Latino (4.9%), 31 Other (16.8%) and 4 Multiple (2.2%).In the Other category, students reported (24) Middle Eastern, (4) African, (1) East Indian, and (2)Native American. Figure 3 shows the ethnicity distribution by

Conference Session

Virtual Instruction of Chemical Engineering Courses

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Rupak Dua, Hampton University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

of Kahoot in the learning process of science and mathematics", Education Sciences Vol. 9, No. 1, 2019, pp. 55.[5] Plump, C.M., and J. LaRosa," Using Kahoot! in the classroom to create engagement and active learning: A game-based technology solution for eLearning novices", Management Teaching Review Vol. 2, No. 2, 2017, pp. 151-158.[6] Triyono, B., and A.F.R. Syafei," Using Lino. it application in teaching English", Journal of English Language Teaching Vol. 5, No. 1, 2016, pp. 137-145.[7] Stead, D.R.," A review of the one-minute paper", Active learning in higher education Vol. 6, No. 2, 2005, pp. 118-131.[8] Chizmar, J.F., and A.L. Ostrosky," The one-minute paper: Some empirical findings", The

Conference Session

Virtual and Online Learning Tools in Chemical Engineering Education

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Garret Nicodemus, University of Colorado, Boulder; John L. Falconer, University of Colorado, Boulder; Will Medlin, University of Colorado, Boulder; Katherine Page McDanel, University of Colorado, Boulder, Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering; Jeffrey Steven Knutsen, University of Colorado, Boulder, Department of Mechanical Engineering,

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

simulations related to chemical engineering topics are available at theWolfram Demonstrations site. These simulations can be used both in and out of class to promotestudent interaction with the material.Acknowledgments We gratefully acknowledge support from NSF Grant DUE 1244183 and thank Rachael L.Baumann for preparing many of the interactive simulations that we posted on the WolframDemonstration site.References Page 24.720.71. B. Means, Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia, K. Jones, Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies, U.S. Department of Education (2010). http://www2

Conference Session

Perspectives and Approaches to Teaching Simulation and Design-Based Courses

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebecca K. Toghiani, Mississippi State University; Hossein Toghiani, Mississippi State University; Larry Everett Pearson, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

. She was recently recognized by the Bagley College of Engineering with the 2013 Career Award. She has also been recognized at MSU with the 2001 Outstanding Faculty Woman Award, a 2001 Hearin Professor of Engineering award, and the 1999 College of Engineering Outstanding Engineering Educator Award.Dr. Hossein Toghiani, Mississippi State University Dr. Hossein Toghiani is the Thomas B. Nusz Endowed professor and an associate professor of Chemical Engineering at Mississippi State. He received his B.S.Ch.E., M.S.Ch.E., and Ph.D. in Chemical Engi- neering from the University of Missouri-Columbia. A member of the Bagley College of Engineering Academy of Distinguished Teachers, Dr. Toghiani has taught a variety of courses

Conference Session

Novel Student Experiences in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacob James Elmer, Villanova University; Noelle K. Comolli, Villanova University; William J. Kelly, Villanova University; Zuyi (Jacky) Huang, Villanova University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Paper ID #13244Preparation of Biology Review and Virtual Experiment/Training Videos toEnhance Learning in Biochemical Engineering CoursesDr. Jacob James Elmer, Villanova University Dr. Elmer earned dual B.S. degrees in Biology and Chemical Engineering from the University of Mis- souri Rolla in 2003 and obtained a PhD in Chemical Engineering from Ohio State University in 2007. After a short posdoc at Arizona State University and some adjunct teaching at Grand Canyon University, he secured an Assistant Professorship at Villanova University in the Chemical Engineering department. He currently teaches heat transfer and several

Conference Session

ABET and Curriculum-Level Assessments

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

. The mostobvious “direct” assessment instrument available is student grades. Assigning grades is aroutine task. Tracking the fraction of students who earn A, B, and C in a course, orcalculating the average score on a particular assignment, are data collection tasks that Page 22.337.4require essentially no “extra” effort on the part of faculty. However, ABET cautionsagainst using grades as an assessment metric9 because a grade is a holistic evaluation ofwhether a student has met all of the instructor’s expectations. A class of students that hasone very specific and widespread shortcoming may still earn good grades. There areseveral recent examples of

Conference Session

ChE: Assessment

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph Shaeiwitz, West Virginia University; Daina Briedis, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Assessment of Student Learning in Engineering and Engineering Science Topics,” Journal of Engineering Education, 87 (3), 305-311 (1998).9. Nirmalakhandan, N., D. Daniel, and K. White, “Use of Subject-Specific FE Exam Results in Outcomes Assessment,” Journal of Engineering Education, 93 (1), 73-77 (2004).10. http://www.rose-hulman.edu/REPS/ Page 12.548.1011. http://www.che.cemr.wvu.edu/ugrad/outcomes12. http://edweb.sdsu.edu/webquest/rubrics/weblessons.htm13. http://edweb.sdsu.edu/webquest/rubrics/rubrics.html14. Waalvord B. E. and V. J. Anderson, Effective Grading. A Tool for Learning and Assessment, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

Conference Session

SPECIAL SESSION: Interdisciplinary Course Design Opportunities for Chemical Engineers

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph J. Biernacki, Tennessee Technological University; Christopher D. Wilson, Tennessee Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Teach Interdisciplinary Research Practice,” Journal of Research Practice,3(2), Article M17.5 Repko, A. F. (2008), “Interdisciplinary Research-Process and Theory, Sage Publications, Inc., p. 295.6 Muscat, A. J., Allen, E. L., Green, E. D. H., and Vanasupa, L. S. (1998), “Interdisciplinary teaching and Learningin a Semiconductor Processing Course,” J. of Eng. Ed., October, 413-421.7 O’Connor, T., Sibray, H., and Forinash, K. (2001), “Interdisciplinary Research project Involving Physics andElectrical Engineering Students,” J. Eng. Ed., July, 423-428.8 Shooter, S., and McNeill, M. (2002), “Interdisciplinary Collaborative learning in Mechatronics at BucknellUnversity,” J. Eng. Ed., July, 339-344.9 Biernacki, J. J., and Ayers, J. B. (2000

Conference Session

Professional Skills Development

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashlee Nicole Ford Versypt, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

are located at 3 o’ clock.Figure 4: Skills that students identified as needing improvement as reported in a) the pre-assignment survey andb) the post-assignment survey.Figure 5: Skills that students disclosed as those they worked on throughout the semester as part of the self-reflectionassignments as reported in a) the pre-assignment survey and b) the post-assignment survey.Figure 6: Skills that students disclosed as those they improved upon throughout the semester as reported in the post-assignment survey.Part 2: Likert-Scale and Open-Ended QuestionsWe used the collective responses from the 31 total respondents to Survey 2 for the Likert-scaleand open-ended questions. Note that only 30 students responded to all of the questions in part 2of

Conference Session

Novel Student Experiences in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John L. Falconer, University of Colorado, Boulder; Garret Nicodemus, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

. simulationReferences1. Beaulieu, J. R. A dynamic, interactive approach to learning engineering and mathematics. (2012).2. Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K. & Perkins, K. K. PhET: simulations that enhance learning. Science. 322, 682–683 (2008).3. Wieman, C. E. & Perkins, K. K. A powerful tool for teaching science. Nat. Phys. 2, 290–292 (2006).4. Bodemer, D., Ploetzner, R., Feuerlein, I. & Spada, H. The active integration of information during learning withdynamic and interactive visualisations. Learn. Instr. 14, 325–341 (2004).5. Van der Meij, J. & de Jong, T. Supporting students’ learning with multiple representations in a dynamicsimulation-based learning environment. Learn. Instr. 16, 199–212 (2006).6. Kadiyala, M. & Crynes, B. L. A review of

Conference Session

ChE: Innovations in Student Learning

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danial Hohne, University of Michigan; Leeann Fu, University of Michigan; Barry Barkel, University of Michigan; Peter Woolf, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

andacting as a mentor in the writing process.Bibliography1. Schleter W and Bennett R. Using Web-Based Homework in an Introductory Engineering Physics Course. Proc.ASEE, Chicago, IL, 2006.2. Penick, J.E. Creativity and the Value of Questions in STS. Science/ Technology/Society As Reform In ScienceEducation. Robert E. Yager, (ed), University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 1996.3. Wankat PC and Oreovicz FS. Teaching Engineering, https://engineering.purdue.edu/ChE/News_and_Events/Publications/teaching_engineering/index.html4. Armstrong B. The Imperfect Solutions Homework Format, IEEE Transactions on Education. 38 (3) 258-260.1995.5. Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, eds.. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School.Expanded edition

Conference Session

New Pedagogical Approaches in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony Butterfield, University of Utah; Kyle Joe Branch, University of Utah

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Paper ID #15618Collaboration between Seniors and Freshmen on Senior Capstone ProjectsProf. Anthony Butterfield, University of Utah Anthony Butterfield is an Assistant Professor (Lecturing) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory and freshman design laboratory. His research interests focus on undergraduate education, targeted drug delivery, photobioreactor design, and instrumentation.Kyle Joe Branch

Conference Session

Poster Sessions for Unit Operations Lab Bazaar and Tenure-Track Faculty

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Jefferson Baird, University of Pittsburgh; Schohn L. Shannon, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

ability to build on the results of others has improved.For each statement, the students responded to a Likert scale with the following six choices: (a)strongly agree, (b) agree, (c) neither agree or disagree, (d) disagree, (e) strongly disagree, and (f)not applicable.Following each of the above statements, students were subsequently asked to identify the singlefactor most responsible for the change. The six possible answers were: 1. Feedback from the Instructor. 2. Having to write multiple reports. 3. Having to run multiple experiments. 4. Listening to presentations from other teams. 5. Having to work in a team. 6. Not applicable.The last question on the survey was an open written-response asking the

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Education: Underclass Years

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Silverstein, University of Kentucky; Margot Vigeant, Bucknell University; Donald Visco, Tennessee Technological University; Donald Woods, McMaster University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Scholarship.Margot Vigeant, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering and Associate Dean of Engineering at Bucknell University. She is very interested in first-year engineering education.Donald Visco, Tennessee Technological University Don Visco is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Tennessee Technological University, where he has been employed since 1999. Prior to that, he graduated with his Ph.D from the University at Buffalo, SUNY. His current research interests include experimental and computational thermodynamics as well as bioinformatics/drug design. He is an active and contributing member of ASEE at the local, regional and national level. He is the 2006

Conference Session

Learning By Doing in Chemical Engineering Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peyton Richmond, Lamar University; John Gossage, Lamar University; Qiang Xu, Lamar University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Conference, April, Houston, TX, 2006.5. Modified from Hollifield, B., Habibi, E., “The Alarm Management Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide,” Fidlar Doubleday, Kalamazoo, MI, 2006.6. ABET, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, October 31, 2009, page 3, available online at http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2010-11%20EAC%20Criteria%2011-03-09.pdf (referenced January 7, 2010).7. Marlin, Thomas, private communication (November 16, 2009). Page 15.136.10

Conference Session

Teaching and Assessment in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University; Lisa G. Bullard, North Carolina State University; Christopher C. Willis, North Carolina State University - DELTA; Dan Spencer, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

. Education, 92(1), 7–25 (2003).7. T. DeBacker & R. Nelson. “Variations on an expectancy-value model of motivation in science.” Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 71-94. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1998.0984 (1999).8. P. Pintrich, D. Smith, T. Garcia & W. McKeachie. “Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).” Educational and psychological measurement, 53(3), 801-813 (1993).9. A. Wigfield & J. Cambria. “Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes.” Developmental Review, 30(1), 1-35 (2010).10. J. Flake, K. Barron, C. Hulleman, B. McCoach & M. Welsh. “Measuring

Conference Session

Teaching Professional Skills in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jake Patrick Stengel, Rowan University; Swapana Subbarao Jerpoth, Rowan University; Kirti M. Yenkie, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

technologies in all stages, (b) The optimization of COVID-19 ventilators across the counties of New JerseyIndustry or government-sponsored engineering clinic projectsOne of the key highlights of the HMRCoE at Rowan University is the Engineering Clinicprogram. This is a requirement for each undergraduate student for all four years of their degreeprogram. In the junior and senior years, the student is required to join a project related toresearch offered by the Engineering Professors based on their area of research expertise as wellas federal and industry sponsorship. These projects span from designing phone and computerapplications to testing machinery for use in industry. There is a wide span of projects between allthe different engineering

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering in the Sophomore Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Tracy Q Gardner, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Passed* Mode 1 A 21 12 5 4 81% F2F 2 A 21 20 1 0 95% F2F 3 B 25 12 8 5 48% F2F 4 C 30 27 2 1 90% F2F 5 D 35 30 3 2 86% F2F 6 A 12 10 1 1 83% Online Overall 144 111 20 13 91% Actually moved on: 81%* Here “passed” means at a sufficient level to move on in the core. A D- or better passed all courses

Conference Session

Poster Sessions for Unit Operations Lab Bazaar and Tenure-Track Faculty

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deniz Rende, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Nihat Baysal, Yeditepe University; Sevinc Rende, Isik University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

graduates employed in industry, highlighting the need of an adaptive approach in meetingdifferent professional careers of the students.AcknowledgementsThe contributions of Department of Chemical Engineering, Yeditepe University graduates aregreatly acknowledged. This material is based upon work supported by the National ScienceFoundation under Grant No. 1003574. Page 22.960.17References1. Gomes, V.; Barton, G.; Petrie, J.; Romagnoli, J.; Holt, P.; Abbas, A.; Cohen, B.; Harris, A.; Haynes, B.; Langrish, T.; Orellana, J.; See, H.; Valix, M.; White, D., Chemical Engineering Curriculum Renewal. Educ. Chem. Eng. 2006, 1, (1), 116-125.2

Conference Session

Learning Outcomes and Assessment Within Chemical Engineering

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Laura P. Ford, The University of Tulsa; Janie Brennan, Washington University in St. Louis; David L. Silverstein P.E., University of Kentucky; Lucas James Landherr, Northeastern University; Christy Wheeler West, University of South Alabama; Stephen W. Thiel, University of Cincinnati; Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University; Marnie V. Jamieson, University of Alberta

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Technology by the Numbers 2019, Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Eduation, 2020.[2] L. P. Ford, J. Brennan, J. Cole, K. D. Dahm, M. V. Jamison, L. J. Landherr, D. L. Silverstein, B. K. Vaughen, M. A. Vigeant and S. W. Thiel, "How We Teach: Chemical Engineering in the First Year," in 127th ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada, 2020.[3] D. L. Silverstein and M. Vigeant, "Results of the 2010 Survey on Teaching Chemical Reaction Engineering," Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 31-40, 2012.[4] H. S. Fogler, Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Pearson, 2016.[5] H. S. Fogler, Essentials of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Pearson, 2018.[6] D. L. Silverstein and M. A. Vigeant, "How We Teach

Conference Session

Computer-Based Learning in Chemical Engineering Courses

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashlee N. Ford Versypt, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

. Wilson G (2016) Software Carpentry: Lessons learned [version 2]. F1000Research 3:62.14. The Carpentries (https://carpentries.org/).15. Ekmekci B, McAnany CE, & Mura C (2016) An introduction to programming for bioscientists: A Python-based primer. PLOS Computational Biology 12:e1004867.16. Hall T & Stacey JP (2009) Chapter 2: Designing Software. Python 3 for Absolute Beginners, (Springer, New York).17. Hamby DM (1994) Review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 32:135-154.18. Hartmann AK (2015) Big Practical Guide to Computer Simulations (World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ) 2nd Ed.19. Hemez FM & Kamm JR (2008) A brief overview of

Conference Session

New Classrooms, New Challenges II: Assessing Non-traditional Approaches

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University; Lisa G. Bullard, North Carolina State University; Steven W. Peretti, North Carolina State University; David F. Ollis, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

, T. Harding, C. Finelli, S. Montgomery, H. Passow. “Engineering students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward cheating.” Journal of Engineering Education 95 (3), 181-193 (2006).4. D. Cane. “UNC honor court failed to find McAdoo's obvious plagiarism” News & Observer Online, available at http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/07/17/1349691/mcadoo-paper-case-looks-bad-for.html, published July 17 2011, last accessed January 9 2012.5. B. Vanacker. “Returning students’ right to access, choice and notice: a proposed code of ethics for instructors using Turnitin.” Ethics and Information Technology 13 (4), 327-338 (2011).6. C. Clanton. “A moral case against certain uses of plagiarism detection services.” International Journal of Applied

Conference Session

Focus on Capstone Experiences in the Chemical Engineering Curriculum

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David F. Ollis, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

consistent with recent studies of “How People Learn”(2,3), Here Donovan, Bransford and Pellegrino argue that “To develop competence in anarea of inquiry, students must (a) have a deep foundation of factual knowledge, (b)understand facts and ideas in the context of a conceptual framework, and (c) organizeknowledge in ways that facilitate retrieval and application” We argue that our early introduction of literature searching and reading reviewsand original articles centered around a simple hypothesis provides opportunity to initiatefoundation knowledge construction, that the conceptual framework of writing inproposalformat provides a focus for the student to demonstrate “understanding of facts and ideasin the (research) context”, and that the

Conference Session

Experiential Learning in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lauren Sefcik Anderson, Lafayette College; James K. Ferri, Lafayette College; Ashley Danielle Cramer, Lafayette College

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

coming to lab. This is precisely where the benefit of video SOPs andthe flipped laboratory model can be realized.Table I below is the laboratory schedule for the course, which is divided into four blocks,increasing in complexity. The Blocks are: 1. Sequential Experiments I and II (Fluidized Beds) 2. Gas Chromatography (GC), Pump Performance, and Flow in Pipes and Valves 3. Packed Bed, Vapor Liquid Equilibrium (VLE), and Heat Exchanger 4. Process Control I, II, and III (Twin-column Distillation Unit)Table I. CHE 322 Laboratory Schedule of Experiments Week of Group (Monday) A B C th January 26

Conference Session

Virtual Instruction of Chemical Engineering Courses

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Milo Koretsky, Tufts University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Engineering Education 8(4).3. Saterbak, A., Huang-Saad, A. & P. Helmke, B. Biomedical Engineering Education and the Special COVID-19 Issue. Biomed Eng Education 1, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-020-00029-64. Holme, T. A. (2020). Introduction to the Journal of Chemical Education Special Issue on Insights Gained While Teaching Chemistry in the Time of COVID-19.5. Atman, C. J. (2020). Hope, Stress, Sketch & Kvetch: Emphasizing Caring Through Reflection in Online Teaching in the Pandemic. Advances in Engineering Education 8(4).6. Blizak, D., Blizak, S., Bouchenak, O., & Yahiaoui, K. (2020). Students’ Perceptions Regarding the Abrupt Transition to Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Case of Faculty of

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Education: Underclass Years

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sundararajan Madihally, Oklahoma State Univ.; Marcus Duffy, Oklahoma State University; Lynn Franzmann, Stillwater; Rebekah Reece, Stillwater; Karen High, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

, 91, pp. 309-318, 2002.[9] E. M. Rushton, B. G. Cyr, and L. Prouty, "Infusing Engineering into Public Schools,"presented at ASEE National Conference, Montreal, Quebec, 2002.[10] L. G. Richards, J. Flaherty, and J. Cunningham, "Assessing Engineering Teaching Kitsfor Middle School," presented at ASEE National Conference, Salt Lake City UT, 2004. Page 15.762.7[11] J. Dewaters, W. Hooper, and S. E. Powers, "Partners in Engineering: Outreach EffortsProvide Holistic Engineering Education for Middle School Girls," presented at ASEE NationalConference, Chicago, 2006.[12] S. Gore, "Engineering-A-Future for Tomorrow’s Young Women," Science Scope, pp

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Gammon-Pitman, Ohio State University; Paul E. Post, Ohio State University; Lin Ding, The Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

., vol. 113, no. 5, pp. 969– 1003, 2011.[13] S. A. Bjorklund, J. M. Parente, and D. Sathianath, “Effects of Faculty Interaction and Feedback on Gains in Student Skills,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 153–160, Apr. 2004.[14] C. T. Amelink and P. S. Meszaros, “A comparison of educational factors promoting or discouraging the intent to remain in engineering by gender,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 47–62, Mar. 2011.[15] L. Fiorella and R. E. Mayer, “Eight Ways to Promote Generative Learning,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 717–741, Dec. 2016.[16] K. Grygoryev and S. Karapetrovic, “Tracking Classroom Teaching and Learning: An SPC Application,” Qual. Eng., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 405–418, Jul. 2005.[17] B