Paper ID #41368Essentials of the Nurse + Engineer: Chemical Engineers and Healthcare DevicesDr. Daniel B Oerther P.E., Missouri University of Science and Technology Professor Daniel B. Oerther, PhD, PE, BCEE, DLAAS, FAAN(h) joined the faculty of the Missouri University of Science and Technology in 2010 as the John A. and Susan Mathes Chair of Civil Engineering after serving for ten years on the faculty of the University of Cincinnati where he was head of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Professor Oerther is internationally recognized for leadership of engineers, sanitarians, and nurses promoting the
self-care. Students were asked to reflect in the middle of the quarter on if their plan was being followed, and to perform adjustments if necessary.(22) 4 b) “Reflection leadership assignment” which consisted of five reflection questions: (i) describe their long-term goals (>10 years), (ii) list the most important and least important personal values, (iii) describe ineffective leadership habits that were presented and discussed in class, and how they could overcome such habits, (iv) identifying major successes and failures in the next month as well as five years, and (v) describe leadership roles along with a
Paper ID #42126Work-in-progress: Elevating Chemical Engineering Outreach Through CollaborativeEfforts Showcasing Fluid Flow ExperimentsDr. Neha B. Raikar, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Dr. Raikar is a Senior Lecturer at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, in the Chemical, Biochemical, and Environmental Engineering department. She has taught both undergraduate and graduate-level courses. Dr. Raikar also has 3 years of industry experience from working at Unilever Research in the Netherlands.Dr. Fernando M´erida, University of Florida Fernando Merida is an Instructional Assistant Professor in the Chemical
Valley Section Outstanding Faculty Award. She holds a Ph.D. degree in Bioengineering from the University of Illinois-Chicago (UIC), M. Tech (Chem. Engg.) from IIT Bombay and B. Tech (Chem. Engg.) from Laxminarayan Institute of Technology, Nagpur. She has postdoctoral research experiences from University of Wisconsin-Madison and University of Delaware. Her PhD work on IVF (in-vitro fertilization) hormonal dosing policy prediction was awarded the Best Research on Women and Gender studies at UIC. She is an active member of the AIChE and currently serves on the Executive Committees of the AIChE-Environmental Division, Sustainable Engineering Forum, and the Academic Subcommittee of the AIChE-Delaware Valley Section.Miss
student activity in the TE. A) Heatmap tracking the number of tokens that students earned over the semester with each heatmap row representing 1 student’s token-generating activity. The symbols above specific dates in the timeline represent when midterm exams were administered (green star), the last quiz grades were released (blue triangle), and the last homework grades were released (red square). B) Heatmap tracking the number of tokens that students exchanged to purchase TE rewards. Rows detailing each student’s token-spending activity are matched and aligned with the heatmap rows in 2A. C) Bar chart dissecting the component purchases making up all token exchanges performed by students during the semester (n = 43). Table 4: Ledger of unique
have made use of the “lightly-flexible” deadline policy, we observe that students who earn C, D, and F grades in these threecourses make use of the policy on average two to three times more often than those earning Aand B grades. Further, a higher proportion of students with A grades never make use of thepolicy at all. The data also reveals differences between class levels: in our junior-level course, anaverage of 0.5 slight extensions per student have been granted, versus on average 1.0 extensionsper student among the sophomores and 3.0 extensions per student among the first-years.BackgroundThe University of Delaware is a medium-sized public institution whose chemical engineeringprogram graduates on average 80 undergraduates per year. The
used in standard lecture classrooms so students do not need to wait till their senior year to see examples of process equipment. He also leads a strong program in bioreactor design for biomanufacturing of cartilage tissue and cells for immunotherapy.Dr. Prashanta Dutta, Washington State University Prof. Prashanta Dutta has received his PhD degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Texas A&M University in 2001. Since then he has been working as an Assistant Professor at the School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Washington State UniversitDavid B. Thiessen, Washington State University David B.Thiessen received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Colorado in 1992 and has been at
) for a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering at UC San Diego. Courses that incorporate the chemical process project are shown in bold. Laboratory and capstone courses where students also work in teams are italicized. A) A 3-year upper division chemical engineering course schedule is typically followed by students admitted freshman or sophomore year. B) A 2-year course schedule is typically followed by transfer students admitted junior year. A) Fall quarter Winter quarter Spring quarter Sophomore Material and Energy Chemical Reaction Thermodynamics Year
. "Journal Club." https://phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=962 (accessed Feb. 01, 2024).[18] J. Cham. "Journal Club, pt. 2." https://phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=963 (accessed Feb. 01, 2024).[19] J. Cham. "Journal Club, pt. 3." https://phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=964 (accessed Feb. 01, 2024).[20] B. K. Ige and UCLA Graduate Division. "Steps to Success: Writing a Winning Statement of Purpose." https://grad.ucla.edu/asis/agep/advsopstem.pdf (accessed Feb. 07, 2024).[21] NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program. "Personal, Relevant Background and Future Goals Statement and Graduate Research Plan Statement." https://nsfgrfp.org/applicants/statements/ (accessed Feb. 07, 2024
afterparticipating for 2-3 years might bring more mentors to the program while also giving activementors a brief break from mentoring. Finally, the addition of FEP students to the programmight attract more students to chemical engineering.References[1] J. K. Banerjee, “Mentoring undergraduate students in engineering,” in Proceedings of the2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, June 2020, 10.18260/1-2—34968.[2] K. Elfer, A. M. Rynearson, N. M. Hicks, E. M. Spingola and K. Fair, “Lessons learned:strategies for creating and mentoring diverse graduate student communities,” in Proceedings ofthe 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, June 2017, 10.18260/1-2—28624.[3] S. Zurn-Birkhimer B. and Holloway, (2008, June), “Retention programming For
(Figure 3B). As many faculty are concerned about theimpact of making lecture recordings available on student attendance, this data is reassuring thatstudents do not believe they actively make decisions on whether to go to class based onrecording availability.Figure 3. Student use of classroom recordings and impact on attendance. A) Numberstudents who utilized lecture recordings. B) Number of students who use the lecture recordingsfor reasons other than to skip going to class in person.To further assess the impact of recording availability on attendance, a survey question was lateradded to the survey after its initial release to understand if students are more likely to miss classif a recording was available (Figure 4). Within this response
encouraging the effective use of the student voice to enhance professional development in learning, teaching and assessment within higher education. The Higher Education Academy, 1-65. 5. Ford, L. P., Cole, J., Dahm, K. D., Vaughen, B. K., Jamieson, M. V., Landherr, L. J., Silverstein, D. L., Vogel, T. J., Wheeler-West, C., & Thiel, S. W. (2023, June). How We Teach: Capstone Design. In 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 6. Silverstein, D. L., Bullard, L. G., Seider, W. D., & Vigeant, M. A. (2013, June). How we teach: capstone design. In 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 23-675). 7. Y. Luo et al., “Chemical Engineering Academia-Industry Alignment: Expectations about New Graduates
- semester, as shown in Table 1. 14 B+ 13 B Preliminary results: 12 B- Mid-semester feedback and adjustments 11 C+ 10 C Eight weeks into the Fall 2023 semester, a faculty member 6-9 D unassociated with this course performed an anonymous <6 F midsemester formative evaluation (MSFE) with the students in the course while I was not present. The evaluatoranonymized and summarized student feedback for me, including feedback specific to SBG usedin the course. At this point in the semester, many, but certainly not all, students
person is asking me, I have no problem [with] it being A [helping their employee complete the overtime form]. If this is the fourth time someone’s asking me, I’m going to tell him to do B [ask a co-worker to help them complete their overtime form].As mentioned previously, experience is also a large component when advancing through the stages ofskills acquisition, since it informs an individuals’ perspective when making judgments [10], [20].Participants often relied on previous experience when making judgments by recalling similar situations,how they behaved in that moment, and the outcome of their decision. Most commonly, participants wouldrely on their previous experience if they felt they did not have enough context to inform
with the steps to solve the problem, each of which appear one at a time withanimation. I planned to show the slide in Figure 3a, give the students time to work with neighbors,and then ask them for their answers and explanations before stepping through Figure 3b. a. b. Figure 3. The first practice problem on the third day of class as given (a) and with the solution shown (b).For the second problem, I planned to move on to calculating an unknown half-cell reductionpotential from other known half-cell reduction potentials (Figure 4a). In this example,stoichiometrically, reaction 1 (which we want to find, and which involves 1 electron) can begenerated by subtracting reaction 2
in A Chemical Reactor Design CourseAbstractChemical engineering students are introduced to topics in chemical kinetics, mechanisms,and reactors in traditional chemical reactor design courses. However, additional work isneeded to infuse entrepreneurial mindset skills into coursework, specifically in enablingstudents to expand their curiosity and make connections to their everyday world. This workdocuments the efforts undertaken in two spring semesters (in 2021and 2023) of a requiredjunior level Introduction to Chemical Reactor Design class at Arizona State University toenable students to (a) investigate common processes to determine the function andimportance of chemical reactors, and (b) to acquire and integrate reactor
using Entrepreneurial Mindset. 2024 [cited 2024 January]; Available from: https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/3939.19. Faber, C., C. Smith-Orr, C. Bodnar, A. Coso Strong, W. Lee, and E. McCave. Best Practices for Developing a Virtual Peer Mentoring Community. in ASEE Annual Conference proceedings. 2017. DOI: https://peer.asee.org/2765520. McKenna, A., A.M. Johnson, B. Yoder, R.C. Chavela Guerra, and R. Pimmel, Evaluating virtual communities of practice for faculty development. The Journal of Faculty Development, 2016. 30(1): p. 31-40. DOI: https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/magna/jfd/2016/00000030/00000001/art0000521. Farrell, S., S.J. Krause, N. Ruzycki, A.L. Genau, B. Nelson-Cheeseman, C.A
controllers for the “small tank” liquid level experiments. Similar toolsaccompany all other experiments.Data from every experiment is collected by LABVIEW software and stored in EXCELspreadsheets. A sample is presented in Table 7 for the “small tank” liquid level experimentwhere the time column shows results every 5 s, with the corresponding amperage signal to theperistaltic pump, the liquid level in the tank, and the flowrate delivered by the pump. In thisexample, when the experimental run reaches 3280 s (column A) the pump signal changes from0.0100 amps to 0.0105 amps (column B). This action leads to a change in the flow rate from1.453 lpm to 1.619 lpm (column D), forcing the system to depart from the previous state in theliquid level at 5.76 cm
] C. Martin, B. Bekken and S. McGinnis, “The earth sustainability course series,” Proceedingsof the 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June 2008. 10.18260/1-2—3378.[9] American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), Undergraduate Sustainability Programs,https://www.aiche.org/ifs/undergraduate-sustainability-programs, 2024, accessed February 2,2024.[10] C. Mitchell and A. Carew, A., “What do chemical engineering undergraduates mean bysustainability?,” Proceedings of the 2001 Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico June2001, 10.18260/1-2—10023.[11] United States Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy,Hydrogen and Fuels Technology Office, Hydrogen shot,https://www.energy.gov
content support.Program Assessment and SustainabilityThe program will be monitored from two perspectives: (1) changes in the attitudes andproficiency of students regarding the software of choice, and (2) perceptions of faculty and TAson class implementation. The student-focused assessment will be based on student use of CTAoffice hours and on survey responses. These surveys will be conducted at the start of thesemester (Survey A) and late in the semester when students start team-based assignments(Survey B) – this timing was selected to monitor whether students felt prepared to work withtheir team. Survey question topics and the corresponding program objective measured areprovided in Table 2. Because the program seeks to not only promote
must decide on an outcome. Forexample, one dilemma has students choose a material for a piece of equipment that is either (i)expensive (and safer and lasts longer) or (ii) inexpensive (and less safe and lasts for a shorterperiod). The student states their preference for the dilemma outcome (either option A, B or cannotdecide), and then they respond to ~9-11 follow-up questions where the student ranks theimportance of each question (from great importance to not important) in their decision making.For example, one question from the above dilemma asks students to rate the importance ofpotential safety risks to the employees regarding the choice of the material. These follow-upquestions were designed based on Kohlberg’s three stages of development
muchnarrower list of responses compared to the pre and post course surveys. Again, only the first ~8responses are shown here, but full responses can be found in Appendix C. Figure 4. Student self-identified strengths (a) and virtues to work on (b). Only the most popular answers are provided.Looking at strengths, many students list virtues that could be considered performance virtues,representative of the hard work and high performing background of our students. However, inthe virtues to work on, over half of the students listed either confidence or courage. The courselevel responses were shared with the students to help them understand how many of their peerswere struggling with the same virtue development. In class
Paper ID #41758Climate Change and Kinetics in an Undergraduate Laboratory: Injectionand Tracking of CO2 in a 7 Gallon TerrariumDr. Clint Guymon, Brigham Young University Clint Guymon is a new Associate Teaching Professor in the Chemical Engineering Department at Brigham Young University. There he has developed multiple educational modules for undergraduate chemical engineering students. He previously worked for 15 years as an engineering consultant in the defense industry.Joseph R Tuft ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Climate Change and Kinetics in an Undergraduate Laboratory: Injection
CTCs with ~1CTC for every 100,000 red blood cells (RBCs). This topic was selected because of the strongclinical significance, but also because some of the technologies in development to separate cancercells from other cells (e.g., RBCs and other healthy cells found in the vasculature) use a size- orshape-based separation approach which nicely links to one of the areas of expertise of chemicalengineers (which is highlighted in the lecture).Figure 1. Organization and lecture materials for Bioengineering 101. (A) Organization of theactivity included six days of in-class instruction by the author with each day having a specificfocus. (B) Design project statement and criteria the student teams needed to follow. (C) Summaryof the allowed materials
relatively lowaffinity for either category’s learning style and are well balanced or adaptive in their learningstyles (Figure 1c-d). Again, in the midterm feedback of the course students generally requestedmore opportunities to physically participate in course activities (iClicker questions, group work).(a) (b)(c) (d)Figure 1: Learning Styles Inventory Distribution for students in the senior reactor design course.ScoresPre-SurveyEvaluation of the pre-survey results suggests being able to identify their learning styles helpedstudents to choose more effective resources for their study time and to explain why certain studymethods worked while other methods
. Her primary research foci include graduate student and faculty development, graduate well-being, asset-based approaches to engineering education, and mentorship of women in STEM. Her background is in advanced manufacturing and design. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 WIP: Chemical Engineering Faculty Attitudes towards Evidence Based Instruction Practices and Growth MindsetJennifer S. Brown, Karen High, Mechteld V. Hillsley, Michael J. Janik, Stephanie B. VelegolIntroductionIn the Chemical Engineering (CHE) department at a large public R1 university, we are workingon changing the climate and culture of our department through a multipronged approachinvolving
Paper ID #41931Work in Progress: Do Growth Mindset Interventions Work? Observationsfrom a Case Study in a Chemical Engineering Core CourseDr. Nagma Zerin, The Johns Hopkins University Dr. Nagma Zerin is a Lecturer in the Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (ChemBE) department at the Johns Hopkins University. She has a high interest in understanding the mindsets of undergraduate students and implementing inclusive classroom strategies.Dr. Sakul Ratanalert, Columbia University Sakul Ratanalert is a Senior Lecturer in Discipline in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Columbia University. He received his BS in Chemical
engineering curriculum and (b) expecting laboratory instructorsto assess thirteen different learning outcomes for student success is unrealistic.Therefore, a survey was designed to gain an understanding of the outcomes most important to thevarious lab stakeholders (faculty, non-academic engineers, and students) and the currentsuccesses and gaps of chemical engineering laboratory curricula in addressing those outcomes.This paper describes responses received from chemical engineering students. Including thestudent voice is important in higher education curricular development and can have positiveoutcomes in terms of student perceptions of courses and their engagement in them [2].Additionally, students are more intrinsically motivated by course
Paper ID #44252Fostering Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Engineering Education: A CaseStudy of UIC Chemical Engineering DepartmentDr. Betul Bilgin, The University of Illinois at Chicago Betul Bilgin is a Clinical Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering (CHE) at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Fostering Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Engineering Education: A Case Study of UIC Chemical Engineering DepartmentAbstractThe persistent lack of diversity in engineering remains a pressing challenge, with limited signs
Paper ID #42280Board 22: A Multi-Tiered Mentoring Community Approach to ExpandedResearch Experiences for Local Students from Complex and UnderrepresentedMinority BackgroundsMr. Thomas McKean, University of Arkansas Thomas McKean III is a Ph.D. candidate in the Materials Science and Engineering program and the Ralph E. Martin Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Arkansas working under Dr. Ranil Wickramasinghe. Thomas holds his MS from the University of Arkansas in Microelectronics Photonics and BS in Chemical Engineering from Syracuse University. He has extensive experience mentoring new graduate students and