-methods research on and for people at work, ensuring that organizations intentionally center the human experience. Sreyoshi has spoken at over 100+ global venues, addressing diverse audiences ranging from academics, NSF PIs, in- dustry leaders, entrepreneurs, and professionals to students or high-schoolers starting out with Computer Sciences, helping them strategize and broaden participation, as well as explore, understand, and apply emerging technologies. Sreyoshi is committed to broadening participation among underrepresented mi- norities in engineering and serves as a Senator at the Society of Women Engineers. She is also part of the Advisory Board at the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech and serves as an
Paper ID #47202BOARD # 46: Work-in-progress: Evidence-based scope and selection of thresholdconcepts for the design of computational notebooks in undergraduate statisticscourses for chemical engineeringDr. Viviana Monje, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Dr. Viviana Monje is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering at the University at Buffalo (UB), SUNY. She teaches undergraduate statistics for chemical engineers and a course on molecular modeling theory and applications offered for graduate and undergraduate students. Her research expertise is on computational
, are advised by faculty mentors who become free to explore practice and degree-relatedcontent, are prepared for their senior year and graduation. As shown in Figure 1, we see the criticalthinking that happens inside an advising session, and above the line, the critical thinking goes onoutside of an advising session. A sophomore student is going to likely approach advising in thetraditional way, using their advising session primarily to learn critical pieces of information thatinform their thinking. A more advanced student (juniors and seniors) will already have that criticalfoundation and therefore use their advising relationship more critically.Flipped advising, which requires students to complete their “homework” prior to each meetingwith
experiences, andmove toward anti-racist pedagogy, assessments, and inclusive teaching practices.Within our department, there was a strong desire to make lasting changes to the culture andcurriculum. These efforts were driven by our graduate students with support from our faculty,and included the establishment of an Anti-Racism, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (ARDEI)Committee, collection of data through a climate survey to gauge the needs of the department’smembers, and creation of efforts to include anti-racism and social justice in the department’scurriculum and research [19]. The latter of these initiatives was both the first initiative taken inthe department and is the focus of this paper.There were few established examples for how to increase