Paper ID #38803Preliminary Reflections and Assessment of the 2022 Chemical EngineeringSummer SchoolDr. Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from Cornell University, and her M.S. and Ph.D., also in chemical engineering, from the University of Virginia. Her primary researcDr. Daniel Anastasio, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Daniel Anastasio is an associate professor at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He received a B.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Connecticut in 2009
Paper ID #41718Reflections on a ”Math Disaster”: the Role of Instructor Confusion in theClassroomDr. Lorena S. Grundy, Tufts University Lorena Grundy is an ASEE eFellows postdoctoral fellow at Tufts University, where she works with Milo Koretsky to study chemical engineering education. She received her BSE from Princeton in 2017 and PhD from UC Berkeley in 2022, both in chemical engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Reflections on a “Math Disaster”: the Role of Instructor Confusion in the ClassroomAbstractWhen enacting active learning
Paper ID #43035Building a Great Student Chapter: Reflections on Workshop Activities UsingEntrepreneurial MindsetProf. Matthew W Liberatore, University of Toledo Matthew W. Liberatore is a Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Toledo. He earned a B.S. degree from the University of Illinois at Chicago and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, all in chemical engineering. From 2005 to 2015, he served on the faculty at the Colorado School of Mines. In 2018, he served as an Erskine Fellow at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand. His research involves the
sustained effort. Whileunderstanding the deeper culture of a department is essential for long-term transformation, theclimate - the immediate perceptions and environment - offers opportunities for more immediateimpact. Climate reflects how individuals perceive the culture and influences how they feel aboutbeing part of the community. Research shows that climate is a primary driver for why studentsleave engineering.[5-7] People begin forming opinions about a department’s culture even beforejoining, based on how they are welcomed and the tone of everyday interactions. Each of thesemoments represents an opportunity to positively influence the climate and, by extension,perceptions of the culture. Faculty are uniquely positioned to influence this
realistic scenarios.[12] The training process isreinforced with feedback and reflection, helping to ensure consistent application of skills in real-world teaching contexts, such as student help hours and discussion sections.TA Training ContentOur program for TA training has evolved over time through experimentation with differentapproaches and topics, assessing their effectiveness, gathering participant feedback, and refiningour methods (Figure 1). In its current iteration, the program includes four sessions each semester(Table 1): a 3-hour orientation at the start of the semester, a 1-hour instructional session, a 1-hourmid-semester feedback and reflection session, and an appreciation lunch for all TAs and facultyin the department. TAs are
the earlier portion of the course. Theauthors (instructors of the course) provide (1) ideas for experimental topics of interest which areapplicable to chemical engineering students, 2) focused research opportunities with facultymembers or local entrepreneurs and businesses, and 3) community-based learning experienceswith the ETHOS center at the University of Dayton. Once the instructor approves astudent-centered experiential learning project, the students define the specific objectives, performexperiments or simulations, and summarize the analysis and findings in a final technical report ormemorandum. After submitting the final report, students also provide a written reflection of theirwork and learning experience.In the most recent academic
experience inconnecting, programming, and tuning Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controllers usingthe Opto-22 platform. Based on student feedback, the introduction of this system has led toimprovements in their understanding of process control concepts and in their perceivedpreparedness for industry.In this paper, we present instructions for creating a PLC teaching module, covering everythingfrom physical assembly to phrasing laboratory assignments. We report on data from studentsurveys and feedback sessions, which reflect the effectiveness of this laboratory experience onstudent confidence in applying process control concepts in an industrial setting and theirperceived preparedness for industry roles. Finally, we discuss the broader
synthetic biology. Students assembled a podcast project report throughout the semesterthat included asking questions to the speakers, reflecting on a set of speakers, and following upon one speaker area for new learnings. Introducing this type of organized guest speaker series inchemical engineering elective courses should bolster career development by offering studentstime to reflect on their own career path and by connecting them with professionals who bringdiverse perspectives on evolving career paths available for chemical engineering graduatesacross emerging industries.Introduction:Chemical engineering curriculums include core courses such as Transport Phenomena and UnitOperations that teach fundamental chemical engineering concepts
, and meet objectives.These emphasize ethics and values of students as crucial to earning an engineering degree.However, at many schools these discussions are saved for specific courses on ethics or designrather than intentional integration across the degree. This paper explores the intentional andexplicit inclusion of character and virtue building in the context of a traditional chemicalengineering course during the sophomore year.Student taking their first chemical engineering specific course, Introduction to ChemicalEngineering Processes, were asked to reflect throughout the semester on the importance ofvirtue/character in their development as a chemical engineer. These reflections were graded workwithin the class and either replaced or
self-care. Students were asked to reflect in the middle of the quarter on if their plan was being followed, and to perform adjustments if necessary.(22) 4 b) “Reflection leadership assignment” which consisted of five reflection questions: (i) describe their long-term goals (>10 years), (ii) list the most important and least important personal values, (iii) describe ineffective leadership habits that were presented and discussed in class, and how they could overcome such habits, (iv) identifying major successes and failures in the next month as well as five years, and (v) describe leadership roles along with a
] to better encapsulate culturally responsive engineeringdesign.These types of frameworks and pedagogical approaches are becoming more widely used withinK-12 education; however, this incorporation of culture and community is not generally adoptedfor college engineering curricula. One of the primary ways to incorporate students’ culture andcommunity is to have students reflect on their own experiences and observations and to havestudents interview elders and community members so that they can include various viewpointsand information into their design solutions.Overview of Professional Development and Engineering Design TasksOver the last two years, there have been two cohorts of teachers within this research project.Teachers in the program
research [12] to creating laboratory experiments where students haveincreased opportunities to make decisions about how to analyze data (Domain 3) [13]. Forinstance, using a guided-inquiry approach, Elkhatat and Al-Muhtaseb [13] created scaffoldedremote lab activities that allowed students to generate open-ended solutions to a design problem.The students self-reported their sense of agency increased in Domain 1 (experimental design)and Domain 3 (analysis). Many approaches regarding agency emphasize using reflection [14] orinquiry in some format, such as guided inquiry, discovery, or problem-based learning thatsupport conceptual learning and provide opportunities for students to conduct authenticexperimental practices [15-17]. Less is known about
less than 50% of the class admitted that they used the resourcesavailable.IntroductionThe Felder-Soloman Index of Learning Styles is a validated and accepted tool for assessingwhere on the spectra (visual-verbal, sensing-intuitive, active-reflective, sequential-global)students fall with respect to the different stages in the learning process [1-3]. To date, theinventory has been used as a guide to help instructors vary their classroom instruction to usemethods that will ultimately address all learning styles by cycling through instruction approaches[2, 4-9].Over the last two decades, a group of educational psychologists have attempted to refute thevalidity of learning styles in the design of instruction, stating that doing so is a detriment
between steps,essentially learning in “leaps.” Comics in relation are inherently tailored to sequential learners aseach panel within a comic follows a very specific order for the reader to follow along. Whilst it ispossible to grasp the big picture of a comic, much of the understanding and storytelling aspectsare done through the connections between panels.Sensing learners prefer learning facts and concepts as opposed to intuitive learners who preferabstract relationships and concepts. Finally, active learners prefer application of concepts learnedwhereas reflective learners ponder questions surrounding issues at hand. Essentially, activelearners like very hands-on work whilst reflective learners prefer thinking alone about the problemfirst
, many institutions increasedofferings of diversity trainings for faculty and staff. But whether those diversity trainings wereeffective is up for debate, with evidence pointing to some promising initiatives but fewinstitutional changes that disrupt racism [13]–[15] and some well-intentioned trainingsexacerbating the problem of bias [16]. In turn, many campuses moved to embracing student-centered pedagogies. Tools and resources, such as the “Advancing Inclusion and Anti-Racism inthe College Classroom: A rubric and resource guide for instructors” [17] and “Toward anantiracist engineering classroom for 2020 and beyond: A starter kit,” [18] were developed to helpfaculty reflect on their identity and positionality, consider their students’ lived
cannot be a prerequisite for ABC 101 because then there would be no way to takeeither of them. This makes the graph abstraction both directional and acyclic. Within this representation,the number of credits for each course is reflected by the node size. The course level graph abstraction can allow for the scheduling of one’s term and visualizing howcourses interact with one another. However, these dependencies rely on the accuracy of the prerequisiteswhich could have been established years prior and the courses and, more broadly, the curriculum couldhave changed since. For example, students may be encouraged by their adviser to take ABC 103 and ABC104 in the same term. From the graph abstraction, this need is not clear perhaps because ABC 103
a burgeoning recognition of the need for DEI withinengineering [11]-[13]. The current state of DEI in the discipline is one of active evolution andcommitment. Institutions, professional societies, and industry leaders are increasinglyemphasizing the creation of more inclusive environments that attract and support a diverseworkforce. Efforts are being made to dismantle the barriers that have historically led tounderrepresentation in engineering fields. Initiatives ranging from outreach programs aimed atyoung students to institutional reforms in hiring and retention practices reflect this shift towardsa more inclusive engineering community.The relevance of DEI in engineering cannot be overstated, as the field significantly impactsevery aspect
incorporated in the training of new chemical engineers: • Communication: This is an interpersonal behavior. It means speaking up and promoting discussions that incorporate multiple perspectives and heighten individual knowledge. • Collaboration: This requires cooperation, mutual respect, effective feedback, and common goals within the team. • Experimentation: This aspect is related to the independence created by uncertainty; it required teams that assess and learn from their actions. • Reflection: Teams need to be critical of their results and they need to be ready to implement the changes necessary for their improvement.We propose this model fits best the current needs of chemical engineering students as theconcept and
reported their confidence in each answer both pre- and post-comicon a 1-4 Likert scale. In all cases, average student confidence increased with the second time they answeredthe ConcepTest questions as presented in Table 6, which would again reflect the general self-reportedimprovement in confidence as measured in the additional survey questions. The greatest confidence bothpre- and post-comic were expressed by students who answered correctly pre-comic and then stayed withtheir same correct answer. The lowest confidence were expressed by students who were incorrect pre-comic and changed their answer to another incorrect option.Table 6. Average student reported confidence in their ConcepTest answers from pre-comic to post-comic,for each combination
students subsequently analyze thetransient CO2 response to determine the rate of CO2 uptake by the terrarium plants given the rateof CO2 production by the soil bacteria and the diffusion rate of CO2 from the terrarium. As partof the assignment, the students are also asked to reflect on the similarities between the terrariumand the earth's atmosphere. This multifaceted project not only emphasizes fundamental chemicalengineering principles but also explores the broader context of environmental sustainability andclimate change. This activity is part of a recent curriculum change in the chemical engineeringdepartment with a greater emphasis on a larger quantity of focused laboratory activities in placeof fewer and longer unit operation experiments
thatinclusion of incomplete data sets(missing questions) did not havean impact on the overall findings.Missing sets were normalized to Figure 4: Learning Preferences. The vertical line signifies the meanthe number of questions answered, score. Calculated based on results from the visual and verbal section in Felder Solomon’s Index of Learning Styles. Data are collected from theto reflect a comparable value. initial trial with 10 control participants and 5 study participants.There were no more than 33% ofquestions missing for all data sets used. In total, there are 10 participants from the control groupand 5 participants in the study group, with age ranges between 8
submitting a knowledge inventory and remediation plan. Students create a glossary of termsand concepts from the class and rank them by their level of understanding. Recent iterations ofthe remediation plan also include reflections on emotions and support networks.In February 2023, the project team will scale the interventions to freshman-level IntroductoryProgramming, which has 400 students and the college’s highest fail/withdrawal rate. The largesample size will enable more robust statistics to correlate exam scores, intervention rubric items,and surveys on assignment effectiveness. Piloting interventions in various environments andclasses will establish best pedagogical practices that minimize instructors’ workload and decisionfatigue. The
, including reflections on the usage ofGenerative AI, the overall well-being of students, as well as the future roadmap for student-centric,educator-focused, and institution-based implementation of E.D. 5.0. This course revamp is part ofa broader effort to align Chem Eng education with E.D. 5.0 goals. By preparing students for I.D.5.0 competencies, this approach cultivates a skilled workforce valued across interdisciplinarysectors. Ongoing research further maps I.D. 5.0 to E.D. 5.0, with findings from this study servingas a benchmark for optimizing university pedagogical strategies. Industry 5.0 (I.D. 5.0) envisionsan efficient, productive industry with a strong societal role. Education 5.0 (E.D. 5.0) fostershuman-centric, personalized, and
. While recall of prior coursematerial can improve retention, students can struggle to connect and apply lessons learned yearsago to their present day, leading to higher levels of stress, frustration, and impeded learning [5],[6], [7], [8].The theory of social constructivism contrasts with this existing learning structure as it argues thatlearning is not a passive process of information absorption but rather an active process ofcollaboration and reflection [9]. Through this framework, the traditional curriculum structure canlead to student demotivation by passively teaching chemical engineering knowledge and skillsfirst and reserving the challenge of application for after these skills are gained [10]. By contrast,a curriculum that appropriately
self-reports about student experiencewith the modules referred to herein as self-reflection questions.4.1 Instrument DevelopmentEach of the question sets employed was developed by the project team. The process fordevelopment of the queries included on the instruments was collaborative. The basis for the skillstests and self-assessments was the course instructional objectives. The skills tests, one for eachcourse, were developed as multiple-choice instruments with four possible responses for eachquestion. The initial question sets were devised by the faculty in the discipline with revisions madebased on comments and suggestions from the other faculty working on the project and the researchconsultant. The initial set of self-assessment queries
curriculum needs to support students' development of representational fluencybetter.Appropriately integrating sociotechnical design problems into the curriculum can supportstudents' development of engineering skills, practices, and conceptual understanding whilealso learning design [14], [15]. Sociotechnical problems are design problems that includesocial and technical constraints [16], [17]. Addressing sociotechnical problems reflects theprofessional workplace in which engineers typically address and solve engineering problemsthat merge social and technical constraints [8], [16], [18]. By exploring the students'representational practices and skills, we can design appropriate scaffolds that support them indeveloping expertise. This research aims to
as necessary to alignwith their pedagogical goals and institutional standards. After redesigning the course, facultydocumented their reflections, including the advantages and challenges of using AI in coursedevelopment.Survey Design and AdministrationTo evaluate students’ perceptions of AI, an end-of-semester survey was distributed. The surveyconsisted of: 1. Likert-Scale Questions: Students rated their agreement with statements regarding the reliability, accuracy, and utility of AI tools in their coursework. 2. Open-Ended Questions: Students elaborated on their experiences with AI tools, including specific examples of how they used these tools for problem-solving and their concerns or reservations.Survey questions
three larger subsets of alternative assessment13 include: Specifications-based grading,14 by which grades reflect students’ completion of work to certain specified levels, with achievable tiers for each learning outcome; Standards-based grading,15 by which grades reflect students’ proficiency in the learning objectives, and mastery defined by different tiers; Ungrading,16 by which mastery and proficiency are the greatest emphasis.Ungrading’s name comes from a reduced emphasis on grades, but includes a range of possibleapproaches, including contract grading, self-assessment, peer-assessment, and portfolios.17 Thesetechniques can be used in other approaches, but within ungrading they are centered in the emphasison
declare their major in March of their second semester, while taking theirsecond selected introductory engineering course. Intro ChemE, offered each Fall (≈50 students)and Spring (≈25 students), primarily enrolls undeclared first-years, reflecting the institution’sbroader demographics, with Hispanic/Latino and BIPOC groups underrepresented. The keylearning outcomes for the course are to develop skills in data analysis, material balances, anddetermining state properties.Intro ChemE meets for five hours weekly: three hours of lectures, one hour of lab, and one hourof recitation. Recitation sessions involve small groups working on structured exercises or casestudies—known as recitation problems [25], [26]—based on the material covered in the
). Project Leader (1987-92). Principal Researcher (1992-95). Specialty Products Business Leader (1995-99)Hseen BaledMichael McMahon ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Team Building Games to Reinforce the Training of Chemical Engineering Students in Team Skills Based on Collaboration LeadershipIntroductionTeam building games or activities are popular at work [1] - [3], and college [4]. Team games arecreative activities that simulate team performance at relatively simple and engaging tasks butoffering practice and reflections to apply to real job situations. They can be used when starting anew team project or sometimes later to address conflicts, to encourage positive attitudes, or tounveil new