Paper ID #13196A Metric for Assessment of ABET Student Outcome ”b” – Experimental De-sign and Analyzing the ResultsDr. Allen L Jones PE, South Dakota State University Dr. Allen Jones is a Professor of Civil Engineering at South Dakota State University (SDSU). His area of specialty is geotechnical engineering and general civil engineering. Prior to joining SDSU he was a predoctoral Associate at the University of Washington teaching graduate courses and completing his PhD in Civil Engineering. Prior to that, he was a Senior Engineer for 18 years at a consulting/design firm in Seattle. He is registered or licensed as a Civil
generation are accompanied by affective states such as irritation, frustration, anger,and sometimes rage when the learner makes mistakes… On the other hand, positive affectivestates such as flow, delight, excitement, and eureka are experienced when tasks are completed,challenges are conquered, insights are unveiled, and major discoveries are made... Emotions aresystematically affected by the knowledge and goals of the learner, as well as vice versa.” Theygo on to explain that a balanced system is important when learning through failure. If this formof learning is uncontrolled, students will either be in states of, “(a) engagement/flow as theypursue the superordinate learning goal of mastering the material in the learning environment or(b
Paper ID #21927Peer-Led-Team-Learning in a Mechanics I: Statics CourseDr. James E. Lewis, University of Louisville James E. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals in the J. B. Speed School of Engineering at the University of Louisville. His research interests include paral- lel and distributed computer systems, cryptography, engineering education, undergraduate retention and technology (Tablet PCs) used in the classroom.Dr. Thomas D. Rockaway, University of Louisville Thomas D. Rockaway, Ph.D., P.E., is an Associate Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering
P-Value: 0.0262 Statistically significant P-Value: 0.0768 b) Race Not statistically significantFigure 4. The perceived social involvement of students by (a) gender: male and female; and (b)race: white students and non-white students.Potentially Non-Retaining Students Potentially non-retained students are included students who within the survey, selected,“I have considered/am considering leaving the College of Engineering” and “I plan to leave theCollege of Engineering, but stay at CSU”. Between potential non-retained students, 40 % ofstudents selected
average” students? After examining the overall survey results, weseparated the responses based on grades received in pre-requisite courses. We assigned values of1= No, 2= Maybe, and 3= Yes to the survey question answers and analyzed the average scoresfor each question between the two groups (A/B in pre-requisite course vs. C or below in pre-requisite course). A t-test was used to test for statistical significance. The results (Figure 5)showed that students who came into the class with a C or below felt that the tiered mentoringproject gave them more expertise (p = .02) and more confidence (p = .01) in the topics theyworked on, compared to students who came into the class with As or Bs. Figure 5. Survey responses based on pre-requisite
each course andwas administered at the beginning and end of the course to evaluate learning gains. In theenvironmental engineering course, this was structured as 18 multiple-choice true false questionswith three to four stems per question for a total of 61 responses. In the structural analysis course,this was structured as 20 multiple-choice questions. Example questions are shown in Figures 2and 3. 1. Continuously mixed flow reactors: A Represent a system where contents are instantaneously mixed T F B In these reactors, the composition of the influent is equal to the composition within the tank T F C Typically represent flow in pipes and rivers T F Figure 2. Example question from pre
3.0 – 3.4 5.0 40 3 E 5.0 E4 5.0 2 4 1 0.0 – 11.5 none <5.0 fail 2 FX ∗ * E = Sufficient A = Excellent * B = Very good * FX = Failure with exception (only UoW) * C = Good * F = Failure * D = SatisfactoryTable 6: Conversion matrix of ECEM-partner universities (without ZUST) (* ECTS is the common European marking system, not only for ECEM-partners) A lot of students have the possibility to award two diplomas or as we say a doublediploma: one from the home and the other one from the host university. Up to now there is
39 51 CO* Emission (g) 2622 1304 50*HC-Hydro Carbon*CO-Carbon MonoxideAs part of the project, the students did an hour-long volume study at the intersection, includingturning movements, and measured the existing signal timings. The existing cycle length for theintersection was 90.5 seconds, with a green time of 45.4 seconds for Riverside Street and a greentime of 45.1 seconds for University Ave. After the optimization with the measured volume data,the optimal cycle length for the intersection was found to be 55 seconds, green time of 31seconds for Riverside Street, and 24 seconds for University Ave. The HCM level of service forthe intersection was improved from C to B
, we will add several questions about study abroad to our Civil Engineering seniorsurvey starting in the spring of 2007. These questions will ask about the students’ perceptions ofstudy abroad and probe why those that did not participate did not pursue overseas study: 1. Were you made aware of study abroad opportunities? 2. Did you study abroad during your time at Villanova? a. Would you describe the experience as positive? Explain. b. What type of program did you participate in (summer, semester)? 3. If you did not study abroad, indicate why you did not (for example, you may not have had an interest, your GPA may have been too low to qualify, etc.).The academic indicators have been studied and these
-17.11. Lumsdaine, M. and Lumsdaine, E. (1995). “Thinking preferences of engineering students: implications for curriculum restructuring,” Journal of Engineering Education, April, 193-204.12. Large Seagrave, J. (2007). “Interdisciplinary Pedagogy: Using Teams to Teach the BOK,” Proceedings, Annual Conference and Exposition, 11 pp.13. Gorham, D., Newberry, P. B., and Bickart, T. A. (2003). “Engineering Accreditation and Standards for Technological Literacy,” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, Vol. 93, No. 1, 95-99.14. Shuman, L. J., Besterfield-Sacre, M. and McGourty, J. (2005). “The ABET “Professional Skills” – Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?,” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, Vol. 95, No. 1, 41-55.15. Smith
/news/2005/03/mil-050328-afps03.htm, December 29, 2007.2. The New York Times, “West Point Is Scouted as a Model for Kabul,” May 8, 2004.3. Wallace, D., “Coalition helps build Afghanistan’s ‘West Point’,” Army News Service, September 7, 2004.Accessed at http://www4.army.mil/ocpa/read.php?story_id_key=6331, December 29, 2007.4. Central Intelligence Agency, “CIA World Fact Book - Afghanistan,” December 13, 2007. Accessed athttps://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/print/af.html, December 29, 2007.5. Harpviken, K. B., "Ethnic Conflict—Afghanistan." Accessed at http://www.bookrags.com/research/ethnic-conflictafghanistan-ema-02/, December 30, 2007.6. Marlowe, A., “With the Afghan Army,” Wall Street Journal, December 4, 2007.7. ABET
capstone projects will be assigned students and which students to assign to the selected projects. Student Project A Project B Project C … Baker 5 3 Jones 4 5 1 Little 1 4 Smith 5 4 … Total 14 6 12 …In this first year of offering an international project, the international project received the highesttotal score of the eleven potential projects. In fact, 9 of the 31 seniors preferenced the
fourth student dropped the course six weeks into the semester after having made no progress at all toward course completion. He reported that the challenges of attending his host-institution classes taught entirely in Chinese were overwhelming, and he was unable to devote any significant time to CE300. Of the three successful students, one earned an A+, one earned an A, and one earned a B, according to objective, criterion-referenced grading of all their course submissions, including the final exam, using the same evaluation standards as were used in the standard version of the course.• The three greatest challenges encountered in this experiment were connectivity, connectivity, and connectivity. None of the three
Paper ID #22161Leadership for Engineers: A Course for Developing Professional and Busi-ness Skills for EngineersDr. Decker B. Hains, Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department of Civil and Construction Engi- neering at Western Michigan University. He is a retired US Army Officer serving 22 years on active duty with the US Army Corps of Engineers and taught at the United States Military Academy at West Point (USMA). He earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from USMA in 1994, Master of Science degrees from the University of Alaska Anchorage in Arctic
feedback was requested on how to improve theprogram or what additional resources and/or training would be helpful.Student LearningIn an effort to understand the impact of the UGTF program on student learning, and incollaboration with the Office of Institutional Research and Planning, downstreamperformance of students in a subset of UGTF-supported courses was tracked. Performance indownstream courses based on student grades was compared for students who (a) enrolled inthe upstream course prior to the introduction of UGTFs and (b) students who enrolled in theupstream course while it had UGTF resources. The downstream course analysis wasconducted for four courses: ME 211 (Statics), ME 320 (Dynamics), CE 301 (Statics andDynamics), and CE 310
recognition that the new model inC&ME will require on-going faculty development to truly incorporate all facets.The new C&ME Teaching & Learning Model is “living” from the standpoint that it isextensively used by all of our faculty on a daily basis. It forms the foundation upon which ourmission is accomplished. However, the most completely researched and well-crafted document isonly useful if it continues to be regularly revised. As a truly living document, the new modelwill be evaluated as part of our scheduled Strategic Planning Sessions.References1. Joyce, B. & Weil, M. (1972). Models of Teaching, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.2. Albemarle County Public Schools. (2008). Framework for Quality Learning: Rigorous and
.Marikunte, S., F. Harackiewicz, J. Nicklow, and L. Chevalier, “Benefits and Challenges ofTraining Teaching Assistants,” Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Chicago, Illinois, June 2006. https://peer.asee.org/798.Marra, R., K.A. Rogers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “A multi-year, multi- institution study ofwomen engineering student self-efficacy,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, I 1, p 27 –38, January 2009.Packard, B., Successful STEM Mentoring Initiatives for Underrepresented Students. StylusPublishing, 2015.Roberts, S.C., K.A. Hollar, and V.M. Carlson, “Looking Back: Lessons Learned from Ten Yearsof Training Teaching Assistants,” Proceedings of the 1997 ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, June
Paper ID #14402Can Service Learning Impact Student Learning and Motivation in a Re-quired Engineering Probability and Statistics Course?Dr. Abbie B Liel P.E., University of Colorado - Boulder Dr. Abbie B. Liel is an associate professor of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder.Timothy J Clarkin, University of Colorado - Boulder Mr. Clarkin is pursuing a M.S. in Civil Systems Engineering at University of Colorado at Boulder, with a focus in Water Resources and a certificate in Engineering for Developing Communities. Eventually, he would like to work on water supply systems in
. At the University of Alabama, Fridley has led efforts to establish several new programs including new undergraduate degree programs in construction engineering, architectural engineering and environmental engineering, a departmental Scholars program allowing highly qualified students an accelerated program to earn their MSCE in addition to their BS degree, the interdisciplinary ”Cube” promoting innovation in engineering, and the cross-disciplinary MSCE/MBA and MSCE/JD dual-degree programs.Dr. Decker B. Hains, Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department of Civil and Construction Engi- neering at Western Michigan University. He is a retired US Army Officer serving 22
of the Graduate Assistant Seminar for engineering teaching assistants at Penn State.Irene B. Mena, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering, and a Ph.D. in engineering education. Her research interests include first-year engineering and graduate student professional development. Page 25.314.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Classroom Flip in a Senior-Level Engineering Course and Comparison to Previous VersionAbstractAs students enter the final year of an engineering
Paper ID #10256The Effectiveness of ”Interactive” Slide Presentations for Promoting StudentEngagement in University Engineering CoursesSean A Wirth M.S. Civil Engineering student @ CU Boulder from 2011-2014. Part-time adjunct instructor and CADD Technician. Carried out observations of in-class student engagement levels under direction of Abbie Liel, Ph.D.Dr. Abbie B Liel P.E., University of Colorado Boulder Dr. Abbie B. Liel is an assistant professor of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder.Prof. John S McCartney, University of Colorado Boulder John S. McCartney
, diversity in engineering and engineering education, management of large watersheds, mitigation of repetitively flooded structures in southeast Louisiana, experimental testing of large parts, residual stress measurement using laser interferometry, and materials testing (fatigue, shear, etc.). She, her husband, two engineer daughters and engineer son-in-law all reside in New Orleans.Mr. Michael B. O’Connor, New York University See profile American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Merits of a Civil Engineering Certification Program to Validate Fulfillment of the CEBOKThe American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE
) Leadership Award in 2010. At the University of Alabama, Fridley has led efforts to establish several new programs including new undergraduate degree programs in construction engineering, architectural engineering and environmental engineering, a departmental Scholars program allowing highly qualified students an accelerated program to earn their MSCE in addition to their BS degree, the interdisciplinary ”Cube” promoting innovation in engineering, and the cross-disciplinary MSCE/MBA and MSCE/JD dual-degree programs.Dr. Decker B. Hains, Western Michigan UniversityMs. Leslie Nolen, American Society of Civil Engineers Leslie Nolen, CAE, serves as director, educational activities for the American Society of Civil Engineers
AC 2012-3327: THE RAISE THE BAR EFFORT: CHARTING THE FU-TURE BY UNDERSTANDING THE PATH TO THE PRESENT - THE BOKAND LESSONS LEARNEDDr. Stuart G. Walesh P.E., S. G. Walesh Consulting Stuart G. Walesh, Ph.D., P.E., Dist.M.ASCE, D.WRE, and F.NSPE, is an independent consultant provid- ing management, engineering, education/training, and marketing services. Prior to beginning his consul- tancy, he worked in the public, private, and academic sectors serving as a Project Engineer and Manager, Department Head, Discipline Manager, marketer, legal expert, professor, and Dean of an engineering college. Walesh authored or co-authored six books and many engineering and education publications and presentations. His most recent
baccalaureate degree accredited by the Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) of ABET. “M/30” refers to a master’s degree or approximately 30 semester credits of acceptable graduate-level or upper-level undergraduate courses in a technical or professional practice area related to civil engineering. “E” refers to engineering experience. For this path, the accreditation process provides validation of the baccalaureate component of the BOK. Validation of the “M/30” program will be provided by an approved outside entity, which might also be ABET. B + MABET & E – This alternate path is being considered by ASCE to allow for greater flexibility in BOK fulfillment. For this path, the baccalaureate
historic accreditation-related event occurred during this period. After an intensiveASCE lobbying effort, the ABET Board of Directors voted to remove the prohibition on duallevel accreditation of engineering programs in March 2008. As a result of this policy change andthe implementation of new master’s-level general accreditation criteria, effective in the fall of2008, the alternate path (B + M-ABET & E) has become a viable route to BOK attainment.While new BOK1-compliant accreditation criteria were being finalized and implemented, itbecame apparent that significant updates to BOK1 itself would be required. These revisionswere driven by (1) aspects of the 1st Edition that did not lend themselves to effectivemeasurement and assessment; and (2
Zone proposed a resolution that listed severalpoints supporting the position of the opposition and resolved the following: “That the development of the criteria for B+30 be suspended [emphasis added] until the membership of NCEES and the appropriate professional engineering organizations be provided with a written analysis of 1) the above listed points as appropriate; 2) the educational, professional, regulatory, and economic impact of B+30; and 3) any alternative solutions to the concept of additional education that have been or might be identified (including items such as additional experience before licensure in lieu of additional education, etc. The purpose of these reports would be to allow
. Graduates must demonstrate an understanding and reasonable compliance with the following as they apply to civil engineering: a. an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics (through differential equations and probability and statistics), science (including calculus-based physics and general chemistry), and engineering; b. an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams, c. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems, d. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility, e. an ability to communicate effectively, f. a knowledge of contemporary issues, and g. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to
) in February 2004; a revised (second) edition was published in February2008 (BOK22). The BOK2 is a comprehensive list of 24 outcomes divided into three outcomecategories: foundational, technical, and professional. The BOK2 outcomes have the desired levelof achievement defined according to Bloom’s Taxonomy for the cognitive domain3. The BOK2has recommended outcome achievement targets for each stage of the fulfillment pathway: thebaccalaureate degree (B), post-baccalaureate formal education (M/30), and pre-licensureexperience (E) (see Figure 1).Detailed implementation guidelines are included in the second edition of the Civil EngineeringBody of Knowledge for the 21st Century (BOK22); see www.asce.org/raisethebar/reports. Policy465 and BOK2 are
2006-1450: AIM FOR BETTER STUDENT LEARNING: BEST PRACTICES FORUSING INSTANT MESSAGING AND LIVE VIDEO TO FACILITATEINSTRUCTOR-STUDENT COMMUNICATIONJames Klosky, U.S. Military Academy Dr J Ledlie Klosky, P.E., is an Associate Professor and Director of the Mechanics Group at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, NY. He earned a B.S. and M.S. degree from Virginia Tech in 1987 and 1989 and his PhD from the University of Colorado in 1997. He is the winner of the national ASEE 2004 Best Zone Paper award and is editor of the McGraw-Hill website www.handsonmechanics.com.Decker Hains, U.S. Military Academy Major Decker B. Hains, Ph.D., P.E., is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and