defined a series of objectives for adesign project than the designer- whether in a consulting office or in a classroom- want to findout what the customer really wants. Questions such as: what is an economic project? How doyou define the best design? What is a safe design? What are the factor(s) that will affect thedesign the most? Phrasing it differently, knowledge resides in the questions that can be asked andthe answers that can be provided (2) .A sequence of inquiry characterized by a hierarchy: certainquestions need to be asked and answered before other questions can be asked. There is a setprocedure which constitutes the inquiry process in an epistemological context. Taxonomies ofsuch a procedure or inquiry process have been extended to
). Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Available online at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11463.html.6. Graham, R., Crawley, E., & Mendelson, B. R. (2009). Engineering leadership education: A snapshot review of international good practice. Bernard M. Gordon MIT Engineering Leadership Program.7. Farr, J. V., Walesh, S. G. & Forsythe, G. B. (1997). Leadership development for engineering managers. Journal of Management in Engineering, 13(4), 38-41.8. Torr, S. R., & Ofori, G. (2008). Leadership versus management: How they are different and why. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 8(2), 61-71.9. Bowman
Technical Legacy of Dr. John McMasters,” AIAA 2009 – 0867, 47th AIAA AerospaceSciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 5-8 January, 2009, Orlando, FL.3. McMasters, J. H., and Matsch, L. A., 1996, “Desired Attributes of an Engineering Graduate – An IndustryPerspective,” AIAA 96-2241, AIAA Advanced Measurement and Ground Testing Technology Conference, 19th, NewOrleans, LA, June 17-20, 1996.4. “Boeing attributes of an engineer”, http://www.boeing.com/educationrelations/attributes.html, accessed onDecember 14, 20095. “Welliver Faculty Fellowship Program”,http://www.boeing.com/educationrelations/facultyfellowship/index.html, accessed on December 14, 20096. Gorman, M. E., Johnson, V. S., Ben-Arieh, D., Bhattacharyya, S
which the student works provides the following: Page 15.288.2≠ The student works on GE Transportation project(s) 19 hours per week during the academic year and 50 hours per week during the summer. During a full year, the student works on projects a total of approximately 1500 hours.≠ The project areas include traction, control, cooling systems, remote diagnostics, propulsion equipment, diesel engines, power electronics, software development, noise and vibration, wind energy, and structures.≠ The graduate tuition, fees, and books for the student are paid by GE Transportation (about $16,000-$17,000).≠ The student is an
Universities, Spring 20015. Houston, S. L., “Evaluation of Senior Design Projects”, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings 19936. Randolph, W. A. and B. Z., Posner Effective Project Planning and Management, Prentice-Hall, 19887. Tombers, P. A ., “Value Analysis Projects for Engineering Technology”, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. 19928. Ullman, D. G., The Mechanical Design Process, 4th edition, McGraw-Hill Companies, 20109. Ulrich, C. T. and S. D. Eppinger, Product Design and Development, 4th edition, McGraw-Hill Companies, 200810. University of Arkansas, “Board Policy 210.1 Patent and Copyright Policy", University of Arkansas Board ofTrustees. http://www.uasys.edu
or solutions were generally directed to the instructor who gave the quiz orhomework. Since that instructor was not in the classroom when these were returned tothe student, the student normally had to call or email the instructor. None of the JZinstructors had an office at TU, nor did they have any set office hours which made itmore difficult for students to discuss issues face-to-face after an instructor finishedteaching their topic(s).Another important challenge in the course was the broad scope of topics covered. Forexample, process burners are taught at the JZI over four full days but covered in only twoand half hours total in the TU Combustion Engineering course. Due to time constraints,instructors had to greatly scale back the content
that include narrativeinquiry, phenomenology, grounded theory, and ethnogrophy12. Creswell13, describes case studies Page 15.182.6as follows: Case studies, in which the researcher explores in depth a program, an event, an activity, a process, or one or more individuals. The case(s) are bounded by time and activity, and researchers collect detailed information using a variety of data collection procedures over a sustained period of time (Stake, 1995).Elliot and Luke14, however, argue that case studies are not a method of inquiry but rather a toolfor data generation and interpretation that, most likely, cannot be generalized. In fact
areprogrammed into simple skills, while leading to more complex skills in a scaffold approach. Thismethodology facilitates the s development of crystallized intelligence (i.e., skill setsappropriately applied given certain conditions)8.A training path was created that outlines all formal training courses that associates mustcomplete during their two years in the program. Formal courses are offered in multiple formats Page 15.473.6to support learning objectives and to minimize travel. Theoretical and topic courses are offeredin a virtual training environment. Product application courses, which include hands-on lab workwith equipment, are offered in a