Conference Session

Community-Engaged Engineering Education Challenges and Opportunities in Light of COVID-19 Paper Presentations 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cijy Elizabeth Sunny, Baylor University; Kathleen Koenig, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division, Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

and has taught primarily physics and also research methodology on three different continents. In addition to research, she has also conducted workshops on using concept mapping methodology for scale development, mixed methods research methodology for standardized patient educators, and standard-setting for physician educators. Dr. Sunny continues to invest her skills in engineering education research through her collaborations. As part of her new undertaking at Baylor University, she is investing her skills as a research methodologist and data analyst to fight human trafficking through the use of Information Technology working alongside the research team there in collaboration with a diverse group of

Conference Session

Thinking Globally, Acting Locally: The Role of Engineering Education towards Attaining UN Sustainable Development Goals

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles Cowan, James Madison University; Elise Barrella P.E., James Madison University; Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel; Robin Anderson, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering, Community Engagement Division, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Minorities in Engineering

tools have been aimed at capturing students’ conceptualunderstanding of sustainability using surveys1 and concept maps.2 While it is critical to ensurethat students grasp the complexity of sustainability topics, it is especially important forengineering students to be able to apply this knowledge in the design process. Unfortunately, lessdiscussion in the literature has been devoted to how to assess student sustainable designabilities.3One approach to capturing student sustainable design abilities is the use of rubrics. Rubrics areadvantageous because in addition to allowing for assessment of student work, they can also beused to scaffold student learning.3 Some authors have used or adapted professional ratingsystems for assessment of student

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ebenezer Rotimi Ewumi, Washington State University; Olusola Adesope, Washington State University; Candis S. Claiborn, Washington State University; Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

, Washington State University Dr. Olusola O. Adesope is a Professor of Educational Psychology and a Boeing Distinguished Profes- sor of STEM Education at Washington State University, Pullman. His research is at the intersection of educational psychology, learning sciences, and instructional design and technology. His recent research focuses on the cognitive and pedagogical underpinnings of learning with computer-based multimedia re- sources; knowledge representation through interactive concept maps; meta-analysis of empirical research, and investigation of instructional principles and assessments in STEM. He is currently a Senior Associate Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education.Dr. Candis S. Claiborn, Washington

Conference Session

Stakeholder Perspectives on Community Engagement in Engineering Education

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Kurt Paterson P.E., Michigan Technological University; Chris Swan, Tufts University; John J. Duffy, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University; Nathan E. Canney, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

97 57 49 52 37 34 Students 114 118 85 Community 117 81 100Figure 2. LTS Questions Considered in the Affinity MappingThe cycles of individual idea generation followed by group distillation were repeated until all ofthe areas on the LTS concept map were covered. This paper will focus on the faculty perspective(the top block of the deconstructed Rubik’s cube in Figure 2). The number of differentparticipant ideas (ie. Post-it notes) within each topic area are also shown in Figure 2 for eachsubcategory within a given perspective. In most cases, best practice ideas outweighed benefitsand obstacles, which were about equal.Table 1 below summarizes the