describingproblems experienced by youth, e.g. “If I could change one thing about school, it would be…”, “I wish thepeople around me would…”, “I wish teachers knew…”, etc. These two activities provided youth withopportunities to think not only about the game mechanics they will be designing but also about the story ofthe game and how they want players to feel. The second stage, problem-framing, involved youth thinking together as a group about thechallenges they observe among their peers. Participants were asked to write down on a collaborative boardideas about challenges youth face at home, at school, at work, but also challenges they envision for theirfuture or for future generations. Once each team had brainstormed a list of issues, they would
Paper ID #41379Engagement in Practice: Innovating a Project-Based, Community EngagedCourse for Engineering Students that Fosters Ethical ThinkingProf. Tucker Krone, Washington University in St. Louis Tucker Krone joined the faculty in the McKelvey School of Engineering at Washington University in St. Louis in 2017. He teaches statistics, ethics, publication writing, communication, and community engaged courses. Tucker emphasizes engineering and statistics as forces for equity and social justice. Tucker Krone’s current passion focuses on integrating community engagement, social justice, equity, diversity and inclusion into
research grant (e.g., NSF),s/he must comply with already structured research as stated in the grant proposal which rarelyincludes RT as defined and outlined above (NSF’s Broader Impact criterion is not RT). In spiteof these institutional, structural, and procedural constraints, the student co-authors in this paperdeveloped a commitment to RT mainly due to the spaces that their HES graduate programopened to do so and the guidance of faculty committed to RT. Hence, as expected, their RTefforts had to be implemented somewhat haphazardly, often circumventing established academicpractices but without placing themselves in trouble. Other students, while deeply committed toRT, found themselves prioritizing traditional academic writing, valued by academic
could use the app thenative development facilitated the use of assistive technologies found on both platforms.3.2. App Overview The resulting app, LionHELP, serves as a digital version of the school’s Red Folder. Theapp is divided into four sections: Recognize, Respond, Refer, and Resources. The app homescreen shown in figure one displays these four sections, each with a brief description of theinformation it contains. Note that for this writing the iOS version of the app was captured andthe Android version contains the same functionality. Figure 1: Home Screen for LionHELP The Recognize section was designed to be an interactive survey. Users select the symptomsthey are exhibiting or someone they are
. •EPICS Supervisor •Research Advisor Managerial •Community Partners •Peer TAs •Collaborators TA •Mentees •Students Subordinate Figure 2. Top to down rank GTA’s navigate management in service-learning programs 3. MethodsThis exploration initiated with a curiosity about the distinction between GTA’s experiences inservice-learning relative to other courses, as well as their development relative to undergraduatestudents enrolled in the service-learning courses
deficit views of communities, bring a savior complex to their work, and/or are overly focused on student learning. CES: CE that takes “a scholarly approach”, which means being grounded in previous work and “documented through products that can be disseminated and subjected to critique by peers from a variety of contexts”; a goal of CES is “to generate, disseminate, and apply new knowledge.” Further, “Effective CES demands that the scholar produce diverse forms of scholarship in innovative formats—such as documentaries, websites, briefs, or manuals—for non-academic audiences and uses.” [13, p. 59] “CES is recognized as teaching, discovery, integration, application and engagement that involves the faculty member in a mutually
opportunities for trainees to work on theircommunication skills within the design courses. Trainees may benefit from having more formalfeedback from professors and their peers when preparing for presentations to communitymembers or writing to government leaders. Taken together with trainees’ satisfaction andusefulness ratings, portfolio reflections provided further evidence that our courses helpedtrainees build knowledge and skills.While most students were satisfied with the design courses we offered, there is still room forimprovement in the courses. Feedback on the post-survey and course reflections suggests thatrequiring students to have completed prerequisites may help move the course along faster. Forexample, requiring a prerequisite in statistics
student being unable to identify inequitable or culturally incongruent educational systems that are causing personal hardship but still 'fighting back' or being oppositional because of the hardship they are facing. When a student ismotivated by social justice and not critiquing social oppression(conformistresistance), they may act to address the hardships they and their peers face but continue to be unable to name or address the systems causing those hardships. This could look like a student creating study groups for struggling peersb ut not addressing the curriculum and classroom culture that causes their peers to struggle. In contrast, a student performingnot being motivatedby social justice but critiquing