,” ijli, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–47, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.54855/ijli.23231.[8] M. Salvagno, F. S. Taccone, and A. G. Gerli, “Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing?,” Crit Care, vol. 27, no. 1, p. 75, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2.[9] F. A. Shah, “IS CHATGPT A SILVER BULLET FOR SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPT WRITING?,” JPMI, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.54079/jpmi.37.1.3219.[10] T. Day, “A Preliminary Investigation of Fake Peer-Reviewed Citations and References Generated by ChatGPT,” The Professional Geographer, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 1024–1027, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1080/00330124.2023.2190373.[11] F. Farhat, S. S. Sohail, and D. Ø. Madsen, “How trustworthy is ChatGPT? The case of bibliometric analyses,” Cogent Engineering
longer for a weaker student to finalize the project. As a result, theproject sometimes does not improve the students' weak abilities, knowledge, and teamworkcapabilities.This research investigates the educator's methods at the undergraduate level for engineering andparticularly construction engineering technology courses to analyze, assess, evaluate, and resolveteamwork problems. In addition to a literature review of the experienced and reported methods,the author shares different methods practiced in several years of teaching in various institutionsand countries.One of the methods with the better outcome is the student involvement in the assessment of theirteammates. How to arrange peer assessment is one of the topics. The related forms, their
development, and engineering education. Through these research topics, Raissa has been publishing papers for peer-reviewed journal and conference pro- ceedings. Also, she is part of Dr. Siyuan Song’s research lab, the Safety Automation and Visualization Environment (SAVE) Laboratory, which integrates technologies and education themes to improve build- ing performance and safety engineering.Dr. Siyuan Song, The University of Alabama Dr. Siyuan Song is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental engineering at the University of Alabama. Her research interests include Occupational Safety and Health, Training and Workforce Development, Engineering Education, Building Information Modeling
ethics to mobile technology. A multitude of “how to write a teachingcase study” guidelines are available, including in construction education. However, literature thatprovides insights into developing a specific case study in construction engineering andmanagement is scarce. To fill this knowledge gap, this paper presents the dynamics ofdeveloping an educational case study to explore the implementation of target value design(TVD). This case study was developed for engineering and construction management students toformulate, discuss, and decide on strategies, actions, and solutions to provide the best value tothe project owner when implementing TVD. This work-in-progress paper focuses on the pilottest when developing the case study. Pre-class
their own pace, acclimating to therequired knowledge prior to class and allowing class time for problem-solving and collaborationwith peers and the instructor.This study summarizes the results of implementing a flipped learning approach to a constructionmanagement cost estimating course. Mixed methods were used to collect quantitative andqualitative data. Findings analyzed student perceptions and indirect and direct assessments ofstudent achievements. The outcomes of the flipped approach indicated most students perceivedbenefiting from the flipped learning environment, with a positive impact on student achievement,comprehension of course material, and stronger student-to-student, and student-to-facultyengagement. Furthermore, results reinforced
, Engineering Education, Sustainable Infrastructure, Resilient and Sustainable Post-Disaster Reconstruction, and Circular Economy. He also holds professional credentials in LEED Green Associate for sustainable buildings and ENV SP for sustainable infrastructures as well as several micro-credentials in the commercialization of research. As a Ph.D. Candidate, Piyush has published a dozen peer-reviewed journals and several conference papers.Mr. Mohamed Elzomor, P.E., Florida International University Dr. Mohamed ElZomor is an Assistant Professor at Florida International University (FIU), College of Engineering and Computing and teaches at the Moss School of Construction, Infrastructure and Sustain- ability. Dr. ElZomor completed
engineering education. Through these research topics, Raissa has been publishing papers for peer-reviewed journal and conference proceedings. Also, she is part of Dr. Siyuan Song’s research lab, the Safety Automation and Visualization Environment (SAVE) Laboratory, which integrates technologies and education themes to improve building performance and safety engineering.Dr. Siyuan Song, The University of Alabama Dr. Siyuan Song is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental engineering at the University of Alabama. Her research interests include Occupational Safety and Health, Training and Workforce Development, Engineering Education, Building Information Modeling, Machine Learning
thatpositively impacted instructor and student collaboration included comfortable and flexible(movable) furnishings, sufficient space between collaborative groups, an abundance of white-board surfaces, and digital technology for sharing ideas. Providing a flexible, open design allowsfor easier movement and encourages social interaction among peers and students, enablesstudents and instructors to share knowledge, and creates a feeling of community and engagement[6].Flexibility in the university classroom is becoming increasingly important to meet limitedclassroom space needs and support multiple learning and instructional methods. Studies haveindicated positive perceptions of students and instructors when furnishings allow for moving andadjusting to
phones were notallowed, and they also had to be turned off and inside the backpack. The rules wereexplained before the exam began. The time for the exam was divided into three parts. In thefirst part, the students took the exam for 45 minutes; during this time, the students can readall the questions and exercises and complete the number of questions they want and in theorder they want, like a traditional exam. After these 45 minutes, they had a 15-minute breakin another room where they had water, juice, coffee, cookies, and chips, take a break fromthe exam, and they could talk about anything (including the exam), but they could not bringanything from the exam room nor write anything; during the 15 minute coffee break thestudents were monitored