limited and regulated number of staff. The interns were an excellent way to more fully analyze and utilize this technology. (b) The coaches and athletic trainers are always looking to offer students an opportunity to work in collegiate sports. They were in the same shoes as the student interns and needed someone to give them a chance to pursue their career goals. The coaches saw this as a way to give back while also getting useful assistance in return. The coaches and athletic trainers gave of their time in training the new interns on how to work with the data, wearables, and other athletic technology. They gained a small staff of people who were able to spend time with the data and provided assistance that they would have been
Revolution system. 2. Statistics: Figure 12a shows catapults that are used to teach probability and statistics. In this activity there are three different settings (rubber band strength, ball placement, and catapult angle). The students do experiments to predict where the ball will land for a specific set of parameters. 3. Design Optimization: Figure 12b shows the paper rockets that the students design and build to determine how to get the rockets to fly the farthest distance or hit a designated target.Figure 12. (a) Teaching statistic using catapults. (b) Teaching the design process using compressed air paper rockets. 4. Material deposition: Figure 13a shows the
becomes possible to motivate and educate.References[1] Litton, A., Goodridge, W., Call, B., Lopez, S., (2017) Effect of Mentoring on Undergraduate Students Self-Efficacy and Professionalism: Initial Qualitative Findings Paper presented at 2017 ASEE RMS Section Conference, Provo, Utah. http://www.et.byu.edu/%7Embc57/ ASEE2017/47%20EffectofMentoringonUndergraduateStudentsSelf%20-%20Final.pdf[2] The Charles A. Dana Center at the University of Texas at Austin, Agile Mind, Inc.. (n.d.). Albert Bandura. Retrieved March 20, 2018, from http://learningandtheadolescentmind.org/people_06.html[3] Bandura, A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1986.[4] Bandura
Paper ID #30688The Influence of Experiential Learning on Student ProfessionalDevelopment: A Literature ReviewBeata Johnson, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Beata Johnson is an Engineering Education Ph.D. student at Purdue University and recipient of an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. She received her BS in Chemical Engineering from Purdue University. Her research interests include extracurricular and experiential learning in engineering education, students’ pathways through engineering education, and transition to the workforce.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University at West Lafayette
vol. 1.[10] D. R. Brodeur, P. W. Young, and K. B. Blair, “Problem-based learning in aerospace engineering education,” in Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2002, pp. 16–19.[11] D. Broman, K. Sandahl, and M. Abu Baker, “The Company Approach to Software Engineering Project Courses,” Educ. IEEE Trans., vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 445–452, 2012, doi: 10.1109/TE.2012.2187208.[12] N. Correll, R. Wing, and D. Coleman, “A One-Year Introductory Robotics Curriculum for Computer Science Upperclassmen,” Educ. IEEE Trans., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 54–60, 2013, doi: 10.1109/TE.2012.2220774.[13] E. Bütün, “Teaching genetic algorithms in electrical engineering
. Baglati, and S.E. Sarma, “Fostering 21st century skills in engineeringundergraduates through co-curricular involvement,” Proceedings of 121st ASEE Annual Conferenceand Exposition, June 15. 2014.[38] E.J. Coyle, L.H. Jamieson, and W.C. Oakes, “EPICS: Engineering Projects in CommunityService,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol 21-1, pp. 139-150. 2005.[39] J.P. Borg, and D.H. Zitomer, “Dual-team model for international service learning inengineering:remote solar water pumping in Guatemala,” Journal of Professional Issues inEngineering Education and Practice, vol 134-2, pp. 178-185. 2008.[40] B. Amadei, R. Sandekian, and E. Thomas, “A model for sustainable humanitarian engineeringprojects,” Sustainability, vol 1-4, pp. 1087-1105
Paper ID #29303Developing a Framework for Experiential LearningDr. John H Callewaert, University of Michigan John Callewaert is Director of Strategic Projects in the Office of the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education, College of Engineering, University of Michigan. He previously served as a program director with the University of Michigan’s Graham Sustainability Institute, Director of the University of Michigan- Flint’s Office of Research, and the Director of the Institute for Community and Environment at Colby- Sawyer College. He completed doctoral study in Resource, Policy and Behavior at the University of
Paper ID #23434Summer Exchange Program: A Unique Platform to Broaden Exposure andAddress Several Dimensions of LearningDr. Abhijit Nagchaudhuri, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore Dr. Abhijit Nagchaudhuri is currently a Professor in the Department of Engineering and Aviation Sciences at University of Maryland Eastern Shore. He is a member American Society for Mechanical Engineers (ASME), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and, American Society for Agricultural and Biological Engineers(ASABE) and is actively involved in teaching and research in the fields of (i) robotics and mechatronics, (ii)remote
. Brodeur, D. H. Soderholm, and R. Nasr, “Adoption of active learning in a lecture-based engineering class,” in Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, 2002, vol. 1, pp. T2A-9-T2A-15 vol. 1.[11] D. R. Brodeur, P. W. Young, and K. B. Blair, “Problem-based learning in aerospace engineering education,” in Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2002, pp. 16–19.[12] D. Broman, K. Sandahl, and M. Abu Baker, “The Company Approach to Software Engineering Project Courses,” Educ. IEEE Trans., vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 445–452, 2012.[13] S. Jayaram, L. Boyer, J. George, K. Ravindra, and K. Mitchell, “Project-based introduction to
Movement strategies into these courses, thearbitrary boundaries between extra- and co-curricular learning dissolve, and students take initiativeover their own learning.6.1References[1] Susan Conrad, W. A. Kitch, T. J. Pfeiffer, T. R. Smith and J. V. Tocco, "Students writing for professional practice: A model for collaboration among faculty, practitioners and writing specialists," in Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Seattle, WA, 2015.[2] R. Young, A. Heaney and J. Kladianos, "Assessing writing in a comprehensive design experience course," in Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Conference, 2009.[3] B. Richards and I. Milanovic, "Partnership between
Fellowshipfrom the MSU HUB for Innovation in Learning and Technology, along with support from theMSU College of Engineering and MSU Honors College. Much of the course content wasadapted from or informed by the “Entering Research” and “Entering Mentoring” curricula andmaterials developed by the National Research Mentoring Network (https://nrmnet.net) andmaintained by the Center for the Improvement of Mentored Experiences in Research(https://cimerproject.org).References[1] M. Haddara and H. Skanes, “A reflection on cooperative education: From experience to experiential learning,” International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 67, 2007.[2] B. F. Blair, M. Millea, and J. Hammer, “The Impact of Cooperative Education on Academic
aspects.References[1] L. A. Braskamp, D. C. Braskamp, and K. Merrill, “Assessing Progress in Global Learning andDevelopment of Students with Education Abroad Experiences,” Frontiers: The InterdisciplinaryJournal of Study Abroad, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 101–118, 2009.[2] I. Clarke, T. B. Flaherty, N. D. Wright, and R. M. McMillen, “Student InterculturalProficiency From Study Abroad Programs.” Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 31, no. 2, pp.173-181, 2009, doi: 10.1177/0273475309335583.[3] D. DeGraaf, C. Slagter, K. Larsen, and E. Ditta, “The Long-term Personal and ProfessionalImpacts of Participating in Study Abroad Programs,” Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal ofStudy Abroad, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 42–59, 2013.[4] D. K. Deardorff, “Identification and
imagination affected during the program? a. Which engineering research practices showed the most and least gains in self- efficacy across the program? b. What community building elements supported the mode of imagination? 2. To what extent did alignment to the practices change over the program? 3. How was the mode of engagement affected during the program? a. To what extent did participants engage in each engineering research practice? b. How did engagement happen for the most and least aligned practices and what community building elements were involved?Context and ParticipantsThe context of this study is a research experience for undergraduates (REU) program designedaround the ERM model of
found between any of these group designations.Entering GPA: Students accepted into the program have a wide range of GPAs, ranging from2.3-4.0. Almost half of accepted students have GPAs in the 2.3-3.3 range (C+ to B+ students).We did not find a significant difference between entering GPAs for those who left STEM (n =21, m = 3.40) and those who stayed in STEM (n = 149, m = 3.39); t (168)= -.54, p = 0.96. SeeFigure 3 for a graphical comparison. Figure 3. GPA of those who left STEM and those who Comparison persisted in STEM, N = 182 of GPAs of Akamai 4 N.S., p = .96 interns upon acceptance. No significant 3 difference in GPA was found
insulation may interchanged). The pre-and post-course surveys that will be used are provided in Appendix B. Table 3. Evaluation Plan Outcome or intention: Assessment or evaluation: Collaboratively design an Student designs will be evaluated using rubrics. Design innovative tiny house that serves as outcomes will differ for each affiliated course (e.g., a learning space and as a showcase models, drawings, presentations, calculations). of best practices related to Innovation is included as a component of the sustainable design and construction. evaluation rubric for each course. A sample project description, including rubrics, for
specifically and campus more broadly,and led to the creation of a network on individuals with a shared ethos of innovation. Thisprocess of a scalable program from co-curricular events focused on technology is on that can bemodeled at other institutions.References[1] K. Gama, B. Alencar Gonçalves, & P. Alessio, “Hackathons in the formal learning process.”in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in ComputerScience Education 2018(pp. 248-253).[2] E.A. Kolog, E. Sutinen, & E. Nygren, “Hackathon for Learning Digital Theology inComputer Science.” International Journal of Modern Education & Computer Science, 8(6),2016.[3] A. Herala, & O. Drögehorn, “Hackathons in software engineering education: lessons
design projects andexperiential learning in the makerspace while growing the overall sense of community.Considering these strategies, this research study addresses the following questions. 1. How has the demographics, in terms of student major, gender identity, and racial identity changed over the first three years of use? 2. To what extent have these three strategies, and the initiatives they spawned, impacted that change? a. Early exposure b. Structured learning opportunities c. Marketing and communicationBackgroundFirst opened in the spring of 2017, the Anderson Student Innovation Labs at the University ofMinnesota are a set of makerspaces designed to give the people in the College of Science
following student outcomes. (Note effective with the 2019-2020accreditation cycle, the new ABET EAC Criterion 3 Student Outcomes will replace the a-koutcomes.) (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical
Awareness and Training through a Multidisciplinary OSINT Course Project Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2— 34367[2] Carpenter, A. (2018, June), A Hardware Security Curriculum and its Use for Evaluation of Student Understanding of ECE Concepts Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2—29688[3] Whipple, A., & Smith, K. B., & Rowe, D. C., & Moses, S. (2015, June), Building a Vulnerability Testing Lab in an Educational Environment Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.23640[4] Dvorak, R., Dillon H., Ralston, N., Welch
, pp. 259–286, 2006.[2] E. Wenger, Communities of practice learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008.[3] J. Rogers, “Communities of practice: A framework for fostering coherence in virtual learning communities,” Educational Technology and Society, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 384–392, 2000.[4] M. D. P. Dempsey, C. Barry, and J. Mead, “A Student-Directed Professional Development Program for Doctoral Students Seeking Industry Placement,” in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 2013, vol. 23, p. 1.[5] J. A. Donnell, B. M. Aller, M. Alley, and A. A. Kedrowicz, “Why Industry Says That Engineering Graduates Have Poor Communication Skills: What the Literature Says,” in 2011 ASEE Annual
, vol. 92, no. 4,pp. 325-328, 2003/10/01 2003, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00776.x.[4] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020,” 2018. [Online].Available: https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/E001-19-20-EAC-Criteria-11-24-18.pdf [Accessed: 2-February-2019].[5] Wilson, S.A. "Understanding the gap between communication in the classroom andcommunication during an industrial internship." In Proceedings of the American Society forEngineering Education 2019 Annual Conference, Tampa, FL. (2019).[6] Howe, M. M., & Dwyer, K. K. (2007). The influence of diaphragmatic breathing to reducesituational anxiety for basic course students. Basic Communication Course Annual, 19(1), 9.[7] Rubin, R. B., Rubin, A. M
Annual Frontiers in Education, Boston, MA, 2002.[19] D. E. Giles and J. Eyler, “The theoretical roots of service-learning in John Dewey: Toward a theory of service-learning,” Serv. Learn. Gen., vol. 150, 1994.[20] J. Dewey, Democracy and education. New York: Collier Books, 1916.[21] M. McCall, “Leadership development through experience,” Acad. Manag., vol. 18, no. 3, 2004.[22] B. Banach, E. Foden, and V. Brooks Carter, “Educating undergraduate group workers: Increasing confidence through experiential learning,” Soc. Work Groups, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 158–170, 2019.[23] Center of Inquiry in the LIberal Arts at Wabash College, “Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education: High-impact practices and experiences from the Wabash
Paper ID #22462Integrating Design Thinking into an Experiential Learning Course for Fresh-man Engineering StudentsDr. Mark J. Povinelli, Syracuse University Dr. Mark Povinelli is the Kenneth A. and Mary Ann Shaw Professor of Practice in Entrepreneurial Lead- ership in the College of Engineering and Computer Science and the Whitman School of Management at Syracuse University where he is developing and teaching curriculum in innovation and entrepreneurship. Dr. Povinelli current research interests and curriculum development are in experiential team learning approaches to engineering education focused on design thinking
] P. Deshpande, C. B. Lee, and I. Ahmed, “Evaluation of Peer Instruction for Cybersecurity Education,” in Proceedings of the SIGCSE Conference, 2019.[9] F. Ning, W. Cong, J. Qiu, J. Wei, and S. Wang, “Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 80, pp. 369–378, 2015.[10] J. M. D. Hill, C. A. Carver, J. W. Humphries, and U. W. Pooch, “Using an isolated network laboratory to teach advanced networks and security,” in Proceedings of the thirty- second SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE ’01, 2001, pp. 36–40.[11] D. Dasgupta, D. M. Ferebee, and Z. Michalewicz, “Applying Puzzle-Based
physicalworld. At the end of each virtual lab, the software generates a PDF report, which for eachmeasurement it captures the state of the instrument (how off-level it was) and the truemeasurement versus observed ones. This information is then used by the instructor and studentsto reflect on mistakes made and discuss alternative surveying approaches to improve surveyingprocedures followed by the students in the future.Figure 1. Differential leveling using virtual reality. (a) user in wearing the HMD and managingthe controls; (b) leveling the rod; (c) leveling the differential level instrument; (d) making ameasurement of the rod.The virtual environments are based on the campus where students often complete their physicallabs [3], but we also offer off
Paper ID #25518Preparing Engineering Students for their Profession - A Novel CurricularApproachProf. Joel Howell, University of South Florida Joel Howell is a Professor of Practice in the University of South Florida’s Electrical Engineering De- partment. His focus is to help every student within the department develop skills and competencies through experiential learning activities, including community service, involvement in student organiza- tions, internships/co-ops, undergraduate research, and study abroad programs. Prior to joining USF, Joel served as an Advanced Programs Engineer and Business Development Manager for
Paper ID #28792A Design Thinking Approach to Increasing Student Efficacy in theInternship Search ProcessDr. Katherine McConnell, University of Colorado Boulder Katherine McConnell is a Senior Professional Development Advisor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her work focuses on the integration of experiential learning, industry connections, and career-oriented education across the curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Design Thinking Approach to Increasing Student Efficacy in the
cohort of senior students, but will in the next academic year (Fall 2021–Spring 2022).C. Campus Shutdown Spring–Fall 2020About halfway through the semester, MIT announced that the campus will shut down and that allSpring classes will take place remotely. In addition, grades for classes for the spring semesterwere changed to pass/fail only. II. Pivot to Remote Teaching: Spring–Fall 2020This section covers (a) the program’s immediate response to campus shutdown and the pivot toemergency remote teaching from March 30th, 2020 and through the Spring 2020 semester, and(b) its planned response to remote teaching in Fall 2020. We describe the program-wideresponse, as well as the individual response of each program thread.A
Paper ID #25407Examining the Relationship of Active Team-based Learning and Technologyand Engineering Students’ Research Self-efficacy in a Cybersecurity Trainee-ship ClassDr. Rylan C. Chong, Chaminade University Dr. Rylan Chong is a data scientist in the Division of Natural Sciences and Mathematics at Chaminade University of Honolulu. He earned his bachelor’s degree in Computer Science from Chaminade University of Honolulu. Dr. Chong has a master’s degree from Purdue University in Information Security. He specialized in biometric systems and human factors during his master’s degree. Dr. Chong completed his Doctor of
Paper ID #29095Longitudinal Study to Develop and Evaluate the Impacts of a”Transformational” Undergraduate ECE Design Program: Study ResultsandBest Practices ReportDr. Rachael E Cate, Oregon State University Rachael Cate: Dr. Rachael Cate received her MA in rhetoric and composition from Oregon State Univer- sity in 2011 and her Ph.D. in Higher Education Leadership and Research from Oregon State University in 2016. She joined the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Oregon State University as a member of the professional faculty in 2016. In this role, she provides engineering communications