Paper ID #41805Board #444 - Professional Practice Experiences of Collegiate Rising ScholarsStudents—A Work-in-ProgressMs. Grace Lynn Baldwin Kan-uge Grace Baldwin, joined the Rising Scholar NSF S-STEM program in the Summer of 2017 as a Graduate Research Assistant. She completed her Bachelor of Science, Master’s, and Docterate of Philosophy at Purdue University in Agricultural and Biological Engineering (ABE).Dr. Carol S. Stwalley, Purdue University Dr. Carol S. Stwalley, PE joined the Minority Engineering Program team in the fall of 2007 as Recruitment and Retention Analyst. She earned her Bachelor of Science in Agriculture
science calculations and design considerations. We hypothesize that theprocess of reflection and iteration inherent to hackathon competitions will strengthen theparticipant groups’ perceived EJ skills. Finally, engineering leadership (EL) skills relate to theleadership style(s) used by individuals to lead groups of engineers to achieve a common goal. Aneffective leader exercises influence at interpersonal, team, and organizational levels, whilesimultaneously building strong relationships. We hypothesize that in the absence of a well-structured project, the need to delegate tasks among team members and develop solutionsquickly will increase the perceived EL abilities of participant groups.To frame this study, we will use the Buck Institute of
Hispanic Higher Education, 20(3), 297-312. 4. Prescott, A., Coupland, M., Angelini, M., & Schuck, S. (2020). Making School Maths Engaging: The Maths Inside Project. Springer. 5. Tobias, S. (1998). Anxiety and mathematics. Harvard Education Review, 50, 63–70. 6. Balfanz, R., & Byrnes, V. (2006). Closing the mathematics achievement gap in high- poverty middle schools. J. of Ed. for Students Placed at Risk, 11(2), 143-159. 7. Rowan‐Kenyon, H. T., Swan, A. K., & Creager, M. F. (2012). Social cognitive factors, support, and engagement: early adolescents’ math interests as precursors to choice of career. The Career Development Quarterly, 60(1), 2-15. 8. Bursal, M., & Paznokas, L. (2006). Mathematics
. (2021). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. ABET. https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/2022-23-EAC-Criteria.pdfBland, L., Kusano, S., & Johri, A. (2016). Engineering Competitions as Pathways to Development of Professional Engineering Skills. 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 26629. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.26629Burt, B. A., Carpenter, D. D., Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S., Sutkus, J., Holsapple, M., Bielby, R., & Ra, E. (2011). Outcomes of engaging engineering undergraduates in co-curricular experiences. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86117Carberry, A. R., Lee, H.-S., & Swan, C. W. (2013). Student
impact on improving student understanding ofspecific course concepts. However, these results counter that of Leininger-Frézal andSprenger [19], who find the use of a VFT did help to enhance student understanding.Common between ours and Dada, et al. [15]’s results are a high percentage (>75%) ofagreement to the pre-survey statement, and thus it is more difficult to make a meaningfulimprovement on student understanding.Comparatively, the remaining 4 statements showed significant differences between pre- andpost-DST survey results (p < 0.05). Observations from Figure 3 in conjunction with this dataimplies the DST was ineffective in assisting students to develop problem solving skills,enabling teamwork, and improving their ability to
results will provide insights into howthese experiences can positively impact students' professional journeys. ReferencesABET (2023). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs (2024-2025). https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/2024-2025_EAC_Criteria.pdfAnderson, K. J. B., Courter, S. S., McGlamery, T., Nathans-Kelly, T. M., & Nicometo, C. G. (2010). Understanding engineering work and identity: A cross-case analysis of engineers within six firms. Journal of Engineering Studies, 2 (3), 153-174.Arthur, B., Guy, B., Armitage, E., LaBarre, M., & O'Connor, S. (2022). "Difficult but worth it": Exploring the Experiences of Women in
not necessarily reflect the views of the Natural ScienceFoundation of China.REFERENCES[1] C. K. Y. Chan and K. K. W. Lee, “Constructive alignment between holistic competency developmentand assessment in Hong Kong engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 2,pp.437-457, 2021.[2] N. D. Q. Nguyen, “The essential skills and attributes of an engineer: A comparative study ofacademics, industry personnel and engineering students,” Global J. of Engng. Educ, vol. 2, no. 1, pp.65-75, 1998.[3] E. Krylov and S. Devyaterikov, “Developing students’ cognitive skills in MMS classes,” STEMEducation, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 28-42, 2023.[4] M. Pinho-Lopez, M. and J. Macedo, “ Project-based learning to promote higher order thinking
between individual predispositions and thetransformative potential of these programs.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.NSF-EEC #2106229. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] R. Vandeveer and M. L. Menefee, “Study abroad, international internship and experiential learning: A world-class adventure in learning,” in Decision Sciences Institute Southwest Region (SWDSI), 2006.[2] S. Shandilya, S. Y. Yoon, G. Raju, and C. A. Kwuimy, “Engineering Students’ Transformative Learning Experiences from A Virtual
., Zwicky, D., & Van Epps, A. S. (2024). A scoping review of engineering education systematic reviews. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(4), 818– 837. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20549[6] ASEE (2024). https://peer.asee.org/[7] Gunn, C. (2000, June), Utilizing Co Op To Further Liberal Education Within Engineering Paper presented at 2000 Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri. 10.18260/1-2--8828[8] Anderson, A., & Lee-Thomas, G. (2000, June), Assessing Cooperative Education Through The Lens Of Abet Outcomes Paper presented at 2000 Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri. 10.18260/1-2--8172[9] Wilding, K., & Grossman, C., & Hundley, S., & Fox, P. (2001, June), An International Cooperative Education
help them form theirpersonal narratives as they prepare for interviews and careers after graduation, and as generalengagement grows, students will gain self-awareness of their professional skills and be able tobetter communicate them to employers.References[1] J. H. Callewaert, J. M. Millunchick, C. S. E. Woodcock, K. C. Jiang, and S. Edington, “Developing a Framework for Experiential Learning,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jun. 2020. Accessed: Jan. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/developing-a-framework-for-experiential-learning[2] J. H. Callewaert, J. M. Millunchick, C. S. E. Jamison, and K. C. Jiang, “Assessing and Communicating Professional Competency Development
initiative.References[1] A. M. McAlister, S. Lilly, R. Bailey, and J. L. Chiu, “The Many Roles of an Engineering Graduate Student: Exploring How Graduate Students Identify with the Multiple Roles They Assume,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1307– 1327, 2022.[2] D. F. Feldon et al., “Graduate Students’ Teaching Experiences Improve Their Methodological Research Skills,” Science, vol. 333, no. 6045, pp. 1037–1039, Aug. 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204109.[3] K. McGoldrick, G. Hoyt, and D. Colander, “The Professional Development of Graduate Students for Teaching Activities: The Students’ Perspective,” The Journal of Economic
ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Feb. 13, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/the-moocibl-platform-a-custom-made-software- solution-to-track-the-innovation-process-with-blockchain-learning-tokens[4] E. M. Swartz, R. Striker, L. Singelmann, E. A. Vazquez, M. Pearson, and S. S. Ng, “Innovating Assessment: Using Innovative Impact as a Metric to Evaluate Student Outcomes in an Innovation-Based Learning Course,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Feb. 13, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/innovating-assessment-using-innovative-impact-as-a-metric-to- evaluate-student-outcomes-in-an-innovation-based-learning
Annual Conference, Paper ID #38418, Baltimore, June, 2023. 8. Park, Y. S., Wu, S. S., Effectiveness of High-Impact Practices (HIPS) in an Engineering Course, in the Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper ID #24738, Tampa, June, 2019.9. Henderson, T. S. Exploring the Post-graduation Benefits of High-Impact Practices in Engineering: Implications for Retention and Advancement in Industry, in the Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper ID #19263, New Orleans, 2017.10. Gagliardi, J. S., Martin, R. R., Wise, K., Blaic, C., The System Effect: Scaling High- Impact Practices Across Campuses, New Directions For Higher Education, no. 169, Spring 2015. DOI: 10.1002/he.2011911. Jennifer R. Keup, J. R
findings.References[1] United States, Executive Office of the President [Joseph Biden]. Executive Order #14008:Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad, 27 January 2021. Federal Register, vol. #86,7619-7633[2] M.H. Nguyen, S. Laderman, K. Heckert, J.J. Ramirez, The MSI Data Project full data set(06142023; Version 2) [Data set]. The Minority Serving Institutions Data Project, 2023.[3] J.A. Martinez, K.J. Sher, J.L. Krull, & P.K. Wood, Blue‐collar scholars?: Mediators andmoderators of university attrition first‐generation college students. Journal of College StudentDevelopment, 50(1), 87‐103, 2009.[4] E.M.J. Fischer, Selling into campus life: Differences by race/ethnicity in college involvementand outcomes. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(2), 125
Evaluation (-PE), which informs program administration. The student survey (S-)consists of four categories of questions, detailed in Appendix A: SSB, SCP, SPC and SPE. Thementor survey (M-) consists of three categories, Appendix B: MCP, MPC and MPE.Responses to questions use either a numerical five-point Likert scale or are open-endedresponse-based. The intern surveys are administered at the beginning, midpoint, and end of theinternship period. Mentor surveys are administered at the midpoint and end. Midpoint surveyshave fewer questions, and mainly serve as a check-in point. The majority of the SB, CP and PCquestions are posed at the beginning and end points of the internship period. Some CP questionsare posed only at the end point. PE questions are
, Jun. 2021.[5] E. Douglas, G. Dietz, and E. McCray, “A narrative exploration of the in/authentic experiences of Black engineering interns (Work in Progress),” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[6] E. Anderson, K. Williams, L. Ponjuan, H. T. Frierson, and others, “The 2018 status report on engineering education: A snapshot of diversity in degrees conferred in engineering,” 2018.[7] J. Brooks, “Why Should I Care About Diversity in Engineering?,” National Society of Professional Engineers, Jul. 2020. https://www.nspe.org/resources/pe-magazine/july- 2020/why-should-i-care-about-diversity-engineering (accessed Feb. 10, 2023).[8] S. Brown, L. Flick, and K. Williamson, “Social capital in engineering
-Spencer, and K. Frias, “The Role of Mentorship in StudentPreparation for Impactful Internships,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Aug.2022.[2] A. Lozano-Nieto, “Internship Experiences in Biomedical Engineering Technology: AnOverview of Students and Prospective Employers Perceptions,” in 1998 ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, Jun. 1998.[3] E. Kramer-Simpson, “Moving from Student to Professional: Industry Mentors and AcademicInternship Coordinators Supporting Intern Learning in the Workplace,” Journal of TechnicalWriting and Communication, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 81–103, May 2016.[4] M. F. Cox, O. Cekic, and S. G. Adams, “Developing Leadership Skills of UndergraduateEngineering Students: Perspectives from Engineering Faculty,” Journal
sixqualitative questions focused on defining the role of professors and facilitators in the work-basedengineering program of focus. Demographic information was also obtained. All study procedureswere approved by the Minnesota State University, Mankato Institutional Review Board (IRB).The focus of the sub-study was to answer the following research question: how do professors,facilitators, directors, and students perceive the complementary nature of the professor andfacilitator roles? In order to determine the answer to this question, the responses from students(“S”, n=15), professors (“P”, n=7), facilitators (“F”, n=7), and directors (“D”, n=1) for thefollowing questions were examined: ● What does the interaction of professors and facilitators look
engineer.DiscussionThe results of this study and [Program X]’s co-op-based learning model continue to support thepositive outcomes of co-op experiences on engineering identity and sense of belonging. Themeans for all sub-groups were higher than 5.2 (out of 6), and the qualitative analysis yieldedmany statements about the positive effect of co-op experiences. Students stated that workingaround other engineers and being recognized as an engineer by others had a large impact on theirconfidence, identity as an engineer, and sense of belonging. This aligns with previous work onthe value of developing students’ identity and belonging to an engineering community [11], [12].This quantitative analysis of survey responses showed no difference between the
, the findings fromthis work will inform a second pilot semester. In terms of research, future work will compareacross students who participated in the intervention and students who remained at the maincampus.References[1] S. Lavado-Anguera, P.J. Velasco-Quintana, and M.J. Terrón-López, “Project-Based Learning (PBL) as an Experiential Pedagogical Methodology in Engineering Education: A Review of the Literature,” Education Sciences, 14(6), 617, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14060617[2] S. Atwood, M. Siniawski, and A. Carberry, “Using Standards-based Grading to Effectively Assess Project-based Design Courses,” 2014, doi: 10.18260/1-2--23278.[3] Atwood, S. A., & Scalaro, K., & Holcombe, R., “Work-in-Progress: Seizing failure as
; Manuel Toledo Quispe, P. (2022). Strategy Diagram of Active Research in Practice and Research in Higher Education Students. NeuroQuantology 20(5), 554–560. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2022.20.5.NQ22208Farrell, C. C., Penuel, W. R., Allen, A., Anderson, E. R., Bohannon, A. X., Coburn, C. E., & Brown, S. L. (2022). Learning at the boundaries of Research and Practice: A Framework for Understanding Research–Practice Partnerships. Educational Researcher, 51(3), 197– 208. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x211069073Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.Hu, M., Cleland, S., & Burt, S. (2019). Build up a constructivist learning environment for
,” 2023. Accessed: May 26, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf23315/report/the-stem-workforce#representation-in-the-stem-w orkforce[3] Board on Science Education, Board on Higher Education and Workforce, National Academy of Engineering, and National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Imagining the Future of Undergraduate STEM Education: Proceedings of a Virtual Symposium. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2022, p. 26314. doi: 10.17226/26314.[4] Z. Wilson-Kennedy, G. S. Byrd, E. Kennedy, and H. T. Frierson, Broadening Participation in Stem: Effective Methods, Practices, and Programs. Bingley, UNITED KINGDOM: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2019. Accessed: Feb. 04, 2023. [Online
21st Century,” J. Exp. Educ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 91–98, 1999.[2] J. Cantor, “Experiential Learning in Higher Education: Linking Classroom and Community,” 1995.[3] R. Graham, “The Global State of the Art in Engineering Education,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2018. Accessed: Oct. 04, 2018. [Online]. Available: file://engin-storage.m.storage.umich.edu/engin- storage/jcallew/windat.v2/Documents/Conferences/ASEE/2019/MIT_NEET_GlobalStateE ngineeringEducation2018.pdf[4] L. Harrisberger, “Experiential Learning in Engineering Education,” ERIC Clearinghouse, 1976.[5] D. R. Fisher, A. Bag, and S. Sarma, “Developing Professional Skills in Undergraduate Engineering Students Through Cocurricular
and how these interactions benefitprofessionals. Open-ended responses will be thoroughly examined using qualitative analysissoftware, like NVivo, to conduct a detailed thematic and sentiment analysis to gain deeperinsights into student feedback.References[1] Douglas, E. P., & Jordan, S. S., & Lande, M., & Bumbaco, A. E. (2015, June), ArtifactElicitation as a Method of Qualitative Inquiry in Engineering Education Paper presented at 2015ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.23574[2] Rogers, Courtney & Valdez, Rupa. (2021). Designing for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion inSystems Engineering Education. 10.18260/1-2--36929.[3] Landis, R. B. (1997, June), Enhancing Engineering Student Success: A
as tensions between student and staff, as well as betweenpolicy and pedagogy [15]. In this practice paper, we incorporate the findings of studies [10] [11][12] [13] [14] [15] into the careful design and implementation of the SIG program, whichleverage the ample resources in the Inno Wing. We also adopt the SaP method in SIGs andestablish clear governance structure, finance principles, and development programs.The Student-initiated Interest Group (SIG) programGovernance structureThe SIG program adopts a Student as Partners (SaP) approach, which begins with consultationservice aimed at assisting developing teams in uniting the commitment of five parties: studentleader(s), student teammates, academic advisor(s), technical advisor(s), and host
duration of the ten-week program. REFERENCES[1] L. Hong, and S. E. Page, "Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers," Economic Sciences, vol. 101, no. 46, pp. 16385-16389.[2] A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy," in Encyclopedia of human behavior, vol. 4, V. S. Ramachaudran Ed. New York: Academic Press, 1994, pp. 71-81.[3] A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy: Toward a unifiying theory of behavioral change," Psychological Review vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191-215, 1977.[4] A. Bandura, "Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales," Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 307-337, 2006.[5] R. Scherer and F. Siddiq, "Revisiting teachers
objectives for the course included an ability for each student to a) apply academicknowledge and engineering skills to a real-world problem, b) develop a project scope, majorproject deliverables, and a project schedule, c) practice the fundamentals of the engineering designprocess to develop a solution(s) to an industry-defined project challenge, d) create a solution whichmeets design requirements and standards set by the industry client, e) develop skills for effectiveteam collaboration, f) develop skills for effective communication, both written and verbal, tocomplete technical and work-related projects, f) develop professional skills by interactingfrequently with peers and engineers from industry.Though the course provided many essential academic
elaborate that how this program was received by industryliaison, and how alumni of the program evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the SEEcourses.References:[1] D. Spang, “Curriculum design and assessment to address the industry skills gap,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2020.[2] M. Menekse, X. Zheng, and S. Anwar, “Computer science students’ perceived needs for support and their academic performance by gender and residency: An exploratory study,” Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1025–1044, Jan. 2020.[3] “To infinity and beyond: Taking on the grand challenges of education in the new space age.” [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/to