The University of New Mexico – Albuquerque Copyright © 2008, American Society for Engineering Education Courses/Topics ABET Criterion 3 ABET Program CriterionDEPT Courses a b c d e f g h i j k PC.1 PC.2 PC.3 PC.4 PC.5201 X X X X X301 X X X X X X302 X X X X X X X303 X X X X X X X X XRequired Topics a b c d e f g h i j k PC.1 PC.2
timing plan will bethe basis for Scenario IV-(b).Scenario IV-(b) will strive to have longer, more realistic intervals to increase the intersection’sperformance. MOE’s for this scenario will once again be tabulated. It is anticipated that in thiscase the intersection will be operating rather optimally. To create another scenario there will bea shift in volumes, e.g. twice the volume E-W than N-S, while maintaining the same signaltiming plan - this will be Scenario IV-(c).At the end of all the scenarios, the MOEs from each will be compared to provide both aqualitative and quantitative measure of how different means of controlling an intersectionperform. The instructors will emphasize the use of a traffic signal, and provide the take-homemessage
AC 2009-2543: IN-CLASS PEER TUTORING: A COST-EFFECTIVE MODEL FORENGINEERING INSTRUCTIONShane Brown, Washington State UniversityCara Poor, Washington State University Page 14.714.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 In-Class Peer Tutoring: A Cost-Effective Model for Engineering InstructionAbstractThe in-class experience in engineering education has not changed significantly in the last 100years, although some instructors are attempting to replace didactic teaching with active learningtechniques. Despite its promise, the impact of active learning can be limited due to the lack ofsocial learning resources, such as
Methods for Successful Product Engineering”, Addison-Wesley, New York, 1991.2. Gallois, B. and Jain, R, “Introducing ‘Total Design’ in an Engineering Design Course: A Pilot Experience”, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Chicago, June 2006, Session 1425.3. Sheppard, K and Gallois, B., “The Design Spine: Revision of the Engineering Curriculum to Include a Design Experience each Semester”, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Charlotte, North Carolina, June 1999, Session 3225.4 Streveler, R. A., Nelson, M. A., Miller, R. L., Olds, B. M., Evans, D. L., Mitchell, J., Martin, J., Investigating the Conceptual Understanding of Engineering Students
Michigan State University in 2000. Professor Raymer has led an NSF supported research project to develop the nation's first undergraduate curriculum in bioinformatics, and has been a finalist for the CECS Excellence in Teaching Award at Wright State University.David Reynolds, Wright State University DAVID B. REYNOLDS is an Associate Professor in the Department of Biomedical, Industrial and Human Factors Engineering at Wright State University. He received his Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Virginia in 1978. Professor Reynolds has conducted NSF supported research to develop human factors engineering undergraduate design projects for persons with disabilities, and has
. Figure 2. Most common student prediction of deflected shape. (a) (b) Figure 3. Actual deflected shape once instructor applies load to the model in the classroom. (a) If students predict right end will go down, instructor creates this situation. (b) If students predict right end will go up, instructor creates this situation.The instructor then introduces the concept of metacognition. Since their prediction didnot work out well, they should reflect on why they thought it was a good prediction.There was something they assumed or had previously experienced that suggested theirprediction; what was it? Why was their assumption poor, or why did their previousexperience not serve well in this
incorporated: (a) active student learning, (b) team-based approach to teaching, (c)computer-based technological resources in the lesson, (d) the engineering design process, and/or(e) the inquiry approach to teaching and learning science.The overarching aim of the three-year PISA program is to: (a) demonstrate and institutionalizewithin participating schools a methodology, supporting curriculum materials, and otherinstructional resources and strategies to increase student interest, engagement, and achievementin science, mathematics, engineering, and technology and further, to (b) promote a culture ofinventiveness and creativity that calls upon students to demonstrate 21st century workforce skills
analyze the J-hook(recounted above) had difficulty in even beginning the problem. To exclude a force, even onethat appears to be irrelevant, is to surrender an important opportunity for the instructor tocultivate the complete understanding of the problem at hand.Next, we found that nearly all textbooks frequently exclude units, especially in intermediatecalculations, although usually they are attached to the final answer (see Appendix B, Figure B3).Repetitious inclusion of the units, accompanied by emphatic comments, provides a valuableopportunity for the educator to lead the students to realize that units reveal insights and specialproperties of the underlying mechanics. Students who develop the habit to consider and includeunits will be more
Test 4 [ t (1,42) 2.52 , p .05 ]. Although the difference for the Page 15.1338.7Final Exam is not statistically significant, the corresponding letter grade for the Final Exam wasa “B” for the 2006 class, and a “C” for 2005 class.Table 2. Comparison of Circuits student performance for Spring 2006 and Spring 2005. Experimental Comparison DifferenceCategories Spring 2006 (ILN) Spring 2005 (non-ILN) N=41 N=28Quiz Average 4.7 3.4 1.3*(out of 5)Homework Average
2006-712: ESTABLISHING HYDROGEN FUEL CELL EDUCATION IN THE HIGHSCHOOLRoss McCurdy, Ponaganset High School Ross McCurdy received a B.A. in Biology and M.Ed. from Rhode Island College and is currently teaching Chemistry, Biology, and Fuel Cell classes at Ponaganset High School in Glocester, Rhode Island. An advocate of renewable energy and founder of the Fuel Cell Education Initiative, he strives to bring unique and exciting learning opportunities to students that effectively demonstrate renewable energy technologies. Page 11.596.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006
2006-2674: USING INTERACTIVE ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN THE CLASSROOMGary Moe, U.S. Air Force Academy Lieutenant Colonel Gary P. Moe is an Assistant Professor at the United States Air Force Academy. Lt Col Moe received a B.S. degree from the University of California in 1976 and an M.S. degree in Aeronautical Engineering from the Air Force Institute of Technology in 1984. gary.moe@usafa.af.mil Page 11.1391.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Using Interactive Assessment Tools in the ClassroomAbstractResearch continues to show the most common instructional technique, the lecture, is
Mr. Hill is the Director of Undergraduate Recruitment for the College of Engineering at the University of Arkansas. He manages the college-wide recruitment operation and directs the engineering summer programs.Edgar Clausen, University of Arkansas Dr. Clausen currently serves as Professor, Associate Department Head and the Ray C. Adam Endowed Chair in Chemical Engineering at the University of Arkansas. His research interests include bioprocess engineering (fermentations, kinetics, reactor design, bioseparations, process scale-up and design), gas phase fermentations, and the production of energy and chemicals from biomass and waste. Dr. Clausen is a registered professional engineer