system setting.C. Collaborative Remote Computer Networks Lab7 This is another interactive remote computer networks laboratory, where many users cancollaborate on a single experiment. In this design, real-time collaboration between severalstudents is enabled by using Microsoft ConferenceXP Client. Unlike the system designed atMTSU, lab routers are connected via their console lines to a terminal server (see subsection IV-B), and thus can be accessed even if their configuration is incorrect. However, the maindrawback in this design is that students can only work on predefined topologies and cannot builda network topology remotely.III. Internetworking Lab Overview The internetworking laboratory at AUB aims at showing how computer networking
to be coupled witheach other in a manner that transportation requirements may be met. The springs are to be usedin the design of the mechanisms to satisfy the required modes/configurations of the modulesduring their: a) transport, b) expansion, and c) the final intended geometry. For full details of thescenario and the activity, refer to Appendix “A”.If there are to be four (4) groups of students [comprised of three (3) or four (4) members] forconducting the experiment, each group will collect data on only one of the sample sets. Eachgroup will then share the results of their measurements with the other groups. In this process,each group has established an average “K” value for “each and all” of the 25 springs in oneassigned set. Since five
SoftwareWCM 609 - Radio Systems ModelingWCM 612 - Wireless Economics TopicsWCM 611A - Master’s Research Project I (Prerequisites: all ten courses)WCM 611B - Master’s Research Project II (Prerequisite: WCM 611A)WCM611 A & B Master’s Research Project Class StructureThe Master’s Research Project at the end of the program requires students to integrate what theyhave learned across the program by completing a research project in a specific area relevant tothe field of wireless communications. This is a three month project. All students are required toenroll in the project classes. During the first month, students select their project partners andform small groups (two to four students per group). Each group conducts extensive research toselect an
Page 11.1135.7 for enabling control and data acquisition with respect to the new experiment.References[1] C. L. Bohus, A. Crowl, B. Aktan, and M. H. Shor, “Running control engineering experiments over the internet,” in Proceedings of the 13th IFAC World Congress, (San Francisco, CA), 1996. paper no. 4c-03.[2] M. L. Corradini, G. Ippoliti, T. Leo, and S. Longhi, “An internet based laboratory for control education,”in Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, (Orlando, FL), December 2001.[3] S. E. Poindexter and B. S. Heck, “Using the web in your courses: What can you do? what should you do?,” IEEE Control System, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 83–92, 1999.[4] A. Gupta, M. A. Gabr, and V. C. Matzen, “Alternatives in the
andFM receivers as part of their project-based learning experience. For the 2008 fallsemester project students studied, designed and implemented AM transmitters and AMreceivers. The main challenges that the students faced in the 2008 Project-based learningproject were: a) an AM transmitter or receiver design of their own, b) intensive study andresearch of AM modulators, oscillators, mixers, frequency multipliers and other RFcircuits, since electronic communication circuits are studied in detail a semester later in asecond electronic course and RF theory is introduced a year later in the Communicationcourse.Effects on student learning concerning the concepts and applications of the studiedelectronics components were measured during the semester
was supported through the National Science Foundation through theCAREER program (NSF9984896); the Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvementprogram (NSF0088279), and the Department Level Planning Grants for Engineering Education(NSF0230695). LASER CULT case studies are available on-line3, as are portfolios of studentwork8. The author acknowledges generous equipment donations from Melles Griot andThorlabs.Bibliography1 Committee on Optical Science and Engineering, Harnessing light: Optical science and engineering in the 21st century. (National Academy Press, Washington, D. C., 1998).2 S. B. Feichtner and E. A. Davis, "Why some groups fail: a survey of students' experiences with learning groups," J. Organ. Behav. Teaching Soc
AC 2009-1473: LEARNING MECHATRONICS THROUGH GRADUATEDEXPERIMENTATIONJohn Rogers, United States Military Academy John Rogers received the B. S. degree in aerospace and ocean engineering from Virginia Tech in 1986, and the M.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Montana State University in 1993, and his Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in 2003. Dr. Rogers is an Assistant Professor at the United States Military Academy. His research interests are design of mechatronic and robotic systems, and modeling of dynamic systems. Dr. Rogers is a registered professional engineer.Robert Rabb, United States Military AcademyChristopher Korpela, United States Military
interest while the instructor observed the students applying higher order thinking skillsto formulate, analyze, and generate a working solution for their projects [6, 7].In the fall semester of 2007, a second project experience was introduced into the 2 hour creditElectronics lab. This project had the following objectives:Provide students with the opportunity to: a) Apply the concepts learned from previous courses, especially Circuits I and II, b) Apply the concepts learned from their concurrent Electronics lectures and predefined lab experiments, and c) Challenge them to research, study and apply concepts from future course such as electronic communication circuits and RF
junction depth must beless than the diffusion length Lp of holes in the N material to allow holes generated nearthe surface to diffuse to the junction before they recombine. Similarly, the thickness ofthe P region must be such that the electrons generated in the P region can diffuse to thejunction before they recombine. b. Review of some photovoltaic production optionsThere are mainly two technology options for solar production: flat plate or concentrators.Flat plate technology includes crystalline silicon and thin films of various semiconductormaterials as well as organic polymers and nanomaterials. The concentrator technologyuses a system of lenses or reflectors to magnify and focus the incident solar illuminationsfor higher efficiencies1,2,3
kind of interaction with people and objectslikely to result in deep learning of STEM concepts and practices. Engagement is productive tothe extent that conceptual or practical progress on a problem is made over time. Finally,engagement is disciplinary when students use the discourse and practices of a specific STEMdiscipline in their work together.If Engle and Conant’s conjecture is accurate, the STEM learning environments that we describein this paper should foster productive disciplinary engagement by supporting “(a) problematizingsubject matter, (b) giving students authority to address such problems, (c) holding studentsaccountable to others and to shared disciplinary norms, and (d) providing students with relevantresources.”6 The pull of
EDuring th he 2008-20111 academicc years, the project wass offered sevveral times tto three diffferentcohorts anda by diffeerent instrucctors. The im mpact of thhe project w was assessedd through stuudentsurveys conducted c att the end off the course following thhe protocol aapproved byy the InstituttionalReview Board. B Addiitional data were drawn n from studeent reports. The data reeported heree (seeTable 1) are from a section not taught by an ny of the auuthors; insteaad the instruuctional materialsand hard dware were provided p to a different instructor aand his teachhing assistannt. Howeverr, theresults frrom surveyinng the authorrs' sections agree
implementation issues. Thisenvironment allowed for extensive experimentation, performance comparison, and developmentof several practical control algorithms. The combination of dSPACE DS1104 DSP andMATLAB/Simulink/RTW effectively created a rapid control prototype environment in whichstudents focused on control design rather than programming details or debugging controllanguages. In this way, the lab offers an unparalleled experience and is a great source of Page 11.498.11attracting students and exciting their interest.References 1. R. Molengraft, M. Steinbuch, and B. Karker, “Integrating Experimentation into Control Courses,” IEEE
), ability to plan and design a system, component orprocess that meets desired needs (abet c), ability to use techniques, skills, and modernengineering tools necessary for engineering practice, including computer tools and informationtechnology (abet k), and the ability to design and conduct experiments as well as to analyze andinterpret data (abet b).The course topics include computer aided structural analysis of trusses, structural design oftrusses, computer aided structural analysis of 2D-frames for gravity and lateral loads and loadcombinations, computer aided structural design of 2D-frames, setting up of an experiment on asmall shake table and dynamic experimentation, computer aided structural dynamic analysis withtime history, and verification
students completed severallab exercises and case studies. The following weekly labs were completed by students using theFedora Linux virtual machine: a. Installing and running Host-based Intrusion Detection System AIDE, a free replacement of Tripwire b. Installing and running Host-based Intrusion Detection System OSSEC c. Loadable-kernel-module rootkit detection d. Using packet capture and analysis tools Tcpdump and Wireshark (Ethereal) e. Traffic analysis of network scanning f. Installing and using Network-based Intrusion Detection System Snort g. Installing and using Basic Analysis and Security Engine (BASE) h. Installing and using Network Traffic Monitoring System IPAudit i. Installing and using Bro Intrusion Detection
the Engineering AccreditationCommission of ABET General Criterion 3, Student Outcomes, particularly student outcome b,“an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data”5. This challenge led us to develop an engineering-wide research course which exposes studentsto the research process in a structured, step-by-step manner. The main difference between thiscourse and a more traditional approach is that the research topic is initiated by the student withthe assistance of the class instructors. The student then performs each step of the researchprocess using their chosen topic. Because the student will have an inherent interest in theproblem they choose to solve, we anticipate the student will be exposed to
has a built-inrotation sensor that measures speed and distance thus allowing precise motor control within onedegree of accuracy. NXT Intelligent Brick includes two microcontrollers: one 32-bit ARM7microcontroller with 4 KB FLASH and 64 KB RAM, and one 8-bit AVR microcontroller with 4KB FLASH and 512 B RAM. Apart from a major change in microcontroller hardware, whencompared to the previous LEGO Mindstorms RIS 2.0 version, NXT has more memory, isBluetooth enabled, has an additional input port, has an 8-bit 12-16 KHz sample rate soundchannel with external speaker, and is MAC compatible. USB 2.0 port allows fast programtransfer. A quick-start program can get students started three times faster then with RIS 2.0.LEGO Mindstorms NXT is not
Science of Weights and Measures, 2005. Butler County Community College, P.O. Box 1203 • Butler, PA, 16003-1203.4. Metrology Education and Training – NCSLI Taking the Initiative, Cal Lab, The International Journal of Metrology, Oct-Nov-Dec 2007, C. Grachanen pp. 31-33. Article also included in The Standard, Vol. 21, No. 4, The Newsletter of the Measurement Quality Division, American Society for Quality, December 2007, C. Grachanen pp. 9-10.5. You Can Be a Metrology Ambassador! Metrologist, January 2008, C. Grachanen, pp. 22-24. Appendix B. Page 13.922.11Appendix A: Next Generation Education OutreachMeasurements
certainamount of asphalt after mechanical compaction. Figure 1 shows the aggregate for typicalasphalt mixture, different sizes of coarse aggregate in mixture after image processing, andasphalt mixture construction.a. Aggregate stockpile b. different aggregate size c. asphalt concrete construction Figure 1. Asphalt Mixture and ConstructionThe development of micromechanical models started about a hundred years ago,beginning by Voigt (1889), Einstein (1911), and Reuss (1929). During this time, anumber of research studies addressed micromechanical models with both non-interactingand interacting particles. In models with non-interacting particles, geometries were eitherspecified or not specified. Some simple micromechanical models
. Page 15.859.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Measurement of Hands-On AbilityIntroduction“Practical ingenuity,” according the National Academy of Engineering, is a necessary attributefor the engineer of 20201. Hands-on ability is considered an important characteristic of practicalingenuity2. Two of the ABET criteria address hands-on skills: ability to design and conductexperiments and interpret data (criteria b); and ability to use the techniques, skills, and modernengineering tools necessary for engineering practice (criteria k)3. Employers value hands-onability and routinely ask recruits about hands-on experiences outside of classes4. A “tinkeringdeficit” has also been identified that puts females
go in reverse, the light in the back of the robot will be turned on and the wheel on the top will start turning. (iii) While going in reverse, when the car crosses a dark line, it will stop, light will be turned off, wheel on top will stop turning and the first line of “Row Row Row your boat” will be played. (iv) If the bar in front of the car is pushed again, step (i) through (iii) will be repeated. Students are expected to submit a lab report explaining how each task has been translated into computer codes taking into account the physical arrangement of the robot’s components (wheels, arms, lights etc.) and data needed to activate them.(b) PC Turn 55 CNC lathe
considered to be a novelty1-5,nevertheless, each new application seems to present its own set of often-unexpected challenges.And this was what we experienced, which we now share with a wider audience. Page 14.1019.2 (a) (b) Figure 1: (a) Schematic of MEMS electrothermal actuator, (b) Image of MEMS electrothermal actuator and tip displacement measurement scaleII. Project Implementation DetailsThe equipment that was originally available to us in the MEMS research lab included: a KarlSuss model PM-4 microprobe station, a microscope, a video
engineering proposal consisting of a problem statement, project objectives, preliminary B.O.M and a plan of action. This is due one week after the project is assigned. 2. Project Progress Updates: The students provide a weekly update to the instructor and their team either via email or through pre-scheduled meetings. Altogether 9 updates are required. In these updates the teams are required to communicate the following: a. What happened the past week? b. What will happen this week? c. What are the major issues the team is facing? 3. Project Report: At the end of the term the teams submit a comprehensive project report. This report provides the details of how the project is executed. It
Circuit AnalysisCourse in a General Engineering Curriculum”, Proceedings of the Annual Conference of theAmerican Society for Engineering Education, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 20114 ABET, inc.; Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs;http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents- UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2009-10%20EAC%20Criteria%2012-01-08.pdf; Last accessed 1/12/155 Bidanda, B. and R.E. Billo, “On the Use of Students for Developing Engineering Laboratories”,Journal of Engineering Education, April 19956 O’Connell, Robert, M. Moore and K. Zimmershied, “Using Student Projects to DevelopLaboratory Experiments for the Power Electronics Course”, Proceedings of the AnnualConference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Pittsburgh, PA
students to collectinformation about the course. Moreover, during the Fall 2015 semester, survey data wascollected from the students following each of the lab experiments. The lab benches for theexperiments as well as the USRP equipment from NI are illustrated in Figure 1. (a) Lab benches with USRPs. (b) USRP from National Instruments. Figure 1 Lab benches for experiments with USRPs, and a closer view of USRP SDR from National Instruments. The course involves two components: In-class lecturing (two 75 minute sessions perweek), and bi-weekly lab experiments. The students are grouped in pairs. There are a total of 5lab experiments that the students need to finish. Each lab
level of uncertainty. Metrology regulations form the basis for national andinternational trade—we trust that a gallon of gas sold at gas station A is the same quantity as agallon of gas obtained down the road at gas station B, mainly because we know that legalmetrological requirements have to be enforced by the state by law. The same applies tointernational trade. How else can we be sure that a volt measured with a voltmeter produced inthe United States is the same quantity measured by a voltmeter produced in Germany (takinginto account the two instruments’ specifications, of course)? The lack of such assurance wouldbe a large obstacle to global trade.The need for international agreements on measurement units and standards as the basis for
6. The fuel cell was used to power the propeller.The result was a fuel-cell powered boat that consistently produced a 0.63V for over 3minutes.Program OutcomesThe classes have been offered for over 7 years. The following data is summarized basedon this year’s (2007) exit interview of graduating students to observe the recent feedback.About 20 students were surveyed, and 10 feedbacks were received. The assessment isbased on the expected program outcomes. Two sets of questions were asked: A) How important is it to you? “Check a number between ‘1’ and ‘5’, with ‘1’ being not important, and ‘5’ being very important.” B) How effective is this program? “Check a number between ‘1’ and ‘5’, with ‘1’ being not effective, and ‘5
. An assessment of in-person and remotely operated laboratories. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1):57–62, 2003.[34] Eileen Scanlon, Chetz Colwell, Martyn Cooper, and Terry Di Paolo. Remote experiments, re-versioning and re-thinking science learning. Computers and Education, 43 n.1-2:153–162, 2004.[35] H. Shen, B. Dalager X. Xu, V. Kristiansen, Ø . Strøm, M. S. Shur, T. A. Fjeldly, J.-Q. Liu, and T. Ytterdal. Conducting laboratory experiments over the internet. IEEE transactions on Education, 42(3):180–185, 1999. Page 14.259.10[36] D. C. Sicker, T. Lookabaugh, J. Santos, and F. Barnes. Assessing the effectiveness of
development principles to provide students structured engagement, such as incorporating the “predict, observe, explain” technique. 3. Deliver the Interactive Virtual Laboratories in classes using the studio architecture recently implemented at the home institution. 4. Assess the perception and effectiveness of the Interactive Virtual Laboratories through a. Classroom observation, student surveys, and instructor and student focus groups b. Measurement of learning gains on the Throttling Valve question and the Technician question, two conceptual questions that have been historically difficult for students 5. Incorporate the Interactive Virtual Laboratories as resources in the AIChE
student will be able to:1. apply the fundamental principles of thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, and heat transfer [ABET’s A,E,K].2. apply modern measurement techniques and experimental methods to energy systems [ABET’s A,B,E].3. apply computational techniques to energy systems [ABET’s A,E,K].4. apply team working skills [ABET’s D].5. communicate effectively [ABET’s G].6. design and conduct experiments [ABET’s B,E,K].7. analyze and interpret data [ABET’s B].8. implement experimental results in a design process[ABET’s B,C].Topics CoveredWeek Topic 1 Safety Guidelines, Error Analysis, Pipe Flow, Flow Meters 2 Design Project Initiation, Road Load Simulation 3 PEM Fuel Cell Performance 4
[ 1/ 2 γ cs = γ c + γ s − 2 (γ cd γ sd ) 1/ 2 + (γ cpγ sp ) ] (3)Here the subscripts c and s refer to cell and solid, respectively; and the superscripts d andp represent long-range dispersive interactions and short-range polar interactions,respectively. Figure 3: Interfacial free energy as a function of substratum energy [3].Baier [4] described an hypothetical optimal biocompatibility zone (Figure 4). The non-adhesive zone (A in Figure 4) represents a zone of minimal interaction or hydrophobicsolid surfaces, whereas and the adhesive zone (B in Figure 4) are