. Livingston, and S. M. Misak, “Finding a Passion and Making It Happen: A Program’s Approach to Promoting Entrepreneurship, Making, and Innovation through Hands-On Projects that Benefit Society,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[40] J. Larson, M. Lande, S. Jordan, and S. Weiner, “Makers as Adaptive Experts-in-Training: How Maker Design Practices Could Lead to the Engineers of the Future,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017.[41] A. Wigner, M. Lande, and S. S. Jordan, “How Can Maker Skills Fit in with Accreditation Demands for Undergraduate Engineering Programs?,” presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual
from 1986-2014. He also worked for Siemens- Switchgear Division and for Measurement Group, Inc. Dr. Branoff’s research interests include constraint- based solid modeling strategies and spatial visualization abilities in undergraduate students. He has con- ducted CAD and Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing workshops for both industry and education professionals. Dr. Branoff served as President of the International Society for Geometry and Graphics from 2009-2012. In 2013 he was elected into the Academy of Fellows of the ASEE, and in 2014 he received the Distinguished Service Award from the Engineering Design Graphics Division of ASEE. In April of 2015 Dr. Branoff received the Orthogonal Medal for
offering ofthis course on campus in fall 2019. In the table, Exam 1 covered the materials in Modules 1 and2. Exam 2 covered the materials in Modules 3 and 4. Exam 3 covered the materials in Modules 5and 6. The level of the exams in those two offerings were about the same. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Annual Conference Fig. 7: a sample of weekly announcementsThe demographics for the fall 2019 offering was that 88% of the 44 students were seniors and12% were postbac students. The GPA of 82% of students were greater than 3.0 and 17% between2.0 and 2.99. The gender distribution was that 88% male and 12% female.The demographics for the
Science Teacher Education (NE-ASTE) where faculty, researchers, and educators inform STEM teaching and learning and inform policy. c American Society for Engineering Education, 20194/28/2019 ASEE - S2S - Final - Google Docs WIP: Student to Scholar: A Learning Community Model for Professional Skills Development ABSTRACT This WorkInProgress paper documents the first steps in the creation of a cocurricular program, Student to Scholar (S2S), designed to assist students in their
, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/20988[4] Karimi, A., & Manteufel, R. D. (2014, June), Assessment of Fundamental Concept inThermodynamics Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis,Indiana. https://peer.asee.org/20104[5] Karimi, A., & Manteufel, R. D. (2017, June), Use of Adaptive Questions and ElectronicPooling to Promote Mastery of Fundamental Thermal Science Concepts Paper presented at 2017ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/29064[6] Wright, K., & Milanovic, I., & Yavuzturk, C. C. (2019, June), Testing Prerequisite Knowledgeof Thermodynamics during a Thermodynamics II Course Paper presented at 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition
and competition,” Human Relations, vol. 2, pp. 129– 152, 1949. [Accessed Oct. 7, 2019][3] D. W. Johnson, and R. Johnson, “Student motivation in co-operative groups: Social interdependence theory,” in Cooperative Learning: The Social and Intellectual Outcomes of Learning in Groups, A. Ashman and R. Gillies, Eds. Routledge, pp. 137-171, Sept. 25, 2003. [E-book] Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/purdue/reader.action?docID=181919&ppg=153 [Accessed Aug. 5, 2019][4] R. Erdei, B. E. McCord, and D. M. Whittinghill, “Unreal collaboration: exploring the use of formal collaborative learning strategy in games development coursework,” in ASEE 2019 Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, USA, June 15-19
content mastery in EET2141between two groups of students. The first group of students attended EET2141 in Fall 2019 andthey were administered real-world problems to solve in the form of printed worksheets handedout after each class lecture. The printed worksheets were related to that day’s lecture materialand were collected in class. The second group of students attended EET2141 during Fall 2020semester and after each class session they were assigned the same worksheets but only availableonline (on Canvas Learning Management System). Students submitted their completedworksheets online via the LMS. The recitation sessions for both groups were held face to face inorder to evaluate the absolute impact of physical and online worksheets between the
Science Teaching, vol. 48, no.5, pp. 36-41, 2019.[12] A. Delgado and J. Vazquez Paragulla, “Improving teaching and learning in systems programing courses using participatory action research,” IEEE CACIDI 2016 – IEEE Conference on Computer Sciences, 30 Nov. – 2 Dec. 2016, Buenos Aires, Argentina [Online]. Available: IEEE Explore, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7786000[13] L. Hahn and V. Werpetinski, “Work in progress – Using Participatory action research to investigate student learning in Engineers Without Borders,” 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Session T2D, October 27-30, 2010, Washington
PhD from U.C. Berkeley.Dr. Hadas Ritz, Cornell University Hadas Ritz is a senior lecturer in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, and a Faculty Teaching Fellow at the James McCormick Family Teaching Excellence Institute (MTEI) at Cornell University, where she received her PhD in Mechanical Engineering in 2008. Since then she has taught required and elective courses covering a wide range of topics in the undergraduate Mechanical Engineering curriculum. In her work with MTEI she co-leads teaching workshops for new faculty and assists with other teaching excellence initiatives. Her main teaching interests include solid mechanics and engineering mathematics. Among other teaching awards, she received the 2020 ASEE St
work systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Co-Designed Research Agenda to Foster Educational Innovation Efforts Within Undergraduate Engineering at HSIsAbstractThe responsibility to educate and empower underrepresented groups in undergraduate educationoften relies on the commitment of educators and the curricula they design. Without financial orinstitutional support, there are limited opportunities for educators from different Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) to engage in conversations about their curricula developments andshare their vision for the future of engineering education. This multi-institutional research projectadopted a participatory research design to
. Retrieved from Washington, DC:Brubaker, E. R., Kohn, M., & Sheppard, S. (2019). Comparing outcomes of introductory makerspaces courses: The role of reflection and multi-age communities of practice. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Academic Makerspaces, New Haven, CT.Carbonell, R. M., & Andrews, M. E., & Boklage, A., & Borrego, M. J. (2019, June), Innovation, Design, and Self-Efficacy: The Impact of Makerspaces Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/32965Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Fasso, W., & Knight, B. A. (2019
, and Computer Engineering, Engineering Technology, and ConstructionManagement. Some non-College of Engineering students’ majors included ElementaryEducation, Communication Studies, English, Psychology, Sociology, Biology, Finance, Pre-Business, Architecture, Health Systems, and Kinesiology.Table 1 shows the aggregate numbers of Engineering and non-Engineering students. In Fall2018, the course description was not posted when the course schedule was released, possibly dueto an administrative error. The absence of course details may account for why less than half thestudents were from the College of Engineering, unlike Spring 2019 and Fall 2019. Not allstudents were aware of the problem-based learning technique used in the course until
James McCormick Family Teaching Excellence Institute (MTEI) at Cornell University, where she received her PhD in Mechanical Engineering in 2008. Since then she has taught required and elective courses covering a wide range of topics in the undergraduate Mechanical Engineering curriculum. In her work with MTEI she co-leads teaching workshops for new faculty and assists with other teaching excellence initiatives. Her main teaching interests include solid mechanics and engineering mathematics. Among other teaching awards, she received the 2020 ASEE St. Lawrence Section Outstanding Teaching Award.Prof. Elizabeth Mills Fisher, Cornell University Elizabeth M. Fisher is an Associate Professor in the Sibley School of
, and S. Bedi,. (2018, June), Engineering Design Days: Engaging Students with Authentic Problem-Solving in an Academic Hackathon Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/30407[7] R. H. Mui, S. J. Woo, S. Arbuckle, & R. Al-Hammoud, S. Walbridge (2019, June), Architectural Engineering Starts with Design from Day 1 Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/32102[8] R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions.” [Online]. Available: https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0361476X99910202?token=66ACF4A250B8A16
environments informed by the How People Learn framework. Dr. Yalvac’s research has been funded by NSF, IES, and NIH. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 WIP: Cultivating the Maker Culture through Evidence-Based PedagogiesThis is a work in progress paper.1. IntroductionScience, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields are essential to America'seconomic growth and global competitiveness. However, there is a mismatch between the supplyand growing demand for STEM-skilled workers. According to the 2016 White House Report [1],there were over a million unfilled jobs in information technology across all sectors of theeconomy. The STEM workforce has grown
research centers around online learning, and information and data literacy education.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Matthew W. Ohland is Associate Head and Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the
engagement and performance: The social network analysis perspective," Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 15, p. 020150, 2019.[26] A. a. H.-S. Johri, C and Ruiz, D and Malik, A and Karbasian, H and Handa, R and Purohit, H. , ""More Than an Engineer: Intersectional Self-Expressions in a Hashtag Activism Campaign for Engineering Diversity.," " ACM COMPASS, 2018.[27] H. a. J. Le, A. and Malik, A., ""Curating Tweets: A Framework for Using Twitter for Workplace Learning," " ASEE Annual Conference proceedings, 2019, 2019.[28] C. O'Toole, " “Virtual Learning Environment Faculty Continuing Professional Development-Networked Learning Communities” A Critical Literature Review.," Irish Journal of
the sub- surface and indoor environments. She also conducts research in service learning and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics education.Dr. William ”Bill” C. Oakes, Purdue University at West Lafayette William (Bill) Oakes is the Director of the EPICS Program, a 150th Anniversary Professor and one of the founding faculty members of the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has held courtesy appointments in Mechanical, Environmental and Ecological Engineering as well as Curriculum and Instruction in the College of Education. He is a registered professional engineer and on the NSPE board for Professional Engineers in Higher Education. He has been active in ASEE serving in the FPD
, “Comparing methods for comparing networks,” Sci. Rep., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53708-y.[35] B. D. Gane, D. Denick, N. Jorion, L. V. Di Bello, J. W. Pellegrino, and R. A. Streveler, “Continuous improvement of a concept inventory: Using evidence centered design to refine the thermal and transport concept inventory,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 122nd ASEE, no. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, 2015, doi: 10.18260/p.23743.[36] D. L. Denick, “Difficulty as a concept inventory design consideration: An exploratory study of the concept assessment tool for statics (CATS),” ProQuest Diss. Theses, p. 192, 2015, [Online]. Available
and develop their own will be integral to theirsuccess as a practicing engineer. Identifying how most first-year students understand intuition isthe first step in achieving this goal.ReferencesCorbin, J. C., Reyna, V. F., Weldon, R. B., & Brainerd, C. J. (2015). How reasoning, judgement, and decision making are colored by gist-based intuition: A fuzzy-trace theory approach. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(3), 344-355.Cunningham, C. S., Martin, K. M., & Miskioglu, E. (2019, June), Work in Progress: Comparing Creativity and the Perception of Creativity of First-Year and Senior Engineering Students. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL.Dreyfus, S. E., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1980). A Five-Stage
%20Methods%20Hyb rid.pdf.5. University of Akron, Research Methods for the Social Sciences (RSMM) Proseminar Syllabus Model. [cited 2019 3/21/19]; Available from: http://www3.uakron.edu/arm/URMSSproseminar.pdf.6. Depaola, N., R. Cammino, B. Haferkamp, P.R. Anderson, E.M. Brey, J. Mohammadi, and F. Teymour. ENGR497 – An Introduction to Research Methods Course. in 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2016. Seattle, WA.7. Rodenbusch, S.E., P.R. Hernandez, S.L. Simmons, and E.L. Dolan, Early Engagement in Course- Based Research Increases Graduation Rates and Completion of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Degrees. CBE-Life Sciences, 2016. 15(1-10): p. 15:ar20, 1 - 15:ar20, 10.8
implemented to increase retention in engineering programs across the United States,” in Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Zone II Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico, March 2 – 5, 2017.[24] A. F. Melissa, “Engineering persistence: Designing and testing a communal strategies intervention to increase the retention of women in engineering,” PhD. dissertation, Department of Psychology, Miami University, 2019.[25] S. Munir, “Effects of academic and nonacademic factors on undergraduate electronic engineering program retention,” PhD dissertation, College of Education, Walden University, 2016.[26] J. L. White and G. H. Massiha, “The retention of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: A framework for persistence
, team assign- ment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS.Louis Tay, Purdue University, West Lafayette Louis Tay is William C. Byham Associate Professor in Industrial-Organizational Psychology. His research interests are in well-being, research methodology, and data science
students and teams within the model, even in its simplistic form, are influential infurther understanding the innovation process, as very little is known about it [22]. Suchinformation is crucial to develop courses that strive to educate students in innovative learningenvironments with hopes of preparing them for the complexities of an ever-evolving world.References[1] L. Singelmann, E. Swartz, M. Pearson, R. Striker, and E. A. Vazquez, “Design and Development of a Machine Learning Tool for an Innovation-Based Learning MOOC,” in 2019 IEEE Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS), 2019, pp. 105–109.[2] R. Striker, M. Pearson, E. Swartz, L. Singelmann, and E. A. Vazquez, “21st Century Syllabus: Aggregating Electronic Resources for Innovation
: Grantee poster session - Year 1,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2019.[7] L. L. Long, “Toward an antiracist engineering classroom for 2020 and beyond: A starter kit,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 636–639, 2020.[8] K. J. Cross, K. B. H. Clancy, R. Mendenhall, P. Imoukhuede, and J. R. Amos, “The double bind of race and gender: A look into the experiences of women of color in engineering,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2017-June, 2017.[9] K. Crenshaw, “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color,” Stanford Law Rev., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1241–1299, 1991.[10] K. Crenshaw, “Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist
opportunity toincrease their understanding.Additional issues that may contribute to the average performance include low attendance andparticipation in lecture for the spring offerings, overburdened workload from lengthy homeworkassignments and application / programming projects, frequent written tests that did not clarifycommon misunderstandings, insufficient feedback on all assignments, but especially writtenassessments, and insufficient support to improve performance throughout the semester.Oral Formative AssessmentBeginning in the spring 2019 semester, a significant change was made to the Numerical Methodscourse at ASU. The biweekly written assessments were changed into biweekly oral assessments.This change was made primarily to increase student
representing the various disciplinesand countries. This number of participants is considered sufficient to reach an acceptable levelof trustworthiness.ResultsThe interviews of faculty are ongoing during spring 2019. By March 2019, four interviewshad been conducted at the first university. By the time of the ASEE conference in June, allinterviews and a first round of analysis will have been completed, enabling presentation ofpreliminary results.The initial analyses made so far have identified the disciplines themselves as importantfactors in the variations noted. The more science-dominated engineering disciplines, includingbiotechnology and in one case energy, seem to expect less future change, whereas engineeringdisciplines such as mechanical and
member of ASEE since 2000 and has been actively involved with the Society in var- ious capacities. He has served in multiple leadership roles in the ERM and FPD divisions, including: ERM board of directors (2002-2004), program chair for ERM (2005 and 2009), ERM program chair for Frontiers in Education (FIE) (2004), FIE Steering Committee ERM representative (2003-2009), as well as program chair (2016) and division chair (2016-17) for FPD. He has also served on two ASEE advisory committees. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Student Attitudinal Success Inventory III (SASI III): Construct Validity and Measurement
grounded-theory model,” in American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[14] L. C. Benson, M. S. Kennedy, K. M. Ehlert, P. M. D. Vargas, C. J. Faber, R. L. Kajfez, and A. M. McAlister, “Understanding undergraduate engineering researchers and how they learn,” in Frontiers in Education Conference, 2016.[15] E. G. Creamer, An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2018.[16] R. L. Kajfez, A. M. McAlister, C. J. Faber, K. M. Ehlert, L. C. Benson, M. S. Kennedy, and D. M. Lee, “Exploring undergraduate engineering researchers’ identities and epistemologies: Who are they and what do they believe,” in Annual
and use of the design sciencesearch terms in the text.ResultsThe analysis of the final sample of 32 peer-reviewed journal articles resulted in the followingfindings. These primary studies are listed in Appendix 1. The timeline of the articles startsfrom 2005, with only a very moderate growth for more than ten years and a more substantialincrease in past three years. As the literature search was conducted in autumn 2020, when allthe papers published in 2020 were not yet available, it is likely that the number for 2020 doesnot represent the full number for that year. Using the Scopus “Analyze search result” tool, thenumber of yearly published research articles (2010–2019) using the query “design science”AND “engineering education” and the