. 167-179, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790601118697[14] C. Pezeshki, R. T. Frame, and B. Humann, “Preparing undergraduate mechanical engineering students for the global marketplace-new demands and requirements,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Salt Lake City, USA, 2004.[15] E. A. Fielding, J. R. Mccardle, B. Eynard, N. Hartman, and A. Fraser, “Product lifecycle management in design and engineering education: International perspectives,” Concurrent Engineering, vol. 22(2), pp. 123-134, 2014.[16] D. Gerhard and M. Grafinger, “Integrative Engineering Design using Product Data Management Systems in Education,” in E&PDE 2009: Engineering and Product Design Education, 2009.[17] A
; Hammond, T., 2018 Kinsey, B., Examining Industry Perspectives PSVT:R and Self-efficacy Scale N=278 ME, Towle, E., Related to Legacy Data and EE, Civil, for Hwang, G., Technology Toolset first year and O'Brien, E. Implementation upperclass J., Bauer, C. F., & Onyancha, R. M., 2007Rafi, A., & The Relationships of Spatial self-efficacy scale N=225, F=75,Samsudin, K. A., Experience, Previous Mathematics M=1492007 Achievement
. Hammond and P. Taele, “Sketching cognition and creativity.” ACM, 6 2019, pp. 708–713.[Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3325480.3326552[4] M. B. Weaver, J. Buck, H. Merzdorf, D. Dorozhkin, K. Douglas, and J. Linsey, “Investigatingpriming effects of sketch evaluation instructions on idea generation productivity,” inInternational Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information inEngineering Conference, vol. 86267. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2022, p.V006T06A019.[5] L. C. Schmidt, N. V. Hernandez, and A. L. Ruocco, “Research on encouraging sketching inengineering design,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core.[6] Lawson,“Cad and creativity: does the computer really help?” 2002
” based on pre-training pre-test scores would not serve the study right. Instead, the professor simply named the groups A, B,and C, as shown in Figure 1. Behind the scenes, students in group A needed to make the mostimprovement, and they were given 177 practice items of easy to moderate level of difficulty inthe training software. Group B was assigned 143 practice items with a range of problem typesfrom easy to challenging while the majority were in the moderate difficulty range. Group C wasassigned the least number of practice items, 93, but they ranged from moderate to mostchallenging. All assignments were given as homework and were graded automatically by SpatialVis™.So which group of students made the biggest improvement? A paired sample t
., & Kelly, D. P. (2023, June). Supporting StudentPersistence in Engineering Graphics Through Active Learning Modules. In 2023 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition.[6] Chen, X., & Soldner, M. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out ofSTEM fields (NCES 2014-001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics,Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education. Institute for EducationSciences, US Department of Education.[7] Christe, B., & Feldhaus, C. (2013). Exploring Engineering Technology Persistence andInstitutional Interventions: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Engineering Technology,30(2).[8] Gardner, A. (June 2022), Persistence and Retention Fall 2020 Beginning PostsecondaryStudent
their order can yield the same final shape. However, they can be useful in verifying that specific modeling decisions have been made. For example, confirming if a particular type of feature is used in the model and are they added at a suitable stage in the modeling process. These would have to be stated requirements that a designer would need to meet in the modeling activity. Even with these guidelines there remain numerous modeling strategies that can be followed to arrive at a solution. Using the same crank arm capstone example, Figure 3 illustrates this using the strategies taken by three of the student designers. Designers ‘A’ and ‘B’ start by modeling the chainring end of the crank, though using different strategies
insights. This preliminary analysis serves as a foundation for deeper investigationsinto spatial skills within the MET program. While the data shows promising trends, furtherexamination and collaboration are essential to unlock the full potential of spatial skills assessmentand its impact on education and interdisciplinary cooperation.REFERENCESDuffy, G., Power, J., Sorby, S., Bowe, B. (2018). Differentiating between Spatial Ability as aSpecific Rather than General Factor of Intelligence in Performance on Simple, Non-routineProblems in Mathematics. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 82(1), 43-46.http://edgj.org/index.php/EDGJ/article/view/682Lubinski, D. (2010). Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification anddevelopment
Paper ID #42358WIP: Designing an Immersive Robotics Curriculum with Virtual RealityJordan Osborne, Illinois State University Jordan Osborne is a Lecturer in the Department of Technology at Illinois State University, where he teaches courses in Engineering Technology and Computer Systems Technology. Before joining the university faculty, Jordan manufactured and designed switchgear power distribution systems. He has also worked in the electronics manufacturing industry to develop circuitry for high-resolution media broadcast. His research interests include interdisciplinary STEM education and applied educational
Paper ID #41359(Board 100: Work in Progress): Creating Human-centered Building DesignCurriculum: Understanding the Health Impacts of Active, Collaborative Learning- An Analysis Using CFD and GD-BIM in an Existing Classroom with DiscussionTablesMr. Simon Zhang, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Hello there! I’m a fourth-year PhD student at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, specializing in Agricultural and Biological Engineering. My research dives into the critical realm of air quality and human health, notably relevant in the context of the ongoing COVID era. Besides the lab research, I have been teaching
Paper ID #41279Effectiveness of Using Animated Versus Static InfographicsAsefeh Kardgar, Purdue University Asefeh Kardgar is currently a PhD Candidate in Technology at Purdue University, West Lafayette.Dr. Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University Dr. Lucietto has focused her research in engineering technology education and the understanding of engineering technology students. She teaches in an active learning style which engages and develops practical skills in the students. Currently she is exploring various aspects of engineering technology registration, retention, and learning. ©American Society for