University Dr. Colleen Janeiro teaches engineering fundamentals such as Introduction to Engineering, Materials and Processes, and Statics. Her teaching interests include development of solid communication skills and enhancing laboratory skills.Dr. William E. Howard, East Carolina University William E (Ed) Howard is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University. He was previously a faculty member at Milwaukee School of Engineering, as well as as a design and project engineer with Thiokol Corporation, Spaulding Composites Company, and Sta-Rite Industries.Dr. Patrick F. O’Malley, Benedictine College Patrick O’Malley teaches in the Mechanical Engineering program at Benedictine College
Paper ID #22127Where Should We Begin? Establishing a Baseline for First-year StudentAwareness of Engineering EthicsMs. Natalie C.T. Van Tyne, Virginia Tech Natalie Van Tyne is an Associate Professor of Practice at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univer- sity, where she teaches first year engineering design as a foundation courses for Virginia Tech’s under- graduate engineering degree programs. She holds bachelors and masters degrees from Rutgers University, Lehigh University and Colorado School of Mines, and studies best practices in pedagogy, reflective learn- ing and critical thinking to inform enhanced student
AC 2007-2158: THE ROLE OF INFORMATION WARFARE IN INFORMATIONASSURANCE EDUCATION: A LEGAL AND ETHICAL PERSPECTIVEAndrew Hoernecke, Iowa State UniversityThad Gillispie, Iowa State UniversityBenjamin Anderson, Iowa State UniversityThomas Daniels, Iowa State University Page 12.1462.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 The Role of Information Warfare in Information Assurance Education: A Legal and Ethical PerspectiveAbstractTypically, information assurance (IA) professionals utilize information warfare (IW) techniqueslearned in professional development courses when performing vulnerability and securityassessments. With cyber crime on the rise
AC 2010-1738: ASSESSING ROLE ORIENTATION AMONG STEMRESEARCHERS: THE DEVELOPMENT OF A RESEARCH ROLEORIENTATION INVENTORYMichael Bowler, Michigan Technological UniversitySusie Amato-Henderson, Michigan Technological UniversityTom Drummer, Michigan Technological UniversityJoseph Holles, Michigan Technological UniversityJoanna Schreiber, Michigan Technological UniversityTed Lockhart, Michigan Technological UniversityDebra Charlesworth, Michigan Technological UniversityJingfang Ren, Michigan Technological University Page 15.204.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Assessing Role Orientation Among STEM Researchers: The Development of a Research Role
AC 2011-1501: A CASE STUDY-BASED GRADUATE COURSE IN ENGI-NEERING ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITYCraig T Evers, PhD, PE, Minnesota State University - Mankato Craig T. Evers currently I am an assistant professor at Minnesota State University Mankato teaching un- dergraduate and graduate courses in the Automotive and Manufacturing Engineering department. I have over 25 years experience in the manufacturing industry, mostly in automotive related positions. Some of my past employers include John Deere, Robert Bosch Corporation, Intel and IBM. Previous positions include tooling manager for a Fortune 500 electronics company, production engineer for fuel components line with $125 million annual sales, manufacturing
AC 2011-510: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO CURRICULUMDEVELOPMENT FOR ENGINEERING GRADUATES WHO ARE SOCIALLYAND ENVIRONMENTALLY JUSTCaroline Baillie, University of Western Australia Chair in Engineering Education Faculty of Engineering, Computing and Maths University of Western Australia Page 22.71.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 A multidisciplinary approach to curriculum development for engineering graduates who are socially and environmentally justIntroductionThe traditional approach to teaching engineering problem solving, where students are limited tofinding
Paper ID #6322Two Years Later: A longitudinal look at the impact of engineering ethics ed-ucationDr. Trevor Scott Harding, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Trevor Harding, Ph.D., is a professor and chair of Materials Engineering at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo, where he teaches courses in engineering design from a materials perspective. He is currently PI on a multi-university collaborative research study assessing the ethical outcomes associated with the curricular and extra-curricular experiences of engineering undergraduates on a national scale. In addition, Dr. Harding has
Paper ID #22376Risk Management and Ethics in Capstone DesignDr. Elizabeth A. DeBartolo, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Elizabeth A. DeBartolo, PhD is the Director of the Multidisciplinary Senior Design Program at the Rochester Institute of Technology, where students from Biomedical, Computer, Electrical, Industrial, and Mechanical Engineering work together on multidisciplinary teams to complete a 2-semester design and build project. She received her graduate degree in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University and has worked at RIT since 2000.Prof. Wade Lee Robison c American Society for
Paper ID #30780Many Facets of Imagination: What Really Matters in Engineering EthicsInstruction?Mr. Yousef Jalali, Virginia Tech Yousef Jalali is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He re- ceived a B.S. and M.S. in Chemical Engineering and M.Eng. in Energy Systems Engineering. His research interests include interaction between critical thinking, imagination, and ethical reasoning, interpersonal and interinstitutional collaboration, diversity, equity, and inclusion, systems thinking, and chemical en- gineering learning systems. Yousef taught chemical engineering courses for a few
Paper ID #5842Enhancing Engineering Ethics Curriculum by Analyzing Students’ Percep-tionMiss Brittney Hope Jimerson, North Carolina A&T State University Brittney Jimerson is a Ph.D. student at North Carolina A&T State University. She graduated from North Carolina A&T State University with a M.S. in Industrial and System Engineering in 2013. She was an undergraduate research scholar and earned her B.S. in Industrial Engineering and Management from the University of North Carolina at Asheville in 2009. She is an Alpha Pi Mu Engineering Honor Society Member, NSBE member, and IIE member.Dr. Eui Hyun Park, North
Paper ID #19706Curing the Cheating Epidemic? A Multi-site International Comparison ofPerspectives on Academic Integrity and the Way We ”Cure” by TeachingTeresa Ryan, East Carolina University Dr. Teresa Ryan teaches mechanical engineering fundamentals such as Dynamics, Mechanics of Materi- als, Acoustics and Vibrations. She also focuses on technical communication skills within an engineering context. Her research interests include acoustics, the dynamics of complex structures, and the use of laser Doppler vibrometry for characterization of such structures including percussion instruments, land- mines/IED, and coupled
Paper ID #15871On the Integration of Ethical, Legal, and Societal Issues into a Computer Sci-ence Senior Design Capstone ProgramDr. Shawn Bowers, Gonzaga University Dr. Bowers is the Chair and an Associate Professor of Computer Science within the School of Engineering and Applied Science at Gonzaga University. He graduated with a PhD in Computer Science from the OGI School of Science and Engineering at OHSU. He was a postdoctoral researcher at the San Diego Supercomputer Center at UCSD and an Associate Project Scientist at the UC Davis Genome Center prior to joining the faculty at Gonzaga. His research interests are in the
AC 2008-339: THE TEST OF ETHICAL SENSITIVITY IN SCIENCE ANDENGINEERING (TESSE): A DISCIPLINE-SPECIFIC ASSESSMENT TOOL FORAWARENESS OF ETHICAL ISSUESJason Borenstein, Georgia TechMatthew Drake, Duquesne UniversityRobert Kirkman, Georgia Institute of TechnologyJulie Swann, Georgia Tech Page 13.1270.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 The Test of Ethical Sensitivity in Science and Engineering (TESSE): A Discipline-Specific Assessment Tool for Awareness of Ethical IssuesI. Introduction There has been much written about the need for integrating ethics into the science andengineering curriculum. Efforts to accomplish this task are ongoing
Paper ID #13410ENGINEERING ETHICS IN TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY COURSESDr. David A. Rogers P.E., North Dakota State University Service in the U.S. Army in 1961-62 followed graduation from the University of Washington with a B.S.E.E. degree. Then Rogers earned the M.S.E.E. degree at IIT and the Master of Divinity degree (ministry) from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. He earned the Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering at the University of Washington in 1971. Rogers taught in Brazil until 1980 in electrical engineering at the University of Campinas. Rogers then moved to North Dakota State University in Fargo where he still
students’ viewpoints would be likely to change withadditional study, and how relevant and important students believe these ethical issues are to themand society. With each question, students were instructed to mark one of five possible choices.The same five questions were attached to each of the ten ethical issues, as follows:• Where do you stand on this ethical issue? The possible responses were “agree strongly with viewpoint A,” “lean toward viewpoint A,” “neutral,” “lean toward viewpoint B,” and “agree strongly with viewpoint B.”• How would you describe your interest in this ethical issue? The possible responses were “high,” “significant,” “moderate,” “little,” and “none.”• Do you think your viewpoint would change with thorough study of this
ethical issue? The possible responses were “agree strongly with viewpoint A,” “lean toward viewpoint A,” “neutral,” “lean toward viewpoint B,” and “agree strongly with viewpoint B.”• How would you describe your interest in this ethical issue? The possible responses were “high,” “significant,” “moderate,” “little,” and “none.”• Do you think your viewpoint would change with thorough study of this ethical issue? The possible responses were “yes,” “probably,” “maybe,” “unlikely,” and “no.”• How relevant is this ethical issue to your career plans? The possible responses were “very much,” “considerably,” “somewhat,” “hardly,” and “not.”• How important is this ethical issue to society? The possible responses were “very much,” “considerably
." Question 1 - Is it plagiarism if the following sentence appears in your paper? He heard the usual sounds of the sea and the birds. After a while, he could hear the other sounds that weren't so apparent at first (Covey, 1989, p. 293). A) Yes, this is plagiarism. The author's exact words are not in quotation marks. B) No, this is not plagiarism. The author's exact words are properly cited. C) I don’t know. Page 26.642.5This question tested the need for quotation marks. The passage is taken verbatim from theoriginal text. While a citation is given, the necessary quotation marks are not. The correctanswer is A. Question
compiled, analyzed and tabulated. There are plans to generate similar modules for use insophomore, junior and senior level courses. Appendix B provides an example of an EthicsModule that was used by the authors. (Henthorn, 1994 – 2004).Students were encouraged to participate in classroom discussions. There were no lectures.On the contrary, Socratic Inquisition techniques were utilized in the classroom to create anatmosphere identified as Learning Paradigm. (McKendall,1993) Students were asked tosummarize their thoughts in a written report, which was later analyzed, graded, assessed andtabulated. The results were analyzed using Washington State University’s Rubric (Appendix A)and categorized using a Likert Scale. Data were plotted using a bar chart
: a. The student will be able to articulate the impact of ethics on society and the professions. b. The student will be able to apply an ethical decision-making process.3. Faculty will identify and develop one written assignment in the selected course that studentswill upload into their E-Leadership portfolios to be evaluated by the QEP assessment team usingthe national Association of American Colleges and Universities VALUE rubric on EthicalReasoning [6].Freshman students take LDRS 101 and LDRS 111. LDRS 101 is a two lecture hour, one creditcourse which includes an ethical analysis of their summer reading assignment “A Few GoodMen”. LDRS 111 is a Freshman Ethical Fitness Seminar which is taken in the second semesterof the
/how-people-learn-ii-learners-contexts-and-cultures13. Kevin Devaney, James Johnson, Storytelling as a Key Enabler for Systems Engineering, 27th Annual INCOSE International Symposium (IS 2017) Adelaide, Australia, July 201714. Karanian, B. et. al. Telling Design Stories for Engineering Design Entrepreneurship, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2009, Austin, TX.15. Karanian, B. et. al. Analyzing Engineering Design Stories - Predicting Engagement in Inventive Action, 2010 IEEE Frontiers In Education Conference (FIE), Arlington, VA.16. Karanian, B. & Suria, A. & Summers, J. Car Storytelling and Interaction Design. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA (US).17. Peter Lloyd, Storytelling and the
3. Table 3. Pairwise Comparison of Undergraduate Major Tukey Mean Number of Undergraduate Grouping Score Subjects Major A 3.6789 5088 Civil Engineering A B 3.6530 1366 Electrical B 3.6682 3318 Mechanical Table 4. All Pairwise Comparisons among Undergraduate Major Undergraduate Major = Civil subtracted from: Undergraduate Difference of SE of T-Value P-value Major Means Means
; Daily, J. S. (2014). Developing engineering ethics through expert witness role plays.Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Conference 2014.2. Brummel, B. J., Gunsalus, C. K., Anderson, K. L., & Loui, M. C. (2010). Development of role-play scenarios forteaching responsible conduct of research. Science and engineering ethics, 16, 573-589.3. Seiler, S. N., Brummel, B. J., Anderson, K. L., Kim, K. J., Wee, S., Gunsalus, C. K., & Loui, M. C. (2011).Outcomes assessment of role-play scenarios for teaching responsible conduct of research. Accountability inResearch, 18, 217-246.4. Numminem, O., Leino-Kilpi, H., van der Arend, A., & Katajisto, J. (2011). Comparison of nurse educators' andnursing students' description of
. Page 13.1330.15 Figure 9—Sonshine School near Ruhengeri, RwandaConclusionIt is possible for college students to have a significant impact upon poor people in the developingworld by using a bottom-up approach. As more engineering students work in this way, manycommunities can be transformed.References1 Our Day to End Poverty: 24 Ways You Can Make A Difference, by Shannon Daley-Harris and Jeffrey Keenan,San Francisco, CA, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2007, 216 pages.2 Kelley, B., Bradley, W., and Thomas, B., Student-Aimed Appropriate Technology Engineering Projects in Kenya,presented at the 2006 A.S.E.E. Southwest Regional Meeting, Baton Rouge, LA, March 2006.3 Jordan, W., Ballard, B., Morton, A., Sanders, B., and
engineeringeducation during COVID-19 pandemic.” ORMS Today Informs Membership Magazine, 2020.Available: https://pubsonline.informs.org/do/10.1287/orms.2020.06.10/full/[3] Y. Lambrinidou & M. Edwards, “Learning to Listen: An Ethnographic Approach toEngineering Ethics Education,” ASEE, 2013, Paper ID# 8224.[4] E. A. Cech, “Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?,” Science, Technology, &Human Values, 39(1) , pp. 42-72, 2014.[5] M. F. Young, S. Slota, A. B. Cutter, G. Jalette, G. Mullin, B. Lai, & M. Yukhymenko, “Ourprincess is in another castle: A review of trends in serious gaming for education”. Review ofEducational Research, 82(1), pp. 61-89, 2012.[6] D. G. Johnson, “Can engineering ethics be taught?” Yale University Press Blog, June 4
bycolleagues (Amber Diaz Pearson, Stacy Tantum) at Duke University as a part of a larger effort tomeasure ethical awareness. This instrument asked more practical questions around safety, designdecisions, regulations, etc. Thirty questions were sourced from this survey and are found inAppendix B. Students selected a level of agreement using a six-point Likert scale, which rangedfrom strongly disagree to strongly agree. In all, the instrument consisted of 47 multiple choicequestions and took ~10 min to complete. The survey was conducted under the Duke Universityapproved IRB Protocol 2021-0134.We recognize that other changes may be occurring during a student’s first year on campus,although these are factors that cannot be controlled. The Fall 2020
Admin. 2 3 a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. Ave.F91 17.8 81.3 79.2 92.7 93.8 19.8 63.5 88.5 39.6 65.6 64.2S92 13.0 77.0 83.0 97.0 92.0 17.0 62.0 88.0 33.0 31.0 59.3F92 12.3 68.8 73.7 89.3 91.0 18.9 64.8 89.3 33.6 27.0 56.9S93 10.0 72.0 75.0 87.0 90.0 19.0 52.0 83.0 28.0 34.0 55.0F93 15.0 69.0 76.0 90.0 94.0 19.0 61.0 87.0 40.0 48.0 59.9S94 12.0 66.0 65.0 73.0 79.0 19.0
like to thank Colleen Halpin for their assistanceduring the early stages of this project.References[1] M. Davis, “Teaching Ethics across the Engineering Curriculum,” in International Conference on Ethics in Engineering and Computer Science, 1999.[2] L. Fan, “Decision-making models for handling ethical dilemmas,” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., vol. 156, no. 4, pp. 229–234, 2003.[3] B. Bero and A. Kuhlman, “Teaching ethics to engineers: Ethical decision making parallels the engineering design process,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 597–605, 2011.[4] M. Rogerson, M. Gottlieb, and M. Handelsman, “Nonrational processes in ethical decision making.,” Am. Psychol., vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 614–623, 2011.[5] A. Tjeltveit and M
thatarrests material degradation in a galvanized metal (theoretical knowledge) but have never seen apart being galvanized.Now a more mathematical definition of competency is proposed. It enhances the previousdefinition, and re-expresses it by the formula: z z Competency = ( skill )dB ( knowledge)dBwhere the variable of integration, B, represents breadth of different fields. This implies that truecompetency is composed of skill and knowledge in a multiplicity of subjects. This relationshipcan be represented graphically with a vehicle that captures the mix of skill and knowledge ineach of the topics covered. In other words, a competent individual has a unique mix of both
tasksand reflected on their thoughts and feelings. We deliberately incorporated discussion about wayswe think, individual and collective responsibility, power relations, and systematic patterns ofoppression.4.1 Lesson planEthics Discussion- NSF REU Program- Interdisciplinary Water Science and Engineering I. Opening and Introductions II. Freewrites What role do you think you can play in diminishing human suffering? III. Purpose/Objectives A. To think about the role of science and engineering profession/discipline in diminishing human suffering B. To imagine future/consequences of actions C. To imagine being someone else IV. Ethical Theory and
reviewers for constructive comments.ReferencesAnderson, M. S., Horn, A. S., Risbey, K. R., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007). What Do Mentoring and Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Have To Do with Scientists’ Misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-Funded Scientists. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 853–860.ASCE. (2017). Code of Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.asce.org/code-of-ethics/.Bachmann, B. (2017). Ethical Leadership in Organizations. New York, NY. Springer.Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. (2016). A Meta-analytic Review of Ethical Leadership Outcomes and Moderators. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 517–536.Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005