Paper ID #10060The Development of an Instrument for Assessing Individual Ethical Decision-making in Project-based Design Teams: Integrating Quantitative and Quali-tative MethodsQin Zhu, Purdue University Qin Zhu is a PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His main re- search interests include global/comparative/international engineering education, engineering education policy, and engineering ethics. He received his BS degree in material sciences and engineering and first PhD degree in philosophy of science and technology (engineering ethics) both from Dalian University of Technology
Education, 2020 Ethics in Undergraduate Construction Curricula: A Two-Stage Exploratory Sequential Approach to Developing and Piloting the HETC SurveyAbstractConstruction and construction related engineering programs (construction engineering and civilengineering) must provide ethics education to students for accreditation; however, there arelimited resources for instructors who teach ethics in these degree programs. This exploratorytwo-stage sequential research study utilizes three of Eash’s five curriculum components (content,modes of transaction, and evaluation) as the conceptual framework to understand the teaching ofethics in construction programs by developing and piloting a survey instrument
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Design and Assessment of the Social Responsibilities of Researchers Graduate Training Program at the University of Notre DameWhy Social Responsibilities? “Ethics” is, by now, recognized as a necessary and important part of the training of bothundergraduate and graduate engineering students. But the word can mean different things indifferent contexts. While as received from philosophy the term is profoundly broad, coveringeverything from making good decisions to living the good life, when it enters the engineeringeducation context considerations beyond immediate pragmatic concerns tend to fall away.Engineering ethics education at both the undergraduate and graduate levels
Page 24.674.5 Research 1 population but in a different year (2012). These students were provided with somewhat different prompts (see Instruments section) but the identical waste electronics article as the other two populations. However, students in this population were not required to use the article in their essays, but were given the freedom to draw on sources most appropriate to their argument as presented in the essay.In this pilot study, ten essays from each student population were randomly selected for analysis.A. Research QuestionsThree research questions were addressed in this pilot study.Research Question #1:What patterns of ethical literacy emerged in engineering student writing?This research question provides a
engineering.Jean S. DeClerck, Michigan Technological University Jean Straw DeClerck has supported two National Science Foundation (NSF) grants through the design, facilitation, and ongoing improvement of ethics education instruction to science and engineering students. She is an Engaged Learning and Integrated Technology Specialist at Michigan Technological University’s Van Pelt and Opie Library. Her undergraduate studies included technical communication and mechanical engineering coursework, and she will complete her master’s of science degree in rhetorical and tech- nical communications at Michigan Tech in early 2012. Her current interests include engaged learning environments, mentorship, and the rhetorical aspects of
Paper ID #32977Integration of Ethics-Focused Modules into the Steps of the EngineeringDesign ProcessMs. Jessica R. Edelson, Duke University Jessica is senior Robertson Scholar at Duke University pursuing a double major in Political Science and Visual and Media Studies, with a certificate in Information Science.Micalyn Struble, Duke University Micalyn is a third-year student at Duke University, majoring in Public Policy and minoring in Computer Science. She views this project as a chance to ingrain ethical thinking into engineering, in the hopes that many ethical dilemmas of the past can be confidently handled in the
conceived of as much broaderthan merely responsible of professional conduct. The expertise of professional ethicistsarticulates the ways in which ethics is broader and deeper than the mere development ofintuitions, and is thus a necessary component of engineering ethics education. I conclude thatthere is a need for more careful study of the nature and place of ethics – and ethicists – in theteaching and training of graduate students in engineering.Toward that end, the next section of this paper more differentiates between questions about thevalue of ethics and questions about the value of ethicists. Next, I describe the methods of anempirical pilot study before discussing the results of that study. Finally, I draw preliminaryconclusions that are
York, NY.9. Brown, B. S. (1996). A comparison of the academic ethics of graduate business, education and engineering students. College Student Journal, 30(September): 294-301.10. Brown, B. S., & Emmett, D. (2001). Explaining the variations in the level of academic dishonesty in studies of college students: Some new evidence. College Student Journal, 35(4): 529-538.11. Carpenter, D. D., Harding, T. S., & Finelli, C. J. (2006, May). The implications of academic dishonesty in undergraduate engineering on professional ethical behavior. Proceedings of the 2006 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, Omaha, NB. (Available on CD-ROM)12. Carpenter, D. D., Harding, T. S., Finelli, C. J., Montgomery, S. M., & Passow