engagementwith the instrument. An expert in the field was tasked with taking the assessment to establish abaseline for the amount of time reasonably required to complete the EERI thoughtfully. Thechange in score was calculated for each individual, and histograms, Q-Q Plots and theShapiro-Wilks test were used to evaluate the normality of this data [9]. A paired pre/post t-testwas employed to evaluate the differences in the EERI scores from the first to the fourth year.This test was chosen for its effectiveness in comparing two related samples.ResultsInitially, the P score, which measures postconventional thinking based on universal good, had amean pre-score of 60.62 (SD = 17.59). Over four years, it decreased to a mean post-score of57.24 (SD = 19.37
programs. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2016.[2] R. F. Clancy and A. Gammon, “The Ultimate Goal of Ethics Education Should Be More Ethical Behaviors,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2021.[3] P.-H. Wong, “Global Engineering Ethics,” in Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Engineering, D. Michelfelder and N. Doorn, Eds. 2021.[4] Q. Zhu and B. Jesiek, “Engineering Ethics in Global Context: Four Fundamental Approaches,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2017, doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 28252.[5] R. F. Clancy and Q. Zhu, “Global Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? and When?,” J. Int. Eng. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jiee/vol4/iss1/4?utm_source
://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=Up3xXOMd&id=E458D9F12983E9F34CDE1C E0AAC29BDFE258B0B3&thid=OIP.Up3xXOMdDQqip3vFxIS5ugHaID&mediaurl=https%3A%2F%2Fth.b ing.com%2Fth%2Fid%2FR.529df15ce31d0d0aa2a77bc5c484b9ba%3Frik%3Ds7BY4t%252bbwqrgHA%26r iu%3Dhttp%253a%252f%252fgraphic-design.tjs-labs.com%252fpictures%252fteflon-gh-10-01-1965- 244.jpg%26ehk%3D3i1JGZxB9w8PAo%252fliKrPVtFueBpCudbfbqsaSGTFPVE%253d%26risl%3D%26pi d%3DImgRaw%26r%3D0&exph=653&expw=600&q=%22happy+pan%22+ads+- panda+%2bteflon&simid=608001764376843371&form=IRPRST&ck=20E6246D3641F36C71504AF60DB0 48A2&selectedindex=1&ajaxhist=0&vt=0&sim=11 (accessed September 3, 2022).4. M. Janofsky, ” E.P.A
. Strobel, and A. O. Brightman, "The Development of Empathic Perspective- Taking in an Engineering Ethics Course," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 534-563, 2017.[20] D. A. Martin, E. Conlon, and B. Bowe, "Using Case Studies in Engineering Ethics Education: The Case for Immersive Scenarios through Stakeholder Engagement and Real Life Data," Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 47-63, 2021.[21] N. M. Smith, Q. Zhu, J. M. Smith, and C. Mitcham, "Enhancing Engineering Ethics: Role Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 27, no. 3, 2021.[22] K. Lewis et al., "Teaching the Global, Economic, Environmental, and
’ journeys navigating public-inspired science work,”2021 ASEE Annual Conference, Jul. 2021.[15] K. Anderson, S. Courter, T. McGlamery, T. Nathans-Kelly, and C. Nicometo,“Understanding the current work and values of professional engineers: Implications forengineering education,” 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, pp. 14.1297.1–14.1297.17, Jun. 2009.[16] S. D. Streiner, Q. Zhu, and R. Clancy, “Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North CentralSection Conference,” in Examining the Relations between Moral Intuitions and Values amongFirst-Year Engineering Students: Implications for Culturally Responsive Ethics Education.[17] D. Kahneman and A. Deaton, “High income improves evaluation of life but not emotionalwell-being,” Proceedings of the
Apr. 16, 2018).[3] R. F. Clancy and Q. Zhu, “Global Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? and When?,” J. Int. Eng. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jiee/vol4/iss1/4?utm_source=digitalcommons.uri.edu%2Fji ee%2Fvol4%2Fiss1%2F4&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages.[4] H. C. Luegenbiehl, “Ethical autonomy and engineering in a cross-cultural context,” Techné Res. Philos. Technol., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 57–78, 2004, doi: doi:10.5840/techne20048110.[5] T. Iseda, “How should we foster the professional integrity of engineers in Japan? A pride- based approach,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 165–176, 2008, doi: 10.1007/s11948- 007-9039-0.[6
://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3287216. 2019.[14] T. Saheb, “Ethically contentious aspects of artificial intelligence surveillance: a social science perspective,” AI and Ethics, 3(2), pp. 369-379. 2023.[15] A. Etzioni and O. Etzioni, “Pros and cons of autonomous weapon systems”. Military Review, May-June, 2017. pp. 72–81, 2017.[16] D.M.A. Karwat, “Engineering for the people: Putting peace, social justice, and environmental protection at the heart of all engineering,” In National Academy of Engineering. Frontiers of Engineering: Reports on Leading-Edge Engineering from the 2018 Symposium. 2019.[17] J.R. Mihelcic, C.C. Naughton, M.E. Verbyla, Q. Zhang, R.W. Schweitzer, S.M. Oakley, E.C. Wells, and L.M. Whiteford, “The grandest
practical ethics,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 21, pp. 767-787.2015.[14] I. M. Goldin, K. Ashley, R. L. Pinkus, “Validity and reliability of an instrument forassessing case analyses in bioengineering ethics education,” Science and Engineering Ethics,vol. 21, pp. 789-807. 2015.[15] Q. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. K. Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. C. Oakes, & A. D. Mead, “Thedevelopment of an instrument for assessing individual ethical decision-making in project-baseddesign teams: Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods,” Proceedings of the 2014 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN. 2014.[16] P. W. Odom, & C. B. Zoltowski, “Statistical analysis and report on scale validation resultsfor the Engineering Ethical
; Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[4] R. Snieder and Q. Zhu, "Connecting to the Heart: Teaching Value-Based Professional Ethics," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 26, pp. 2235-2254, 2020.[5] H. Zandvoort, T. Borsen, M. Deneke and S. J. Bird, "Editors’ Overview Perspectives on Teaching Social Responsibility to Students in Science and Engineering," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 19, pp. 1413-1438, 2013.[6] J. Koehler, O. Pierrakos and A. Yeaman, "Character Development in the Engineering Classroom: An Exploratory, Mixed-Methods Investigation of Student Perspectives on Cultivating Character," in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimare, MD, 2023.[7] ABET Engineering Accreditation Commision, "2024
Know What’s Right. Yale University Press, 2010. doi: 10.12987/9780300161328.5 National Society of Professional Engineers, “History of the Code of Ethics for Engineers.” [Online] Available: https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics/history-code-ethics- engineers#:~:text=The%20first%20reference%20to%20a,a%20suggestion%20for%20membership%20cons ideration.6 American Society for Engineering Education, “Papers on Engineering Education Repository.” [Online] Available: https://peer.asee.org/?q=ethics.7 ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022-2023.” [Online] Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs
engineering programs, 2022-2023”. ABET. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineeri ng-programs-2022-2023/ (accessed Jan. 3, 2023).[5] National Society of Professional Engineers. “NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers.” NSPE.org. https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics (accessed Jan. 4, 2023).[6] Q. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. K. Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. C. Oakes, and A. D. Mead, “The Development of an Instrument for Assessing Individual Ethical Decisionmaking in Project-based Design Teams: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods.” Presented at ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June, 2014
://impact.enlight-eu.org/toolkit/web/en (accessed 7 Feb. 2024).[7] D.A. Martin, A. Gwynne-Evans, A.A. Kazakova, and Q. Zhu, “Developing a Global andCulturally Inclusive Vision of Engineering Ethics Education and Research,” in: InternationalHandbook of Engineering Education Research, Editor, A. Johri, Routledge, 2023 (pp. 87-114).[8] E. L. Boyer, "the Scholarship of Engagement," Bulletin of the American Academy of Artsand Sciences”, vol. 49, pp. 18-33, Apr. 1996.[9] Engineering Ethics Toolkit Advisory Group, “Best Practice in Teaching EngineeringEthics Through Case Studies,” Engineering Professors Council, https://epc.ac.uk/toolkit/best-practice-in-teaching-engineering-ethics-through-case-studies/ (accessed 7 Feb. 2024)[10] J. Lajoie, J. S. Kim, H. A. Love
, “What Is Good Is Beautiful (and What Isn’t, Isn’t): How Moral Character Affects Perceived Facial Attractiveness,” Am. Psychol. Assoc., 2022.[20] C. Gilligan and J. Attanucci, “Two Moral Orientations: Gender Differences and Similarities,” Merrill-Palmer Q., 1988.[21] J. L. Hess and G. Fore, “A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 551–583, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9910-6.[22] B. Jesiek, S. Claussen, D. Kim, and L. Stepback, “Exploring Perceptions of Ethics and Social Responsibility Among Engineering Students and Professionals: Research Highlights and Implications for the Field,” in Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Annual
. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991.[5] C. Moos, L. Dougher, L. Bassett, M. Young, and D. D. Burkey, “Game-Based Ethical Instruction in Undergraduate Engineering,” NEAG Journal, no. 1, pp. 20–37, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.59198/8259gnir7.[6] J. L. Hess and G. Fore, “A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions,” Science and Engineering Ethics, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9910-6.[7] Q. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. K. Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. C. Oakes, and A. D. Mead, “The Development of an Instrument for Assessing Individual Ethical Decisionmaking in Project-based Design Teams: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods.” Presented at ASEE
and playful suggestions for resistance in engineering spaces.Ultimately, we hope our joyous embrace of failure, and all of the strange and wonderful pos-sibilities it opens, will encourage other educators and mentors to find the courage to challengedominant systems similarly and curiously engage with different ways of being and becomingto do so.VII. Q UEERING FAILURE IN THE C LASSROOMAlthough playful learning has long been a model for teaching children, there are many bene-fits to introducing this pedagogical model to the classroom, particularly for pushing studentsto think differently within the boundaries of the game. As Rose Klein argues, when queerplay is put into dialogue with queer pedagogy, both can enhance the experience of