Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying all 2 results

Canary in the Mine: An LLM Augmented Survey of Disciplinary Complaints to the Ordre des ingénieurs du Québec (OIQ)

Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session - Expanding horizons
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tammy Mackenzie, The Aula Fellowship; Varsha Kesavan, University of Alberta; Thomas Mekhaël, Ecole de Technologie Superieure; Animesh Paul, University of Georgia; Branislav RADELJIC, Aula Fellowship for AI Science, Tech, and Policy; Sara Kodeiri; Sreyoshi Bhaduri, Private Corporation
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)
2010–2014 3.07.01 Duties and Obligations towards the customer - Ac- 1 0 0 cessibility and rectification of files and delivery of documents 3.07.06 Duties and Obligations towards the customer - Ac- 1 0 2 cessibility and rectification of files and delivery of documents 3.08.01 Duties and Obligations towards the customer - 2 0 0 Fixing and payment of fees 3.08.02 Duties and Obligations towards the customer - 1
Relevance Score: 0.030214695

Evaluation of an AI-based medical application using AI-generated methods: Student experiences with a case study on “patient preference predictors”

Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session - GenAI in ethics education
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bernd Steffensen, University of Applied Sciences Darmstadt/European University of Technology; Bettina von Römer, University of Applied Sciences Darmstadt
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)
aspects addressed by theVDI in the process of technology development. Very similar approaches can be found in the“Report of the Future Ready Engineering Ecosystem (FREE)” [5: p.3-2], which was presentedby the ASEE in 2024. With reference to Schwab and Davis, they mention the following keyprinciples: “1) Focus on systems that deliver human well-being, not just on technologies; 2)Manage technologies with diverse human decision-making and agency, instead of giving in toa determinist view of technology; 3) Employ human-centered design thinking, not passive ac-ceptance of technology as the default; and 4) Recognize values as a core feature, instead ofperceiving technology as neutral and values as interference.” It is therefore about responsibleaction
Relevance Score: 0.015900597