majors at Beijing Institute of Technology areestablished through a “dual mentor system”, with academic mentors and mentors from externalsocial practice departments jointly participating in guiding students. Senior technical personnelfrom enterprises and universities with rich practical experience and teaching guidance form amentor team, with on campus mentors taking the lead, and off campus mentors assistingstudents in practical project research, courses and papers in some engineering majors. Dividedby professional title level, both leaders and teachers participate in the construction of this course;According to the organizational form, the Graduate School has established a courseconstruction group for Engineering Ethics, and the rich teaching
vocations collaboration the authors along with aprofessor in mechanical engineering, led a student project last semester to assess the sentimenttowards ethics education among undergraduate engineering students and faculty at the Universityof Notre Dame. This student group was in our socially engaged computing projects class. Theyconducted interviews with key faculty members that were engaged in a variety of ethics andengineering endeavors.Outcomes from the faculty interviews:A group of undergraduate students interviewed a number of faculty in engineering andphilosophy.From the faculty interviews, some key concerns identified, which echoed what we had learnedfrom computing faculty interviews as well : • Time/limited resources for courses
conflicts between profit motives andpublic good, leading some engineers to change careers (1). Common ethical issues includeillegal waste dumping and data manipulation (2). Research suggests a concerning link be-tween academic dishonesty in engineering education and unethical behavior in professionalsettings. Studies have found that engineering students are among the most likely to engagein academic cheating (3; 4). This behavior appears to correlate with unethical conduct in theworkplace, as demonstrated by surveys exploring decision-making patterns in both academicand professional contexts (5). These findings highlight the need for interventions to addressunprofessional behavior. Researchers have identified various approaches, with most interven
Engineering from the National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad. He has worked as TA of multiple undergraduate and graduate courses during his Masters in ITU and as a Lecturer in the Superior University in Lahore. He aims to contribute to the advancement of educational practices in engineering by addressing both the opportunities and challenges presented by the emerging technologies.Bailey Kathryn McOwen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Bailey McOwen is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech with an academic foundation in physics and industrial engineering. Her research focuses on workforce development, professional training for engineering practitioners, and
earned a Doctor of Philosophy in Policy and Governance at the Australian National University in Canberra, a Bachelor of Engineering (Mechanical) from Carleton University in Ottawa; a Certificate of Graduate Studies in Natural Resources Organization Management from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor; and Master of Arts in Environmental Security and Peace from the University for Peace in Costa Rica. For approximately a decade, Sergio worked on sustainable energy policy and finance throughout Latin America and collaborated with leading U.S. government agencies, multilateral banks, and public interest organizations involved in international clean energy policy and rural electrification, including the