Displaying all 7 results
- Conference Session
- Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session - Case Studies
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Qin Zhu, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Lisa M Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Iris Louella Jenkins, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)
, “Research Integrity and the Regulatory-Industrial Complex,” Account. Res., Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2179395.[9] APPE, “Improving Research Integrity: The Role of Accountability Across the Research Enterprise,” 2024.[10] C. Bicchieri, Norms in the Wild. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.[11] D. Narvaez, J. L. Vaydich, J. C. Turner, and V. Khmelkov, “Teacher self-efficacy for moral education: Measuring teacher self-efficacy for moral education.,” J. Res. Character Educ., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 3–15, 2008, [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy.umsl.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db =psyh&AN=2011-19985-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site%5Cndnarvaez@nd.edu
- Conference Session
- Using technology in engineering ethics education
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Tracy Anne Hammond, Texas A&M University; Pauline Wade, Texas A&M University; Shawna Thomas, Texas A&M University; Hillary E. Merzdorf, Texas A&M University
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)
education, vol. 6, p. 184, 2015. 11. N. McDonald, A. Akinsiku, J. Hunter-Cevera, M. Sanchez, K. Kephart, M. Berczynski, and H. M. Mentis,“Responsible computing: A longitudinal study of a peer-led ethics learning framework,” ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1–21, 2022. 12. G. C. Graber and C. D. Pionke, “A team-taught interdisciplinary approach to engineering ethics,” Science and engineering ethics, vol. 12, pp. 313–320, 2006. 13. A. R. Carberry, H.-S. Lee, and M. W. Ohland, “Measuring engineering design self-efficacy,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2010.14. P. R. Pintrich and D. H. Schunk, “Motivation in education: Theory, research, and
- Conference Session
- Broader Approaches to Engineering Ethics Education
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Qin Zhu, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Lisa M. Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)
and Florida Ethics Frameworks in STEM Enculturation IT #6 Institutional Transformation: University of Washington 2023-2028 Anticipating Undesirable Consequences of Computer Science Research IT #7 Institutional Transformation: Virginia Tech 2023-2028 Transforming Cultures of Responsible Research through the Development of Ethics Expertise and Self-Efficacy 3 among Faculty through Social NetworksTable 1 NSF CCE STEM (ER2) funded institutional transformation grantsAfter identifying the seven institutional
- Conference Session
- Engineering, Ethics, and Leadership
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- James N. Magarian, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; John M. Feiler, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Leo McGonagle, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Eileen Milligan, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Alexander Rokosz, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Elizabeth Schanne, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Reza S. Rahaman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Olivier Ladislas de Weck, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS), Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)
- Conference Session
- Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _Monday June 26, 11:00 - 12:30
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Jeff R. Brown, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Chad Rohrbacher, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Taylor Joy Mitchell, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University ; Leroy Long III, Sinclair Community College - Dayton; Jenna Korentsides, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Joseph Roland Keebler, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)
] reported results from a quasi-experimental study that evaluated embedded ethics modules in a computer science course. Thisintervention included discussion, perspective-taking activities and stakeholder analysis aroundthe ethics of contact tracing in a public health context. These researchers reported an increase instudents’ level of interest and perceived self-efficacy in addressing ethical issues. Our inventionalso seeks to increase interest and perception regarding ethical issues, and using a similar quasi-experimental methodology, we can review the implications of our intervention on students’perceptions of ethical and professional responsibility. Furthermore, Hess et al. [ 27] usedqualitative methods to investigate empathetic perspective
- Conference Session
- Broader Approaches to Engineering Ethics Education
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Kyle Payne, Collins Engineers
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)
. Justine reflected on times when she did not trust herinstincts, stating, “The most important thing is to not give up on that instinct. There’s a reasonyou feel that way.”Acknowledging Pressure to Go Along Just like pressure in a liquid or gas may be used by a professional engineer to exert forcein a mechanical system, pressure may be used by a leader to encourage compliance with anunethical directive or request. Of course, pressure in a liquid or gas may be easier to measure andevaluate than the human mind when under stress. Participants emphasized the importance oftheir awareness of what actions others had taken to apply pressure and how they were feelingunder that pressure, both as a means to respond appropriately and to avoid
- Conference Session
- Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _Monday June 26, 11:00 - 12:30
- Collection
- 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Alice Fox, Stanford; Benjamin C. Beiter, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)
insistence from engineering and engineering ethics thatfailure is a necessary component of a ‘good’ engineering process and embracing failure isparamount to success in engineering [31], [32], [33], [34], engineering course and programdesign rarely integrate this value. Instead, 40% and 50% student failure rates in engineeringare often explained as not meant to be, unready for rigorous education, or poor work ethic[35], [36]. However, Brandi Geisinger and Raj Raman’s work on understanding attrition ratesidentify ”classroom and academic climate,” “grades and conceptual understanding,” and “self-efficacy and self-confidence” as the three leading reasons students report leaving engineeringdisciplines ([36] p.914). Of these issues, recent investigations