Institutional Transformation Approach to STEM Ethics Education: An Exploratory Study of NSF-funded Institutional Transformation Projects IntroductionThere is consensus that the integration of ethics into STEM curricula is critical for cultivatingcultures for ethical practices in STEM research. We argue that the establishment of the Ethicsand Responsible Research (ER2) program, previously known as Cultivating Cultures for EthicalSTEM (CCE-STEM), at NSF was driven by a cultural perspective on ethics education.According to the most recent version of its solicitation, A comprehensive approach to ethical STEM not only influences individual behavior, but it also maintains and fosters an ethical
Education & Innovation at Texas A&M. Her education research interests are in active learning, inclusive teaching, inclusive teaching, project-based learning, and communities of practice.Hillary E. Merzdorf, Texas A&M University College of Engineering ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A Student-Led Ethics Deep Dive, Discussion, and Content Generation Ethics Assignment in Computer Science & Engineering CapstoneAbstractAs senior capstone design represents the culmination of the knowledge and understanding gainedthroughout the four-year degree program, it has significant prominence in ensuring that wegraduate ethical and professional engineers. We implemented a
the four comparison sections did not complete theintervention.Figure 1. Activities and timeline for critical-narrative interventionProject-Group Discussion AssignmentBoth the study and comparison groups were required to complete the project-group discussionassignment near the end of the semester. Because the primary objective of this research effort isto gain insights on the impact of critical narratives on students’ abilities to identify the broaderimpacts of engineering work and transfer these abilities to their own senior/capstone designprojects, researchers designed the group-discussion exercise to be focused on each groups’senior/capstone design project.The project-group discussion (PGD) was organized in an identical manner to the
across the curriculum. This paper serves as one example ofsharing student perspectives that continue to inform the project. Student perspectives guide us inimproving the integration of character education within engineering education. Key facets thatare essential to this integration are the project-based learning environment that cuts across thecurriculum from year one to year four and other innovative pedagogies (e.g., use of mastery-based learning approaches, flipped classrooms environments, case-based learning, andcollaborative learning).Table 2 presents some of the engineering courses and their associated primary virtues targeted.Courses with targeted virtues means that engineering faculty took intentional steps to introduceand talk about
been recognized as crucial to responsible engineering, but the increasinglyglobalized environments present challenges to effective engineering ethics training. Thispaper is part of a larger research project that aims to examine the effects of culture andeducation on ethics training in undergraduate engineering students at universities in theUnited States, China, and the Netherlands. We are interested in how students’ curricular andextra-curricular (e.g., internships, service projects) experiences and training impact theirethical reasoning and moral dispositions, and how this differs cross-culturally. To understandthis, we are conducting mixed methods research longitudinally over four years to engineeringstudents at our participating
Paper ID #43553Benchmarking a Foundation for Improving Psychological Safety in TeamsDr. Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Michelle Marincel Payne is an Associate Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She earned her Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, her M.S. in Environmental Engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology, and her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla (same school, different name). At Rose-Hulman, Michelle is leading a project
Paper ID #43419Engineering a Bridge Across Cultures: Insights to Support Dialogue withEngineering Professionals on Ethical and Social Design ConsiderationsMs. Tiffany Smith, NASA Tiffany Smith serves as NASA’s Chief Knowledge Officer (CKO) and Director of the Office of the Chief Engineer’s Academy of Program/Project and Engineering Leadership (APPEL). Ms. Smith is responsible for managing NASA’s APPEL Knowledge Services learning and development program, providing strategic communications and continuous learning to project management and systems engineering personnel, and overseeing knowledge services across the agency in
science. Theframework is presented together with a tool developed to guide any instructor at the college levelto select ways to insert ethical considerations into their class. These insertions could come fromcase studies, every day examples, or even instructional approaches.IntroductionThis paper begins with a discussion of one of the outcomes of an NSF-sponsored project aroundthe future of STEM education at the university level. After this introduction, we present anexample of how to implement the Ethical Reasoning InstrumentTM (ERITM) in a first-yearintroductory engineering class. We hope that this example might inspire others to use theinstrument to embed ethics in disciplinary engineering courses.The Future Substance of STEM Education project
to the prosperity and future developmentof the country. They play an important role in the process of national engineering educationmoving towards practice and engineering technology transforming towards innovation. Toachieve the transformation of engineering education, it is necessary to break the phenomenonof "engineering only", break down the barriers between humanities and social sciences andscience and technology, and cultivate innovative and composite engineers who can adapt topractical needs. In 2016, China became a formal signatory to the Washington Accord and thesolid promotion of the New Engineering Project provided an important opportunity for Chinato move towards becoming a strong engineering education country [2]. The Washington
alumnifrom 2010-2020 (n=65) were surveyed in 2021-2022 to determine their perceptions of the classand its impact on their ethical principles and conduct. Responses were compared to a control groupof graduate students who were enrolled in the same department during the same time period whodid not take the class (n=68). The control group placed significantly higher value on technicalexpertise, salaries, and work on projects for perceived job satisfaction, compared to course alumni,who placed greater value on interactions with the people whose lives their work may impact(p<0.001). Course alumni also were also more likely to listen to members of the public outside oftheir field (p=0.040) in considering ethical dilemmas.IntroductionThrough their work
Paper ID #43910Educating the Whole Engineer: Leveraging Communication Skills to CultivateEthical Leadership CharacterMrs. Farnoosh B. Brock, Prolific Living Inc. Farnoosh Brock went from electrical engineer and project manager at a Fortune 100 to an entrepreneur, published author (4 books), speaker and trainer in 2011. She has coached and trained hundreds of professionals at all levels of the organizations in their Mindset, Leadership and Communication Skills. She delivers her workshops at universities such as Johns Hopkins, Duke and Wake Forest and has spoken her message at many places such as Google, Cisco, MetLife, SAS
settings to professional careers, they facethe imperative task of acquiring not only technical expertise but also hands-on experience andpractical insights to be effective in their engineering work. This experiential learningencompasses problem-solving, critical thinking, project management, effective communication,collaboration with multidisciplinary teams, adaptability to industry trends, and a profoundunderstanding of real-world constraints and challenges and therefore involves addressing variousethical dilemmas. In today's society, heightened awareness and expectations concerning ethicaland equity issues underscore the need to assess the preparedness of early-career engineers tonavigate this complex landscape in their professional journeys. To
Medal for Research.Casey Gibson, National Academy of Engineering Casey Gibson, M.S., is an Associate Program Officer at the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) of U.S. National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. Gibson contributes to multiple NAE and cross-Academies initiatives, focusing primarily on the Cultural, Ethical, Social, and Environmental Responsibility in Engineering program. Gibson completed her M.S. from the Colorado School of Mines as a member of the inaugural cohort in Humanitarian Engineering and Science (HES). In the HES program, Gibson specialized in Environmental Engineering and conducted research under the NSF-funded ”Responsible Mining, Resilient Communities” project in Colombia
in managerial programs, theprofessional nature of the discipline and the general characteristics of undergraduates supports ourpoint of view that providing the ethics training in the context of students’ summer research projectswill enhance their learning and retention. The proposed project will build on this lesson in thesciences by demonstrating the value of context-based training. The tech ethics course addresses thelearning of the issues and the question-directed framework. Then the question-directed frameworkis directly applied to the students’ research project, connecting the learning to their professionalpractice. I believe, strongly, that this type of contextualizing will result in lifetime learning. Olimpo et al. [5] conducted a
underlying values) atwork in their departments and programs. Specifically, this paper reports a subset of data that ispart of a larger NSF-funded research project (award #2024296) exploring the interplay amongindividual value foundations and disciplinary ethics frameworks in engineering and STEMeducation. We conclude by analyzing the conceptual and practical distinctions betweenresponsibility and accountability as they relate to the standards identified by the disciplinaryfaculty we interviewed.Faculty Roles in Shaping Normative ValuesStudents are often exposed to the ethical norms, or frameworks, of the discipline through manydifferent vehicles, both implicit and explicit. Students might be implicitly enculturated throughthe mentor-mentee
coverage is included in programs’ cores, how is the learning operationalized toreinforce it as being integral to engineering leadership practice? Proposals for embedding ethicsinstruction more integrally within engineering coursework have included increasing the emphasison human-centric approaches to design on engineering team projects [10, 17], mitigating orreducing the isolation of ethics instruction from other aspects of courses and projects [8, 13], andincreasing the use of experiential learning approaches for ethics instruction [12, 17 - 20], among 18 19others. As this paper’s central focus, we illustrate how an ethical reasoning challenge can
decision-making Leadership Formal and informal leaders, the organization’s expectations of themAlthough there are many definitions and frameworks related to organizational culture, [14] wasselected since it is situated in the university setting.MethodsStudy OverviewThe present study is part of a larger project that explored ethics and societal impacts education inengineering and computing. The aim of the mixed-methods project was to identify potentialexemplars of ethics and societal impacts instruction, including their context and impact onundergraduate students and recent graduates. The first phase of the project was quantitative, andover 1400 educators responded to an online survey. More information on the surveydevelopment and results is
knowledge andsociocultural issues in their field. For example, Franquesa [42], who obtained a Bachelor’sdegree in computer science engineering and a Master’s degree in sustainability, implementedservice-learning activities where students fixed and updated old (and sometimes broken)computers for local communities; Holloway [43], who was the department chair in Electrical andComputer Engineering and the director of an institute bringing policy-side perspectives on powerand energy, offered a class on global energy issues; and Bielefeldt [44], who holds a PhD in civilengineering and is interested in sustainability and social responsibility in engineering, employedtwo case studies consisting of a controversial local water supply project and Hurricane
solution should follow a specific format, such as filling specific fields in a table and/or preparing a presentation for 5 min to explain the solution. We used this kind of assignment in a Machine learning course. • For group project assignments, students are required to present either a research idea or a programming project. The presentation is presented in-person for on-site courses. In the case of online courses, two different approaches are available. The first approach involves organizing a Zoom meeting where students present their work and respond to questions. Alternatively, the second approach entails recording the presentation with their voices accompanying each slide. Other group
Paper ID #42216Developing a Team-Based Regulatory Framework for Mobility EngineeringProfessionalsMs. MAN LIANG, University of Maryland College Park Man Liang is a PhD student in Civil Engineering at the University of Maryland. She has over 3 years of working experience as a civil engineer conducting independent engineering designs for residential, commercial, institutional projects in the states of Ohio, Kentucky, Wisconsin, Texas, and etc. She specializes in site surveys, roadway engineering, pavement design, traffic analysis, site layout, site grading, sustainable stormwater management, utility connections, erosion and
the teaching of engineering ethics. Despite use of de-sign iteration and trial-and-error in engineering practice and projects, engineering instructionbroadly does not seem to leave much room for failure as part of the learning experience. Inclasses, students can be instructed only on how to find the right answer, and then be pun-ished, through low marks or exclusion from opportunities, for failure. Even in classes thatcultivate intuition, innovation and creativity, there is usually a right answer and thus a spe-cific, predetermined pathway to success that, unlike Elden Ring, does not repeatedly endurefailure. This may be a practical position for more introductory, knowledge and theory basedcourses (although still debatable), but one area that
undergraduatecomputing students worked in teams to sketch and create ethics based decision making scenariosusing paper or blackboard. This scenario creation activity model was later refined and employedin different Ethics in Engineering courses as a means to increase engagement through gameplayand role playing.In 2022, this work was expanded by joining forces with engineering faculty from the Virtues andVocations initiative and the Ethics at Work project which included other computing faculty,faculty from Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, and faculty from Philosophy, where thegoal was to capture an engineering wide faculty and undergraduate student sentiment about ethicscontent in engineering. A multidisciplinary team of undergraduates, led by advising
engineers see how they canstay true to their beliefs and lay the groundwork for improved outcomes.An example case illustrates how an early-career engineer stood up for their values in the face ofprofessional pressures. While an undergraduate student at the University of Virginia, that studentstudied the Dominion Energy Atlantic Coast Pipeline project and met residents of in the BlueRidge Mountains of Virginia who were to be directly impacted by the project. These personalencounters made the student question the ethics of the project’s development. She rememberedthat learning experience during her first job as an engineer when she was assigned to work on aconsulting project related to that same pipeline. Aligned with GVV pillars, she drew upon
engineering degree programs.Undergraduate engineering curricula include engineering ethics through specialized courses andprogram-wide integration. While some engineering programs embed one stand-alone ethicscourse within a curriculum, other programs embed ethics modules across a few courses within acurriculum. Very few engineering programs weave engineering ethics across a four-yearundergraduate curriculum in a concerted and developmental way [7]. Engineering ethics taughtin stand-alone courses is usually offered within the first two years of study [4]. According toDavis [6], several engineering programs also embed ethical modules into technical writing andcommunication seminars, senior capstone projects, and introduction to engineering courses
Across the Curriculum. Dr. Zhu’s research interests include global and international engineering education, engineering ethics, engineering cultures, and ethics and policy of computing technologies and robotics.Xianghong WUDr. Ryan Thorpe ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Assessing the Effects of a Short-Term Global Engineering Ethics Course on theDevelopment of Engineering Students’ Moral Reasoning and Dispositions [Traditionalpaper – research/evidence-based, DEI/research methods]1 IntroductionThis paper describes a project to develop, deliver, and assess a short-term (one-week) course onglobal engineering ethics at Shandong University in the Summer of 2022. This project builds onprevious
approaches to teaching ethics. For many years, these programshave included an engineering ethics course as part of the first-year general education curriculum.Typically, the course covers normative ethical theories, a code of ethics, and three famous casestudies: The Challenger Disaster, SDI: A Violation of Professional Responsibility, and GilbaneGold. Students are assessed based on their report-writing skills, a method that can disadvantageinternational students. Additionally, senior students are expected to evaluate the ethical issues intheir capstone project designs. However, the generic approach to teaching ethics often results inless student engagement and superficial learning [11]. Graduating students are expected topossess in-depth knowledge
values and the need for a morecaring, aware, and engaged engineering community by adapting the Compassionate Engagement andAction Scales to the engineering context. The results may facilitate new research pathways withinengineering education (i.e., What factors influence compassionate behaviors, and how can they beencouraged?). Ultimately, the study advocates for a broader approach to engineering ethics that embracescompassionate values in the conception, design, and implementation of engineering projects. Introduction.In engineering, the prevailing discourse often concerns technical proficiency, innovation, and ethicalconsiderations. Rarely, however, is compassion explicitly acknowledged as a
learning theory of situated learning[1], [2], such playful learning may enable instructors to create assignments that induce studentsto break free of the typical student mindset of finding the “right” answer.Mars: An Ethical Expedition! is an interactive, 12 week, narrative game about the colonization ofMars by various engineering specialists. Students take on the role of a head engineer and arepresented with situations that require high-stakes decision-making. Various game mechanicsinduce students to act as they would on-the-fly, within a real engineering project context, usingpersonal reasoning and richly context-dependent justifications, rather than simply right/wronganswers. Each segment of the game is presented in audio and text that ends
International Council for Com- puter Communications. He has served as a member of the Steering Committee for Project Inkwell.Dr. Shatha Jawad Jawad, National University Dr. Shatha Jawad has more than 22 years of experience in teaching and more than three years as a software engineer. She had UNESCO Fellowship in the field of Information and Communication Technologies, in 2002. Her Ph.D. is in computer engineering. She is a member of the Institute for Learning-enabled Op- timization at Scale (TILOS) which has an NSF grant that began on November 1, 2021, for five years. TILOS is a National Science Foundation-funded Artificial Intelligence (AI) Research Institute led by the University of California-San Diego and includes
. Agreeableness involvespositive interactions with people. Finally, openness to ideas allows for an individual to seek outcreative solutions to helping others and the inclusion of groups that are often overlooked.This study uses longitudinal interviews with engineering students and early-career engineers atthree timepoints over seven years to characterize the moral exemplars selected by participantsand, in turn, to use these moral exemplars as a tool for assessing the ethical perceptions of theinterviewees. This study is part of a series of ongoing longitudinal projects focused onengineering students’ and early-career professionals’ views of engineering ethics and socialresponsibility [13], [14].MethodsThis study is part of a longitudinal research