ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying results 1 - 30 of 31 in total

← Previous
1
2
Next →

Pedagogy of Engagement: Exploring Three Methods in an Engineering Ethics and Professionalism Course

Conference Session: Increasing Engagement in Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jessica Wolf, University of British Columbia; Gayatri Gopalan, University of British Columbia; Christoph Johannes Sielmann P.Eng., University of British Columbia
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

activities weredesigned to stimulate critical thinking about social aspects of engineering and to reframe thetraditionally technical obligations of the engineer within sociopolitical and equity-orientedstructures.Through a qualitative analysis of student experiences, assignments, and reflections as part of thecourse, this paper evaluates the impact of three pedagogical methods on student engagement withethical questions surrounding their decision-making as both individuals and as future engineers.The three methods being studied are Virtue Points, a tool that encourages self-reflection bycontrasting personal and professional virtues, an adapted ‘Spectrum Game’ based on conceptspresented by Jubilee Media, and a modified Pisces Game used to explore

Relevance Score: 0.030025467

Exploring the Role of Self-Efficacy in Entrepreneurial Decision-Making: An Action Research Study [WIP]

Conference Session: Decision-Making in Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Tim Ransom, Clemson University; Alysa Rose Lozano, University of Kentucky; Betul Bilgin, The University of Illinois Chicago; Courtney Pfluger, Northeastern University; Sindia M. Rivera-Jiménez, University of Florida; Katie Cadwell, Syracuse University; Gisella R Lamas Samanamud, University of Kentucky
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

' written reflections on ethical dilemmaswill be grouped according to three types of possible outcomes: client-based, company-based, andinnovation-based according to their answers to corporate social dilemmas. Students will have asurvey to determine what type of moral reasoning they adopt when they face an ethical dilemma.Students will be presented with an ethical decision-making scenario and answer it based on theirown individuality. The pre and post activity reflections will be compared to verify any changesin perspective in addressing the dilemma. The EM component to this decision-making activity isnot only mimicking decision-making situations as entrepreneurs, but it also includes thediscussion of the entrepreneurial mindset framework to either

Relevance Score: 0.027387438

The Challenges of Assessing In-the-Moment Ethical Decision-Making

Conference Session: Decision-Making in Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Tori N. Wagner, University of Connecticut; Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut; Richard Tyler Cimino, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh; Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Jennifer Pascal, University of Connecticut
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

score (n = 178, p = 0.65), butshowed a decrease of -3.38 in P score (n = 178, p = 0.017). This suggests that over four years,there is a reduction in students prioritizing decisions that were altruistic and based on universalgood. It is challenging to predict why this occurs, but we tentatively suggest that it may reflect amore accurate representation of students' thoughts on these ethical dilemmas. Additionally, itmight indicate a deeper consideration of the complex factors typically involved in real ethicaldecisions, rather than merely an abstract evaluation of what a reasonable engineer should do.Given these results and to gain a fuller understanding of students’ changes in ethical reasoningthroughout their undergraduate programs, we contend

Relevance Score: 0.026313

Navigating the Mystery: An Approach for Integrating Experiential Learning in Ethics into an Engineering Leadership Program

Conference Session: Engineering, Ethics, and Leadership
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: James N. Magarian, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; John M. Feiler, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Leo McGonagle, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Eileen Milligan, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Alexander Rokosz, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Elizabeth Schanne, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Reza S. Rahaman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Olivier Ladislas de Weck, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS), Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)

deliverables reflecting a partial recognition or incompletehandling of ethical dimensions, and those that submitted deliverables reflecting thorough navigationof ethical dimensions. These performance observations were possible because the activity involvedmaking resource choices linked to ethical implications, resulting in certain materials’ use (orabsence) evident in teams’ physical deliverables. Students’ post-activity reflections, submitted afterthey participated in an activity debrief, included indications of intended learning in a majority ofcases (83% of submittals) based upon a rubric. Drawing from activity observations and reflections,we discuss how teams’ ethical decision making appears to have been strained by various intendedpressures

Relevance Score: 0.022767939

Conceptualizing the Institutional Transformation Approach to STEM Ethics Education: An Exploratory Study of NSF-Funded Institutional Transformation Projects

Conference Session: Broader Approaches to Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Qin Zhu, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Lisa M. Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

researchuniversities seeking federal funding often led to RCR education being housed in legal orcompliance divisions, such as ethics and compliance offices, research divisions, such as grantdevelopment offices, or STEM academic units, such as schools of engineering or medicine(Geller, Boyce, Ford, & Sugarman, 2010). As Resnick (2014) argues, this institutionalbifurcation between the traditional teaching of ethics in the humanities to instill understandingand promote critical reflection, and the emphasis within the sciences to govern behaviors viaresearch conduct and professional codes creates problems when assessing ethics education.The emphasis on institutional factors in ethics education in this paper can be seen as a responseto a small but consistent

Relevance Score: 0.022043683

Choreographing Virtue: The Role of Situatedness and Layering in Building Moral Muscle Memory in Engineering Ethics Education

Conference Session: Virtues in Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sergio Guillen Grillo, University of Virginia; Bryn Elizabeth Seabrook, University of Virginia
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

preparing learners todevelop scripts and action plans for acting consistently with their values in ethically challengingscenarios. The approach moves away from discussing what the right action would be accordingto different ethical normative frameworks, and instead starts from the premise that most peopleare able to recognize the right course of action that is consistent with their values, and want topursue it; however, they have difficulties acting accordingly. Central to this learning model is theapplication of a thought experiment framed as: “Assuming I know what I want to do to act onmy values, how can I get it done?” The capacity to bridge the space between decision and actionis strengthened by reflection about past experiences and each

Relevance Score: 0.018386768

Developing a Team-Based Regulatory Framework for Mobility Engineering Professionals

Conference Session: Professional Development and Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: MAN LIANG, University of Maryland College Park; Michael P McMeekin
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

specifically for mobility engineers. Since examination is oneof the pillars toward licensure, the gap reflects the lack of a complete roadmap toward theprofessional career of mobility engineers. It implies the effectiveness of education programs andquality of practice in this field could be undermined. For example, decision making generatedfrom engineering judgment may lack the grounds of widely accepted norms. Besides,engineering practice could be less tracked, disciplined, or protected. Eventually, less regulatedpractice could lead to adverse impacts on public safety as well as the health of the engineeringcommunity.One of the most important purposes of professional engineering licensure is to provide assuranceto the public of a minimum level of

Relevance Score: 0.017584775

Engineering a Bridge Across Cultures: Insights to Support Dialogue with Engineering Professionals on Ethical and Social Design Considerations

Conference Session: Engineering, Ethics, and Community Engagement
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Tiffany Smith, NASA; Zachary T. G. Pirtle, NASA
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Community Engagement Division (COMMENG), Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

studies,methodologies, and frameworks for thinking about how to teach engineers about the nature oftheir work1. The American Society for Engineering Education has a separate Engineering EthicsDivision that has also tackled broader topics on how engineers should consider the ethical andsocietal implications of what they do. Our research paper here seeks to build bridges to some ofthat engineering education and ethics research by reflecting on recent efforts that have beenperformed from within a government agency, the National Aeronautics and SpaceAdministration (NASA), to reflect on the implications on the work of engineers. This event wascalled the Artemis and Ethics workshop, and it focused on bringing in social science andhumanities scholars

Relevance Score: 0.017090796

Ethical Reasoning, Moral Intuitions, and Foreign Language in Global Engineering Education [Global Engineering Ethics Education]

Conference Session: The Global and Cultural Dimensions of Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Qin Zhu, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh; Andrea Gammon, Delft University of Technology
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

final metric, the N2 score, concerns the prevalence of post-conventionalrelative to the absence of preconventional reasoning, not only that participants make decisionsbased on universal principles of justice, but also that they do not make decisions based on aconcern for themselves alone.The MFQ is a measure of moral intuitions that asks participants to decide on not onlyconsiderations relevant to resolving ethical questions, but also the extent to which they agreewith statements with moral content [23]. These considerations belong to one of five “moralfoundations,” understandings of right and wrong driven by intuitions, closer in nature toemotions than reflective thought [25]. These include care-harm, fairness-cheating, loyalty-betrayal

Relevance Score: 0.015191818

A Student-Led Ethics Deep Dive, Discussion, and Content-Generation Ethics Assignment in Computer Science & Engineering Capstone

Conference Session: Using technology in engineering ethics education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Tracy Anne Hammond, Texas A&M University; Pauline Wade, Texas A&M University; Shawna Thomas, Texas A&M University; Hillary E. Merzdorf, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

diversity and equity, which is reflected in her publications, research, teaching, service, and mentoring. More at http://srl.tamu.edu and http://ieei.tamu.edu.Prof. Pauline Wade, Texas A&M University Pauline Wade was formerly the assistant director for the Craig & Galen Brown Engineering Honors and Grand Challenge Scholars programs. Previously, she was a tenured faculty member at the University of the Philippines, Cebu (UP), in the Department of CompuDr. Shawna Thomas, Texas A&M University Dr. Thomas is an Instructional Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at Texas A&M University. She is a member of the Engineering Education Faculty in the Institute for Engineering

Relevance Score: 0.015072664

Collective vs. Individual Decision-Making in an Engineering Ethics Narrative Game

Conference Session: Decision-Making in Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Tori N. Wagner, University of Connecticut; Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut; Richard Tyler Cimino, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh; Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Jennifer Pascal, University of Connecticut
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

Ethics Narrative Game [Research Paper] Knowing what's right doesn't mean much unless you do what's right. -Theodore RooseveltFostering ethical decision-making skills in undergraduate engineering students is central toABET accreditation and crucial to student engineers’ success in future careers [1]. This ongoingresearch focuses on the development of a narrative game called Mars: An Ethical Expedition(Mars) [2]. The game draws on the contemporary learning theory of situated cognition to providestudents with a situated, contextualized, and playful platform for using and reflecting on theirethical reasoning abilities [3, 4]. The game aims to be an engaging and

Relevance Score: 0.015072664

Research on Engineering Ethics Education in China’s Science and Engineering Universities

Conference Session: The Global and Cultural Dimensions of Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Huiming Fan, East China University of Science and Technology; Xinru Li
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

scenarios, students are trained to apply engineering ethics knowledge to practice.Implement educational reform in the form of debate competitions, and conduct engineeringethics debate competitions in various engineering ethics course teaching classes. Practical activities not only fully leverage the leading role of teachers, but also reflect thesubjectivity of students. Student debaters can gain a deeper understanding of the basic concepts,principles, guidelines, moral values, public safety obligations, social responsibilities, and otherelements of engineering ethics from different perspectives through discussions and in-depthanalysis of the topic. This can enhance moral awareness, cultivate moral emotions, and regulatemoral behavior. Under the

Relevance Score: 0.01424233

Benchmarking a Foundation for Improving Psychological Safety in Teams

Conference Session: Engineering, Ethics, and Leadership
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Kenneth W. Lamb P.E., California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Seth Claberon Sullivan, Texas A&M University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS), Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)

taken [2]. The research ofEdmondson noticed that certain teams within the same hospital produced very differentoutcomes for the patients they oversaw. As she observed more closely why certain teams couldbecome a learning organization, she noticed that the teams did seven things positively. From theseven items she created a survey that a team could use to guide a reflection on where they are intheir growth towards becoming a learning organization.The seven survey items that Edmonson created are included in the appendix of this paper, butcan be summarized into the following categories of scenarios commonly encountered in teams:making mistakes, asking for help, taking small risks, discussing tough issues, respecting thecontribution of others

Relevance Score: 0.0131565

Board 101: Compassion and Engineering Ethics: Validation of the Compassionate Engagement and Action Scales for the Engineering Education Context

Conference Session: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Poster Session
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Cristian Eduardo Vargas P.E., Purdue University, West Lafayette; Manuel José Alejandro Baquero Sierra, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Michael Robinson, Saint Vincent College; Jacqueline Rose Tawney, California Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

foundational value withinthe engineering profession. According to Gilbert [3], compassion is a sensitivity to suffering in oneselfand others and a steadfast commitment to alleviate and prevent that suffering. Drawing from the ethicalframework proposed by Campbell [5], which defines care as "active compassion, empathy, and concernfor the well-being of other living (and in some cases non-living) things" [p. 112], this paper explorescompassion as an essential component of ethical engineering practice.While engineering ethics has traditionally emphasized the importance of reflecting on the broaderconsequences of technological advancements, compassion extends beyond cognitive reflection. Itembodies a motivational force beyond empathy and sympathy [3

Relevance Score: 0.0131565

Crowdsourcing a Practical Toolkit for Embedding Ethics in the Engineering Curriculum (Work in Progress Paper)

Conference Session: Using technology in engineering ethics education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sarah Junaid, Aston University; Wendy Irene Attwell; Sarah Hitt
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

use to identify the level offocussed topics versus diverse topics. These will be used as a proxy for assessing regionalrelevance and urgency. Testimonials from four educators who have used toolkit resources ineducational contexts have also been collected to evaluate the efficacy of the toolkitqualitatively. These user cases reflect both novice users introducing ethics and experiencededucators’ use of the toolkit, which comprises of guidance articles and resources to buildknowledge and structure for curriculum delivery. This initial phase of the impact assessmentof the engineering ethics toolkit has shown that it also helps to support educators to achievethe directive from professional bodies to imbue ethics into engineering degrees. Further

Relevance Score: 0.012738727

Application of African Indigenous Knowledge Systems to AI Ethics Research and Education: A Conceptual Overview

Conference Session: The Global and Cultural Dimensions of Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Kerrie Danielle Hooper, Florida International University; Ivan Oyege, Florida International University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

andintegrity, perennialism emphasizes the significance of conserving and reviving these ways ofknowing [11]. 17Application to AI Ethics Research and EducationPerennialism theory has significant implications and suggests approaches for AI ethics researchand education. The essential component of perennials is the requirement that AI incorporateculture, guaranteeing that technical developments honor and reflect the varied cultural legacies ofcommunities. This viewpoint emphasizes how AI has the potential to be a tool for culturerevitalization and preservation, helping to pass along traditional knowledge, stories, and practicesto future generations. Perennialism also highlights education as a continuous

Relevance Score: 0.011511937

Evidence-Based Practice: Looking Good When It Matters: How Engineering Students Regard the Virtue Ethics Framework

Conference Session: Virtues in Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Natalie C.T. Van Tyne, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

in chemical engineering and Russian language. Her research interests focus on the use of reflection in student learning, specifically for self-regulated learning and identity formation. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Evidence-Based Practice: Looking Good When It Matters: How Engineering Students Regard the Virtue Ethics FrameworkIntroductionOur first-year engineering ethics unit contains an introduction to and guided practice in ethicaldecision making under each of four ethical frameworks: Deontology, Virtue Ethics,Consequentialism, and Utilitarianism. Students receive a briefing about each framework to learnabout its basic features and how to apply them. Prior studies with

Relevance Score: 0.011511937

The Virtues of Engineering Practice: An Investigation of Professional Codes of Ethics in Engineering

Conference Session: Virtues in Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Elizabeth M Boatman; Kyle Luthy, Wake Forest University; Christian B. Miller, Wake Forest University; Olga Pierrakos, Wake Forest University
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, and LatinAmerica. They discovered that only four countries had adopted the IEEE code of ethics as is andthe majority of countries (N=28) had variations that reflected sociopolitical and culturaldifferences (2014).A global professional code of ethics for engineers would be great but unfortunately does notexist. The most prominent U.S. code of ethics for engineers is the one developed by the NationalSociety of Professional Engineers (NSPE), as it represents licensed professional engineers.Please note that licensure for engineers is not a requirement for most engineering disciplines.The majority of licensed Professional Engineers (PEs) are civil engineers. Industry exemptionshave inhibited most of the other

Relevance Score: 0.011393864

On the Challenges of Transferring Teaching Practices in Engineering Ethics and an Asset-Based Approach to Developing Ethics Instruction

Conference Session: Broader Approaches to Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Bono Po-Jen Shih, Pennsylvania State University; Benjamin Daniel Chambers, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Matthew James P.E., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

following: whereas theideal of engineering education research seeks to identify and promote “best practices” inengineering education, this goal faces at least three sets of challenges in the practice ofengineering ethics instruction. First, the scope of engineering ethics has grown and diversifiedowing to evolving accreditation criteria and reflections from the engineering educationcommunity. Second, teaching practices for engineering ethics also expanded and divergedaccordingly to answer the increased and changing needs in engineering ethics education. Third,even when a promising ethics teaching practice is identified, there is a great variation in facultyviews about its effectiveness, further compounded by the methodological challenges

Relevance Score: 0.011393864

Making Room for Followers: A Grounded Theory Study of Ethical Followership Among Professional Engineers

Conference Session: Broader Approaches to Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Kyle Payne, Collins Engineers
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

. One rater disagreedwith the other two raters on the interpretation of two codes, resulting in an interrater agreementscore of .80 (that is, among three raters, the number of actual agreements divided by the numberof potential agreements equaled .80). This result, while acceptable, prompted an immediaterevision to define the two suspect codes more clearly and establish complete interrateragreement.Results Among professional engineers, the ethical implications of the work are significant.Whether their output is buildings or bridges, or roadways, or sewage systems, or electrical grids,professional engineers play an important role in protecting the public. As Bert reflected, “Stopand think for a moment about the number of lives that the

Relevance Score: 0.010742237

Exploring the Influence of Identity Development on Public Policy Career Pathways for Engineers

Conference Session: Professional Development and Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Bailey Kathryn McOwen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Dayoung Kim, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

, the aim of an individualis to create a positive social image, and this goal can be threatened by a perceived lack ofcompetence, questionable moral behavior, or even when an individual or group feels they are notrecognized as a person or group with autonomy or unique qualities [17]. This would in turncause one’s social identity to develop in a negative direction; development in a positive directionwould occur when one’s social identification and social comparison reflected good or popularbehaviors or attitudes either through initiating positive change in their group or potentiallymoving to another group that aligns with their developed personal identity.The second theory which differentiates and acknowledges the interplay between personal

Relevance Score: 0.010615606

Engineering Ethics and Unionization: Challenging NSPE's Positions on Engineers' Relationship with Labor Unions

Conference Session: Engineering, Ethics, and Community Engagement
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Lazlo Stepback, Purdue University ; Joey Valle, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions: Community Engagement Division (COMMENG), Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

engineer within society byupholding an alignment of industry over engineering reflective of a hegemonic adherence tobusiness professionalism [1, 2, 3]. The ideology of business professionalism, described in moredetail to follow, advances beliefs that engineers are, and should be, unshakably beholden tocapitalist corporate owners and the industries they extract profit through [3]. In this paper, weexamine the historically anti-union attitudes and actions of the National Society of ProfessionalEngineers (NSPE), and their adherence to the ideology of business professionalism, throughanalysis of ethics case studies published by their Board of Ethical Review (BER). As an advocateof professional engineering licensure and as leaders in engineering ethics

Relevance Score: 0.010615606

A Directed Question-Based Framework for Teaching and Learning Ethics: A Tool but also a Memorable Framework that Students Can Take Forward into their Professional Practice

Conference Session: Increasing Engagement in Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Udayan Das, Saint Mary's College of California
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

questions. Others who wish to incorporate this framework may use the questionsas a starting point along with the bullet points above and make changes according to the applicationarea and as to what they see as relevant.ETHICAL REFLECTIONS There are 3 ethical re�lections that students complete during the course. The re�lections aredesigned to have students carefully consider their personal values and how those values are likely toplay out in their future professional lives. One of the concerns that I have had for a long time is that Isee a disconnect between the personal values of individuals whom I know personally that work forlarge tech companies and the ways that the companies that they work for act. While an individualdoes not have direct

Relevance Score: 0.009867375

How Good is Our Undergraduate Engineering Ethics Training? A Comparative Analysis of Engineering Ethics Textbooks

Conference Session: Virtues in Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Chloe Adams, Wake Forest University; Olga Pierrakos, Wake Forest University and National Science Foundation ; Lasya Agasthya
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

topical themes wereinitially identified by reviewing the following three textbooks - Ethics in Engineering Practiceand Research [27], Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Case [9], and Engineering Ethics [8]– andthen continued by adding each additional textbook. Thus, more topics were iteratively addedafter each textbook examination. The final list of forty-one ethical topics identified, shown inTable 1, reflects a comprehensive list of engineering ethics topics. When a keyword wasmentioned or clearly alluded to, the topic was marked on the table with an “X” to indicate it wasincluded in that textbook. It is noteworthy that there were differences in the format of thetextbooks’ table of contents, specifically with the headings. The table of contents

Relevance Score: 0.009867375

Educating the Whole Engineer: Leveraging Communication Skills to Cultivate Ethical Leadership Character

Conference Session: Engineering, Ethics, and Leadership
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Farnoosh B. Brock, Prolific Living Inc.; Jessica Koehler, Wake Forest University; Andy Brock, Prolific Living; Olga Pierrakos, Wake Forest University and National Science Foundation
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS), Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)

mechanisms, and habits/patterns that no longerserve us in a professional environment. A sample scenario used in this session is below. Thisscenario enables students to feel the power of both (1) self-awareness and (2) blind spots andhow ignoring a blind spot can become a barrier to deeper relationships with their ecosystem.Sample Scenario: We explored conversations with superiors - executives, upper management -and their body language / facial expressions in response to our request and reflection on whatmay have been a blind spot on our part. This is a way to sharpen your self-awareness byunderstanding the impression you make on your ecosystem and how to elicit the desired outcomeby improving on your blind spots. A strategy to learn about your blind

Relevance Score: 0.009494886

Connecting Engineering Ethics with a Shared Curriculum

Conference Session: Broader Approaches to Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Markus D. Ong, Whitworth University; Kamesh Sankaran, Whitworth University
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

requirement for all students in the program, students will consider thecollapse of the skywalks in the Hyatt Regency in Kansas City, MO in a module similar to the onedescribed by Bottomley [12]. In Internship Reflection, students are equipped to seek discernmentof vocational plans based on their internship experience, the readings and discussions throughoutthe semester, and alignment with their personal values, beliefs, and goals. The aforementionedvirtue ethical theory helps students connect what they want to do with who they want to become. Shared Curriculum Engineering Major Core 150 Required for all students Statics Required Core 250 Required for

Relevance Score: 0.009399457

The Development of a Student Survey on Macroethics in Aerospace Engineering [Work-In-Progress]

Conference Session: Decision-Making in Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Corin L. Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles; Elizabeth Ann Strehl, University of Michigan; Megan Ennis, University of Michigan; Andrew Benham; Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson (he/him) is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Faculty member of the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. His lab’s design-based research focuses on how to re-contextualize engineering science engineering courses to better reflect and prepare students for the reality of ill-defined, sociotechnical engineering practice. Their current projects include studying and designing classroom interventions around macroethical issues in aerospace engineering and the productive beginnings of engineering judgment as students create and use mathematical models. Aaron holds a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering

Relevance Score: 0.008056678

Examining the Characteristics and Traits of Young Engineers’ Moral Exemplars

Conference Session: The Global and Cultural Dimensions of Engineering Ethics Education
Collection: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Darius Grandvil Carter, San Francisco State University; Stephanie Claussen, San Francisco State University
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)

Grant Nos.2024301 and 2130924. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References[1] D. MacMillan and M. Laris, “After midair failure, critics ask: Did Boeing learn from Max crashes?,” Washington Post, Jan. 12, 2024. Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/01/12/boeing-max-safety-crashes/[2] N. Kallioinen et al., “Moral Judgements on the Actions of Self-Driving Cars and Human Drivers in Dilemma Situations From Different Perspectives,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, p. 2415, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02415.[3] W. T. Lynch and R