for the four main scales, in a very good range,and from .70 to .80 for the nine subscales. For test-retest reliability, the Pearson correlations runfrom .78 to .92 for the scales and the subscales.2With regard to validity, a concurrent validity study with 1,050 participants, who took both theKGI measurement and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator assessment, produced very significantcorrelations between the two instruments' scales, which followed the theoretical designs of themeasurements. In a smaller concurrent validity study with the KGI measurement and theFundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation-B (FIRO-B) assessment, again there weresignificant correlations between the two sets of scales, as would be expected based on theirtheoretical
, D. R. Brodeur, and K. Edström, Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach, 2nd Ed. Springer International Publishing, 2014.[6] P. Phyllis, “Proposal to add a Minor in Engineering Leadership Development,” Maryland, 2007.[7] R. J. Schuhmann, “Engineering Leadership Education – The Search for Definition and a Curricular Approach,” J. STEM Education, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 61–69, 2010.[8] NSPE, “NSPE Position Statement No . 1752 — Engineering Education Outcomes,” National Society of Professional Engineers, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.nspe.org/sites/default/files/resources/GR downloadables/Engineering_Education_Outcomes.pdf. [Accessed: 01-Dec-2014].[9] R. Graham, E. Crawley, B. R. Mendelsohn, W. Paper, B. M. Gordon, M
Paper ID #13341The Touchstone Engineering Leadership Development ProgramDr. Jay B. Brockman, University of Notre Dame Dr. Jay Brockman is the Associate Dean of Engineering for Experiential Learning and Community En- gagement. He received his Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University and previ- ously worked for Intel Corporation. He is also a founder of Emu Solutions, Inc., a startup company that is commercializing research in the area of high-performance computing.Dr. Victoria E Goodrich, University of Notre Dame Dr. Victoria Goodrich is the Director of the First-Year Engineering Program at the
Paper ID #14038Contributions of Competition Based Complex Engineering Design Experi-ence to Leadership Development in Engineering StudentsDr. Farah I. Jibril , Qatar UniversityDr. Bassnt mohamed yasser, Qatar University A research assistant in VPCAO office in Qatar University and have my masters degree in quality man- agement with thesis project about ”utilization of Lean six sigma in enhancement of sterile suspensions manufacturing”. Being working on pharmaceutical manufacturing field in Glaxosmithkline Egypt as sec- tion head for quality assurance and validation I have a great experience in quality management system
Narratives That Captivate, Convince, and Inspire,AMACONxxiii French, J. and Raven, B. (1959). “The Bases of Social Power. In Studies in Social Power”, D. Cartwright, Ed.,pp. 150-167. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.xxiv McGregor (1960), The Human side of Enterprise, McGraw Hillxxv The Kennedy Group (2012), “Organizational Climate vs Culture Monograph”, online articlexxvi Mellinger, “The Ten Rules of Good Followership”, AU-24 Concepts for Air Force Leadershipxxvii Avolio, Gardner, Walumbwa, Luthans, May (2004), “Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by whichauthentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors”, The Leadership Quarterly 15 (2004) p. 801-823, ElsevierIncxxviii Ancona, Kochan
Paper ID #14123Engineering Leadership: A New Engineering DisciplineDr. Roger V. Gonzalez P.E., University of Texas, El Paso Roger V. Gonzalez, Ph.D., P.E., is the Director of the Leadership Engineering program for the College of Engineering and Professor and Chair of Engineering Education and Leadership. Dr. Gonzalez earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 1986 from UTEP. He earned his M.S. in Biomedical Engineering and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin and was a Post-Doctoral Fellow and the premier Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago and Northwestern Medical School. Professor Gonza
Paper ID #13649Engineering Leadership as Principled NonconformityDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She is a past chair of the Liberal Educa- tion/Engineering & Society Division of ASEE and is particularly interested in the role of liberal education in developing engineering leaders. Page 26.631.1 c
prompts: 1. What was/is your role in the development of the IRE program? 2. How did you get involved? 3. When you first got involved, what did you think of the idea? Why? 4. Did your thinking about the program change during the process? How? Why? What influenced your thinking? 5. What do you feel was the biggest challenge in getting the program started? How was that overcome? 6. What challenges is IRE still facing? 7. What do you think of the current program? a. What do you feel are IRE’s strengths? b. What do you feel could be done differently? 8. What do you anticipate in the future for the program? 9. What advice would you give others who are involved in similar projects? Lessons learned
Paper ID #11738Interactive Panel on Perspectives and Practical Skills for Men as Advocatesfor Gender EquityDr. Lawrence J. Genalo, Iowa State University Dr. Genalo is a University Professor and Associate Chair of the Materials Science and Engineering Department at Iowa State University. He is a Fellow of ASEE and has run the NSF Grantees Poster Session for nearly 20 years. He is a former chair of DELOS and the Freshman Programs Constituent Committee (the year before it became a Division).Dr. Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University Roger Green received the B.S. degree in electrical and computer engineering and the
Paper ID #13727Developing a New Generation of Leadership at the University of CalgaryCase Study on the Maier Student Leadership ProgramDr. Lynne Cowe Falls, University of Calgary Lynne Cowe Falls, PhD, P. Eng., FCAE, FCSCE, is an Associate Professor in Civil Engineering at the Schulich School of Engineering, the University of Calgary. She is a co-author of over 30 technical papers and several books in the area of pavement and infrastructure management and most recently of Current Pavement Management. With over 20 years in industry prior to joining the University of Calgary, she is a Vice-President and Board Member of the
. (2013). Developing Students' Leadership Capacity: New Directions for Student Services, Number 140: Wiley. Hartmann, B. (2015). Surveying industry needs for leadership in entry-‐level engineering position, Unpublished manuscript. Iowa State University. Higher Education Research Institute. (1996). A social change model of leadership development: Guidebook version III. College Park, MD: National Clearinghouse for Leadership Programs. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2005). The Student Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI): Wiley. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2012). The Leadership Challenge: How to
). Influences impacting leadership development. Journal of Management inEngineering, 22(2), 68-74.9. Russell, J. S., & Stouffer, W. B. (2005). Survey of the national civil engineering curriculum. Journal of ProfessionalIssues in Engineering Education and Practice, 131(2), 118-128.10. Ahn, Y. H., Kwon, H., Pearce, A. R., & Shin, H. (2010, April). Key competencies for US construction graduates:an exploratory factor analysis. In ASC Proceedings of the 46th Annual International Conference, Boston, MA.11. Arciszewski, T., & Harrison, C. (2009). Successful civil engineering education. Journal of professional issues inengineering education and practice, 136(1), 1-8.12. Ellis, L. A., & Petersen, A. K. (2011). A way forward: Assessing the
“because you don’t have the resources or the equipment or the knowledgethat is available out in the world”13. These Makers collaborate together to share information andexperiences within the community14. This community populates maker spaces and hackerspaces15 and gather with Makers in commercial spaces like Tech Shop16 and Maker Bench17.This study works alongside a larger project to explore if Makers can be considered engineers andvice versa2.B. LeadershipLeadership can be defined as having the knowledge and skills to lead a team in achieving goals3.Engineering leadership is often determined by an analysis of what leaders in engineering do18.Leaders should be lifelong learners, be service-oriented, express a positive attitude, balance theirlives
. Page 26.1447.6Table 4.Question MatrixCategories/Dimension A. Knowledge B. Abilities Behaviors1. Initiative/Confidence 1A 1B 1C2. Communication 2A 2B 2C3. Interpersonal Interaction 3A 3B 3C4. Teamwork 4A 4B 4C5. Engagement 5A 5B 5CCognitive interviewsAfter developing 60 possible survey questions regarding competencies and 4 user questions, twocollege recruiters were identified to assist with improving the survey instrument
Frameworkidentified and described the range of leadership behaviors exhibited within teams.Thematic coding of the ECT transcripts produced 11 categories of leadership behaviors: IdealBehavior, Individual Consideration, Project Management, Technical Competence,Communication, Collaboration, Motivating Others, Training & Mentoring, Delegation, Problem-Solving, and Boundary-Spanning (Table A). To assess the relative importance of these concepts,team members mentioning behaviors in each category were counted (Table B).Table A. Definitions of behavioral categories. Behavioral Category DefinitionIdeal Behavior Behaving as a role model for team members.Individual Consideration Recognizing that each team
, “Engineers Learn ‘Soft Skills the Hard Way’: Planting a Seed of Leadership in Engineering Classes,” Leadership and Management in Engineering, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 18–24, 2007.[2] P. Galloway, “Engineering Education Reform,” in The 21st-Century Engineer: A Proposal for Engineering Education Reform, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2007, pp. 46–51.[3] B. Ahn, M. F. Cox, J. London, O. Cekic, and J. Zhu, “Creating an Instrument to Measure Leadership, Change, and Synthesis in Engineering Undergraduates,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 115–136, Jan. 2014.[4] S. S. K. W. Fakeh, M. S. Shahibi, A. Jamaludin, M. R. Rahim, J. Paiman, and Z. Ibrahim, “Understanding Leadership Values Among Under Graduate Students in UITM
benefits to theDepartment of Engineering as well as the expected benefits for Madison Engineering Leaders inthe workforce and graduate programs. A longitudinal study will be put in place for the first-yearengineering students until they graduate and a survey study will be implemented for the leaderswho have graduated.References1. Engineering at Illinois. Illinois Engineering First Year Experience. Retrieved fromhttp://www.iefx.engineering.illinois.edu/#!about/c7pj Page 26.539.162. Engineering Ambassadors (2013). Engineering Ambassadors Penn State. Retrieved fromhttp://www.engr.psu.edu/ambassadors/3. Kouzes, J., Posner, B., High, B., & Morgan, G
IGURE 3 : L EADERSHIP O RIENTATION B Y Y EARS EXPERIENCE Page 26.1519.6No clear patterns emerge from this graph with the exception of a strong orientation amongnovice engineers (zero to two years) toward collaborative optimization. This “experience” effectmay be confounded by a “sex” effect, as women make up a greater percentage of individuals intheir first two years (35%) than in the sample as a whole (26%).Finally, we found no clear pattern of leadership orientation preferences by organizationalposition. Please see Figure 4 for an illustration of these findings. While we expected engineerswith formalized management
graduation.Attainment of proficiency for each outcome is measured using embedded indicators based onmapping to the six levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy 11,12. Table 1 summarizes the 22 CEE Page 26.1465.3Table 1 Summary of Citadel Civil Engineering CEE Department Program Outcomes Dept. Program Outcome Dept. Program Outcome with Professional Skills Linkage 1. Mathematics 2. Science 3. Solid & Fluid Mechanics 4. Experiments 5. Problems Solving a.) Techniques b.) Tools Design 6. a.) Environmental 7. b.) Structural 8. c.) Land Development 9. d.) Transportation 10. Contemporary Issues 11. Project Management
Paper ID #11996Engineering Leadership Assessment to Action: Development Leadership Pro-files for Academic SuccessMr. Joseph Louis, Purdue University Joseph Louis is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Civil Engineering at Purdue University and is working as a graduate research assistant for Purdue University’s Engineering Leadership Minor. He received his B.Tech. in Civil Engineering from the National Institute of Technology Trichy India, and a M.S. in Civil Engineering from Purdue University.Mr. Amadin Osagiede, Purdue University, West Lafayette Amadin Osagiede, a native of Londonderry, New Hampshire and originally from
larger field of projectmanagement is more broad and diverse, as shown in Table 1. CAPM® (Certified Associate in Project Management) PRINCE2 Foundation PMP (Project Management Professional) PRINCE2 Practitioner PgMP® (Program Management Professional) IPMA Level A (Certified Projects Director) PfMPSM (Portfolio Management Professional) IPMA Level B® (Certified Senior Project PMI-RMP® (PMI Risk Management Professional) Manager) PMI-SP® (PMI Scheduling Professional) IPMA Level C® (Certified Project Manager) PMI-ACP® (PMI Agile Certified Practitioner) IPMA Level D® (Certified Project Management PMI-PBASM (PMI Professional in Business Analysis
faced.Capstone ExperienceThe objectives of the Capstone Experience, as given to the students, were 1. Choose a “real-life” leadership opportunity in an organization that you have the greatest personal interest (passion) in addressing 2. Describe the leadership opportunity (including aspects the organizational structure) 3. Describe the problem(s) that you will or must address in this role 4. Envision the organization in your ideal outcome(s) and describe 5. Explain your vision for solving the problem(s) by developing specific objectives 6. Create a strategic plan for achieving your vision including a. Communication strategy b. Delegation and empowerment of your followers c. Timeline for completion of your
Paper ID #13734Implementation of an Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum to Prepare21st Century LeadersMs. Katherine Agnew Trevey, Marquette University Ms. Trevey currently serves as the Director of Engineering Leadership Programs in the Opus College of Engineering at Marquette University. She has more than 10 years of experience creating leadership development programs for undergraduate students. In early 2014, she was hired to run the newly created E-Lead Program (a three-year people-focused, technical leadership program offered to undergraduate students in the College of Engineering). Her responsibilities include
- dyne (Pratt & Whitney), he helped design the Space Shuttle. As manager of Reactor Safety Analysis, Experimental Engineering, and Fluid Dynamics Technology at KAPL (Lockheed Martin), he conducted research for Naval Reactors. He currently serves as the Walter L. Robb director of Engineering Lead- ership and as an instructor in Engineering Science at Penn State. Erdman has chaired the local Jaycees, Department of Social Services Advisory Council, GE Share Board, and Curling Club; and served on the Human Services Planning Council, United Way, Chamber of Commerce, and Capital Fund Drive Boards of Directors. Erdman has also lectured on leadership topics at Penn State and RPI. He returned to campus frequently as a
Paper ID #11725Developing Leaders by Putting Students in the Curriculum Development DriverSeatMiss Yazmin Montoya, LEADMr. Aaron Eduardo Pacheco Rimada, University of Texas at El PasoErwin Delgado, Univerity of Texas at El PasoIsaiah Nathaniel Webb,Dr. Meagan R. Vaughan, University of Texas, El Paso Dr. Meagan R. Vaughan received her PhD from The University of Texas at Austin where her research focused on the design of a low-cost, volume adjustable prosthetic socket. Now an Assistant Professor at The University of Texas at El Paso, she is helping develop a new Engineering Leadership Program to help students to bridge the gap