Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Physics II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yumin Zhang, Southeast Missouri State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

for the first time, what he didn’t realize was that thereal challenge for the students was the difficulty in understanding the inner structure of thesedata tables. As a result, a few students failed to learn this course very well. The final exam scoresof the whole class are shown in Fig. 1(a). In the fall of 2010, the author taught this course for asecond time and issued a final exam which shared 90% of the problems used two years ago. Fig.1(b) shows the scores of this final exam, and it indicates that the students’ performance hasimproved significantly. 80 80 Fall 2008 Fall 2010 60

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Physics II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Teresa L. Larkin, American University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

what many others teaching in a moretraditional college classroom setting have found, they also give rise to a potential gender-related Page 22.260.10bias in the instrument itself. This issue has also been raised by others within the PER communityand is worthy of further consideration. Perhaps a study that looked at individual FCI questionsalong with a set of comparably-crafted free-writing questions would provide additional insight.VII. REFERENCES 1. Jones, T. H. & Paolucci, R. (1998). The learning effectiveness of educational technology: A call for further research. Educational Technology Review, (9), 10 – 14. 2. Arons, A. B

Conference Session

Programmatic Issues in Physics or Engineering Phys

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yumin Zhang, Southeast Missouri State University; David Probst, Southeast Missouri State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

the two magnets, which isshown in Fig. 2. Then the magnetic field distribution was investigated by changing the relativepermeability (μr) of the top bar in the range from 1 to 1000. If μr is pretty low, there is littleeffect to the distribution of the field. Unlike the situation in electric field, the presence of non-ferromagnetic metals, such as aluminum and copper, has little effect on the distribution of staticmagnetic field. On the other hand, materials with high relative permeability can change the fielddistribution significantly. Figuratively speaking, materials with a high permeability are just likeshortcut paths. As a result, the magnetic field is crowded into them, which is shown in Fig. 2(b).In addition, the software can also

Conference Session

Engineering Physics Technical Session 3

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hüseyin Sarper, Old Dominion University; Drew Landman, Old Dominion University; Linda Vahala, Old Dominion University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

Skytrax which comes with its own payload bay. A payload can be an altimeter as in Figure5 or anything else that is allowable including an insect. The MaxTrax has a built-in altimeter, butit is very unreliable. Figure 5. RTF model rockets used for practiceThe project used QWEST Corporation’s Big Dog (B & D) model that had to be constructed. TheB&D is a relatively large model, but it does not have a payload bay as in the SkyTrax above. Thecone had to be fitted with hooks and wires to hang the altimeter and tiny holes had to be drilled onthe upper part of the tube to allow air in for pressure differential detection. The B & D model hasfour fins, a length of 82.55 cm and a mass of 198.45 grams according to the manufacturer

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Phy

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Teresa Larkin, American University; Dan Budny, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

sessionsstudents are introduced and coached in the following topic areas: 1) Working in Teams 2) Use of software packages (MATLAB) in problem solving, a. Mathematical Operations b. Matrix Operations c. Curve Fitting d. Plotting e. Input/Output f. Scripting g. Branching h. Looping 3) Use of software packages (C++) in problem solving, a. Mathematical Operations b. Input/Output c. Scripting d. Branching e. Looping f. Functions g. Pointers 4) Use of software packages (WORD, POWERPOINT) in communications. a. Introduction to Technical Report Writing b. Effective Use of the LibraryOpen-ended homework projects related to

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Physics I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adrian Ieta, Oswego State University College; Rachid Manseur, State University of New York, Oswego; Thomas E. Doyle P.Eng., McMaster University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

development and enhancement.” Proceedings of the ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Austin, TX, June 14-17, 2009.[7] McDonald, D. and P. Duesing. “Laboratory development in power generation, conversion,and dissipation.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City,Utah, 2004.[8] Furman, B. J., F. Barez, J. C. Wang, P. Hsu, P. Reischl, and T. R. Hsu. “MechatronicsEngineering laboratory development at San Jose State University.” Proceedings of the ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Milwaukee, WI, June 15-18, 1997.[9] Rosato, A. D., Ian S. Fischer, Jonathan Luke, Rajesh N. Dave, Robert Pfeffer, and DorisYacoub. “On laboratory development for a Curriculum in Particle Technology.” Proceedings ofthe ASEE Annual

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Physics

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Radian Belu, Drexel University; Alexandru Belu, Case Western Reserve University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

areas for theapplications of symbolic computation. A good example is the use of the algebra systems in quantumfield theory to check the accuracy of the answer with experimental results. Electromagnetic field theory Page 14.1147.4is one of the areas of physics and engine engineering where symbolic computation is applied on anextended scale due to their capabilities in solving differential equations and visualization and graphiccapabilities.Some of the advantages of using a CAS packages are: a) students can write down mathematics in aprogramming-like way, using symbolic notations; b) less time spent with calculations leaves more timefor

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics II

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steve E. Watkins, Missouri University of Science & Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

circuits; and the last digit for thespecific course.) Prerequisites for many upper-level courses in EE made it difficult for CPEstudents to cross over and vice versa for EE students wanting CpE courses. New elective coursestended to be developed for either EE majors or for CpE majors. Calculus II Circuits I (a) Prior EE Calculus II Circuits I (b) Prior CpE & Lab. Curricula & Lab. Curricula EE 151 EE 151 & 152 Programming & 152 C++Programming

Conference Session

Engineering Physics & Physics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angeles Dominguez, Tecnologico de Monterrey & Universidad Andrés Bello; Jorge Eugenio de la Garza Becerra, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

Education from Syracuse University, New York. Professor Dominguez is a member of the Researchers’ National System in Mexico (SNI) and currently she is the President of Red de Investigaci´on e Innovaci´on en Educaci´on del Noreste de M´exico (REDIIEN). Angeles has been a visiting researcher at Syracuse Uni- versity, at the University of Texas at Austin. She teaches undergraduate courses in Mathematics and grad- uate courses in Education. Professor Dominguez is a thesis advisor on the master and doctoral programs on education at the Tecnologico de Monterrey. Her main research areas are: a) models and modeling, b) use of technology to improve learning and c) evaluation. In addition, Professor Dominguez is the coordi- nator

Conference Session

Engineering Physics Technical Session 4

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angeles Dominguez, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM) and Universidad Andres Bello; Jorge Eugenio de la Garza Becerra, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM)

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

degree in Mathematics Education from Syracuse University, New York. Professor Dominguez is a member of the Researchers’ National System in Mexico (SNI) and currently she is the President of Red de Investigaci´on e Innovaci´on en Educaci´on del Noreste de M´exico (REDIIEN). Angeles has been a visiting researcher at Syracuse University, at the University of Texas at Austin. She teaches undergraduate courses in Mathematics and graduate courses in Education. Professor Dominguez is a thesis advisor on the master and doctoral programs on education at the Tec- nologico de Monterrey. Her main research areas are: a) models and modeling, b) use of technology to improve learning and c) evaluation. In addition, Professor

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Timothy J. Garrison, York College of Pennsylvania

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

learning. During thatfive-year span, the course was taught exclusively by the author. The author also considered thefive-year period prior to 2010, for which the course was taught in the traditionallecture/lab/recitation format. (In 2009, the course elements were combined but only modestamounts of active learning were added). Table 2 summarizes the grade data over the completeten-year period. The table includes the number of students in the course each year, the averageGPA for the class (neglecting withdrawals), the percentage of the students that passed the course(requires a grade of “C” or better), and the percentage of the students that earned a “B” or better.The years shaded in green were taught using the new course structure with active

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marie Lopez del Puerto, University of Saint Thomas; Jeff Jalkio, University of Saint Thomas; Paul R. Ohmann, University of Saint Thomas

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

byElectrical Engineering and Physics majors.We first introduced “Equations in Words” in our courses as part of homework or in-classproblem packets. We showed students an example of an equation in words to clarify theexpectation that they were not to do a literal translation symbol by symbol but that they had tothink about the physical meaning of the equation. A typical “Equations in Words” problem fromthe Waves unit in Classical Physics II is shown below: Consider the following equation: ∆L = 𝑛 + 1 2  𝜆 n = 0, 1, 2, 3, … a) This equation applies to: b) The variables and their units are: ΔL n λ c) Explain the equation in your own words: d) Draw

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Physics I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Ludwigsen, Kettering University; Janet Brelin-Fornari, Kettering University; Joseph Neal, Kettering University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

who completed surveys, lower case letters denote those exposed to the previousexpository curriculum and upper case letters denote those involved in Crash into Physics. Groupb and c are the same set of students that were administered both tests; otherwise, the groups aredifferent sets of students. Page 22.389.6Table 2: Sample Group Sizes, Background and Scores a b c d E F GSample Size 96 47 47 25 28 32 56% Never Taken Phys 95.8 93.6 91.5 68 89 84

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics I

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Teresa L. Larkin, American University; Jessica Uscinski, American University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

. Department Learning Outcomes Upon completion of the BS in Physics, students will be able to: A demonstrate their understanding of the foundations in physics. B competently solve appropriate problems in upper level physics courses. C demonstrate competency in experimental design and scientific data collection and analysis. D demonstrate competency in their understanding of scientific information

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching Physics

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Radian Belu, Wayne State University; Alexandru Catalin Belu, Wayne State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

electrodynamics attractive seems much more elegant if one can provethem. Once a result is obtained in the discrete theory, it is trivially true in the continuumlimit; learning the corresponding continuum limit; learning the corresponding continuumresult requires no additional effort.Maxwell’s equations are equations for determining the time evolution of two vectorfields, the electric field E and the magnetic field B. ρ dE ρ 1 ρ = c 2 curl B − j (25) dt ε0 ρ dB ρ = − curl E (26) dtAnd the continuity equation

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Physics II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Ross, University of Detroit Mercy; Meghann Norah Murray, University of Detroit Mercy

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

) Voltage (V) Figure 5. Current-voltage characteristics of an OLED displayed in semi-log and log-log form. This is the same data as that of Figure 4 plotted in a different format.Figure 5 shows the same data as the previous figure, but plotted in semi-log and log-logforms. Plotting the data in these (semi-)logarithmic forms is a useful activity forstudents. It allows them to glean useful information regarding the functional dependenceof the current on the voltage. If the current depends exponentially on the voltage, I = Ae BV with A and B constants, then a semi-log plot should yield a straight line withslope B. If the current has a power-law dependence on the voltage, I = CV n with C andn constants, then a log-log plot yields a straight

Conference Session

Engineering Physics Technical Session 1

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

AnalysisThe survey was done at the end of the semester, so the students had a clear view of the activitiesand were able to answer questions regarding the impact of the group activities (see a sampleproject in appendix D). Seven survey questions were asked (see appendix A). About fortystudents took part in the survey. In addition, students were asked to rate other groups’ projects(see appendix B). The data obtained for each question and peer rating were analyzed using abasic excel spread sheet. The following survey questions (q) were analyzed for this report.q1. Rate the weekly group/team activities from very interesting (5) to uninteresting (1).q2. Rate how much you helped other group/team members to learn physics concepts during theweekly group

Conference Session

Engineering Physics & Physics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hank D. Voss, Taylor University; Scott Henry Moats, Crown College; Bill Chapman, University of Arizona

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

. Figure 4. Small University LACU start-up example5.0 Proposed Two Year Standardized Curriculum and AssessmentProposed freshman classes would include Introduction to Engineering, Software, and Ethics (3hrs.), Calculus (8 hrs.), University Physics (8 hrs.), and 16 hours of other courses. Proposed Page 26.638.9sophomore classes would be Chemistry (4 hrs.), Programming (3 hrs.), Differential Equations (4hrs.), Principles of Engineering (4 hrs.), Introduction to Electronics or Statics/Dynamics-B (3hrs.) and Digital Circuits or Strength/Materials (2 hrs.) and 15 hours of other courses (Figure 5below).A sophomore “Capstone-like” class (better named a

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Physics

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Teresa Larkin, American University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

further research. Educational Technology Review, (9), 10 – 14. 2. Arons, A. B. (1990). A Guide to Introductory Physics Teaching. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 3. Halloun, I. A. & Hestenes, D. (1985). The initial knowledge state of college students. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1043 – 1055. 4. McCloskey, M., Caramazza, A., & Green, B. (1980). Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: Naïve beliefs about the motion of objects. Science, 210, 1139 – 1141. 5. McDermott, L. C. (1984). Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics. Physics Today, 37, 24 – 32. 6. McDermott, L. C. (1991). A view from physics. In M. Gardner, J. Greeno, F. Reif, A. H. Schoenfeld, A. diSessa, and E

Conference Session

Technology in the Physics or Engineering Physics C

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Jonassen, University of Missouri

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

development (pp. 371-393). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.6. Kuhn, D., & Dean., D. (2004). Connecting scientific reasoning and causal inference. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5 (2), 261-288.7. Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20, 99-149.8. Sembugmorthy, V. & Chandrasekeran, B. (1986). Functional representations of devices and compilation of diagnostic problem-solving systems. IN J. Kolodner & C.K. Riesbeck (Eds.), Experience, memory, and reasoning (pp. 47-53). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.9. Thagard, P. (2000). Explaining disease: Correlations, causes, and mechanisms. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 254-276

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching Introductory Physics

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gary Turner, Morningside College

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

performed at a high level in Advanced Placement B(AP-B) or International Baccalaureate Higher Level (IB-HL) physics at High School, or inCollege Physics, will usually find much of a University Physics sequence repetitive and boring;most of the sequence is not significantly different to a high quality algebra-based preparation.For these students, the opportunity to “top-up” their conceptual framework with CalculusApplications makes the entry into engineering or physics much more appealing, and allows themto be meeting another graduation requirement instead of a “busy work” requirement.One of the problems associated with breaking down a course into two components comes aboutwhen those two components are instructed by different faculty. This is

Conference Session

Engineering Physics & Physics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Evan C. Lemley, University of Central Oklahoma; Aric M. Gillispie; Mathew Benton

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

. 14­19, January, 2004. 16 Khlar, D. and M. Nigam, “The Equivalence of Learning Paths in Early Science Instruction,”  Psychological Science​ , ​ 15​ (10), 661­667, 2004. 17 Tuovinen, J.E., and J. Sweller, “A Comparison of Cognitive Load Associated With Discovery Learning  and Worked Examples,” ​ Journal of Educational Psychology​ , ​ 91​ (2), pp. 334­341, 1999. 18 Lemley, E.C., and B. Jassemnejad,“USE OF SUPPLEMENTARY ONLINE LECTURE MATERIALS  IN A HEAT TRANSFER COURSE,” Transactions of the Amer. Soc. for Engr. Ed., ​ AC 2012­5110

Conference Session

Technology in the Physics Classroom

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gerald Rothberg, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

lecturer, of the new technologies. More will besaid about this later. Before ALERT! With ALERT! All Students A=66=28% A=95=32% A=161=30(8)% B=36=15% B=44=15% B=80=15(3)% C=88=38% C=117=39% C=205=39(3)% D=19=8% D=15=5% D=34=6(3)% F=24=10% F=27=9% F=51=10(4)% exc=15=6% exc=48=16% exc=63=12(6)% Total 233 Total 298 Total 531Table

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Physics II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adrian Ieta, State University of New York, Oswego; Alex Pantaleev, State University of New York, Oswego; Carolina C. Ilie, State University of New York, Oswego

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

discussion we would have in class about it. Q3. I found that the online preparation assignments and the discussions we had in class about them helped me learn the course material better. Q4. When an answer I submitted was discussed by the class I felt: excited, embarrassed, apprehensive, interested, I don't think my answers were presented to the class Q5. In your opinion, which of these options would motivate students to prepare for class by doing the reading assignments? A. Daily quizzes over the reading B. Pop quizzes over the reading C. Online preparation assignments (as done in this course) D. Nothing, just

Conference Session

Programmatic Issues in Physics or Engineering Phys

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Evan Lemley, University of Central Oklahoma; Baha Jassemnejad, University of Central Oklahoma; Matthew Mounce, US Navy; Jamie Weber, Parsons; Sudarshan Rai, Unknown; Willy Duffle, University of Central Oklahoma; Jesse Haubrich, University of Central Oklahoma

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

engineeringprofession and for graduate engineering study.Bibliography1. R. Todd, S. Magleby, C. Sorenson, B. Swan, and D. Anthony. "A Survey of Capstone Engineering Courses in North America.” Journal of Engineering Education, April 1995, pp. 165-174.2. Susannah Howe and Jessica Wilbarger. “2005 National Survey of Engineering Capstone Design Courses.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, 2006. Session 2525.3. Miguel A. Labrador, John Wolan, Grisselle Centeno, Ashok Kumar, Gray Mullins, Rudiger Schlaf. “ A Research Initiative to Close the Gap between Undergraduate and Graduate School in Engineering.” 34th ASEE/ IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, GA, 2004.4. Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the

Conference Session

Technology in the Physics or Engineering Physics C

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Raymond Winton, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

mathematics overhead andallows the novice professional to see the concepts without either investment in the analyticaloverhead nor in the extensive set of second-order parameters reflected by the parameter setsfor these advanced device models.The simplest model of the MOS transistor is represented by figure 1.1, and identifies theessential operation of the device and minimum set of device parameters. (a) 4-terminal schematic symbol (b) physical cross-section Figure 1.1. MOS device cross-section and circuit symbol.The device cross-section is the basis for the symbol and emphasizes that the device is a field- Page 13.807.3controlled

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics I

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Harold T. Evensen, University of Wisconsin, Platteville; W. Doyle St.John, University of Wisconsin, Platteville

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

senior design course, and is an important partof our curriculum. The primary ABET outcomes associated with this course are [a] and [b]: “anability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering” and “an ability to designand conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data.” Further, the program hasassigned several secondary outcomes to this course: experiment design, effectivecommunication, teaming, modern techniques and tools, ethics, and life-long learning [ABEToutcomes c, d, f, g, i, and k]. The determination of particular science and/or engineering topics Page 23.140.2that should be assigned to this course has been a

Conference Session

Engineering Physics Technical Session 1

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yumin Zhang, Southeast Missouri State University; David K. Probst P.E., Southeast Missouri State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

down. However, only 1.8% of students got the correctanswer for problem #26, when the pushing force is doubled. Following Newton’s second law,there is a constant acceleration since the friction force is unchanged. However, the wording ofthis option is “with a continuously increasing speed”, which sounds unrealistic to the students.Because only two students got the correct answer for problem #26, we investigated further on theselections: 38 students (34.2%) selected ‘A’ (double the speed), 44 students (39.6%) selected ‘B’(at a slightly higher but constant speed), 8 students (7.2%) selected ‘C’ and 19 students (17.1%)selected ‘D’, these last two options have a transient period. Since 74% students selected ‘A’ or‘B’, their intuitive understanding

Conference Session

Technology in the Physics Classroom

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sabina Jeschke, University of Stuttgart; Olivier Pfeiffer, Technische Universitat Berlin; Thomas Richter, Technische Universitat Berlin; Harald Scheel, Technische Universitat Berlin; Christian Thomsen

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

freely available webbrowser plug-in has to be downloaded and installed. Remote experiments can easily be combinedor extended due to the modular programming structure of LabView.13We can now run the same experiment -namely that of measuring the hysteresis loop of magneti-zation vs. magnetic field- in reality: a magnetic coil generates a magnetic field H that is propor-tional to the current passing through it, which is controlled by the computer. The magnetic fieldmagnetizes a ferromagnetic core. The Magnetic induction B is measured by a Hall probe, see Page 12.1120.5Fig. 4. The measured value is then digitized by an analog-digital converter that

Conference Session

Technology in the Physics or Engineering Physics C

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nataliia Perova, Tufts University; Patricia Hogan, Suffolk University; Walter H. Johnson, Suffolk University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

understanding of these concepts? (A) Collaboration with students and faculty (B) Analysis of the literature (C) Constructing the model (D) Testing and evaluation (E) Analysis of the data (F) Redesign (G) None of the above.Content LearningQuestion 4 By participating in this project you were solving the problems of interfacing different kinds of sensors to the Tmote sky model. What kind of signal Tmote requires on the input? Select an applicable answer(s). (A