1. Pick a random number, R, such that 0 R 1 . 2. Keep R fixed and do the following: Set q aa a . If R q then 000 , else 2 set q q b . If R q then 001 , else 2 set q q c . If R q then 010 , else 2 set q q d . If R q then 011 , else 2
the frequencies and becomes an inductor in anarrowband near acoustic resonance. The area of the resonator electrodesdetermines the capacitor Co, the thickness of the Piezoelectric filmdetermines the frequency expressed in BVD as LC resonance, whereCm = 4 Co Kt2 / 𝜋2Lm = 1 / 𝜔 2 CMRm = 𝜔 Lm / QWhere Cm, is the motional Capacitance that represents the elasticity of theresonator, Lm is the motional Inductance that represents the mass, Rm is theacoustic energy loss and Co is the clamped capacitance between the twoelectrodes of the resonator. The electro mechanical coupling coefficient (Kt)and quality factor (Q), can be given asKt = (𝜋2 /4) ((fP - fS) / fP )Q = 2 𝜋 fS L / Rwhere fs is the resonance frequency and fp is the anti resonance
, Recurrent Neural Networks with Python Quick Start Guide: Sequentiallearning and language modeling with TensorFlow, Packt Publishing (2018). ISBN-13: 978-1789132335.[12] Richard S. Sutton and Andrew G. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, 2nd ed.,A Bradford Book (2018). ISBN-13: 978-0262039246.[13] Maxim Lapan, Deep Reinforcement Learning Hands-On: Apply modern RL methods, withdeep Q-networks, value iteration, policy gradients, TRPO, AlphaGo Zero and more, PacktPublishing (2018). ISBN-13: 978-1788834247.[14] François Chollet, Deep Learning with Python, 2nd ed., Manning Publications (2017). ISBN-13: 978-1617294433.
graph for I2 as a function of time for 𝑡 ≥ 0. Show clearly the value at 𝑡 = 0 and for 𝑡 → ∞. Explain your reasoning. c) Sketch a qualitative graph for the capacitor’s voltage VC as a function of time for 𝑡 ≥ 0. Show clearly the value at 𝑡 = 0 and for 𝑡 → ∞. Explain your reasoning.2. Quantitative Analysis.a) For all times 𝑡 ≥ 0 and using the concept of the sum of voltage, relate the voltage in the battery with the resistances R and the currents I1 and I2.b) For all times 𝑡 ≥ 0 and using the concept of potential difference, find a relation among current I2, resistance R, the charge stored in the capacitor Q, and its capacitance C. Take the derivative of this equation with respect to time to find a relation between the derivative of
throughthe quiz in case questions arise during grading about how they got their answer. The lockdownbrowser limits them to one page on the Trinket website and prevents them from opening otherapplications on their computer during the exam. They are also encouraged to use VPython tocomplete homework problems. A friend of yours has just completed the first discussion activity where a storm cloud is modeled as a negative point charge with q = 200 C a height of 1000 m directly over your position. They show you their computer screen and you notice something can’t be right with their model. Describe in detail how you know their results are wrong. Include an explanation of what you would expect to see instead. Feel free to include a sketch
(1b) 2π (C p + Ci ) Lcoil 59 × 10 ( f 0 × 2π ) −6 2 The results are tabulated below. Parallel capacitance (C p + Ci ) Measured f 0 (MHz) C p ( calculated ) (pf) Cp 1.60 168 C p + 95 pf 1.27 171 As observed from the table, with or without the extra capacitor, the value parasitic capacitance varied from C p ≅ 168 → 171 pf. The variation in C p is probably due to the LC network not having a having a sharp resonance point (i.e. high Q). Parasitic inductance due to excessive lead length. Theory states that any length of wire can be modeled as an
Raton: CNC Press, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books?id=DiFMPmXSsLUC&pg=SA2- PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false [2] R. P. Feynman, “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom,” Science and Engineering, pp. 22–36, 1960. [Online]. Available: http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/47/2/1960Bottom.pdf [3] M. Ruivenkamp and A. Rip, “Entanglement of Imaging and Imagining of Nanotechnology,” Nanoethics; Dordrecht, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 185–193, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://search-proquest- com.ezproxy.uvu.edu/docview/887465026/3ADDD4C0F5D0457BPQ/1?accountid=14779 [4] A. D. Derjaguin, B. V. and Titijevskaia, A. S. and Abricossova, I. I. and Malkina, “Investigations of the forces of interaction of
Role Confidence and Gendered Persistence in Engineering,” Am. Sociol. Rev., vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 641–666, Oct. 2011.[6] K. L. Lewis, J. G. Stout, S. J. Pollock, N. D. Finkelstein, and T. A. Ito, “Fitting in or opting out: A review of key social-psychological factors influencing a sense of belonging for women in physics,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 2, 2016.[7] K. L. Lewis et al., “Fitting in to Move Forward,” Psychol. Women Q., p. 036168431772018, Aug. 2017.[8] K. Rainey, M. Dancy, R. Mickelson, E. Stearns, and S. Moller, “Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 10, Dec. 2018.[9] C. Good