AC 2008-1063: THE S&T ECO-SYSTEM: PRESSURES FROM KINDERGARTENTO GLOBALIZATIONMichael Richey, The Boeing Company Michael Richey is a Boeing Associate Technical Fellow supporting the Learning Training and Development group. Michael has 30 years experience in tool design and metrology, analyzing commercial aircraft and has developed many advanced CAD/CAM and Product Lifecycle management standards and engineering educational programs. Michael is the industry representative for the FAA AMTAS Center of Excellent at the University of Washington and is the Chair of their A&A Department's Aircraft Structures Composite and Manufacturing Certificate Programs. Michael received his B.S. in
Engineer- ing from the University of Virginia. Her research interests include Team Effectiveness, Collaborative and Active Learning, Engineering Education and Pedagogy, and Quality Control and Management.Rosalyn S. Hobson, Virginia Commonwealth University Dr. Rosalyn S. Hobson has been at Virginia Commonwealth University since 1996. Currently she is the School of Engineering Associate Dean for Graduate Studies, Associate Professor of Electrical Engineer- ing, and Director of the VCU/University of KwaZulu Natal International Partnership in South Africa. She received her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Virginia. Her research interests include artificial neural networks, K-16
AC 2011-2441: WHAT DO MARKETS TELL US ABOUT DEMAND FORENGINEERS IN THE WORKPLACE?Martin S. High, Oklahoma State University Marty High is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oklahoma State University. His aca- demic interests include teaching in all areas and at all levels of chemical engineering with a focus on instruction in thermodynamics and mass transfer. His research interests are in the areas of mass transfer in polymeric systems, corrosion modeling, equation of state development and refinery catalysis. Marty also writes in the area of sustainability and on the intersection of law, science and society. He received his engineering education at Penn State (B.S., M.S., and Ph.D.) and earned his law
AC 2011-25: IMPACTS OF THE VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY RESEARCHEXPERIENCE FOR TEACHERS PROGRAM 2008-2010: ANALYSIS OFSTUDENT SURVEYS REGARDING MOTIVATIONAL IMPACTStacy S Klein-Gardner, Vanderbilt University Stacy Klein-Gardner is the Director of STEM Outreach for Peabody College and the School of Engineer- ing at Vanderbilt University. She is an associate professor of the practice of Biomedical Engineering, Teaching & Learning, and Radiological Sciences.Amber C. Spolarich, North Carolina State University Amber Spolarich is currently a senior at North Carolina State University majoring in chemical engineering with a concentration in green chemistry. She has worked with outreach programs through the university that have
Paper ID #10812Students Pursuing Senior Projects Analyze the Public Need and Draft thePublic PolicyDr. Murray Teitell, DeVry University, Long Beach Murray Teitell is a Professor at DeVry University, Long Beach, California. He teaches courses in mathe- matics, science and technology. His research interests are algorithms, solutions of equations and statistics as they relate to education, engineering and design.Mr. William S. Sullivan, DeVry University, Long Beach Page 24.1131.1 c
) for the RIT NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation grant. The goal of this large-scale ($3.4M), multi-year university-level organizational transformation effort is to increase the representation and advancement of women STEM faculty. At the university level, she serves as Senior Faculty Associate to the Provost for ADVANCE and co-chairs the President’s Commission on Women.Prof. Maureen S. Valentine, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST) Professor Maureen Valentine, P.E. has been a faculty member at the Rochester Institute of Technology for 23 years. She has served in many rolls, including teaching faculty, Department Chair, Director of Women in Technology and Associate Dean of the College of Applied Science and
Commerce is worried about whether we’re producing enoughSTEM graduates from our colleges and universities.” American companies are quite Page 23.506.2concerned about impending shortages of workers to fill science, technology, engineering 1 and mathematics jobs in the future. Shortages of workers trained in these fields couldlogically impede the growth of technology, lower competitiveness with otherindustrialized nations, and thereby exacerbate the decline of the U. S. economy.Likely, all engineering educators who are at all interested in policy matters have read thatChina and India are producing from 5 to 10 times
of the engineering workforce.Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Margaret Bailey is Professor of Mechanical Engineering within the Kate Gleason College of Engineer- ing at RIT and is the Founding Executive Director for the nationally recognized women in engineering program called WE@RIT. She recently accepted the role as Faculty Associate to the Provost for Female Faculty and serves as the co-chair on the President’s Commission on Women. She began her academic career as an Assistant Professor at the U. S. Military Academy at West Point, being the first woman civil- ian faculty member in her department. Margaret maintains a research program in the area of advanced thermodynamic analyses and
normally used to discoverthe latent factor(s) that determines the inter-correlations among the observed variables.For instance, in psychology, general intelligence is believed to be composed of twofactors: the fluid and crystallized intelligence. Under each factor, observed variables oritems were developed to measure these unseen (or latent) factors.The purpose of this study is to re-evaluate the psychometric soundness of the DET survey Page 22.1616.2using new data collected from a larger and a relatively more diverse group of elementaryteachers. Specifically, we aimed at obtaining further psychometric evidence of the DETinstrument by conducting the EFA
and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) face different barriers to implement sustainablepractices. Some of the major barriers were consolidated by Natarajan & Wyrick (2011)6. The Page 25.579.3major barriers were finance, lack of expertise, lack of information, and company culture.Similarly there were factors that motivated firms towards better environmental practices. Themajor motivators were legislation, owner(s) perspective, customer demands, and internal drive.SMEs struggle with understanding environmental sustainability due to the lack of people withsustainability education in their organization. In addition an owner or a group of owners
-competitive markets in engineering education could arise whenever there is oneperson/organization/institution involved in providing or “consuming” a good or service. On aregional level, this could arise from engineering programs themselves if there is a paucity ofprograms for students in a certain geographical area, or for a particular technical specialty. In thisexample, there might be a small number of schools offering an engineering course of study. As aresult, students interested in engineering (or a particular type of engineering) would haveminimal options, leading to a potentially non-competitive market because the extant program(s)do not have to compete with other engineering programs to enroll engineering students. Barriersto entry for new
, recommendations for best practices and policychanges to mitigate unconscious bias in faculty searches, and continued identification of policyimprovements at the state level.AcknowledgementsThis project is funded by an NSF Award number 1463993, “South Dakota Working in STEM forEquity (SD-WISE): A System, Institutional, and Individual Level Approach to Policy Change.”Data, findings, and conclusions or recommendations are those of the authors, only.References[1] S. Howe, M. Juhas, and J. Herbers, “Academic women: Overlooked entrepreneurs,”AAC&U Peer Review, vol. 16, no. 2, Spring 2014. [Online]. Available:https://www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/academic-women-overlooked-entrepreneurs[2] C. Rankins, F. Rankins, and T. Innis, “Who
information science; her industry experience includes systems analysis and cognitive science applications. She is one of the Principal Investigators on two NSF S-STEM and one NSF ADVANCE-PAID grants. With a life-long interest in technology and its potential for enhancing human capabilities, her research includes advances in analytics, motivated system energetics, and other topics relative to knowledge-intensive systems.Dr. Karinna M Vernaza, Gannon University Dr. Karinna Vernaza joined Gannon University in 2003, and she is currently a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department and Associate Dean of the College of Engineering and Business. She earned her Ph.D. and M.S. in mechanical engineering from the University
: https://www.asce.org/uploadedFiles/Issues_and_Advocacy/Advocacy_Programs/Content_Pieces/state- government-relations-manual.pdf [4]. Hallahan, K. (2001). Enhancing motivation, ability, and opportunity to process public relations messages. Public Relations Review, 26(4):463{480. [5]. Kilpatrick, D. G. (2000). Definitions of public policy and the law. National violence against women prevention research center. [6]. Dunn, K. (2009). The case for leadership skills courses in the engineering curriculum. In American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Midwest Section Conference. [7]. Tull, K. and Jones, S. (2006). A sophomore-level engineering and public policy course required for ba engineering majors at
nation) and expect rebates approaching 50% for systems up to Page 12.651.310kW in size. For example, in just the past few years the CORE rebate program5 was offered bythe NJBPU - Office of Clean Energy that enabled the state to move its way up the ladder tobecome the U.S.’s second most abundant generator of photovoltaic energy. This is quite animpressive story of success since the solar insolation resources from the Sun’s light are notnearly as abundant in New Jersey as in some of the other states in the nation. It was new statepolicy that overcame the lack of solar resources and created the potential for state to possessreliable and
semi-log function using the logarithm of earnings as the dependentvariable. Mincer used two forms of the earning function, parabolic and Gompertz. The grossannual earnings Es,t for a worker with s years of schooling and t years of experience is expressedwith parabolic dependence as: (1)where rs and rp are the rates of return on schooling and post-school investments, k0 is the ratio ofinvestment to gross earnings at the start of work experience, and T is the positive net investmentperiod (career work span). The Gompertz earning function incorporates a sigmoidal transferfunction to express the decline in value of up-front investment in education
. C2010BR-02. Washington DC: U.S. Census Bureau. 10 U.S. Department of Education. (2011). Postsecondary Awards in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, by State: 2001 and 2009. NCES 2011-226. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education. 11 Baum, S., J. Ma, and K. Payea. (2010). Education Pays 2010: The Benefits of Higher Education for Individuals and Society. New York: The College Board Advocacy and Policy Center. 12 National Research Council. (2011). Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America's Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 13 National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering. (2008). Confronting the “New” American
increase the representation and advancement of women STEM faculty. At the university level, she serves as Senior Faculty Associate to the Provost for ADVANCE and co-chairs the President’s Commission on Women. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Into the Light: Diffusing controversy and increasing transparency in the faculty salary equity study processABSTRACTWomen are underrepresented in most science, technology, engineering and math (STEM)disciplines within academe and the workforce. In response, the National Science Foundationlaunched the ADVANCE grant program in the early 2000’s to fund efforts which increase therepresentation of women STEM faculty and academic leaders
, Eds. New York, NY: Springer, 2008, pp. 303–307.[3] National Research Council of the National Academies, Using science as evidence in public policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.[4] R. Chong, D. Depew, I. Ngambeki, and M. Dark, “Teaching social topics in engineering: The case of energy policy and social goals,” presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 2013, pp. 1–16.[5] J. Mendoza-Garcia, I. B. Ngambeki, L. J. Behbehani, D. Evangelou, S. C. Rao, and M. F. Cox, “Defining the knowledge and skills that enable engineers to participate in public policy,” presented at the American Society for Engineering Education, 2012, pp. 1–12.[6] WASC Senior College and University Commission
]. However, NSF has had only limited success in reaching deeply within all elements of theUS population and across the diversity of institutions of higher education.Although the overall percentage of STEM workers compared to the general employed populationincreased from 4.4% in 1983 to a high of 5.6% in 2001 [4] and the STEM labor force grew fasterthan the general workforce in the second half of the 20th century [5], approximately one quarterof Science and Engineering (S & E) degree recipients and 40% of those with Ph.D. degrees in S& E fields are approaching retirement age [5]. As the overall number of STEM jobs is expectedto increase over the next five years [5], it is imperative to recruit and retain enough students inthe STEM fields to
information watching my colleagues presenting their projects. (Average = 3.8) 7. The debate made the project more effective than a traditional student presentation. (Average = 3.8) 8. I worked harder, knowing that the students would vote on my team's effectiveness. (Average = 3.7) 9. This project should be adopted as a permanent component of future thermodynamics classes. (Average = 3.9) 10. I consider this design project to be an excellent experience. (Average = 3.7) Page 11.1001.9Appendix B: Selected Statement Responses Graphically Represented 1. Com pare d to a s tandard
AC 2007-735: SPEAKING TECH TO POWERDavid Bodde, Clemson University Dr. David L. Bodde Dr. Bodde is a professor of engineering and business at Clemson University and a Senior Fellow at Clemson’s Spiro Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership. Dr. Bodde serves on the Board of Directors of a variety of companies: Great Plains Energy (a diversified energy company and electric utility), the Commerce Funds (a mutual fund), and several privately held ventures. His past experience includes Vice President of the Midwest Research Institute, Assistant Director of the U. S. Congressional Budget Office, and Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Department of Energy. He recently
ASE degreeprovided similar expertise, however, the salary profile for individuals with the accredited andunaccredited degrees should converge in a meritocracy.Kazmer and Badaro1 found that engineering salary data, s, followed a Gompertz type sigmoidalbehavior as a function of time: (3)where sb is the base salary at the onset of engineering work, rs is the annual rate of salaryincrease, t is the number of years of work experience, and is the half-life of the engineeringsalary function. This model suggests that all salaries will tend to decay unless rate of salarygrowth is high and the half-life of the career is long; only graduates from a few
trend in the UK is similar. For example, the UKPassport Office instead of seeking a witness for the applicant of a passport from the traditionalprofessions now includes the statement “…or professionally qualified person e.g. lawyer, engineer,doctor, school teacher, police officer or person of similar standing” [5].Engineering, although long considered a profession, has not remained static in this changing space.Ever since the engineering institutions were established in the UK they have sought prestige andstatus. In the 1950’s and 1960’s engineers in the UK argued for an equivalent organization to theRoyal Society and they were rewarded by the establishment of a Royal Academy of Engineering.Several years before that, American engineers had won
provided of some of these approaches. Talk/seminar: A talk or seminar is a singular, short (usually 45 minutes – 2hours) experience during which a speaker or pair of speakers familiar with a topic provide an overview of the topic and discuss some aspect of that topic. The substance of the talk/seminar is usually a report of the speaker(s) work. Module: A module is a short treatment of a policy topic, usually occurring within a larger class. Modules usually take place over 1-3 course periods. Workshop: A workshop is an in-depth treatment of a specific topic, usually occurring outside the regular classroom setting. Workshops usually last 2 hours – 2 days. Exposure Experience: An exposure
distance learning faculty in whichthe work is developed specifically for the online asynchronous delivery copyright ownershipwill likely vest in the university as a “work for hire”. As the pandemic marches on these linesmay blur and the university may modify their copyright policy to include all work preparedfor the purpose of delivering course content in any format and/or any platform includinglearning management systems.b. Bayh-Dole Act: Federal Sponsored ContractsIntellectual property (IP), specifically patents, generally vests in the creator(s) when notwithin their scope of work; i.e., “work for hire”. The Bayh-Dole Act [18] provides thatinventions arising from government sponsored research are to be used to promote theirutilization as well as
on society. Theprimary difficulties are the lack of a textbook in this area, and the constant need to keep abreastof rapidly changing engineering policy topics. It is also becoming more difficult to coverengineering public policy at anything other than the federal level because of the vast amount ofinformation. And, it is important for the instructor to maintain a classroom environment thatrespects differing political perspectives, and in fact, highlights the many aspects other thanpolitics that affect technology policy.References1. Kraft, M. and Furlong, S. (2004). Public Policy: Politics, Analysis, and Alternatives, CQ Press, Washington D.C.2. Easton, Thomas A. (2005). Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in Science
365.33 436.33 61.00 $85,842,104 100 O 94.33 482.33 301.00 20.00 $10,266,666 100 P 146.67 731.67 228.00 74.00 $48,452,394 99.61 Q 105.00 262.00 239.00 49.00 $74,392,134 99.38 R 200.00 646.67 382.33 132.67 $150,514,179 99.37 S 37.33 128.00 133.00 4.00 $2,155,104 98.58 T 377.67 1294.33 916.00 236.33 $188,390,621 98.39 U 278.00 1029.00 457.00 191.33 $161,379,281 98.37 V 49.33 169.00 205.00 2.33 $1,939,628 97.09 W
Engineering Programs, 2011 - 2012. (2011).at 4. Tull, K. & Jones, S. A sophomore-level Engineering and Public Policy course required for B.A. Engineering majors at Lafayette College. 13 (2006).at 5. Myers, T. D. Learning outcomes for an Engineering and Technology Public Policy curriculum. (2008).at 6. Grose, T. K. Public Policy for the Tech-Minded. ASEE Prism 18, 47 – 48 (2009).7. Myers, T. & Stuart, B. Teaching engineering and technology public policy while fulfilling multiple ABET and university requirements. 13 (2010).at 8. Harter, K. & Libros, R. Aset 101: Science, Technology And Public Policy: Increasing Technological Literacy Among Community College Students. (2010).at 9. Sicker