faculty here reflects a majority cis-gender research population, as thesystem has even lower levels of representation of women faculty of color and fewer LGBTQ+faculty members than national averages. Although the conceptual emphasis is a limitation in theresearch, the specific policies forwarded are intended to help all faculty succeed in this system.Assessment of our success will include specific reference to race and citizenship, although sexualidentity and orientation assessment is limited due to a lack of data across the system.This project is driven by three goals: 1) To establish and sustain system-wide priorities forgender equity in the STEM sciences; 2) To document and evaluate incremental change fromdata-driven policies for gender equity
system, universities need to createknowledge and develop technology to carry out scientific and technologicalinnovation activities.[16]The performance of scientific and technologicalinnovation in universities reflects the quality and level of university construction. Itis the evaluation of the high level of scientific and technological innovationproduced by universities through the effective transformation of academic factorsand the input of scientific and technological innovation activities in the ways ofknowledge innovation, achievement transformation ,and management innovation.Studies have shown that patents are a direct indicator of knowledgeaccumulation.[17]Therefore, the performance of scientific and technologicalinnovation in universities