support students. We explore how thoughtful curriculumdesign, new teaching strategies, and the integration of AI tools can address some of the challengesfaced by students. We also examine how to ensure that these programs are equitable and inclusive,ensuring that all learners, regardless of background, have a fair chance of success.There is a lot of research on online education for adult learners, covering topics like retention,motivation, and self-esteem [3-4]. However, few studies have specifically focused on theexperiences of learners in asynchronous online degree programs. More importantly, even lessresearch has looked at what learners think could improve their online experience in terms ofassessments, communication with faculty, and peer
candidate over their six years probationaryperiod historically have applied somewhat different standards of achievement depending onwhich of the two broad categories of institutions the program resides in. The Tier I researchinstitution will usually look to see that an individual has been able to generate sufficient externalfunding to support part of their salary (sufficient to reduce their base teaching load), and tosupport the salaries of several PhD and Master’s students, along with perhaps acquiringequipment to outfit a research laboratory. The individual must also produce some minimumnumber of journal and conference papers in readily recognizable quality venues sufficient toproject an image of rising authority in their chosen field. Some
, curriculum, practical training, teacher team construction, campusenvironment construction to carry out the exploration. At the same time, it can also befound that there are still some problems to be solved in the process of promoting thedigitization of engineering education in Chinese universities. The integration betweenthe digital curriculum and the original professional curriculum is not high; The digitalskills of teachers are weak, and it is difficult to integrate professional knowledge anddigital skills in teaching. The teaching of professional application scenarios of digitalskills is insufficient, and students' learning of digital skills mainly stays in thetheoretical learning stage. Therefore, this paper puts forward countermeasures and
the first to do so. The specific implementation forms include: offering dedicated STEM courses, club-based teaching, focusing on science and technology competitions, project-based courses, open laboratory space-oriented, and diversified comprehensive courses[22]. From the gradually “captivating” development of theory and practice, we cannot help but raise the following question: under the unique institutional context in China, what exactly are the core connotations and the primary form represented by STEM education? What factors make it up? What is the relationship between these factors? Answering these questions has important implications for the in-depth promotion of STEM education in China and