international levels and subjected to greater scrutiny than traditional laboratory curriculums.Some of the routine work such as sample collection, sample storage and preservation, sampleintegrity, preparing standard solutions of analytical grade chemicals, preparing blank and controlsamples, establishing standard curves, instrument calibration, and experimental reproducibilityhelped students enhance their understanding of research work compared to what they could havegained in traditional laboratory classes. Teaching of core research values such as independentjudgment and critical thinking in terms of experimental set-up, experimental design and copingwith difficulties such as errors in instrumentation calibration, HPLC failure under high pressure
AC 2009-820: TEACHING SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPTS THROUGH ANAPPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY: STUDYINGSTORM-WATER PONDS AT THE UNIVERSITY AND IN LOCAL COMMUNITIESMaya Trotz, University of South FloridaKen Thomas, University of South Florida Page 14.1155.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Sustainability concepts through an applied environmental engineering laboratory: studying stormwater ponds at the University and local communitiesAbstractStormwater ponds are vital for the control of floodwaters and the reduction in pollution loadsreaching larger water bodies. Community awareness programs aim to reduce
reported. Third, a comparison could be made between the opinionsof department heads, lab managers, and safety officers.References[1] Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology, “Self-Study Templates,” 2018. [On- line]. Available: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/self-study-templates/. [Accessed June 18, 2018].[2] P. Alaimo, J. Langenhan, M. Tanner, and S. Ferrenberg, "Safety teams: An approach to engage students in laboratory safety," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 87(8), pp. 856-861, 2010.[3] D. Herrington, and M. Nakhleh, "What defines effective chemistry laboratory instruction? Teaching assistant and student perspectives," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 80(10) pp. 1197, 2003.[4] M. Jiménez
American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Inverted Approach to Teach InversionAbstractInversion is one of the most important weather phenomena that determines air quality and istypically covered in courses concerning air pollution. Anecdotal evidence indicates that followingtextbook readings and lectures, students generally express misconceptions about this topic. Addingactive learning to the classroom has been advocated amongst the best practices for highereducation, with physical in-class demonstrations being especially effective for engineeringeducation. The study explores the impact of adding a laboratory demonstration, centered oncreating an artificial inversion layer (with dry ice, smoke bombs, and bubble
senior design project, aneducational device was created to teach students in developed and developing nations about theenvironmental impacts of water contamination and to promote sustainable water utilization. Toaccomplish this goal an interactive, educational, cost-effective water purification system, knownas the Adaptive Water Treatment for Education and Research Laboratory (Adaptive WaTERLab), was developed. The design includes six different purification methods contained inindividual housings that can be connected and reordered to create multiple purification solutions.The purification methods selected for this project include: sediment filtration, carbon filtration,chemical disinfection, reverse osmosis, forward osmosis, and ultraviolet
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Performance OutcomeFigure 2. Assessment of 15 performance outcomes including both a self-assessment score and acomposite score derived from graded assignments and exams Students were also given the opportunity to provide written comments regarding thecourse. The following comments [unedited] specifically addressed the use of in-class problemsets and the laboratory format: I actually really do like your teaching style with the use of class problem sets and working through these during lecture to learn the material. I feel this is a great way for me to
University, TAs have been employed to coverundergraduate lecture courses in addition to the laboratory classes typically taught by TAs, due Page 14.223.3to the departure of faculty and the hiring of new faculty with reduced teaching loads. To help theTAs, the author of this article taught a special topics course during the spring 2008 semesterbased on the ExCEEd teaching model. The purpose of the course was to introduce and exposeTAs to the ExCEEd teaching model and assess teaching effectiveness. Topics of the ExCEEdmodel were presented at weekly class meetings. TAs were observed at the beginning and endingof the semester to assess each TAs
2006-144: STUDENT GENERATED REAL-TIME NOTE DEVELOPMENT ANDWEB PAGE ARCHIVALBruce Berdanier, Ohio Northern University Bruce W. Berdanier is currently an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering in the TJ Smull College of Engineering at Ohio Northern University. In this position, Dr. Berdanier is responsible for teaching all of the courses in Environmental Science, Water and Wastewater Treatment, Solid and Hazardous Waste, Surface Water Quality and Project Management that are included in the Civil Engineering curriculum. Additionally, Dr. Berdanier directs all teaching and research activities in the Environmental Engineering laboratory. Dr. Berdanier also conducts research in surface
2006-1185: DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ANINTERNET-ENABLED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING EXPERIMENTJohn Bergendahl, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Page 11.450.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Development and Implementation of an Internet-Enabled Environmental Engineering ExperimentAbstractSome degree of laboratory experience is desirable for a comprehensive education inenvironmental engineering. While it would be advantageous for all students to obtain hands-onlaboratory skills in a laboratory class on campus, it is not feasible for some students to attend labcourses either because of time constraints (e.g. part-time students) or
World. Science Ed., 82, 407-416.15 Hurd, P.D. (2002). Modernizing Science Education. J. Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 3-9.16 NASA Langley Research Center, MY NASA DATA web site, http://mynasadata.larc.nasa.gov/index.html Page 22.1376.13 (accessed 07/09).17 NASA Science for Educators, Earth Science Education Catalog, http://nasascience.nasa.gov/educators/earth- science-education-catalog , (accessed 07/09).18 NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Climate Time Machine, http://climate.jpl.nasa.gov/ClimateTimeMachine/climateTimeMachine.cfm (accessed 07/09).19 U.S. Global Climate Change Research Program
engineering projects7. Learn to professionally communicate technical findings and develop ability to work effectively in a groupThe objectives of the new EnvE course are as follows:1. Develop understanding of water quality parameters used in characterizing water and wastewater pollution (augmented by laboratory experiments)2. Motivate the need for water and domestic wastewater treatment3. Develop knowledge of commonly used technologies in water and wastewater treatment (augmented by laboratory experiments)4. Given raw water quality and effluent requirements, recommend and justify a train of treatment of processes5. Develop knowledge of commonly used technologies in air pollution treatment (augmented by laboratory experiments)6. Given input
Paper ID #15870Satisfying ABET’s Program Criteria for Environmental Engineering: Expe-riences with a Laboratory-Based Course in Air QualityDr. Prahlad Murthy, Wilkes University Prahlad Murthy is a Professor of Environmental Engineering at Wilkes University, Wilkes-Barre, Penn- sylvania. He is currently serving as the Associate Dean of the College of Science & Engineering at the university. Since receiving his doctoral degree in civil & environmental engineering from Texas A&M University, he has been teaching courses in environmental engineering and science such as air pollution, water and wastewater treatment
toanalyze the data. The experimental setup is typically fully laid out by laboratory technologists orgraduate teaching assistants and analytical equipment is checked, troubleshoot and calibratedwith little or no input from the undergraduate students. In most cases such an approach toundergraduate laboratory experiments is driven by the need to move a large number of studentsthrough a lab with limited resources and within a prescribed time period. Page 12.1313.2There are several limitations with the conventional approaches to laboratory exercises inundergraduate courses. Conventional in-course laboratories do not encourage student enquiryand sense of
conduct sampling pointsapproximately every 6 hours and can focus on proper execution of the lab. This laboratory isideally suited for a class size of 12-15 students. However, the lab could be scaled up with anadditional GC, more shaker table space, and the assistance of teaching assistants.The laboratory class in which this experimental procedure was designed is a 3.0-credit, lab-basedcourse that takes place at Stanford University once every two years and focuses on current topicsin applied microbiology. Each class is unique; therefore no student assessment data is currentlyavailable. The laboratory will best support ABET Engineering Criteria Program EducationalOutcome B, “an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and
2006-1662: RESEARCH APPROACH TO TEACHING GROUNDWATERBIODEGRADATION IN KARST AQUIFERSLashun King, Tennessee State University Graduate Research Assistant, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Tennessee State University,Thomas Byl, U.S. Geological Survey Research Biologist, U.S. Geological Survey,640 Grassmere Park, Suite 100,Nashville, TN 37211 (tdbyl@usgs.gov)Roger Painter, Tennessee State University Page 11.1083.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Research-enhanced Approach to Teaching Groundwater Biodegradation in Karst Aquifers Abstract – TSU
themes, real world examples, and new topics such as sustainability. The rationalefor implementing the cases within a traditional laboratory was to determine if the cases impactedstudent engagement; helped students to see the link between laboratory exercises and real worldapplications; increased student’s critical thinking levels above the lower levels of Bloom’sTaxonomy of knowledge and comprehension for their experimental data; and improved thequality of student laboratory reports. The new cases developed addressed: 1) E-waste to teachenvironmental ethics and statistical analysis of data, 2) the 2014 Duke Coal Ash Spill inDanville, VA to teach physical and chemical water quality and treatment; 3) a Confined AnimalFeeding Operations water
: Presentation of their designYear 1 AssessmentTeaching/Learning Preferences and ABET Post Assessment Student perception of the PBL and case studies used during the laboratory course Page 22.1232.8activities were assessed with focus group interviews, a final survey and an ABET assessment.The surveys were designed to assess the benefit of various teaching techniques, interventions,and tools. In the first survey, students were asked if they to Strongly Agree, Agree, Neutral,Disagree, or Strongly Disagree to the teaching/learning method contributed their learning (Table2). The second survey was the ABET based assessment conducted for the course (Table
interest among students [6, 7]. The authors have beenworking to incorporate hands-on and laboratory-based experiments for introducing studentsto environmental engineering related research [8, 9]. Laboratories are foundation of sciencebased education in this century [10] and their use usually result in understanding conceptsbetter. There are published studies that provide evidence in favor of student-centered hands-on active teaching and learning in laboratories [11-15].When it comes to preparing future professionals of environmental engineering laboratory-based education should provide students understanding of techniques, instrumentation,operating procedures, and precautions that are necessary for deriving meaningful data-basedconclusions
AC 2012-4862: SUMMER MERIT CAMP AND ENVIRONMENTAL COM-MUNICATION WEEK: TARGETED APPROACHES TO ENVIRONMEN-TAL ENGINEERING EDUCATIONDr. Sudarshan T. Kurwadkar, Tarleton State University Sudarshan Kurwadkar is an Assistant Professor and a board-certified Environmental Engineer. He teaches environmental engineering and general engineering courses at the freshman, junior, and senior level. His research areas include fate and transport of micro-pollutants such as pharmaceuticals and neonicotinoid insecticides in soil and aquatic environment. He is a Co-faculty Advisor for the engineering club and French club at Tarleton State University. Kurwadkar is also a licensed Professional Engineer in the states of Texas, Ohio, and
applications in micro- combustion, fuel cells, green fuels, and plasma-assisted combustion. Husanu has prior industrial experi- ence in aerospace engineering that encompasses both theoretical analysis and experimental investigations, such as designing and testing of propulsion systems including design and development of pilot testing fa- cility, mechanical instrumentation, and industrial applications of aircraft engines. Also, in the past seven years she gained experience in teaching M.E. and E.T. courses in thermal-fluid and energy conversion areas from various levels of instruction and addressed to a broad spectrum of students, from freshmen to seniors, from high school graduates to adult learners. She also has extended
previous classes to this newproblem. The PBL lab was well received; students reported enjoying collaborating with theirpeers to develop a tangible solution to a real-world problem. Student feedback suggests theinfluence of the PBL lab may increase if learners had an opportunity to see the influent prior toconstruction. This study provides additional empirical evidence to encourage more widespreadinclusion of PBL teaching/learning experiences into environmental engineering curricula.IntroductionWhen undergraduate engineers leave the university environment and enter the workforce, theyare often asked to solve complex problems in areas where they have limited knowledge ortraining. This requires the recent engineering graduate to: (i) apply concepts
sustainability education,” in Proc. ASEE Annual Conf., 2010. [11] S. Grober, M. Vetter, B. Eckert, and H.-J. Jodl, “Experimenting from a distance—remotely controlled laboratory (RCL),” European Journal of Physics, vol. 28, pp. 127–141,2007. [12] S. D. Burd, A. F. Seazzu, and C. Conway, “Virtual computing laboratories: A case studywith comparisons to physical computing laboratories,” Journal of Information TechnologyEducation, vol. 8, pp. 55–79, 2009. [13] N. Ertugrul, “Towards virtual laboratories: a survey of labview-based teaching/ learningtools and future trends,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 16, pp. 171–180,2000. [14] D. R. Loker, “Remote data acquisition using labview,” in Proc. ASEE Annual Conf.,2001. [15] M
AC 2012-3143: A HANDS-ON EXPERIENCE IN AIR POLLUTION ENGI-NEERING COURSES: IMPLEMENTING AN EFFECTIVE INDOOR AIRPOLLUTION PROJECTMajor Andrew Ross Pfluger, U.S. Military Academy Andrew Pfluger is an officer in the U.S. Army and an instructor at the U.S. Military Academy (USMA) in the Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering. He holds two graduate degrees from the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Stanford University. He currently teaches environmental science and air pollution engineering at USMA.Mr. David-Michael P. Roux, U.S. Army David-Michael P. Roux, P.E., is a U.S. Army officer and was an instructor in the Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering at the U.S. Military
2006-92: USING PHOSPHORUS RECOVERY FROM WASTEWATER AS ACONTEXT FOR TEACHING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WITH USEPA P3SUPPORTDaniel Oerther, University of Cincinnati Associate Professor of Environmental Biotechnology, University of Cincinnati. Dr. Oerther teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in biology and molecular biology as applied to natural and engineered environments. His research focuses upon microorganisms in wastewater treatment plants, drinking water treatment plants, bioremediation field sites, and natural surface watershed.Cinnamon Carlarne, University of Cincinnati Assistant Professor, Environmental Studies Program, University of Cincinnati. Dr. Carlarne teaches graduate and
Connect2U, topics on water resources applications, and the social, economic, administrativeand legal issues related to WRM were included within the curriculum. Since no singleappropriate textbook was found, additional teaching materials were developed by the instructorand his colleagues. Simple laboratory demonstrations and field trips were added. Current waterissues and emerging water problems were learned in the class ‘icebreaker minutes’ and throughdocumentary review assignments. Important assignments and teaching materials were posted onBlackboard. Students were guided to research and gather water related information relevant totheir neighborhoods. They were encouraged to work on a term paper topic that could eitherconnect water resources to
. His research interests include: engineering education, geotechnical earthquake engi- neering, and hazard mitigation. Address: Department of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engi- neering, 130 Butler Carlton Hall, Missouri S&T, Rolla, MO, 65409; telephone: (+1) 573.341.4484 be- gin of the skype highlighting(+1) 573.341.4484end of the skype highlighting; e-mail: rluna@mst.edu Page 22.123.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 A Web-Based Learning Module for Teaching GIS within the Context of Environmental EngineeringAbstractThere is a growing need for
AC 2011-235: USING KEFIR TO TEACH MICROBIAL KINETICS IN ANUNDERGRADUATE WASTEWATER TREATMENT COURSEIsaac W. Wait, Marshall University Isaac W. Wait is an assistant professor of engineering in the College of Information Technology and Engineering at Marshall University in Huntington, West Virginia. Dr. Wait conducts research and teaches courses in the area of water resources and environmental engineering, and is a registered Professional Engineer in the States of Ohio and West Virginia.Richard F. McCormick, Marshall University Richard F. McCormick is a Professor of Engineering at Marshall University in Huntington, West Virginia. He received his BSCE from WV Tech in 1971 and MS and PhD from Va Tech in 1973 and 1979
evaluation of an “Appropriate Technology” courseat RHIT, we have had many insights. In future years we plan to be more intentional towardsachieving both technical preparedness and social fluency for humanitarian engineering work. Wewill attempt to add quantitative elements to all qualitative aspects of the course. This may requireus to teach economic analyses for decision making by drawing parallels to environmentaleconomics. To augment, we will also continue to improve our collaborations with engineeringpractitioners, EWB, and aid groups to develop more case studies, particularly ones withquantitative analysis components.Additionally, our dream is to have permanent installations of the project demonstrations on ourcampus in an outdoor laboratory
source. This is aunique approach to high school science laboratory activities.All watershed data is collected and organized using Microsoft Excel spreadsheets and graphingsoftware. Students are able to form conclusions using technology that is used in today’sworkplace. Initial findings regarding student response to this innovative teaching approachindicate that the actual application of molecular technology methods, employed to solve aproblem with an unknown conclusion, is very meaningful to students. Unlike other traditionalclassroom labs, neither the teacher nor the students know what the results of the watershed testsare before-hand. This type of innovative teaching approach, supported by research on inquirylessons, provides a more memorable
process that is used extensively to removecontaminants from water and air. Environmental engineering faculty typically teach this topic bydescribing mathematical models that are used to quantify adsorption. This approach, by itself,may result in students having an incomplete understanding of adsorption because studentsfrequently have difficulty visualizing scientific phenomena such as the mass transfer process thatoccurs during adsorption. A hands-on laboratory experiment (cf. Speitel, 2001) where studentscollect and analyze adsorption data, may enhance students’ understanding of adsorption.Undeniably, hands-on experiences help students develop a deeper understanding of principlesstudied in and out of the classroom (Butkus et al., 2004; Pfluger