., 2022Challenges with Intervention Throughout the articles, authors discussed seven main challenges when integratingequitable design concepts into their workshops, courses, or programs: (1) curriculum integration,(2) faculty development, (3) assessment and evaluation, (4) student engagement and motivation,(5) prior experience, (6) long-term impact, and (7) addressing societal challenges (Table 4).During curriculum integration, faculty encountered challenges incorporating new,interdisciplinary concepts into their existing curricula, namely topics on ethics, social justice,accessibility, and sustainability (Forbes et al., 2022; Hoople et al., 2020; Letaw et al., 2022;Motti & Dura, 2021; Rossmann et al., 2020). Engineering education has continued
, invokes a context inwhich “societal actors and innovators become mutually responsive to each other with a view onthe (ethical) acceptability, sustainability, and societal desirability of the innovation process andits marketable products” (Von Schomberg quoted by Schwartz-Plaschg, p. 149). In other words,the language of RRI assumes a very different kind of relationship between actors than does thelanguage of regulation. An awareness of the power of analogies can heighten our sensibilitiesregarding the linguistic choices we habitually make.Where analogical imagination refers to the context evoked by a particular choice of words,analogical reasoning is a form of critical thinking in which we make an implicit comparisonexplicit and explore how the
the Social Responsibility Attitudes of Engineering Students Over Time,” Sci Eng Ethics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1535–1551, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9706-5.[13] J. Huff, B. K. Jesiek, C. B. Zoltowski, K. D. Ramane, and W. C. Oakes, “Social and Technical Dimensions of Engineering Identity,” presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2016. Accessed: Jan. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/social-and-technical-dimensions-of- engineering-identity[14] M. H. Hwang, E. Trueblood, and S. A. Claussen, “Engineering Identity, Perceptions of Sociotechnical Education, and Views of Engineering Practice in Undergraduate Students,” in 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education
Education Has Failed’: Reading like an Engineer in 1960s America,” Technol. Cult., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 753–782, 2009.[6] A. G. Christie, “A Proposed Code of Ethics for All Engineers,” Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 97–104, 1922.[7] R. Kline, “Construing ‘technology’ as ‘applied science’: Public rhetoric of scientists and engineers in the United States, 1880-1945,” Isis, vol. 86