quality of mentorship) ● faculty well-being and health ● faculty self-efficacy in different faculty roles ● faculty self-perceptions of success ● faculty EM, innovation, adaptability, risk-taking
/journal.pone.0108497 9) MacPhee, D., Farro, S., & Canetto, S. S. (2013). Academic self-efficacy and performance of underrepresented STEM majors: Gender, ethnic, and social class patterns. Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy, 13(1), 347-369. doi:10.1111/asap.12033 10) Lyon, G. H., Jafri, J., & St. Louis, K. (2012). Beyond the pipeline: STEM pathways for youth development. Afterschool Matters, 16, 48-57.11) Baird, K. (2012). Class in the classroom: The relationship between school resources and math performance among low socioeconomic status students in 19 rich countries. Education Economics, 20(5), 484-509.12) Salto, L. M., Riggs, M. L., Delgado De Leon, D., Casiano, C. A., & De Leon, M. (2014
engineers than non-HSIs [6]. Focusing efforts atthese institutions has the potential to increase representation of the Latinx population inengineering.Faculty play a critical role in educational change efforts and within the day-to-day support ofstudents’ self-efficacy and self-regulated learning behaviors [7], [8]. For Latinx students, inparticular, faculty support is a key factor in student retention [9]. Faculty support students byserving as role models and mentors, which if maintained, particularly outside the classroom, cancontribute to higher student satisfaction and persistence to graduation [10].Within engineering programs at HSIs, and engineering programs more broadly, instructional,non-tenure track faculty comprise nearly 14% of the