knowledge graph and discovers faculty who are leading undergraduate research programs, and resources related to this practice. Through these resources, she learns that undergraduate research programs are considered a High Impact Practice that impacts STEM identity. She also finds a publication that provides good practices to build an undergraduate research program. The chair provides this information to new faculty and connects them to practitioners of this High Impact Practice to learn more about their institutional experience for this practice. Figure 1. A scenario that illustrates the use of the SSKG for knowledge discovery. 3. A Concept Map to Represent Student Success Elements To create the SSKG, we followed a bottom-up approach
questions Session 1:1 and gain clarity on the KEEN Framework. The facilitators presented and reviewed learning objectives and Bloom’s Taxonomy depending on the faculty member’s previous knowledgeNovember Building Faculty were introduced to connection strategies with an Connections in example related to standard deviation, a list of strategies and your Course examples, and an activity using one of the connection strategies, concept mapping. Faculty worked together to be in the shoes of students using concept mapping. They were then
implementations or additional teachingconcerns in the classroom. Table 1. Four FLC sessions related to EML micromoment activities with examples provided to faculty participants during the Fall 2022 term. Session Topic Micromoment Activities Used 1 Introduction to Micromoments and EML Question Frenzy 2 Connections: Implementations & Tools Concept Mapping 3 Creating value: Implementation & Tools Discussion only 4 Curiosity: Implementation & Tools Question Formulation Technique (QFT)Accountability is also crucial for successful FLC, and in this case, weekly checklists were givento all
learningcomforts. However, board games, align well with engineering and computing, and are lessintimidating for faculty to even attempt to learn. Still, physical learning might be an area of futureresearch in the space of role reversal.References [1] A. L. Beach and M. D. Cox, “The impact of faculty learning communities on teaching and learning,” Learning Communities Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–27, 2009. [2] T. Lowe, “An experiment in role reversal: teachers as language learners,” ELT Journal, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 89–96, 1987. [3] B. A. Beyerbach, “Developing a technical vocabulary on teacher planning: Preservice teachers’ concept maps,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 339 – 347, 1988. [Online]. Available: http
professional and personalneeds [8].Given the variation in EBIP approaches, situational influences, and individual needs, it standsthat barriers to adoption likely vary from EBIP to EBIP. In one recent study by Gardner, et al.[9], over 80% of STEM faculty participants demonstrated awareness of PBL, followed by 68%for collaborative learning, and 58% for inquiry learning. In contrast, only about 45% ofparticipants indicated awareness of concept mapping and only 24% knew about just-in-timeteaching. Like awareness, uptake of these methods varied as well, with the highest EBIP use(60% of participants) seen in collaborative learning, 55% in inquiry learning, and only 53% inPBL despite high awareness of the practice. To strengthen efforts to bridge the gap
Active, Blended, Collaborative Legend: Enduring Outcome Activities Workshop Topics/Related Concepts Participants/Existing Frameworks Figure 1. Concept Map of Curricular Priorities for the Faculty Development Workshop 4Philosophy of Engagement and Curricular PrioritiesThe enduring outcomes of the workshop concerned an internalization of various active, blended,collaborative pedagogies of engagement that are particularly effective for teaching engineeringstudents. Participants of the workshop also demonstrated through their reflections and