assignments. Thispaper presents the results of the surveys, analyzing students' initial perceptions, expectations, andexperiences with AI tools, as well as the strategies they employed to enhance their interactionswith ChatGPT during a structured assignment 2. MethodsThis study utilized a survey-based approach to examine the understanding, expectations, andperceived applications of artificial intelligence (AI) among first-year engineering and computingstudents. The survey was designed to capture the students’ initial perceptions prior to any formallecture on AI tools and their perspectives after engaging with the lecture content.The study included participants enrolled in an "Introduction to Engineering and Computing"course at xxxxxx University
studies representative of student experiences from eachcategory that expands on the model and its implications in higher education learningenvironments. The findings emphasize that learning is not a static process; students’ interactionswith AI tools evolve over time, influenced by their initial attitudes and skills. The implications ofthis paper extend to curriculum design, pedagogical approaches, and the broader integration ofgenerative AI tools in higher education.IntroductionThe rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence has revolutionized various industries,including education. As generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini becomeincreasingly accessible, educators are exploring their potential to transform teaching
articlesummarizing the impact of ChatGPT on a variety of engineering assessments, the authorsconcluded that introductory-level programming assessments can be very accurately solved byChatGPT, and that instructors must add complex features to their assessments to deter studentcheating [7].However, there is no published research on the usage of generative AI to offer customizedquestion banks and explanations of course concepts based only on course materials, for anintroductory computing course, within the learning management system, thereby providing apersonalized learning experience tailored to each student’s needs. The primary innovation in ourstudy lies in ensuring that the generated questions remain entirely focused on the course content,strictly avoiding
Mahabharata) ● Chinua Achebe (Nigeria) ● Sun Wukong (Monkey King, China, from "Journey to ● Jane Austen (England) the West") ● Hans Christian Andersen (Denmark) ● Aladdin (Middle Eastern, from "One Thousand and ● Khalil Gibran (Lebanon) One Nights") ● William Shakespeare (England) ● Elizabeth Bennet (England, by Jane Austen) ● Anna Karenina (Russia, created by Leo Tolstoy)Generative AI ToolsText Generation: Microsoft Copilot, Open AI’s ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini, Anthropic’s Claude,Perplexity AIImage Generation: Microsoft Copilot, Open AI’s ChatGPT, Canva, PIXLR, OpenArt.aiNote: rapidly changing innovation in the generative AI
sub-branch of artificial intelligence that uses machinelearning. It allows machines to understand, analyze, and generate responses that are easy forhumans to understand. NLP already facilitates the interactions between our students and all sortsof artificial intelligence like chatbots (ChatGPT), smart assistants (Siri), and more. Calls formore integration of artificial intelligence into education grow louder by the day. For instance, aspecial committee was established in the US to make recommendations, including around AI ineducation [1]. Outside of academia, regular interaction with AI tools is becoming commonplacein industry. Scholars have already outlined a plethora of opportunities and concerns aroundapplying this technology in the
using ChatGPT for high-level analysis. Datasets weremanually formatted to ensure consistent wrangling by the AI, using standardized key phrases andstructured formatting to enhance the AI's ability to parse and interpret the information accurately. Thisstudy implemented a simplistic segmentation, considering each sentence as a single statement, toimprove reliability and repeatability. This process was systematically repeated and refined by utilizingsubsets of the data with established qualities until preprocessing consistently achieved accurate parsingfollowing emerging best practices [23].Throughout the analysis, refinements were made to prompts and categorizations, ensuring alignmentwith the nuances of each reflection. Reanalysis occurred in
problem generation has beenstudied since the mid-1960s [26], the accessibility and sophistication of modern AI models havesignificantly enhanced the personalization, generation speed, and robustness of these problems.Recent efforts, such as the use of OpenAI’s ChatGPT to generate problems in real-time withinclassroom settings, have demonstrated the potential of these tools to adapt dynamically tolearners’ needs [27]. This approach is gaining traction, particularly in K–12 education, wherepersonalized arithmetic problems are being used to establish meaningful context for students[28], [29]. While these tools have been emerging, a formal tool designed for engineeringeducation and the challenges first-year students face in calculus has yet to be
Metric Analysis of ‘The Future of Thinking Analysis of PBL Video (Part Two) Manifesto’ (Part One) AI Utilization The average AI-generated content of all AI tools were used to a lesser extent 15 students is about 80-85% generated for elaborating ideas and content using AI tools such as ChatGPT, primarily creation, complemented by for structuring, content creation and paraphrasing and incorporating research. The team relied heavily on class research papers. Around 30% of the content was AI-generated and later notes and ideas taught in class which were rephrased. As
see several opportunities to refine the assignment based on the lessonslearned. Currently, the scenarios were developed by a single faculty member in the EngineeringEducation department through the use of generative AI (ChatGPT Model 4.0). To enhancedisciplinary representation, we will collaborate with colleagues from degree-granting majors todevelop scenarios that better highlight underrepresented fields, such as biological systems,mining, and materials science. Faculty from these disciplines are well-positioned to identifyemerging challenges and opportunities that reflect the nuances of their fields while remainingrelevant to first-year students.Additionally, we plan to guide students more explicitly toward resources that clarify both
and biases that seepinto the design of products and their effect on different populations and society at large.Increasing the representation of historically marginalized populations in the engineering pipelineand into the workforce is crucial in creating a more equitable future for all people.VI: AcknowledgementsThis project is being supported through an internal grant from the university president’s office tofoster innovation. ChatGPT was used for editing earlier drafts of this paper. Also, we wish toacknowledge several colleagues Drs. Kirstie Plantenberg, Michael Santora and Kenneth Lamb ofUniversity of Detroit Mercy, who contributed in various ways to the project discussed here.References[1] “Transforming Undergraduate Engineering