moderately enhanced their understanding of materials processing. Additionally, as seen inFig 2, majority of students (53.8%) reported feeling positively influenced to some extent by theindustry presentations in terms of their engagement and interest in the course material. A substantialportion of the class (42.3%) indicated that the presentations had a significant positive impact on theirengagement and interest. The impact was also evident through verbal as well as written studentfeedback, one of which read “I learned a lot in a little time about what the companies do”. Figure 2: Survey results to Q2- if industry presentations influenced student engagement and interest in the course material?In response to Q.3, 50% of students acknowledged that
facilitated student feedback. critiques; offered feedback. 14 Practice poster presentations: Submit final poster Facilitated student Each group presented their final presentations and poster and practiced giving a 3-5 Q&A minute overview of their work, with questions from the rest of the class. 15 Poster Session (during lecture None Took attendance sections) during poster
valuable.References[i] “Listing of Online Engineering Programs Accredited by ABET,” [Online]. Available at:https://www.abet.org/accreditation/find-programs/. J. Starks, F. R. Hendrickson, F. Hadi, M. J. Traum, “Miniaturized Inexpensive Hands-On Fluid Mechanics[ii]Laboratory Kits for Remote On-Line Learning,” Proceedings of the 124 th American Society for Engineering Education(ASEE) Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, June 25 - 28, 2017.[iii] M. J. Traum, F. Hadi, “A Miniaturized Circular Hydraulic Jump for Remote On -Line Fluid Mechanics Instruction,”Journal of Online Engineering Education, Vol. 10, No. 1, Article 3, June 2019. M. J. Traum, S. R. Niemi, P. Collins, M. Q. Jenkins, S. R. Putnam, C. M
: From Ab Initio to Monte Carlo Methods, 1999th edition. Berlin ; New York: Springer, 2000.[17] A. D. Rollett and P. Manohar, “The Monte Carlo Method,” in Continuum Scale Simulation of Engineering Materials, D. Raabe, F. Roters, F. Barlat, and L.-Q. Chen, Eds., Weinheim, FRG: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2005, pp. 77–114. doi: 10.1002/3527603786.ch4.[18] R. N. Giere, Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. in Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1988. Accessed: Jan. 06, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/E/bo3622319.html[19] D. Hestenes, “Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction,” Am. J. Phys