(oftenworksheets distributed and students encouraged to work with a partner or table group).The course was largely structured around the topics in the textbook by Callister and Rethwisch,Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction [33], with one to two chapters groundingthe topics covered for the week. Students purchased the WileyPLUS 10th edition of the book,giving them access to the additional online materials (practice problems and solutions, muddiestpoint videos, etc.). Each week students were given a list of textbook problems that they wereencouraged to complete on their own; solution sets written up by the instructor and/or TeachingAssistant (TA) were provided for those problems via the Canvas course management system.Most of the weeks in the
Undergraduate Engineering Education,” Trans Comput Educ, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 16:1-16:22, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1145/2534971.[9] A. J. Magana and R. E. Garcia, “FiPy and OOF: Computational simulations for modeling and simulation of computational materials,” in Proceedings of the 117th Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), Louisville, Kentucky, June, 2010, pp. 20–23.[10] R. Mansbach et al., “Reforming an undergraduate materials science curriculum with computational modules,” J Mater. Educ., vol. 38, no. 3–4, pp. 161–174, 2016.[11] J. Karaganis, “Open Syllabus: Explorer,” Open Syllabus. Accessed: Jan. 11, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://opensyllabus.org/[12] W. D. Callister and D. G. Rethwisch