only a small percentage of students attempted to use AItools for report writing in their project-based assignments. This has been an ongoing challenge,particularly with non-traditional assessments. However, further research is needed to gain abetter understanding of the ethical use of such tools in student assignments and assessments,including ethical use of AI-based tools as programming assistant.Another key observation was that student engagement with the course material, throughattending classes, participating in tutorials, and completing assignments on time, was closelylinked to their final grades. The context-based approach, practiced in class through step-by-stepproblem-solving with dedicated work time, is further reinforced through
engineering and understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global economic, environmental, and societal context. [I,II] (4) knowledgeThis course supports ABET Student Outcomes: (1, 2, 4) 1. ABET 1 an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics. 2. ABET 2 an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors. 3. ABET 4 an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed
applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics. • ABET 2 an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors. • ABET 4 an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts. 7. Grade Distribution: • Participation 5% • Homework (WS) 10
London (QMUL) with research interests in applied mathematics (nonlinear dynamics, analytical mechanics and mathematical modelling) as well as mathematics and engineering education pedagogy (diversification of STEM curricula, threshold concepts and concept inventories in mathematics courses, university-industry and community partnerships, embedding ethics and sustainability in mathematics, history of mathematics and physics). He completed his PhD in Applied Mathematics (Nonlinear Dynamics) at University College London (UCL), an MSc in Mathematical Modelling and Scientific Computing from the University of Oxford (St. Anne’s College) and a BEng in Mechanical Engineering with Business Finance from UCL
.” International dimensions of ethics education in science and engineering, 2008. Accessed: Sep. 21, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/bitstreams/db3507e7-baa8-4abb-8f60- 688b0dbfc068/download[28] C. A. Erikson, “Appropriate Technology: Engineering for the 21st century,” in 1998 Annual Conference Proceedings, Seattle, Washington: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 1998, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.18260/1-2--6926.[29] UNESCO, “Appropriate technology in engineering education,” in The environment in engineering education, D. Brancher, Ed., Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing, 1980, pp. 49–78.[30] A. Saduakas and P. Sang-Hu, “A short review of appropriate technology and engineering design education for underdeveloped countries