AC 2007-2053: AN INTEGRATED UNDERGRADUATE DYNAMIC SYSTEMSTEACHING METHODOLOGY UTILIZING ANALYTICAL ANDEXPERIMENTAL APPROACHESPeter Avitabile, University of Massachusetts-Lowell Peter Avitabile is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department and the Director of the Modal Analysis and Controls Laboratory at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. He is a Registered Professional Engineer with a BS, MS and Doctorate in Mechanical Engineering and a member of ASEE, ASME, IES and SEM. Page 12.222.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 AN INTEGRATED UNDERGRADUATE
Solution Manual for Grade Assignments Fall 1998 Fall 1999 Spring 2000 Fall 2000 Fall 2004 Spring 2009 (N=38) (N=24) (N=35) (N =39) (N=40) (N=56) A 17% 29% 17% 8% 28% 12% B 31% 13% 20% 41% 35% 14% C 26% 38% 31% 21% 15% 19% D 17% 8% 6% 15% 15% 15% F 9
Sample Sketches FromCode Description Student ProjectsNumber Identify Report, Page number, visual numberA Type Number to indicate Sketch (1), Line Drawing (2), CAD Drawing (3), Photograph (4), or Simulation Output (5)B Design Concept GenerationPhase Embodiment Design Detail Design Redesign Code: [A1,B2,C0,D2,E2,F2, G0,H0,I0,J1,K0,L0,M1,N0]C Sketch Lesson Indicator exists for courses in which a lesson is given tostudentsD McGown Sketch Level sketch visuals
,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 87, pp. 79-85, January1998.[4] C. M. Vogt, “Faculty as a Critical Juncture in Student Retention and Performance inEngineering Programs,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, pp. 27-36, January 2008.[5] G. Lichtenstein, A. C. McCormick, S. D. Sheppard, and J. Puma, “Comparing theUndergraduate Experience of Engineers to All Other Majors: Significant Differences areProgrammatic,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, pp. 305-317, October 2010.[6] C. Wampol and S. R. Burckhard, “Using 3D Printers in a Structural Materials Lab forProblem Based Learning,” Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,2018.[7] B. H. Ferri, A. A. Ferri, D. M. Majerich, and A. G. Madden, “Effects of In
using Nonlinear Regression (b) Open Systems: Fluid Flow in Tanks. Data collection, Mathematical Modeling, Construction of numerical solution of the governing differential equation. Comparison of Theoretical, Experimental and Numerical Results.The average laboratory grade varied from 86% to 100% which indicated that the performancewas “Very good.” The main reason was the 11 Workshop sessions conducted by the instructorduring the semester. Each Workshop session illustrated a particular topic of the course. Duringthe Workshop students used MATLAB® programming and verified examples in pertinentChapters of the Textbook and worked on additional lab exercises assigned by the instructor.Final Exam
10 Likert scale questions that can be seen in Table 1. Each questionused in the pre-survey was given a letter for simplicity during analysis. Demographicinformation collected in the pre-survey was gender, age, previous year enrollment, and previouscoursework. This information was collected and used to describe the subject groups. TABLE 1 PRE-SURVEY QUESTIONS WITH CORRESPONDING ANALYSIS LETTERSBefore designing the experiment: A I have a good understanding of how to design experiments. B I feel the task description was adequate. C I understand the purpose of the experiment. D I understand the physical set-up that I will need to use. E I can identify all of the variables to be manipulated
; analysis of potential students (students, who take the course are juniors and do not have a prior knowledge in the field of mechanism kinematics and design and its applications); • Determine faculty role in the learning process and develop an instructional plan; • Identify faculty interested in collaborative research and education activities across disciplines; • Design cross-disciplinary research project activities, assignments, and assessments that are congruent with the three major desired student outcomes: (a) critical thinking, (b) responsibility for one’s own learning, (c) intellectual growth, congruent with the discussion project goals.Project Activities Specific GoalsThe goal of the project
allows the vehicle speed to reach 20 mph only.Driving Information: This is a text string displaying the power source and energy flow in thepowertrain according to the driving conditions of the vehicle. There are typically five types ofenergy flows (items b to f) in an HEV, which are the major features of HEVs as shown in Figure1.a. The vehicle is turned off: Please press the vehicle’s key button to turn it on and drive the vehicleb. The vehicle is turned on, but it is not moving. If you want to move the vehicle, please change to one of the following gear: • Electric: accelerate the vehicle from 0 to 20 mph. • Engine: accelerate the vehicle from 20 to 60 mph. • Maximum Acceleration: accelerate the vehicle from 60 to 80 mph. The
in student learning; and(3) students’ opinions on the online versus paper homework assignments.One limitation of the study is that the student perceptions data of online homework assignmentsprior to the course were not collected. Whether their perceptions were biased by theirexperiences over the course of the semester is thus unknown. Figure 1: Sample homework assignment question (a) (b) (c) Figure 2: Statistics of a sample homework assignment generated by the online analytical tools. 2(a) gives statistics of student progress in an assignment; 2(b) separates students in different performance
printer parts demonstrates thestructure-processing relationships in metal processing. Abstract concepts like texture and plasticanisotropy can be better visualized and learned using those materials.(a) (b)Figure 3. EBSD scanning image of (a) 3D printed aluminum alloy by focused ultrasonic welding(b) conventionally wrought aluminum alloy.Macro-scale testing and imaging using DICMacro-scale mechanical tests are conducted to demonstrate the overall material properties andbehavior. The testing results are explained in view of the micro-scale images and structuresobtained in the micro-scale imaging study. In this paper, all the tensile tests using aluminumdogbone samples were conducted following ASTM E345
Engineering (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994). 4. Petroski, H. To Engineer is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design (Vintage Press, 1992). 5. Ghosh, S. (2002) Humbleness As a Practical Vehicle for Engineering Ethics Education. 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education, Vol. 3, DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2002.1158738. 6. Chiles, J. R. Inviting Disaster: Lessons from the Edge of Technology (HarperCollins, 2002). 7. Kececioglu, D. B.; Wang, W. (1997) On the Lower Confidence Limit of the Calculated Reliability for Mechanical Components and Structural Members. Collection of Technical Papers – AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Vol. 4, 2885- 2889. 8
results.Homework assignments, examinations, end of semester design problem/project and student exitsurveys are used as metrics to check efficacy of pedagogy. This course on finite element methodstargets ABET criteria a,b,e,g,i,k.Paper OutlineThis paper describes (i) analytical mathematical techniques, viz., solution of differential equationsby the method of variables separable and Galerkin’s method of weighted residuals and (ii)computational tools, viz, MATLAB and its partial differential equations toolbox (pdetool) for anundergraduate elective course in finite element methods.In this paper, an introduction, literature review and brief philosophy of this study and the classdemographics are first described. A skill assessment exam is conducted to
AC 2011-1816: REVERSE ENGINEERING MODERN ENGINEERING ED-UCATION AND ITS SCIENTIFIC APPROACH: WHAT WOULD STEPHENTIMOSHENKO SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT ENGINEERING EDUCA-TION?Sergio Celis, University of Michigan Sergio Celis is a doctoral student and research assistant in the Center for the Study of Higher and Post- secondary Education at the University of Michigan. His research interest are engineering education and methodologies of evaluation and assessment. He received a professional degree in Industrial Engineering from the University of Chile. Page 22.1255.1 c American Society for
course modification, are discussed in detail, followed byconclusion and future plan.Learning ObjectivesME-335/L and 435/L are aligned to several key ABET outcomes and hence are crucial coursesfor the Mechanical Engineering (ME) curriculum. Both these courses provide students withtheoretical knowledge and hands on experience. The ABET outcomes for ME-335/L class are asfollows:1. an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering, outcome (a),2. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data, outcome (b),3. an ability to communicate effectively (3g1 orally, 3g2 written), outcome (g), and4. an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering
Academic Librarianship, 34:1, pp. 25 -30, 2008.3. Acar, B. S., Newman, I. A. “Students as Tutors-Learning Problem-Solving Skills by Tutoring PBL” International Journal of Engineering Education, 19:5, pp. 712-716, 2003.4. Denayer, I., Thaels, K., Sloten, J. Vander and Gobin, R. “Teaching a structured approach to the design process for undergraduate engineering students by problem-based education” European Journal of Engineering Education, 28:2, pp. 203 – 214, 2003.5. Said, S. M., Adikan, F. R. Mahamd, Mekhilef, S. and Rahim, N. Abd “Implementation of the problem-based learning approach in the Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Malaya” European Journal of Engineering Education, 30:1, pp. 129 - 136, 2005.6
and interpret data (ABET outcome b). In particular, you will be expected to: 5 i. Interpret power usage and energy consumption data for the Atheneum building. ii. Design and execute and necessary experiments to confirm or verify analytical findings related to the building analysis. 2. The ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (ABET outcome c). i. Design and analyze alternate cooling systems for the Atheneum building. ii
-0.181 0.0240There are many possible “prior experiences,” and Table 1 suggests no one or two experiences isvital for developing hands-on ability or mechanical aptitude. We took the analysis a step furtherto try and identify a set of experiences that would develop this ability. As such, we selected 20items with |r| > 0.20. We then performed an exploratory factor analysis with varimax rotation onthese items. Based on both intelligibility of the factor solution and criteria regarding the amountof variance accounted for, we determined a reasonable 5-factor solution accounting for 58% ofthe variance. These 5 factors were (a) prior tool usage (7 items), (b) formal dance training (4items), (c) outdoors skills (3 items), (d) racket
AC 2010-1702: ETIOLOGY OF THE ENERGY CRISIS IN ONE LECTUREB.K. Hodge, Mississippi State University B. K. Hodge is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Mississippi State University (MSU) where he serves as the TVA Professor of Energy Systems and the Environment and is a Giles Distinguished Professor and a Grisham Master Teacher. He is the author of more than 180 conference papers and archival journal articles and three textbooks and served as President of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Southeastern Section for the 1999-2000 Academic Year. He was the 2004-2005 Chair of the Mechanical Engineering Division of the ASEE at the national level. He is a Fellow of the ASEE and
standards, financial management, business conduct, leadership,communication, etc…. Early in the semester, the students were asked to update, peer review, andsubmit copies of their resume as an assignment. Under the auspices of “another resume exercise,”in opening to a lecture on diversity and inclusion, the author provided each student in attendanceone of two resumes. The resumes, provided in Appendices A & B, were developed to reflectexperiences familiar to students at the author’s institution, and were identical with the exceptionof utilizing a traditionally female vice traditionally male first name. The resumes were distributedto students in attendance randomly. Students were given approximately 5-10 minutes to reviewthe resume then, using
annual international ACM conference on Page 26.376.9 International computing education research, Auckland, New Zealand , 10-12 September 2012.17. Lea, Bih-Ru, "Clickers Adoption in a Small Class Setting," Decision Line, July 2008.18. Smith, M. K., W. B. Wood, W. K. Adams, C. Wieman, J. K. Knight, N. Guild, and T. T. Su. "Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance On In-Class Concept Questions." Science: 122-24.19. "AIChE Concept Warehouse." AIChE Concept Warehouse. Web. 19 Jan. 2015. .20. Canino, J. “Views on Flipping Engineering Thermodynamics,” ASEE Illinois/Indiana Section Conference, April 6
, somemodifications are implemented and offering the online section of the CAD class is approved forat least one more semester. Further evaluations will be performed on the effectiveness of thecourse as more data is collected in the future.References[1] R. Toogood, Creo Parametric 5.0 Tutorial, SDC Publications ISBN-10: 1630572071, ISBN-13: 978- 1630572075, 2018.[2] I. Zeid, Mastering CAD/CAM, McGraw Hill, ISBN-0070634343, 9780070634343..[3] Jensen, Helsel, and Short, Engineering Drawing and Design, 7th Edition, ISBN-978-0-07-352151-0.[4] A. Saxena and B. Sahay, Computer Aided Engineering Design, ISBN-13: 978-1402025556.[5] "SolidWorks Books".[6] R. Cozzens, "Youtube: An Effective CAD Training Resource," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San
right venue for this learningobjective. Rather, we moved that open-ended project to the senior-level lab course, after thestudents had learned (a) how to confidently use several common transducers, and (b) how tocollect, analyze, and present data in a credible manner for a well-defined problem.In the week-4 lab period, devoted to the project, students are generally able to fabricate theapparatus they designed in week 3 and make a preliminary measurement. At this early stage, ourobjective is for students to get a rough value for their result even if they haven’t had time toassemble all the transducers they plan to use. It is intended to give them an early start on gettingthe apparatus assembled, and verify the feasibility of their design.Three
Wentworth Institute of Technology since 2001 with 14 years of prior full time industrial experience. He has worked in the design of various technologies from advanced underwater and ultrahigh altitude propulsion systems to automated manufacturing equipment. His interests include advanced thermal and mechanical system design for green power generation.Prof. Michael Jackson, Wentworth Institute of Technology a. Professional Preparation. Institution Major Degree Year Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Aero- nautics B.S. 1989 Cambridge College Higher Education M.Ed. 1993 b. Appointments. 2010-present Department Chair, Mechanical Engineering and Technology, Wentworth Institute of Technology, Boston, MA 2007-2010 Assistant
Mechanical and Electrical Engineering at Monterrey Tech (ITESM-Monterrey Campus). Teaches courses in CAD/CAE, Mechanical Design, Finite Element Method and Optimization. His interest are in the area of product development, topology optimization, additive manufacturing, sustainable design, and biomechanics.Mr. Timothy Neil Thomas, CADENAS PARTsolutions LLC Tim Thomas is a founding partner and CEO of CADENAS PARTsolutions and continues to evangelize the importance of standardization techniques in design processes. Tim has 28 years of CAD technol- ogy development and application experience. Previously he spent thirteen years at Structural Dynamics Research Corporation (SDRC) where he was the Director of CAD Development. He
subordinate clause is Page 22.1169.7used per sentence, for example: Sample 2: Practitioner Use of Subordination and Embedded Structures (in italics) A. In addition, this report contains cost estimating instructions and formulas, which allow the user to estimate replacement and rehabilitation costs for additional bridges not included in this study. B. No jurisdictional ditches (or ditches of any kind) were present, although storm drains capture roadway runoff along 17th Street below the bridge.The sentence in 2A starts with a simple sentence and then contains a relative clause thatdescribes the object in the main sentence. The
, CA, 1999. http://www.ecpsystems.com[3] Manual for Model 220 Industrial Emulator/Servo Trainer, Educational Control Products, Bell Canyon, CA, 1999. http://www.ecpsystems.com[4] Manual for Model 750 Control Moment Gyroscope, Educational Control Products, Bell Canyon, CA, 1999. http://www.ecpsystems.com[5] Manual for Model A51 Inverted Pendulum Accessory, Educational Control Products, Bell Canyon, CA, 2002. http://www.ecpsystems.com[6] Burchet, B., “Four Hardware Experiments for Advanced Dynamics and Control,” Proceedings of the ASEE 2006 Annual Conference and Exposition, 2006.[7] Liaw, B., and Voiculescu, I., “An Integral Analytical-Numerical-Experimental Pedagogy for a System Dynamics and
calendar, ASAP, blackboard and bluebook can all be found from the common Universitywebpage and this is demonstrated for the attendees. If attendees have brought a laptop, they areasked to navigate these sites during the workshop. Often the instructor must stop to help oneattendee, yet it is better to navigate these sites before the semester begins.Detailed Syllabus is EssentialMany problems stem from the lack of a clear understanding of important points that should becovered in the syllabus. All engineering courses have a two part structure for the syllabus. Part“A” describes the standard information for all courses followed by Part “B” which described howthe course will be conducted this semester by this instructor. Part A is 2-pages long, which
Frontiers in Biomedical Devices Conference and Exposition, Irvine,California, BioMed2009-83132[14] A. Sanoff, 2005, “Competing Forces,” ASEE Prism, American Society of Engineering Education, v.15, n. 2, pp. 24-29.[15] B. Wolcott, 2007, “Filling the Void,” Mechanical Engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineering, v. 129, n. 2, pp. 24-27 Page 15.1031.10
assists the mechanicalengineering students in all three domains and to break the glass wall and become competentmechatronic engineers. To fulfil the need the aim and objectives were set in the following way:Aim:To provide the competence and confidence to (a) handle and explain mechatronic components,laboratory instruments and measurement systems, (b) carry out time and frequency responseanalyses, (c) differentiate analog and digital systems and (d) deal with microcontroller-basedexperimental applications, so that they can engage in the development of mechatronic systemwith the advanced courses to be studied later in the program.Objectives:The objectives of the course are to 1. Familiarize and consolidate the fundamental knowledge with hands-on
Summer 2016 Traditional (N = 24) Online (N = 11) Online (N = 16) Grades Percentage A+- 37 18 38 B+- 13 37 38 C+- 17 27 12 D+- 8 9 0 F 21 0 6 W/CW 4 9 6Comparing the grades of the students of the same course offering in traditional format and two onlinecourse