out the steps of what you have to do. I really enjoy when teachers in class will be like, ’Oh, well for external flow problems you have to do A, B, C, D, E’, and that really helps me because my brain has to be organized. I have to know exactly what to do next.”This indicates that Chelsea wanted an exact procedure to follow for each type of problem. Shealso stated that the goal of studying was to practice enough problems before the test so that shewould have seen all variations of the problems. “Well, I think the goal is to have done so many problems so that when I get on a test and I've ran into something like that, I am able to work through it. The goal is to work through as many problems so that you come
pedagogical methods to teach core engineering courses and leveraging technology to enhance learning experiences. Nick holds a BS and MS in Mechanical Engineering and has eight years of engineering experience. He also has four years of experience as an adjunct instructor at the community-college and research-university level.Craig Zywicki Craig is a Data and Assessment Analyst in the Office of Institutional Research, Assessment, and Effec- tiveness at Purdue University.Dr. David B. Nelson, Purdue University, West Lafayette c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #15763 David B
. Jorgensen, “The Learning Factory: Industry-Partnered Active Learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 5–11, Jan. 2008.[2] J. S. Lamancusa, J. E. Jorgensen, and J. L. Zayas-Castro, “The learning factory - a new approach tointegrating design and manufacturing into the engineering curriculum,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 103–112, Apr. 1997.[3] V. Wilczynski, C. S. O’Hern, and E. R. Dufresne, “Using an engineering design center to infuse designexperience into a mechanical engineering program,” in Proc. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis,IN, 2014.[4] C. R. Forest, R. A. Moore, A. S. Jariwala, B. B. Fasse, J. Linsey, W. Newstetter, P. Ngo, and C. Quitero,“The invention studio: A
been focused on teaching junior and senior engineering design classes as well as educational and curriculum development. He is coordinator of the first new ME-Practice course in the revised Mechanical Engineering curriculum and faculty advisor of the Mining INnovation Enterprise.Dr. Nancy B. Barr, Michigan Technological University As the Communications and Senior Design Program Advisor, Barr developed a multi-faceted technical communications program in the Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics Department at MTU. She delivers communication instruction to undergraduate and graduate students, assists faculty in crafting critical thinking/communication assignments, and trains GTAs and faculty in best practices in
. References1. Canino J. V. 2015. “Comparing student performance in thermodynamics using the flipped classroom and think- pair-share pedagogies.” ASEE Paper ID Paper ID #11,334. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, June 14–17, 2015.2. Swartz, B., S. B. Velegol, and J. A. Laman 2013. “Three approaches to flipping CE courses: Faculty perspectives and suggestions.” ASEE Paper ID Paper ID #7982. 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 23–26, 2013.3. Lape, N. K. and R. Levy. 2014. “Probing the inverted classroom: A controlled study of teaching and learning outcomes in undergraduate engineering and mathematics.” ASEE Paper ID Paper ID #9475. 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, June 23–26, 2014.
Undergraduate Students in Engineering through Freshman Courses, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Quebec.2. Johnson, J., & Niemi, A. D. (2015). A First-year Attrition Survey: Why Do They Say They Are Still Leaving? ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington.3. Meyer, M. & Marx, S., (2014). “Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering”, Journal of engineering education, Vol. 103, Issue 4, Pages 525-548, October 20144. Skurla, C., Thomas, B., & Bradley, W., (2004). Teaching Freshman Using Design Projects and Laboratory Exercises to Increase Retention, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.5. Hall, D., et al., (2008). “Living with the Lab
the motion. 7 The external resultant force must be in the same direction as the acceleration. Work and Energy 8 Gravitational potential energy can be either positive, zero, or negative. 9 Elastic potential energy can be either positive, zero, or negative. 10 When a spring is stretched by 5 in, it has more elastic potential energy than when it is compressed by 5 in. Conservation of Linear Momentum 11 If two same-size balls A and B are coming from the opposite direction, mA > mB. Ball B will experience a larger change of momentum. 12 If two same-size balls A and B are coming from the opposite direction, mA >
in the course were going well and smoothly in terms of the fund collecting.At the end of this course, each group has to attend the annual projects exposition and competition.A 4-page project summary needs to be submitted for the judges in competition. Poster display,exhibition, and oral presentations are required to demonstrate the achievement of the projects.Awards and certificates of merit are prepared to praise the achievement of the winners.The Creativity Evaluation TestThe TTCT, first developed by E.P. Torrance in 1966, has been the most widely used test ofcreativity and is the most referenced of all other creativity tests. It consists of two parts, theTTCT-Verbal and the TTCT-Figural, and each one has two parallel forms, A and B. The
standard deviation of 1.28. The three open-ended laboratory modulesincluded the toaster oven, the wind tunnel, and the boiler project. For these laboratory modulesthe average response was 4.33 with a standard deviation of 0.94 indicating the students clearlyperceived the experiment as primarily in their hands without a predefined outcome. For the ovenmodule the average was also 4.33 with a standard deviation of 1.04, confirming that the ovenmodule as perceived by the students to give them a great deal of control over the experimentoutcomes. 8 (a) (b)Figure 3. The student responses to the question, “How much control did you have over
design, andanalysis and proving of the final design. Thus there is a need to have inspiringcapstone projects that integrate machine elements, the impact of engineering designsand designers on society and the systematic design process. This paper describes thecarrying out of such a project and the lessons learned.2 Brief Description of the ProjectThe broad aim was to develop a capstone project that would (a) provide the learningexperience in using the knowledge and skills acquired by students from machinedesign courses during their residence in the university in an inspirational way and (b)enable them to become ambassadors for mechanical engineering by realizing andpreaching the impact mechanical engineering had and has on a global and
regarding this work.References1. Hicks, B. J., Culley, S. J., Allen, R. D. & Mullineux, G. A framework for the requirements of capturing, storing and reusing information and knowledge in engineering design. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 22, 263–280 (2002).2. McAlpine, H., Hicks, B. J., Huet, G. & Culley, S. J. An investigation into the use and content of the engineer’s logbook. Des. Stud. 27, 481–504 (2006).3. M. Malik. Understanding the use of paper and online logbooks for final year undergraduate engineering projects. Front. Educ. Conf. FIE 2014 IEEE 1–4 (2014). doi:10.1109/FIE.2014.70442194. Boud, D., Lawson, R. & Thompson, D. G. Does student engagement in self-assessment calibrate their judgement over time? Assess. Eval. High. Educ
could test their projects at their convenience. Likewise, it is attractiveto consider shredded paper or wood shavings as insulation materials but in mathematicalmodeling of the effective thermal conductivity and other thermophysical properties of suchmedia can be rather complicated. A report was required to be submitted before the testing of thedevices. Appendix B depicts the document that provided some guidelines in the reportpreparation. The mini-project/case study on numerical methods in solving heat transfer problems, whichinvolves the introduction of the FEHT software, is completed, submitted and graded by theseventh week of the semester. The design and build project was assigned during the seventh oreighth week of the semester and the
Student Perceptions and Behaviors in a Flipped Classroom Undergraduate Information Technology Course.” 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition June 15 – 18, 2014 paper ID # 8863 2) S. Chetcuti, H. Thomas, and B. Pafford, “Flipping the Engineering Classroom: Results and Observations with Non-Engineering Students” , 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition June 15- 18, 2014, paper ID # 10923 3) J. Bishop and M. Verleger, “The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research” 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 23-26, 2013, Paper ID # 6219 4) R. Haddad and Y. Kalaani, “A Novel Peer-Assisted Hybrid Flipped Classroom Model Using Online Discussion” 122 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
York College of Pennsylvania includes the following studentlearning outcomes. These outcomes are directly related to the ABET student outcomes7. Themechanical engineering program does not require any formal assessment data from this course asthe program collects required assessment data from other courses. Student learning outcomes: • An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (a) • An ability to conduct experiments as well as to interpret data (b). • An ability to use modern engineering software tools needed in professional engineering practice (k). • An ability to use modern engineering equipment and tools needed in professional engineering practice (k).The instructor collected
Foster (UW-Madison), Dr. Kevin Kirtley (General Electric Waterand Power), and Professor Robert Lucht (Purdue University). Finally, Mr. Cole Frazier, anundergraduate student researcher, is acknowledged for his efforts in processing data presented inthis article.References1. T. J. Jacobs, J. A. Caton, J. Froyd and K. Rajagopal. Redesigning the first course ofthermodynamics to improve student conceptualization and application of entropy and secondlaw concepts. in ASEE Annual Conference. 2014. Indianapolis, Indiana.2. R. A. Streveler, B. M. Olds, R. L. Miller and M. A. Nelson. Using a delphi study toidentify the most difficult concepts for students to master in thermal and transport science. inAmerican Society for Engineering Education
Paper ID #17148A Pilot Study of a Novel Set of Three Courses for Teaching Electrical SystemAnalysis to Mechanical Engineering StudentsDr. Paul E. Slaboch, St. Martin’s University Dr. Slaboch is an assistant professor of Mechanical Engineering and Director of the Master of Mechanical Engineering program at St. Martin’s University. His main research areas are experimental fluid mechanics and heat transfer with a focus on vortical flows and aircraft wake turbulence.Dr. Floraliza Bornasal, Oregon State University Floraliza B. Bornasal is an Assistant Professor at Saint Martin’s University. Her research explores engi
Orientationown judgment in setting up and addressing theparticulars of a problem. Students learn how to address each module Startin Figure 1, each of which has specific outputsthat require the application of basic concepts Figure 1: Problem Solving Process.in kinematics and dynamics. They eventuallycombine these outputs to obtain the equations of motion. It is easier to illustrate thisstructure using the simple example in Figure 2 11 . The problem statement is: The double inclined plane supports two blocks A and B, each having a weight of 10lb. If the coefficient of kinetic friction between the blocks and the plane is µk = 0.1, determine the acceleration of each block. Assume the pulley is massless.The next sections
failing. Totalexam points (Figure 2) were scaled accordingly: ─ 1.0: maximal points - 67.6; ─ 1.3 – 67.6 - 62.8 ─ 1.7 – 62.8 - 59.2; ─ 2.0 – 59.2 - 55.6; ─ 2.3 – 55.6 - 50.8; ─ 2.7 – 50.8 - 47.2; ─ 3.0 – 47.2 - 43.6; ─ 3.3 – 43.6 - 38.8; ─ 3.7 – 38.8 - 35.2; ─ 4.0 – 35.2 - 34.0; ─ 5.0 – < 34.0.Grades were grouped into three groups: 0.7-2.7, 3.0-4.0, and 5.0. This is approximately equivalentto A-B (0.7-2.7), C-D (3.0-4.0), and F (5.0) in the United States.The overall average of total exam points was 38.43 11.9 of 94 available with an average gradeof 3.7 (Figures 2 and 3). Students received the lowest number of available points on Task 1(properties and organic chemistry: 2.15
. Students will understand the definitions of stress and strain, and basic mechanical properties of materials such as a Knowledge elasticity, yielding stress, Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio 2. Students will apply concepts of strain and stress to the analysis of statically-determinate (a) and indeterminate (b) a, e Comprehension bars under axial loading 3. Students will apply concepts of strain and stress to the analysis of statically-determinate (a) and indeterminate (b) a, e Comprehension shafts in torsion 4. Students will analyze the shear, moment distribution
) highly cross-coupled (non-linear) spring pendulum, and b) rotary inverted pendulum.Presented in Figure 5 are Simulink and SimMechanics models which are used to solve thecoupled nonlinear equations of motion for the spring pendulum system. With these models,students can develop a deeper understanding of the system by modifying input parameters andseeing their effect on the dynamic behavior of the system at all times.Figure 5. Model and simulated time response for spring pendulum system, Simulink (top), and SimMechanics(bottom).3.3 Modeling, Analysis, and Control of Dynamics Systems – Year 3The base of this course is a standard course in most Mechanical Engineering curricula. Theunique aspects are the integration throughout the course and the
advantage for various positions of the can crusher and comparingthe mechanical advantage of different models. Instructor also lets the students know it’s likelythey will not be able to finish the activity in the one class period, and there is no time pressure tocomplete all of the analysis questions.The student groups are given a handout with a series of suggested steps and a few photographs ofthe can crusher in various positions (see Appendix B). To a fellow engineering professor thismay seem overly prescriptive for an open-ended student-guided activity, but from the students’perspectives it is still far from clear. They often write of not having enough instruction and notknowing how to begin, which is necessary, for they are to decide how to
Conference, Indianapolis, IN.4. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. (2015). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2014 -2015. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/E001-15-16- EAC-Criteria-03-10-15.pdf5. Individual Development and Educational Assessment (IDEA) Center. (2016). Retrieved fromhttp://ideaedu.org/abouton 1/31/2016.6. Garry, B. G. (2011). Relationship Between ABETTAC Criterion 3 A-K Student Learning Outcomes Achievement. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
example of a progressreport template was shown in Appendix B. By contrast, technical reports required students todemonstrate the technical details of design and project management. For example, EngineeringProjects 1 technical report 2 (template shown in Appendix C) covered design assessment andrequired teams to detail their vehicle component research, safety research, plan for component re-use, purchase, redesign, or new design, and project management updates. Even though it seemedmore work compared to the previous progress reports, the students were gradually building theirSAE design reports along the way. In previous years, students would rush to finish these beforethe competition deadlines.Finally, for Engineering Projects 1 and 2, the
in their teams. Other students talked about theheightened awareness they have that a teammate might feel like an outsider and the importanceof trying to see things from other points of view. One student even wrote, “Consciouslyconsidering the perspectives of others has caused me to not completely change, but at least toreconsider my own personal views on the Syrian refugee situation.” Based on our feedback, wefeel that this training went extremely well and that it is in a large part due to the way the materialwas presented to the students.Project B – Building Design ChangesOne of our team members, Dr. Merchan-Merchan, worked closely with an outside design firm tocreate our first display area (see Figure 1). We anticipate the installation of
course, it has been added tothis paper because it shows how powerful peer discussions can be. Figure 2 - Sample clicker question for a Thermodynamics course. NOTE: The original authorship of this question is unknown but was not written by the author of this paper.Table 2 - Table of responses to question in Figure 2. The color red highlights the correct answer. Section 1 Section 2 Independent Peer Independent Peer A 16% 41% 28% 98% B 10
of 2015. Both instructors have extensive experience with teaching the course.Instructor A has taught the course seven times since 1997 and Instructor B has taught the classeleven times since 2004. Instructor A has extensive experience teaching using Active Learningtechniques in fundamental mechanics courses (both Statics and Dynamics) and had used them inthe MC/MSD class previously. Instructor B historically used a more traditional approach to thelecture portion of the class and has experience using Project Based Learning in the Laboratoryportion of the class. Additionally Instructor B was interested in learning to use Active Learningtechniques for the lecture portion of the class and welcomed the opportunity to partner withInstructor A to
Paper ID #14735The Incorporation of a Materials Selection Program in a Junior-Level Me-chanical Engineering Design CourseMr. Elliott Vega, University of Washington, Bothell Elliott Vega is an senior undergraduate mechanical engineer enrolled at the University of Washington Bothell. He received his Associate in Science degree from Shoreline Community College in 2014 in pre- engineering and was accepted as part of the first cohort to enroll as a mechanical engineer at the Bothell campus. His current interest and focus is to apply the knowledge gained in the classroom to advanced vehicle modifications. Upon graduating, he
, Hancock M. Evaluation of NSF support for Undergraduate Research Opportunities: Survey of STEM graduates. … 2005.[8] Alexander B, Foertsch J, Daffinrud S. The Spend a Summer with a Scientist Program: An evaluation of program outcomes and the essential elements for success. Madison, WI Univ Madison-Wisconsin … 1998.[9] Foertsch J, Alexander B, Penberthy D. Evaluation of the UW-Madison’s summer undergraduate research programs: Final report. … Univ Wisconsin–Madison, LEAD … 1997.[10] Humphreys S. Summer undergraduate program in engineering research at Berkeley. Front Educ Conf 1997 27th … 1997.[11] Kitto K. Innovative research and laboratory experiences for undergraduate students. Front Educ Conf 1998 FIE’98
Paper ID #14448Design, Build, and Installation of an Automated Bike Rental System as a Partof Capstone DesignDr. Scott F. Kiefer, York College of Pennsylvania Scott Kiefer has spent the past fifteen years teaching mechanical engineering at four institutions. As an exemplary teaching specialist in mechanical engineering at Michigan State University, Scott received the Withrow Award for Teaching Excellence, given to one faculty member in the College in Engineering for outstanding instructional performance. Scott specializes in machine design, vibrations and controls, and mechatronics. He started his career at the University
Paper ID #14572Redesign of a Graduate Seminar Course Using Active Learning for Oral Pre-sentation SkillsDr. Hamid Rad, Washington State University Hamid Rad, Ph.D., is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Washington State University, Vancouver. His areas of teaching and research interest include mechanical engineering design, design methodologies, and dynamic systems.Prof. Hakan Gurocak, Washington State University - Vancouver Prof. Gurocak is the founding director of School of Engineering and Computer Science at Washington State University Vancouver. His research interests include