AC 2011-1955: A PREREQUISITE SKILLS EXAM FOR SOLID MECHAN-ICSDavid B. Lanning, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Dr. David B. Lanning is an Associate Professor in the Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Department of Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University at Prescott, Arizona. Page 22.88.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 A Prerequisite Skills Exam for Solid MechanicsAbstractA prerequisite skills exam has been created and evaluated for use in a sophomore-level course insolid mechanics. The impetus for creating this prerequisite skills exam is to assist students
______/5Design/stress analysis of shafts ______/10Design/stress analysis of beams ______/10Design/stress analysis of columns ______/10Total for technical analysis ______/35Total points for group ______/100 Page 22.963.11Appendix C: Pre-test ResultsTeamwork: Please answer the following questions based on your experience working on teams. a. Working on a team helped me to better understand the purpose of team projects. b. It is important to be able to ask a teammate to explain something to me that they know. c. I am comfortable in giving feedback to members of my team. d
AC 2011-1511: SUPPLEMENTAL LEARNING TOOLS FOR STATICS ANDSTRENGTH OF MATERIALSCliff J. Lissenden, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Cliff J. Lissenden, Ph.D. (University of Virginia, 1993) is a professor of Engineering Science and Me- chanics at Penn State. In addition to teaching engineering mechanics courses ranging from sophomore level statics to graduate level mechanical behavior of materials, he researches structural health monitoring for aerospace, mechanical, and civil infrastructure applications. He is a member of ASEE, ASNT, ASME, ASCE, ASM, SES, and Sigma Xi.Christine B. Masters, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Christine Masters is an Associate Professor in the Engineering
/E001%2007-08%20EAC%20Criteria%2011-15-06.pdf, Jan.2011.7. Hibbeler, R., “Engineering Mechanics – Dynamics,” 11ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, NewJersey, ISBN 0-13-221504-7: 2007.8. Carroll, D., Integrating Design into the Sophomore and Junior Level Mechanics Courses, J.Eng. Educ., 1997, 86: pp. 227-231.9. Hennessey, M., “Statics and Dynamics Projects Emphasizing Introductory Design andManufacturing,” in Proc. ASEE Annual Conf. & Expo., Pittsburgh, 2008.10. Cottrell, D., and Ressler, S., “Integrating Design Projects into an Introductory Course inMechanics of Materials,” in Proc. ASEE Annual Conf. & Expo., Milwaukee, 1997.11. Armstrong, B., “A Design Project for a Second Course in Controls,” in Proc. ASEE AnnualConf. & Expo., Milwaukee
). Page 22.935.7Figure 4 – Moment equation in 3D with explicit vector formulationThe problem in Figure 4 is that of a plate weighing 500N supported by 3 people (located atpoints A, B, C) exerting vertical forces pointing straight up. Finally, a 3D FBD requires a“joystick” to be able to navigate the 3D environment and rotate in any direction (see Figure 5). Page 22.935.8Figure 5 – Rotation controls in 3D (top right corner)In this manner, InTEL allows students to approach 3-D statics problems in a visual, hands-onmanner. The student can use the rotation controls to pan and rotate the camera view on theproblem space. Students compose the moment vector
] Brathwaite, B. & Schreiber, I. Challenges for Game Designers: Non-Digital Exercises for Video Game Designers, Course Technology, 2009.[9] Coller, B. D. & Scott, M. J. Effectiveness of using a video game to teach a course in mechanical engineering, Computers & Education, 53, pp. 900 – 912, 2009.[10] Coller, B.D. A video game for teaching dynamic systems and control to mechanical engineering undergraduates, Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 2010.[11] Coller, B.D., Shernoff, D.J. and Strati, A.D., Measuring Engagement as Students Learn Dynamic Systems & Control with a Video Game, Advances in Engineering Education (in press).[12] Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G., Force concept inventory, The
learning and the use of concept maps for teaching. We provide our“common concept map,” we detail several ways in which we’ve used the heuristic, and finallydescribe preliminary results assessing its efficacy.Index Terms – Concept Map, Heuristic, Mechanics of Materials, Mind Map, Solid Mechanics,Strength of Materials, Undergraduate Mechanics.Introduction Mechanics of Materials is widely considered “difficult” by students. Many educators overthe past two decades have attempted to improve Mechanics of Materials learning throughendeavors such as the following: (a) development of physical demonstration models or video forclassroom use,1-2 (b) development of computer programs to assist, encourage and facilitateindependent learning by students,3-7 (c
. This hoist is to be made by the manufacturer in severalmodels, each with a different maximum lifting capacity and overall dimension, but all with thesame basic configuration. The manufacturer also offers the option of custom size and capacity ofthe basic design. For every model and customer option, you, as an engineer (student) in thecompany, are given the responsibility of specifying: The material for the pins. Dimensions of three pins A, B, and C. The material for the structure Members 1 and 2. The dimensions of each structural member, Member 1 and Member 2.Developing the mathematical model in symbolic form, and solving the equations with anequation solver program will create a tool for rapid and
”, Journal for Geometry and Graphics, Volume 2, pp. 169-179, 1998. 2. Krueger, T.J. and R.E. Barr. “The Feasibility of Teaching FEA in a Freshman Graphics Course”, in Proceedings of the ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, 2005. 3. Cole, W.E. “Incorporating CAD Analysis Tools into the Mechanical Engineering Technology Curriculum”, Technology Transfer, Volume 3 No.3, Fall 1999. 4. Ural, A. and J. Yost. “Integration of Finite Element Modeling and Experimental Evaluation in a Freshman Project”, in Proceedings of the ASEE Mid-Atlantic Annual Conference, Villanova University, October 2010. 5. Brinson, L.C., T. Belytschko, B. Moran, and T. Black. “Design and
second exam, the commonquestion involved solving for an equivalent force system for a beam subjected tovarious point loads (Figure 2). This question asked the students to replace theforce system acting on the beam by two different equivalent systems. On the thirdexam, the common question involved solving for the forces acting in a member of a2-D frame (Figure 3). In common question 3 students were given the value of Pand asked to calculate all the force acting on member A-B-D. The test questionswere graded by the same person (Vilmann), avoiding any bias that might occur dueto differences in grading schemes.For the first exam, due to a miscommunication between the two authors, thestudents in the online course had a slightly more difficult
the restitution phase of the collision[11]. It isconventional, therefore, to compare their magnitudes by means of a ratio called the coefficient ofrestitution.For two particles A and B that are, say, assumed to be moving in the same direction before aswell as after central impact with absolute velocities v A and v B , respectively, analysis shows thatthe coefficient of restitution is related to the relative speeds of the particles before and afterimpact, as shown below [1-3]. (v B ) after − (v A ) after e= (v A )before − (v B )before (1)If particle B represents the ball and particle A the rigid surface of the court, then, in this case, thecoefficient of restitution
AC 2011-1115: ALIGNMENT OF PREPARATION VIA FIRST-YEAR PHYSICSMECHANICS AND CALCULUS COURSES WITH EXPECTATIONS FORA SOPHOMORE STATICS AND DYNAMICS COURSEKristi J Shryock, Texas A&M University Kristi J. Shryock is a Lecturer and Director of Undergraduate Programs in the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Texas A&M University. She received both a B.S. and M.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Texas A&M and received her Ph.D. in Interdisciplinary Engineering at Texas A&M in May 2011. Her research work focuses on engineering education.Prof. arun r srinivasa, Texas A&M University, Department of Mechanical Engineering Prof. Srinivasa received his batchelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the Indian
AC 2011-1910: THE EFFECT OF ON-LINE VIDEOS ON LEARNER OUT-COMES IN A MECHANICS OF MATERIALS COURSEJeffery S. Thomas, Missouri University of Science and Technology Jeffery Thomas is an assistant teaching professor in the department of Civil, Architectural and Environ- mental Engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology in Rolla, MO. He received a B.S. and M.S. in mechanical engineering and a Ph.D. in engineering mechanics from Missouri S&T. He is a licensed professional engineer. His technical interests are in mechanical characterization, construction, and the influence of force on biological systems. His artistic interests are in music.Richard H Hall, Missouri University of Science &
formulas with the method of superposition regarding (a) theirmethodology and pedagogy, (b) the availability of a one-page excerpt from the method of modelformulas, (c) the availability of a one-page collection of deflection formulas of selected beamsfor the method of superposition, and (d ) assessment of their effectiveness in solving problems ofreactions and deflections of beams in several identical given problems.I. IntroductionBeams are longitudinal members subjected to transverse loads. Students usually first learn thedesign of beams for strength. Then they learn the determination of deflections of beams under avariety of loads. Methods used in determining statically indeterminate reactions and deflectionsof elastic beams include: 2 - 1 3
student misunderstanding thatforces and moments are interchangeable. b Although we refer to the intervieews collectively, and hence the students in plural, the interviews were conductedin serial, i.e., the procedure was repeated for each student in turn. Page 22.792.5Figure 2: At the conclusion of the interview students were given the opportunity to holdthe imagined slider-and-beam to test their understanding of the concepts explored in thethought-experiment part of the interview. A 60 Nm couple acting clockwise keeps the member in equilibrium while it is subjected to other forces acting in the plane shown schematically
already had amajor examination. Examples of this include Outcome 1-3 in Fig. 3(a) and Outcome 2-2 in Fig.3(b), which respectively are “Solve for unknown forces and moments acting on a 2-D rigidbody” and “Construct a free body diagram for a rigid body”. Both of these outcomes areintroduced early in the course and covered on the first examination, prior to the first overarchingproblem solution period.It is noteworthy that an increase in ratings is shown for all 28 learning outcomes. As expectedfor the reason described above, the most significant increases tend to occur on the learningoutcomes that have the lowest pre-survey scores. The “mean of mean” (i.e. average rating for alllearning outcomes covered on a given overarching problem) rating for
indeterminate problem. Using the load-displacement relationship, aswell as the fact that the relative displacement between the bone and nail is 0, the followingrelationships can be developed:where F is force, L is the length, A is the cross-sectional area, % is the percent of bone loss, E isthe elastic modulus, and σ is the stress. The subscript B represents values of the bone, and thesubscript N represents values of the nail. Synthes, the producer of the nail and screws, uses atitanium alloy Ti–6Al–7Nb.[6] Therefore, the elastic modulus used for the nail was 114GPa,[7]and the elastic modulus for the bone was 18.6GPa.[8.9] Due to their complex geometries, thearea of the nail was calculated as an area formed by 2 concentric circles, while the area of
test of conceptual understanding of Statics [12-14]. As reported in [13-14], relativelyhigh correlations have been found at many institutions between scores on the SCI and scores onin-class exams. As one means of judging the level of correlations that might be expectedbetween the SCI and class-based performance measures, correlations between different classexams within a course were also calculated, and found to range from r = 0.32 to 0.73 [13].Summative Course PerformanceFor a summative measure of performance in class, we have used the mean of in-class examscores in the case of Miami and CMU, and the final grade (A, A-, B+,…) rendered into anumerical scale in the case of Itasca.Paper HomeworksWritten homework problems were assigned nearly
what happens to each of the items shown in bold – line A, line B,the square, and the diamond. Sketch what happens to line A. Sketch what happens to line B. Sketch what happens to the square. Sketch what happens to the diamond.In one of the figures above, identify the average shear strain, γ, over the length of the tube.In one of the figures above, identify the angle of twist, θ, of the right end relative to the left end Page 22.1493.7of the tube.Figure 2a. Activity #1: Axial Load Demonstration and State of StressState the type of stress that produces shear strain
AC 2011-66: INVESTIGATING THE VALIDITY OF STUDENTS’ SELF-ASSESSMENTS OF THEIR ABILITY IN STATICSJeffrey L. Newcomer, Western Washington University Jeffrey L. Newcomer is a Professor of Manufacturing Engineering Technology at Western Washington University. He received B.S. (1988) and M.Eng. (1989) degreesin Aeronautical Engineering, a M.S. in Science and Technology Studies (1993), and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (1994) from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. He is engaged in research to improve instruction and assessment in engineering, with an emphasis on engineering fundamentals such as mechanics Page