Mexico.Miss Isabella Acevedo-Rodriguez, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Isabella Acevedo-Rodriguez, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Isabella Acevedo-Rodriguez is a second year student at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology. She received her high school diploma from Alamogordo High School. She is a member of AIAA, the NMT Student Government As- sociation, Alpha Sigma Kappa: Women in Technical Studies, and a volunteer for the AIAA Design Build Fly Junior Design Team. She won the first place presentation award at the New Mexico AMP Conference in 2013.Dr. Ricardo B. Jacquez, New Mexico State University Ricardo B. Jacquez is Dean of Engineering and Regents Professor at New Mexico State
, engineering self-efficacy 2 and engineering careeroutcome expectations were significant predictors of men’s persistence in engineering.Engineering self-efficacy 1 measures a student’s ability to reach academic milestones focusingon courses (Chemistry, Calculus, and Physics) as barriers. Engineering self-efficacy 2 measuresa student’s ability to reach academic milestones facing all undergraduate engineering majors.This tells us that, for this sample, mastering coursework (earning an A or B) is the mostsignificant predictor for women’s persistence in engineering, and completing coursework (notnecessarily obtaining an A or B—merely completing the course) is the most significant predictorfor men’s persistence in engineering. For both men and women
, I. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis of a measure of “mentoring”among undergraduate students attending a Hispanic serving institution. Journal of HispanicHigher Education, 9(3), 232-244.[15] Gregerman, S. R., Lerner, J. S., von Hippel, W., Jonides, J., & Nagda, B. A. (1998).Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. The Review ofHigher Education, 22(1), 55-72.
University as an Assistant Professor, and was promoted to Associate Professor in 2010. He is the first African American to earn promotion and win tenure in the Vanderbilt University School of Engineering. Currently, he serves as Associate Chair of the EECS De- partment. He also serves as the Director of Undergraduate Studies for both electrical engineering and computer engineering. Dr. Robinson leads the Security And Fault Tolerance (SAF-T) Research Group at Vanderbilt University, whose mission is to conduct transformational research that addresses the reliability and security of computing systems. Dr. Robinson’s major honors include selection for a National Science Foundation (NSF) Faculty Early Career Development
AC 2007-2516: A THREE-YEAR EVALUATION OF A NACME PROGRAMMary Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University MARY R. ANDERSON-ROWLAND, PhD, is the PI of three academic programs and a fourth program for transfer students. An Associate Professor in Industrial Engineering at Arizona State University, she was the Associate Dean of Student Affairs in the Fulton School of Engineering at ASU from 1993-2004. She received the ASEE Minorities Award 2006, the SHPE Educator of the Year 2005, and won the National Engineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by the AAAES. In 2002 she was named the Distinguished Engineering Educator by the Society of Women Engineers. A SWE and ASEE Fellow, she is the Chair of
department of Teaching and Learning. Eugenia is mathematically bi-literate (English and Greek) and has taught mathe- matics at the middle school, high school, and college level. She currently teaches mathematics education courses to undergraduate, masters, and doctoral students. Her research explores Culturally Responsive Mathematics Teacher Education (CRMTE), which she defines as teacher education that: a) is responsive to the needs and capitalizes on the funds of knowledge of culturally diverse mathematics (pre-service and in-service) teachers, and b) seeks to prepare culturally responsive mathematics teachers who will advance the education of students whose linguistic and cultural backgrounds have not traditionally
. How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice. New York: National Academies P, 1999.6 Cen, G., Xu, B., Luo, J. Y. 2010. Implementing open-ended project-based instruction in experiment of university physics. 2nd International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science, (1) 830-832, 2010.7 Fontenot, D., Chandler, J.R., Talkmitt, S., and Sullivan, K. 2007. The Texas High School Initiative aims at STEM education reform: Texas Tech University T-STEM Center - Putting the "E" in K-12 STEM education. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, F2B1-F2B5,8 Fuentes, A., Crown, S., Freeman, R. 2006. Selective Integration for Student Motivation in the
AC 2009-1964: RESEARCH ALLIANCE IN MATH AND SCIENCE (RAMS): ANEXCELLENT RESEARCH INTERNSHIP PROGRAM FOR MINORITY SCIENCEAND ENGINEERING STUDENTSXiaoqing Qian, Alabama A&M University Dr. Xiaoqing (Cathy) Qian is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department of Alabama A&M University. Dr. Qian is also Director of High Performance Computing Research and Education project at Alabama A&M University.Zhengtao Deng, Alabama A&M University Dr. Z.T. Deng is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department of Alabama A&M University.George Seweryniak, DoE Computational Science Division Dr. George Seweryniak is a program manager in the Office of Advanced Scientific
a program. 2. Ambassadors must be trained to interact with first-year students in non-intimidating Page 24.1308.7 ways. a. Such topics as stereotyping, stereotype threat, and developmental challenges associated with transitions should be discussed. b. Training should focus on communication, interpersonal relations, perspective- taking, and features and characteristics of academic culture. 3. Ambassadors should be adequately compensated for their work. Payment helps to convey expectations of professionalism and ensures ambassadors have time to commit to tasks without distractions
in STEM Education with a focus on Engineering Education within the Department of Teaching and Learning at Ohio State. He studies topics including but not limited to cognitive development, learning, teaching, and the social contexts within which they occur. He is an experienced Graduate Teaching Associate with the First-Year Engineering Program. He is also currently the Outreach Chair of the OSU American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Student Chapter. His research interests include: (a) technology, (b) diversity and inclusion, and (c) retention and success, with a particular focus on students in STEM fields. To contact Leroy, e-mail long.914@osu.edu.Mr. Michael Steven Williams, The Ohio State University
womanist identity forWOC studying engineering?RecruitmentParticipants who identified as female and currently enrolled in the college of engineering will beeligible to participate. However, the results and analysis in this paper focuses on women of color(WOC) as defined by US racial or ethnic minorities, specifically Black/African American,Latina/o, Native American or Pacific Islander, or multiracial. Participants were recruited in twoways: (a) through engineering professors familiar with the project and (b) through facultyadvisors for targeted students groups (e.g. Society of Women in Engineering (SWE) andNational Society of Black Engineers (NSBE)) with access to member listservs. Students in theengineering professor’s courses were informed about
exhibitedcommon characteristics such as not being calculus-ready. These general characteristics of theincoming freshmen are captured through a survey instrument. The data collected from the surveyare used as a benchmark and comparison tool to assess the efficacy of the cohort program in thesubsequent semesters.The following survey instruments were developed based on the objectives of the cohort: a) Student demographic survey instrument, used to collect the background details of the incoming freshmen registered in the STEM courses. b) Cohort experience survey instrument, used to collect the students’ experiences and their goalsThe survey instruments, included in the appendix, are distributed to the students in the first year
certain amount of the testing set and had anaccuracy of 100%.In addition to recommending a set of courses for students, the decision support system is able todetect an interesting pattern regarding a helper course, pre-calculus. The decision support systemrecommends students predicted to have a FS GPA of CT or below to have a B or higher in pre-calculus. This rule is further investigated by studying two cohorts of students with a FS GPA ofCT or below, students that did not stay past four semesters, and students that did stay for at leastfour semesters. The authors studied the grades students received when taking pre-calculus asshown in Table 4. The provided analysis shows that students who receive a B or higher for pre-calculus tend to stay past
Paper ID #27701Exploring Within-Group Differences in Student-Faculty Interactions amongBlack Engineering Students at a Selective Four-Year Engineering CollegeMs. Felicia James Onuma, University of Maryland, College Park Felicia Onuma is a Ph.D. candidate in Higher Education at the University of Maryland, College Park. Her research interests center around the enrollment and retention of Black (immigrant) students in sci- ence, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields and the experiences of Black immigrant collegians at private elite U.S. colleges and universities. Felicia currently holds a graduate assistantship
them by b and a may be selected. The probability of selecting the next node j(j ∈ {a, b}) may be obtained from 3 × P( j ) + Ln ( j )P ′( j ) = (2) 4 where P(j) is the probability of selecting node j as the next node and Ln(j) is theparameter indicating the instantaneous status of the ant queue for the corresponding inputport at node j. This relation is the same relation as (1) when Nk = 2 and α = 1/3. To obtainthe value for Ln(j), we make use of Tables 2 which is based on the warning signal of“buffer full” of each link (w_full). Each buffer of the router has a status signal which isw_full. When the number ofempty cells of the buffer is less than a certain value, w_full
directly linked to student persistence. The factors outlined in thisframework will be central to understanding student success at HBCUs and enable the connectionof the present study’s findings to existing literature.MethodsThe researchers implemented an iterative, descriptive research model by including the followingaction items: (a) engaging research participants; (b) developing data collection strategies; (c)defining variables and constructs; and (d) gathering information and investigating researchquestion(s). This paper focuses on the data collected currently from one institution. The presentresearch study findings are informed by quantitative data. Data from additional HBCUs will becollected and analyzed subsequently.ParticipantsParticipants
schoolengineering outreach program for girls,” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science andEngineering, 15(2), 2009.[28] P. Sherman, and S. Luton, “Mind the Gap,” Quality Progress, 48(12), 62, 2015.[29] H. Matusovich, R. Streveler, and R. Miller, “Why do students choose engineering? Aqualitative, longitudinal investigation of students' motivational values,” Journal of EngineeringEducation, 99(4), 289-303, 2010.[30] Y. George, D. Neale, V. Van Horne, and S. Malcolm, “In pursuit of a diverse science,technology, engineering, and mathematics workforce,” American Association for theAdvancement of Science (pp. 1-24). 2001.[31] B. Bogue, B. Shanahan, R. Marra, and E. Cady. “Outcomes-based assessment: drivingoutreach program effectiveness. Leadership and
thank Tennessee Board of Regents for supporting the summerprogram.References[1] Freedman, Mervin B. "The passage through college." Journal of Social Issues 12.4 (1956):13-28.[2] Lemons, L. Jay, and Douglas R. Richmond. "A developmental perspective of sophomoreslump." NASPA journal 24.3 (1987): 15-19.[3] Hurtado, Sylvia, Deborah Faye Carter, and Albert Spuler. "Latino student transition tocollege: Assessing difficulties and factors in successful college adjustment." Research in highereducation 37.2 (1996): 135-157.[4] Gregerman, Sandra R., et al. "Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affectstudent retention." The Review of Higher Education 22.1 (1998): 55-72.[5] Fechheimer, Marcus, Karen Webber, and Pamela B. Kleiber. "How well do
(e.g., major, transfer status) alone.Ten significant predictors of enhanced critical/analytical thinking skills were identified: sex,degree aspirations, freshman status, sophomore status, junior status, transfer status, STEM major,grades, and two diversity indices. Table 3 presents a summary of the regression analysis.Table 3Hierarchical regression results from final model predicting critical/analytical thinking skillsVariable B SE Constant 1.998 0.08Degree aspirations 0.12** 0.02 0.07Race 0.04 0.03 0.02First-generation - 0.03
addition, the demographicportion is being revised to include questions that identify participants’ past experiences in CS.Finally, the research team is researching the administration of the survey at the first-year levelfor undergraduates versus the end of 12th grade.References 1. Brown, P.R. & Matusovich, H.M. (2013). Unlocking student motivation: Development of an engineering motivation survey. In the Proceedings of the 120th Annual Conference and Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education. 2. Dorn, B. & Tew, A. E. (2015). Empirical validation and application of the Computing Attitudes Survey. Computer Science Education, 25(1):1-36. 3. Faber, M., Unfried, A., Wiebe, E.N., Corn, J. &
(Electrical & Computer) Strength in Numbers (Aerospace & Civil)Seating capacity: 20 students Seating capacity: 20 students M 408C - Calculus I M 408C - Calculus I EE 302 - Intro to Electrical Engineering CH 301 - Chemistry I EE 306 - Intro to Computing FIG Seminar FIG SeminarThe Visionaries (Mechanical) The Innovators (Interdisciplinary)Seating capacity: 20 students Seating capacity: 20 students M 408C - Calculus I FIG Seminar CH 301 - Chemistry I ME 302 - Into to Mechanical Engineering FIG SeminarInfinite Momentum A (Interdisciplinary) Infinite Momentum B (Electrical &Seating capacity: 15 students
% bisexual; 24% queer)References1. Brawner, C. B., Camacho, M. M., Lord, S. M., Long, R. A., & Ohland, M. W. (2012). Women in industrial engineering: Stereotypes, persistence, and perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), 288- 318.2. Buck, H. J., & Gammon, A. R., & Preston, C. J. (2014). Gender and geoengineering. Hypatia, 29(3), 651-669.3. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London, UK: Routledge.4. Cech, E. A. (2013). Ideological wage inequalities? The technical/social dualism and the gender wage gap in engineering. Social Forces, 1-36.5. Cech, E. A., Rubineau, B., Silbey, S., & Seron, C. (2011
morning sessions in each semester offall, spring, and summer at the Chicago Museum of Science and Industry.Teacher professional development for CHiS&EProgram teachers received background content and instruction, STEM pedagogy anddirect guidance in the facilitation of each engineering activity. Upon completion of theprofessional development, teachers were able to a) to identify K-12 learning opportunitiesand challenges, b) describe engineering careers and K-12 engineering activities, c) relatethe connectedness of mathematics and science in the context of engineering designthrough hands-on practice, d) emphasize for students the role of mathematics and sciencein collecting, recording, analyzing, and communicating observations, e) demonstrate
Paper ID #33206A Systematic Review of Social Constructivist Pedagogies in Computing andtheir Effects on Broadening Participation for Women in UndergraduateComputing (Research)Jasmine Skye Batten, Florida International University Jasmine Batten is a computer science Ph.D. student and computer science education graduate research assistant in the School of Computing and Information Sciences (SCIS) at Florida International University. She received her Bachelor of Science in Computer Science with honors in 2019 from Florida International University. She is dedicated to improving women’s retention and persistence in computer
. Page 24.937.155. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of college student personnel, 25(4), 297-308.6. Frehill, L. M. (2011). Moving Beyond the Double-Bind: WIE and MEP Programs and Serving the Needs of Women of Color in Engineering. Paper presented at the 118th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, B.C. Canada.7. Maine, J. J. d., Freeman, T. L., Keely, B., & Roberts, J. (2001). Affinity Groups: More Bang for the Buck Paper presented at the 108th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Albuquerque, New Mexico.8. May, G. S., & Chubin, D. E. (2003). A Retrospective on Undergraduate Engineering Success for
) Corporation. She has served as the Project Assistant for the NASA Administrator's Fellowship Program for the past 4 years. Ms. Jackson Hittle possesses an A.S. in Computer Aided Drafting and Design and a B.S. in Engineering Design Technology.Gholam Ali Shaykhian, NASA GHOLAM ALI SHAYKHIAN Gholam Ali Shaykhian is a software engineer with National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Kennedy Space Center (KSC), Shuttle Processing Directorate. He is NASA Administrator Fellow (Cohort 7). He served his fellowships at Bethune Cookman College (B-CC) in Daytona Beach, Florida, teaching and conducting research in computer science and software engineering. Ali has received a Master of Science
as they discuss their experiences, interests,and research to develop possible essay topics. The remainder of this paper is dedicated toexplaining our methods. We also evaluate the workshop and its contribution to several factors forstudent success such as empowering students to a) acquire financial aid, b) feel connected to acommunity that is pursuing the same goal, and c) increase their belief that they can raise moneyto fund their graduate education. This kind of peer mentoring would not have been possible if notfor our faculty mentor, the third author, who thought about ways in which we could share oursuccess with our peers, and thereby empowering and encouraging us through her facultymentoring to create the workshop in the first place.In
Equations 85.4% 9.0% 78.9% 10.0%Table 2. Cañada College average retention and success rates for STEM math courses from 2001 to 2009. Retention is defined as completing the course, and success is defined as receiving a passing grade (A, B, or C) in the class.There are numerous studies that have concluded that the standard approaches to teachingtrigonometry and pre-calculus are ineffective, resulting in students who have difficulty completingmany basic tasks,14 or retaining knowledge and skills they have learned,15 and students whofrequently make algebraic errors that indicate a lack of conceptual understanding.16 Other studieshave also shown that the use of active and collaborative learning
, Utah State University, vol. 42, pp. 853‐859, 2008. [9] S. Lee, M. C. Harrison, G. Pell and C. L. Robinson, "Predicting Performance of First Year Engineering Students and the Importance of Assessment Tools Therein," Engineering Education, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 44‐51, 2008. [10] J. F. Milem and J. B. Berger, "A modified model of college student persistence: Eploring the relationship between Astin's theory of involvement and Tinto's theory of student departure," Journal of College Student Development, vol. 38, pp. 387‐400, 1997. [11] M. Oja, "Supplemental Instruction Improves Grades But Not Persistence," College Student Journal, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 344‐349, 2012. [12] D. Arendale, "Increasing efficiency and
Postsecondary Research., Bloomington, 2007.[2] S. H. Russell, M. P. Hancock and J. McCullough, "Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experiences," Science, vol. 316, no. 5824, pp. 548-549, 2007.[3] A. L. Zydney, J. S. Bennett, A. Shahid and K. W. Bauer, "Impact of Undergraduate Research Experience in Engineering," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 151 - 157, 2002.[4] R. S. Hathaway, B. A. Nagda and S. R. Gregerman, "The Relationship of Undergraduate Research Participation to Graduate and Professional Education Pursuit: An Empirical Study," Journal of College Student Development, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 614-631, 2002.[5] B. A. Nagda, S. R. Gregorman, J. Jonides, W. v. Hippel and J. S. Lerner, "Undergraduate