:15 am Adaptable Buildings: Designing a Structure for Today and Instructor 1 Tomorrow9:45 am Arrive to Room A Instructor 29:50 am 10 min break Instructor 1, Instructor 210:00 am Costs and benefits of regulating indoor environments Instructure 211:30 am Break for lunch12:45 pm Arrive to Room B/C Instructor 3 and 4 Group A Group B Instructor 3
plan.”Data AnalysisFirst, we individually coded each episode per family for one or more of the 16 epistemicpractices [6]. Cunningham and Kelly [6] classified the 16 epistemic practices into four broadcategories: (a) engineering in social contexts (e.g., consider problems in context, persist in theface of failure); (b) uses of data and evidence to make decisions; (c) tools and strategies forproblem solving (e.g., consider materials and their properties); and (d) finding solutions throughcreativity and innovation (e.g., innovating processes, systems, and objects). As an example ofour coding process, the following event from the Soccer Bot kit was coded as envision multiplesolutions and consider materials and their properties because Ashley
solutions solutions.Fixated on initial solution ideasThe theme fixated on initial solution ideas highlights students being attached to a single idea orsimilar idea that carried over into their final design. Many teams conceptualized one idea fortheir lunchbox design but presented it as multiple ideas (i.e., varied angles and features). Forinstance, Team #3 claimed they conceptualized multiple ideas, which they indicated met all ofthe design requirements and were inspired by a “penguin” (EDPL-Team #3). However, it was asingle idea presented from different angles as three different design concepts (Figure 2). (a) (b) (c)Figure 2. Lunchbox design: (a) concept A top, (b) concept
, Solutions, and Impacts(ISI) indicators. This is because the integrated STEM lesson assignment included the followingquestion prompts: (a) Where are you going to encourage innovation and creativity?; b) Howdoes this topic/project impact diverse populations of people locally, regionally, and/or globally?Referring to Moore et al.’s FQEE [23], question (a) about innovation and creativity best alignswith the POD indicator whereas question (b) about the impact to diverse populations connectswith ISI indicator. Future iterations of this assignment will include questions that ask elementaryPSTs to plan for the inclusion of other engineering features into their projects. For this portion, we selected four of the seven groups that incorporated
and S. Powers, “Improving science literacy through project-based K-12 outreach efforts that use energy and environmental themes,” in 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Chicago, Illinois: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2006, p. 11.738.1- 11.738.17. doi: 10.18260/1-2--158.[12] A. Collier, D. Knight, K. Hafich, M. Hannigan, M. Polmear, and B. Graves, “On the development and implementation of a project-based learning curriculum for air quality in K-12 schools,” in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, El Paso, TX: IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–7. doi: 0.1109/FIE.2015.7344246.[13] P. Pauw et al., “Transforming the finance system to enable the achievement of the Paris Agreement,” in The Closing Window: Climate crisis
Figure 1. (a) (b) Figure 1. Evaluation of Field TripsOverall Workshop EvaluationStudents provided feedback on the last day of the workshop using the form shown in AppendixC. The results are shown in Fig. 2 below.While the results of Figure 2 agree with the earlier feedback shown in Table 2, the electricalengineering session was rated highest when compared with all other sessions and the field tripsare among the highly rated activities. Figure 2. End of Workshop Evaluation of all SessionsFollow Up AnalysisTo help us examine the success of STEM-SEP in recruiting students to Penn State, we took aclose look at the
,” The Journal of rheumatology, vol. 21, no. 3, p. 454—461, 3 1994. [Online]. Available: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/8006888[2] T. Audino, A. Pautasso, V. Bellavia, V. Carta, A. Ferrari, F. Verna, C. Grattarola, B. Iulini, M. D. Pintore, M. Bardelli, and et al., “Ticks infesting humans and associated pathogens: A cross-sectional study in a 3-year period (2017–2019) in northwest italy,” Parasites & Vectors, vol. 14, no. 1, 3 2021.[3] Unity Technologies, “Unity real-time development platform — 3d, 2d vr &; ar engine,” [online]. [Online]. Available: https://unity.com/[4] D. S. D¨uzkaya, G. Bozkurt, S. Ulupınar, G. Uysal, S. Uc¸ar, and M. Uysalol, “The effect of a cartoon and an information video about intravenous
Combat Goals Shoots- station Trooper (parent) Robots and-Ladders (Kindermusik) (BotsIQ) game [11] (teacher) (parent) An interactive race Buoyancy involving balloon activity physics (parent) (community member) Live owl demonstration (Audubon Society) A hands-on kitchen science activity (parent)a. b. c.d. e. f. Figure 2: STEAM Night activities: a.) Fluid
-Keywords -Future Work 5 mins 10 mins 50 mins 10 mins 5 mins Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Announcements In-class activity Learning Objectives Solving a problem in Research Process y groups B
students with moderate and severe disabilities: A review of the literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 34(4), 195- 204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357619827932Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Harris, A., & Wakeman, S. (2008). A meta- analysis on teaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74(4), 407-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400401Browder, D. M., Trela, K., Courtade, G. R., Jimenez, B. A., Knight, V., & Flowers, C. (2012). Teaching mathematics and science standards to students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 46(1), 26-35. https
engagement. Journal of STEM Outreach, 6(1), 1-15.12. Pollock, M., Yonezawa, S., Sweet, M., Renner, N., Mai, M., & Vasquez, A. B. (2024). Leveraging a University to Create Local Equity-Oriented K–12 Learning Opportunities: A Conversation Starter. Educational Researcher, 53(5), 308-318.13. Moskal, B. M., Skokan, C., Kosbar, L., Dean, A., Westland, C., Barker, H., ... & Tafoya, J. (2007). K‐12 outreach: Identifying the broader impacts of four outreach projects. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 173-189.14. F. W. Baker III & S. Moukhliss, “Concretising design thinking: A content analysis of systematic and extended literature reviews on design thinking and human‐centred design.” Review of Education
with the least impact on time, apre-trip meeting was organized to 1.) identify which course completions and student cohortwould benefit the most, 2.) select a rigorous but accessible laboratory (Appendix A) from thefirst year undergraduate-level Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) course at DukeUniversity [14] 3.) determine that an interest flyer (Appendix B) and 4.) pre-trip survey(Appendix C) with targeted outreach would be implemented to advertise the experience andcapture interest data.Table 1 shows data from the pre-trip survey (Appendix B). It highlights students' year andbreadth of PLTW course (Appendix D) experience, underrepresented group information,interests in STEM courses and areas, and interests in the experience. As can be
refining the case study to include three differentdesign teams (see Appendix A) and conducting a field test of the case study in 5th-gradeclassrooms.AcknowledgmentsThis research was funded by the Partnership for Research and Education Consortium inCeramics and Polymers DOE/NNSA grant no. DE-NA0004051. We want to thank Dr. BenjaminBoesl for his help and assistance with this work.Appendix A Characteristics of Team Interaction Across Four Dimensions Dimension Novice (Team A) "Informed" (Team B) Blend (Team C) References (informed/novice) Problem-Scoping Generate ideas Focus on trying to Try to understand the right
, word associations; see Figure 2) and promptswere developed by the research team to encourage such discussion and for children to presenttheir prototype to others. Prompts include the following (a) What engineer did you feel like withyour most recent kit?; (b) What about the prototype made you excited? What about the prototypefrustrated you?; and (c) Find something around your house that represents how you felt whenworking with someone in your family. As noted by Lippard et al. [12], it is important foreducators to ask questions to build upon and expand children’s use of engineering habits ofmind. While the questions posed in this study were not asked within in-the-moment interactionswith participants during the completion of the kits
-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), vol. 5, no. 2, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.7771/2157-9288.1102.[12] D. B. Montfort, S. Brown, and V. Whritenour, “Secondary Students’ Conceptual Understanding ofEngineering as a Field,” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), vol. 3, no. 2,Oct. 2013, doi: 10.7771/2157-9288.1057.[13] J. E. Morris and L. F. Paris, “Rethinking arts-based research methods in education: enhancedparticipant engagement processes to increase research credibility and knowledge translation,”International Journal of Research & Method in Education, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 99–112, Jan. 2022, doi:10.1080/1743727X.2021.1926971.[14] N. Brown, “Scope and continuum of participatory research,” International
. 5 Resources[1] K. Krippendorff, Content analysis : an introduction to its methodology, 3rd ed. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1980.[2] G. L. Gray, D. Evans, P. Cornwell, F. Costanzo, and B. Self, "The Dynamics Concept Inventory Assessment Test: A Progress Report," in Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Portland, OR, 2005.[3] G. L. Gray, D. Evans, P. Cornwell, F. Costanzo, and B. Self, "Toward a Nationwide Dynamics Concept Inventory Assessment Test," in Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Nashville, TN, 2003.[4] P. S. Steif and J. A. Dantzler, "A Statics
. A. Hill, C. Corbett and A. St. Rose, "Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics," AAUW, Washington, 2010.[2] M. J. Mohr-Schroeder, C. Jackson, M. Miller, B. Walcott, D. L. Little, L. Speler, W. Schooler and D. C. Schroeder, "Developing Middle School Students' Interests in STEM via Summer Learning Experiences: See Blue STEM Camp," School Science and Mathematics, vol. 114, no. 6, pp. 291-301, 2014.[3] R. Wu-Rorrer, "Filling the Gap: Integrating STEM into Career and Technical Education Middle School Programs," Technology and Engineering Teacher, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 8-15, 2017.[4] "At a Glance," National Summer learning Association, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.summerlearning.org/at-a
; Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, 2019, p. 32198. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32198.[21] R. Carr and H. Diefes-Dux, “Change in Elementary Student Conceptions of Engineering Following an Intervention as Seen from the Draw-an-Engineer Test,” in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, San Antonio, Texas, 2012, p. 25.299.1-25.299.12. doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 21057.[22] B. Fralick, J. Kearn, S. Thompson, and J. Lyons, “How Middle Schoolers Draw Engineers and Scientists,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 60–73, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10956-008- 9133-3.[23] B. M. Capobianco, H. A. Diefes-dux, I. Mena, and J. Weller, “What is an Engineer? Implications of Elementary School Student Conceptions for Engineering
aspects of computational thinking,” Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.[16]. B. DiSalvo, C. Reid, and P. K. Roshan, “They can't find us: the search for informal CS education,” In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, pp. 487-492, 2014, March.[17]. A. Yadav, H. Hong, and C. Stephenson, “Computational thinking for all: Pedagogical approaches to embedding 21st-century problem solving in K-12 classrooms,” TechTrends, vol. 60, pp. 565-568, 2016.[18]. L. Martin-Hansen, “Examining ways to meaningfully support students in STEM,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-6, 2018.[19]. A. Silver & B. S. Rushton, “Primary-school
," Communications of the ACM, vol. 36, no.6, pp. 24–28, Jun. 1993.[16] E. B. N. Sanders and P. J. Stappers, "Co-creation and the new landscapes of design," Co-design, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2008.[17] S. Bødker, C. Dindler, O. S. Iversen, and R. C. Smith, Participatory Design. SpringerNature, 2022.[18] S. Thomaz, A. Aglaé, C. Fernandes, R. Pitta, S. Azevedo, A. Burlamaqui, A. Silva, & L.M.Gonçalves, RoboEduc: a pedagogical tool to support educational robotics. In 2009 39th IEEEFrontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, USA, pp. 1-6, 2009. DOI:10.1109/FIE.2009.5350439.[19] M. Resnick, J. Maloney, A. Monroy-Hernández, N. Rusk, E. Eastmond, K. Brennan, and Y.Kafai, "Scratch: programming for all," Communications of the ACM, vol. 52, no. 11, pp
examined. After careful consideration, the Robolink Co-drone [1] was chosenas the experimental platform for students to study drone flight, control and stabilize a drone.However, developing a set of comprehensible lectures proved to be a difficult task. Based onthe requirements of the certificate program, the lectures were designed to cover the followingtopics: (a) an overview of fundamentals of drone flight principles, including the forces actingon a drone such as lift, weight, drag, and thrust, as well as the selection of on-boardcomponents and trade-offs for proper payload and force balance; (b) an introduction to theproportional-integral-directive (PID) controller and its role in stabilizing a drone and reducingsteady-state errors; (c) an
research work is mainly focused on two areas, (a) designing novel materials for electronic and energy applications using ab-initio Density Functional Theory (DFT) which is imple- mented using Quantum espresso package (b). Designing computational tools for engineering education using Python/Matlab.Dr. Binh Q. Tran, Marian University Dr. Binh Q. Tran is the founding dean for the E.S. Witchger School of Engineering at Marian Univer- sity in Indianapolis. He has bachelor’s and master’s degrees in mechanical engineering from U.C. San Diego and San Diego State University, respectively, and received his doctorate in biomedical engineering from the University of Iowa. His research interests are related to applications of
heterogeneous groups in an active learning physics class. NSTA. 8. Rosser, S. V. Group work in science, engineering, and mathematics: Consequences of ignoring gender and race. College Teaching 46, 82-88 (1998). 9. Schwarz, C. V., Passmore, C., & Reiser, B. J. (2017). Helping Students Make Sense of the World Using Next Generation Science and Engineering Practices. NSTA Press. 10. Yusran, Siswanto, Hartono, Subali, B., Ellianawati, Gumilar, S., & Sartika, D. (2019). What's wrong with the cookbook experiment? A case study of its impacts toward learning outcomes of pre-service physics teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(5), 052047. 11. Award for improving undergraduate physics education
introducing two imaginary friends, A and B, andinformed the students that those friends are known to speak the truth 99% and 95% of the time,respectively. Students were then asked to what extent they would place trust in each of thesefriends. The majority of the students expressed a higher level of trust in friend A, who is a morereliable one. Then, we introduced a twist to the scenario. We revealed that now both friends Aand B will speak the truth 97% of the time. This adjustment changed many students’ trustevaluations. Many students indicated that they would place greater trust in friend B, who becamemore trustworthy, while friend A’s trustworthiness decreased. This exploration of trust dynamicsin friendship scenarios served as a parallel to the
teacheriterated and adjusted the schedule during the project, particularly encouraging the slowerprogressing groups to increase their working rate during the reporting sessions at the end of eachlesson. The project ended with the students filling out a questionnaire where they valued theproject and their individual contributions to the group’s work. The purpose was to encourage thestudents to reflect upon their work, their need for improvement, additional studies, and to be partof the summative assessment: Who had done what? Did the groups actually use the plans andspecifications that they created? Were there freeloaders in the groups?One teacher performed the project in two classes (A and B). Participating in the project wasoptional for the students
. 72(1), pp. 187–206, 2001.[3] H. McNeill & D. Polly, “Exploring Primary Grades Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Students’Mathematics Self-Efficacy and How They Differentiate Instruction,” Early Childhood EducationJournal, vol. 51(1), pp. 79–88, 2023[4] S.O. Bada & S. Olusegun, “Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching andlearning,” Journal of Research & Method in Education, vol. 5(6), pp. 66-70, 2015.[5] H. Hedges, J. Cullen, & B. Jordan, “Early years curriculum: funds of knowledge as aconceptual framework for children’s interests,” Journal of Curriculum Studies, vol. 43(2), pp.185–205, 2011.[6] N. McCaughtry, M. Fahlman, J.J Martin, & B. Shen, “Influences of constructivist-orientednutrition education on urban
, and 6 as of Asian descent. When asked at the start of the camp whatundergraduate major they were interested in pursuing, 12 reported computer science, 6 computerengineering, and 4 information technology. The other 6 listed other engineering or computingmajors, including cybersecurity.This study utilized a mixed-method research design that involved the triangulation of qualitativeand quantitative data. Two instruments were constructed for the purpose of this study and can befound in Appendix B. The Summer Computing Camp Survey (SCCS) was administered as a pre-survey on Monday morning and a post-survey on Friday afternoon following the Capstonepresentation. The Perceptions of Computing Fields (Perceptions) was administered prior to thecamp as a
Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington: The National Academies Press, 2012.[2] J. H. Flavell, “Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive– developmental inquiry.,” American Psychologist, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 906–911, Oct. 1979.[3] I. Fiteriani, R. Diani, A. Hamidah, and C. Anwar, “Project-based learning through STEM approach: Is it effective to improve students’ creative problem-solving ability and metacognitive skills in physics learning?,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1796, no. 1, p. 012058, Jan. 2021.[4] B. Heigley, “Why is Hands-On Learning so Important?,” teachagohio.org. [Online]. Available: https://teachagohio.org/why-is-hands-on-learning-so-important/. [Accessed: 30
, which involves various parameters that affect their further design.Consequently, we designed the MATLAB activities and hypothesized that by initiating with amathematical model rather than immediately engaging with physical materials, students coulddevelop a comprehension of the filtration parameters. This theoretical foundation wouldsubsequently inform their prototype building and iterating phase, potentially leading to moreinformed and effective design choices.ParticipantsWe presented our findings from student focus group data from two schools: School A, threestudents, and School B, six students, in two different states. For anonymity reasons, we have notincluded state information. Table 1 displays the characteristics of the schools. This
. 49, no. 1, 2014. 9. C. Funk and M. H. Lopez. "A brief statistical portrait of US Hispanics." Pew Research Center, 2022. 10. R. Fry, B. Kennedy, C. Funk. "STEM jobs see uneven progress in increasing gender, racial and ethnic diversity.” Pew Research Center, 1-28, 2021. 11. R. Dou and H. Cian, “Constructing STEM identity: An expanded structural model for STEM identity research.,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 458–490, 2021. 12. P. R. Crane, A. E. Talley, and B. Piña-Watson, “This is what a scientist looks like: Increasing Hispanic/latina women’s identification with STEM using relatable role models.,” Journal of Latinx Psychology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 112–127, 2022. 13