ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying results 31 - 60 of 205 in total

Enhancing TA Grading of Technical Writing: A Look Back to Better Understand the Future

Conference Session: Technical Session: Student Experience & Perspectives
Collection: 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University; Andrew H. Theiss, Ohio State University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions: Student

lowest in Year 2. Figure 3(a) and (b) shows the three years of course section averages for the lab memo and lab report,respectively. From here the improvement in the lab memo distribution from Year 1 to Year 2 isclearly shown. The program average and +/- 1 standard deviation is displayed. Each data pointcorresponds to a course section average for that assignment. The data depicted in Figure 3clearly demonstrates an improvement (i.e. decrease) in the standard deviation between Year 1and Year 2 for both technical writing assignments. The average grades for these assignments alsodecreased slightly across the program. Page 26.667.8

Relevance Score: 0.29276124

A Systematized Review of the Students’ Upbringing Influence on their Spatial Reasoning

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 5
Collection: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Hassan Ali Al Yagoub, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student

analysis indicates that this trend has been consistent for atleast the last three decades [24]. b. Testing Bias. Maeda & Yoon added that some of this research was influenced by other factors beyondspatial skills such as testing procedure and measurement bias against females such as providingtest time limitations [17]. In an earlier study, they recognized that testing affected the magnitudeof the gender difference gap. They noted that the gender difference increases in favor of malestudents if there was time pressure due to the testing instrument as compared to no time. Thus,the testing results would include a measurement error due to procedural bias [17]. The procedural impact on gender differences is of

Relevance Score: 0.29269713

Taking Control of Control Systems: A Student Developed, Multimedia and Simulation Tool for Control Systems Education

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Matilda Ho, University of Texas at Dallas; Maria Fernanda Valdez; Casey Hatfield; Jieun Kim; Taylor Carlile Beach
Tagged Divisions: Student

tool.Special thank you for the support from the Control Systems Department at University of Texas atDallas. 10 References1. B. Balamuralithara and P. Woods, "Virtual laboratories in engineering education: The simulation lab and remote lab," in Computer Applications in Engineering Education, Wiley Online Library, 2008, pp. 108-118.2. D. Cook, S. Hamstra, B. Zendejas, J. Szostek, A. Wang, P. Erwin and R. Hatala, "Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: Systematic review and meta-analysis.," in Medical Teacher, pp. 867-898.3. Kiryakova, Gabriela & Angelova, Nadezhda &

Relevance Score: 0.29234347

Studying the Resource Networks of First-year Engineering Students: Establishing a Data Collection Method

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Alexis Rae Walsh, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Emily Diehl, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Tagged Divisions: Student

Conference on Select 2016 BCCE Presentations: Tracking Student Use of Web-Based Resources for Chemical Education,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 2010–2012, 2017.[3] D. Z. Grunspan, B. L. Wiggins, and S. M. Goodreau, “Understanding classrooms through social network analysis: A primer for social network analysis in education research,” CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 167–178, 2014.[4] M. Nelson, S. Pearson, N. Pearson, J. Major, A. Godwin, and A. Kirn, “Using Social Network Analysis to Study the Social Structures of Inclusion Using Social Network Analysis to Study Inclusion in the Engineering Classroom,” 2018.[5] M. Saqr, U. Fors, and J. Nouri, “Using social network analysis to understand online

Relevance Score: 0.29234347

Playing the TA Lottery: A Study of How Teaching Assistants Impact Grades in Engineering Courses

Conference Session: Tricks of the Trade
Collection: 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sean Franey, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Anthony Gregerson, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Michael T. Braun, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Tagged Divisions: Student

AC 2012-3397: PLAYING THE TA LOTTERY: A STUDY OF HOW TEACH-ING ASSISTANTS IMPACT GRADES IN ENGINEERING COURSESSean Franey, University of Wisconsin, Madison Sean Franey is a graduate student at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. He is currently working in the PHARM research group under Prof. Mikko Lipasti, joining in Sept. 2010. His research interests include improving the performance and efficiency of data movement in multi-node systems, specifically in the GPGPU realm. His path to UW, Madison, lead through four years on the aircraft carrier USS George Washington in Norfolk, Va., receipt of a B.S. degree from Old Dominion University in computer engineering, and an M.S. degree in electrical engineering from UW

Relevance Score: 0.29166648

A Student-Directed Professional Development Program for Doctoral Students Seeking Industry Placement

Conference Session: Graduate Student Experience
Collection: 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Daniel P. Dempsey, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Carol Barry, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Joey Mead, University of Massachusetts Lowell
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies, Student

students, and (3) a more advanced version of the latter two workshops would be usefulfor the senior graduate students (and possibly, the post-doctoral researchers). (a) (b)Figure 1. Professional development: (a) workshop on library skills and (b) resume/vitae writingworkshop.Improvement of communication skills involved three programs. First, the weekly presentationsby individual graduate students were continued in 2010-2011. Second, a new focus onimproving general writing skills was addressed by the hiring of three “wordsmiths,” seniorEnglish majors who acted as writing tutors to the group. The Graduate Student Council leadersand the wordsmiths worked together, creating a curriculum

Relevance Score: 0.29161468

Theory to Practice: A Reflection on the Application of Engineering Education Coursework to New Course Development

Conference Session: Tricks of the Trade
Collection: 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Ruth E. H. Wertz, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions: Student

structure of the enduring understanding and important to know content(Figure 3).I used the revised Bloom's taxonomy3 to generate and organize learning objectives for theFSMFE course. I used a matrix of the cognitive domain versus the knowledge domain as a visualtool to display weekly learning objectives. The purpose of this tool was to make the alignmentbetween the learning objectives and curricular priorities explicit. For example, I reviewed thematrix of weekly learning objectives to ensure that a) the number of objectives was appropriateand represented a reasonable workload for students (e.g., typically 5-8 objectives each week);and b) learning objectives relating to enduring understanding and important to know content

Relevance Score: 0.29161468

Exploring the Meaning of Fun: A Missed Opportunity to Retain Underrepresented Groups in Engineering?

Conference Session: Student Division Diversity and Persistence Related Technical Session
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jeannie Marie Purchase, Virginia Tech ; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student

. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basic of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing Grounded Theory. 2014: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.19. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.20. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition.21. Meyer, M., & Marx, S. (2014). Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4), 525-548.22. Bean, J., & Eaton, S. B. (2001). The psychology underlying successful retention practices. Journal of College Student

Relevance Score: 0.29088593

Closing the Gap: Using Supplemental Instruction as a Tool to Assist Minorities in Engineering

Conference Session: Student Division Diversity and Persistence Related Technical Session
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: James Blake Gegenheimer, Louisiana State University STEP ; Charles Algeo Wilson IV, Louisiana State University; Adrienne Steele, Louisiana State University; Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Louisiana State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student

American (7.7%), Hispanic (15.2%), Asian (17.6%), Female (20.7%), LSES (14.6%). Supplemental Instruction can now be counted as one of the many programs that successfullydecreases the academic performance gap between ethnic minority students and Caucasians. Thisgap was decreased to within 3% of course averages for all groups excluding African Americans.One of the most surprising things about these findings is that the SI program was not designed togive additional benefit to minority, female, or low-socioeconomic students. Through activelearning and inclusion, the SI program at LSU has shown to have a substantial impact on allpopulations of students7 References[1] E. Brothers, B. Knox, “Best Practices in Retention of Underrepresented

Relevance Score: 0.29088593

Engaging ASEE Student Membership through the Creation of a Student-Inclusive ASEE Conference Program

Conference Session: SD Technical Session: Tricks of the Trade
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Gurlovleen K. Rathore, Texas A&M University; Alexandra Coso Strong, Georgia Institute of Technology; Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions: Student

). Professional Development Topic Mean Interest a Networking 3.59 b Preparing grants & proposals 3.54 c Developing research skills 3.50 d Preparing for jobs in academe/Understand the job market 3.41 e Introducing teaching-related innovations in the classroom 3.39 f Preparing scientific publications 3.37 g Interviewing skills & negotiating job offers 3.30 h Developing a course

Relevance Score: 0.29063582

Into the Pipeline: A Freshman Student's Experiences of Stories Told About Engineering

Conference Session: Research on Diversification & Inclusion
Collection: 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Michael Brewer, University of Georgia; Nicola Sochacka, University of Georgia; Joachim Walther, University of Georgia
Tagged Divisions: K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

response to feedback from “Dr. Jacobson” (see second anecdote below), we spent almost anentire meeting debating over whether or not to describe the upper-level administrator’s watch as:a) “flashy”, which was Michael’s original, immediate observation and visceral reaction, b) “whatlooks like an expensive watch”, or c) to simply leave this part of the story out altogether. Thosein favor of option “a” felt that it was important to highlight the difference between Michael’sprior life experiences and the level of privilege that such watches represent to him. At the sametime, we all agreed that the use of the word “flashy” served to set the anecdotes as immediatereactions captured in Michael’s natural voice apart from the other more formally written

Relevance Score: 0.29015714

Experiential Learning: The Heart of a Successful Education - One Journey Through Graduate School

Conference Session: Tricks of the Trade
Collection: 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Lynn Albers, North Carolina State University; Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions: Student

unstructured epistemological realm of its own in which “anyone has a right to his own opinion,” a realm which he sets over against Authority’s realm where right-wrong still prevails, or (b) the student discovers qualitative contextual relativistic reasoning as a special case of “what They want” within Authority’s realm. Position 5: The student perceives all knowledge and values (including authority’s) as contextual and relativistic and subordinates dualistic right-wrong functions to the status of a special case, in context. Position 6: The student apprehends the necessity of orienting himself in a relativistic world through some form of personal Commitment (as distinct from unquestioned or unconsidered commitment to simple belief in

Relevance Score: 0.2901205

Developing a Robust Teaching Portfolio as a Doctoral Student in a Research-Intensive Engineering Program

Conference Session: Student Division Development of Professional Skills Technical Session
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Anahid Behrouzi, California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo
Tagged Divisions: Student

Paper ID #18205Developing a Robust Teaching Portfolio as a Doctoral Student in a Research-Intensive Engineering ProgramDr. Anahid Behrouzi, California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo Anahid Behrouzi is a new assistant professor at Cal Poly - San Luis Obispo and recently completed her doctoral degree in civil engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She has been involved with STEM education beginning in 2003 as a volunteer and summer instructor with the North Carolina Museum of Life and Science. She has been engaged with undergraduate/ graduate course deliv- ery in the topic areas of

Relevance Score: 0.2481277

Work in Progress: College Students with ADHD: A Framework for Studying the Role of the College Experience on Academic Success

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 7
Collection: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Laura Jill Carroll, University of Michigan; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan
Tagged Divisions: Student

opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] M. K. Eagan, E. B. Stolzenberg, H. B. Zimmerman, M. C. Aragon, H. Whang Sayson, and C. Rios-Aguilar, “The American freshman: National norms Fall 2016,” University of California, Los Angeles, CA, U.S., 2017.[2] A. L. Green and D. L. Rabine, “What do we really know about ADHD in college students?” Neurotherapeutics, vol. 9, pp. 559-568, 2012, doi:10.1007/s13311-012-0127-8.[3] G. J. DuPaul, L. L. Weyandt, S. M. O’Dell, and M. Varejao, “College students with ADHD: Current status and future directions,” Journal of Attention

Relevance Score: 0.23842902

Work In Progress: Examining the Impacts of a Sociotechnical Approach to Energy Education on Engineering Students’ Sense of Belonging and Attitudes Toward Engineering

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 3
Collection: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Felicity Bilow, Clarkson University; Jan DeWaters P.E., Clarkson University; Gordon D. Hoople, University of San Diego
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student

’ experiences and may retain women inengineering. It also presents new data to show that instead of just discussing the social or thetechnical factors of an engineering concept separately, but the two combined together, can affectstudents’ sense of belonging and attitudes toward engineering, especially for female students.However, future research is still needed to get a more complete understanding of the effects thata sociotechnical approach can have on engineering students’ sense of belonging/attitudes towardengineering.References[1] B. Cohen and K. L. Sanford Bernhardt, "Introducing Engineering as a Socio-technical Process," in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 15-18 June, 2014.[2] National Academy

Relevance Score: 0.2374558

Board 134: Methods for Conducting a Scoping Literature Review on Engineering Graduate Student Mental Health (Work in Progress)

Conference Session: Student Division Poster Session
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sarah Jane Bork, University of Michigan; Anu Tuladhar, University of Michigan; Joi-lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan
Tagged Divisions: Student

MacDougall Saylor for her invaluable experience withsystematic reviews and guidance in developing the search protocol. References[1] S. Lipson, S. Zhou, B. Wagner, K. Beck, and D. Eisenberg, “Major Differences: Variations in Undergraduate and Graduate Student Mental Health and Treatment Utilization Across Academic Disciplines,” Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 30(1), pp.23-41, 2015.[2] M. Schmidt and E. Hansson “Doctoral students’ well-being: a literature review,” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 13(1), p.1508171, 2018.[3] J. Hyun, B. Quinn, T. Madon and S. Lustig, “Graduate Student Mental Health: Needs Assessment and

Relevance Score: 0.23649839

Paper: A Review of Personality Type Theory in STEM Education and Implications for First-Year Engineering Teaching Assistants

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 7
Collection: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Andrew H. Phillips, The Ohio State University; Krista M. Kecskemety, The Ohio State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student

personality factors do appear in STEMand FYE TA literature and that some TA personality factors may be linked to student successand retention in FYE and STEM.References[1] R. A. Louis and H. M. Matusovich, “Work in progress: Describing the responsibilities ofTeaching Assistants in first-year engineering programs,” 2012 Frontiers in EducationConference Proceedings, 2012.[2] M. Ohland, C. Brawner, X. Chen, and M. Orr, “A Comparative Study of EngineeringMatriculation Practices,” 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings.[3] I. B. Myers and P. B. Myers, Gifts differing: understanding personality type. Palo Alto, CA:Davies-Black Pub, 2002.[4] D. Keirsey, Please understand me II. Del Mar: Prometheus Nemesis Book Company, 1998.[5] P. T. Costa

Relevance Score: 0.23642515

The Practicality and Scalability of Respooling 3-D printing Thermoplastics A Multidisciplinary Research Project by the Canino School of Engineering Technology at SUNY Canton (WIP)

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 5
Collection: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Matt Jamison Burnett; Michael A Wilson, SUNY Canton; Anthony Filoso, State University of New York, Canton
Tagged Divisions: Student

FFF printing, we must A) determine the OH = “OverHead” costs hard to determine how much of the machine cost goes into one rollquality of reclaimed plastics, B) determine the achievable consistency of the reclaimed 3) Consistency of Pulverized Plasticplastics, C) use this data to calculate the scalability of this process and its entrepreneurial

Relevance Score: 0.23635115

Faculty Perceptions of STEM Student and Faculty Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study (WIP).

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 1
Collection: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Mehdi Lamssali, North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University; Olivia Kay Nicholas, RAPID; Alesia Coralie Ferguson, North Carolina A&T State University; Andrea Nana Ofori-Boadu, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University; Angela M. White, NC A&T State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student

pandemic transition that a lot of students were having issues withbeing able to access their work. Indeed, that was because they didn't have adequate access tointernet at their home. Some students would tell me that they were only able to get internet at arelative's house, one day out of the week, in order to be able to do their work. The reason beingis that at they at their home, they didn't have the internet or they didn't have a computer. So, theywould have to go to their grandmother's or their aunt’s house to be able to do all theirassignments” (Research Participant 23) b) Student cheating behavior, cheating factors and prevention approaches During faculty interviews, student cheating was a common and serious complaint havinga

Relevance Score: 0.234566

Soft Skills Boot Camp: Designing a Three-day Student-run Seminar and Workshop Series for Graduate Students

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Shelby Buffington, Syracuse University; Ryan L. Falkenstein-Smith, Syracuse University; Alexander Johnson, Syracuse University; Katy Pieri, Syracuse University; Alex Vincent Jannini, Syracuse University
Tagged Divisions: Student

. Lannin and S. S. Nair, "Professional Skills in the Engineering Curriculum," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 562-571, 2009.[4] B. Shulz, "The Importance of Soft Skills: Education beyond academic knowledge," Journal of Language and Communication, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 146-154, 2008.[5] S. Kumar and J. K. Hsiao, "Engineers Learn "Soft Skills the Hard Way": Planting a Seed of Leadership in Engineering Classes," Leadership and Management In Engineering, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 18-23, 2007.Appendix A.1: Polling survey sent to graduate students.Please rate your enthusiasm for the following workshop subjects. 1 = I would not attend, 2 =Uninterested, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Interested, 5 = Highly interested.________ Time Management

Relevance Score: 0.23431204

Integrating Public Health Topics in Drug Delivery System Education

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 3
Collection: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Jorge Jimenez, University of Pittsburgh; April A. Dukes, University of Pittsburgh; Morgan V. Fedorchak
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student

captured student demographics, awareness of topics, and 5-point Likert scales evaluating students’ familiarity, perceived importance, interest, and perceived relevance of HD and SDOH for drug delivery. Review papers on delivery systems written by groups of students were evaluated using inductive thematic analysis to capture codes related to the translation of DDS to society and potential HD and SDOH topics. Controlled with the same rubric and traditional course content, three group report sets (total N=23 reports) including the current cohort of students receiving HD and SDOH content (Semester A, N =8 reports) and previous cohorts (Semester B, N = 7 reports; Semester C, N = 8 reports; both without additional content) were

Relevance Score: 0.233859

Work in Progress: Education Beyond Borders – Efforts of a Student Chapter to Foster Education and Promote Academic Excellence in STEM Fields

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 5
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Keyshlan Karinné Aybar Martínez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Juleika M. Villarrubia, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Gionelle J. Perez Rodriguez; Aidsa I. Santiago-Roman, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student

American Society for Engineering Education ByLaws, 20172. University of Puerto Rico Office of Institutional Planning and Continuous Improvement 2018-19 Data Enrolment. Downloaded from https://oiip.uprm.edu/dtos-estadisticos/3. B. L. Yoder, “Engineering by the numbers,” report for the American Society for Engineering Education, 20164. Robert G. Bringle & Julie A. Hatcher (1996) Implementing Service Learning in Higher Education, The Journal of Higher Education, 67:2, 221-239, DOI: 10.1080/00221546.1996.11780257

Relevance Score: 0.23333319

Why Engineering? Students' Reasons for Choosing an Engineering Major

Conference Session: Student Division Diversity and Persistence Related Technical Session
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jackson Kai Painter, University of Louisville; Kate E. Snyder, University of Louisville; Patricia A. Ralston, University of Louisville
Tagged Divisions: Student

-753. doi:10.1007/s10956- 011-9362-8Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Honken, N., & Ralston, P. A. S. (2013). Freshman engineering retention: A holistic look. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14, 29-37.Inda, M., Rodríguez, C., & Peña, J. V. (2013). Gender differences in applying social cognitive career theory in engineering students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 346-355.Jones, B. D., Paretti, M. C., Hein, S. F., & Knott, T. W. (2010). An analysis of motivation constructs with first-year engineering students: relationships among expectancies, values

Relevance Score: 0.23317851

Innovative Graduate Program in Nanoengineering

Conference Session: Educating Students for Professional Success
Collection: 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Ajit D. Kelkar, North Carolina A&T State University; James G. Ryan, Joint School of Nanoscience and Nanoengineering
Tagged Divisions: Graduate Studies, New Engineering Educators, Student

automotive applications. To make the leap from the research laboratory to new products, and thus new jobs,requires an educated and well qualified workforce that comprehends simultaneously (a) theinterdisciplinary principles of nanoengineering with the understanding of the unique andenabling properties at nanoscale and their associated nanoscale engineering and scientificprinciples (b) the implications that nanotechnology holds for not only revolutionizing thematerials and products used in daily life but to see nanotechnology’s promise for entirely newclasses of products as well, (c) the skill set required for managing the nanoengineered materialdevelopment, processing, design and nano-manufacturing procedures and (d) the ability tocommunicate

Relevance Score: 0.2290559

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Implementing Active Learning Opportunities for First-Year Engineering Students who are Taking Math, Physics, and Chemistry

Conference Session: Student Division Early Introduction to Engineering Technical Session
Collection: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Nabila A. Huq, Colorado State University; Wenlong Xu, Colorado State University; Sanli Movafaghi, Colorado State University; Mona Hemmati, Colorado State University
Tagged Divisions: Student

among GTFs, it may beuseful in future semesters to give a sample lesson or sample worksheet in core courses todemonstrate how LLs will be run, and all the possibilities for how LL sessions might go.Perhaps a description of the benefits of active learning, and the intended benefits of theLL program may be worth going explaining to first-year students the program is beingadvertised to.Figure 2. LL attendance and feedback across engineering disciplines. (a) Shows abreakdown of overall LL attendance across first-year engineering courses. (b) Quantifiesoverall LL attendance of students who progressed and did not progress betweensemesters. (c) Quantifies survey responses of whether or not the LLs were helpful while(d) summarizes the reasons for non

Relevance Score: 0.20499718

The Doctorate Journey: Mapping Perceptions of the Ph.D. Process

Conference Session: Tricks of the Trade - Reflections and Advice on the Educational Process
Collection: 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; James J. Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach; Matthew A. Verleger, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach
Tagged Divisions: Student

agreed to allow us to use them as data for future research.MethodologyDuring the FIE session, the groups were asked to create a map of the PhD process, keeping the followingquestions in mind: • Who are the Players and how do they relate to each other? • What are the Milestones? • What are the Events that impact the outcomes?Each of the group-created maps were photographed (included in Appendices B-F), then each element onthe map was transcribed for easier comparison across the different maps. The maps were compared byprocess (intellectual and institutional strand), identified characters (network strand), and the potentialchallenges. These were aligned with each other as well as the original analogy components from thespecial session (shown

Relevance Score: 0.2040312

Tips and Tricks for a More Effective You: Lessons Learned From a USAFA Cadet

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 5
Collection: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Alexander Samaniego, United States Air Force; Martin Span III, United States Air Force
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student

Paper ID #26833Tips and Tricks for a More Effective You: Lessons Learned From a USAFACadetMr. Alexander Samaniego, United States Air Force Alexander is a second class cadet at the United States Air Force Academy, originally from San Diego, CA, who is working towards a bachelors of science in systems engineering.Martin Span III, United States Air Force Trae is the Deputy Director of the Systems Engineering Program and Instructor of Systems Engineering at the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA), Colorado Springs, Colorado. He is commissioned as Captain in the United States Air Force (USAF). In his role as Deputy Director

Relevance Score: 0.20259543

How to Be a Graduate Student (Before I Forget): A Collection of Experiential Wisdom

Conference Session: Student Division Technical Session 2
Collection: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors: Stephen Secules, Florida International University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Student

Paper ID #28576How to Be a Graduate Student (Before I Forget): A Collection ofExperiential WisdomDr. Stephen Secules, Florida International University Stephen is an Assistant Professor Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International Univer- sity. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught a number of courses on engineering and education, including courses on engineering design, systems in society, and learning theories. Stephen’s research interests include equity, culture, and the sociocultural dimensions of engineering