. Sussman, J., et. al. (2007), “The CLIOS Process: A User’s Guide.”6. Mitchell, R., Agle, B., and Wood, D. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience:Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management. The Academy ofManagement Review, Oct 1997; 22, 4; ABI/INFORM Global, p. 853. Page 25.797.11
ABET standards and major coursework.Table 2 (next page) Listing of courses in the undergraduate Leadership Engineering program Page 23.982.11Page 23.982.121. Florman, Samuel C. (2010). The Introspective Engineer. New York City: St. Martin's, 1996. Graham, R.,Crawley, E., & Mendelsohn, B. (2010). Engineering leadership education: A snapshot review of international goodpractice. [White paper]. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/gordonelp/elewhitepapter.pdf2. Schoephoerster, R.T. and Golding, P. (2010). A New Program in Leadership Engineering, TransformingEngineering Education, Creating Interdisciplinary Skills for Complex Global Environments, Paper #1569268596,Dublin, Ireland, April 6-9, 2010.3. Muller, G. 2013, Didactic
Specifications (Hands-on): The class is divided into teams of four to six; half theteams are designate Group A and the rest is Group B. Each team is tasked with building a functionalobject (tower, bridge, mechanism). However, Group A designs one object and creates the instructionsfor Group B, and vice versa. Other than the written instructions, no communication is allowedbetween the teams. (The directions will not explain what is being built, only how to build it.) Eachobject is evaluated based on performance, and the teams report on the limitations and benefits ofhaving clear specifications.• Importance of Clear Mission Objectives (Group design): The class is divided into (different
AC 2012-5573: A SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CAPSTONE COURSE THATMAKES A DIFFERENCEDr. Benito Flores, Universidad de Monterrey Page 25.114.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 A SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CAPSTONE COURSE THAT MAKES A DIFFERENCEAbstractThis paper describes how a Capstone Course in the area of Systems Engineering andEngineering Management resulted in a very positive and productive learning experience forthe students enrolled in a particular Engineering baccalaureate program. Research shows thatpractical capstone courses are linked to high levels of student engagement resulting inimproved
completeexplanation of the process and solution(s) used.Measuring Learner Achievement. The course intends to bring together most topics that studentshave learned in seeking their degree. It will include two primary components: a) the designprocess; b) productive team behaviors. Grades are based on demonstrated contribution to thecompletion of the interim and final project(s), including your individual contribution and the finalreport / presentation. The final report must include all specifications, testing procedures, datacollected, design decisions and performance of the final project in comparison to the initialspecifications for the product. It will not be accepted after the last scheduled class. The parts listand budget are due with this report.Since
) Curricula Design and Materials Development, (b) Instruction Delivery Systems, (c) Student Experiential Learning, and (d) Student Recruitment and Retention.(a) Curricula Design and Materials Development BGREEN is a STEM project that supports the integration of agricultural sciences withthe basic and applied aspects of the traditional STEM disciplines[6]. The focus of BGREEN is tomeet current and future sustainable energy workforce needs, and to better prepare students towork at different USDA agencies. Therefore, curricula will be developed/adapted based oninputs from faculty and USDA leaders. A curriculum development team has been establishedwith members representing university and USDA leaders. The curriculum development team
are as follows. • Describe the role of mechanical engineers in society and identify career opportunities within the field • Implement a systematic approach to solving problems including accurate use of engineering units • Apply engineering fundamentals to solve problems in various areas of mechanical engineering • Use CAD, basic fabrication, and microcontroller tools to develop virtual and physical prototypes for testing • Effectively launch a team in which members (a) recognize and support each others’ styles and strengths and (b) generate and agree to ground rules that they will use to help guide their collaboration • Build consensus and recognize and address emerging conflicts using active
Paper ID #24057From Technology Elaboration Toward Application Innovation: An Instruc-tional Transformation in a Project-oriented Capstone Course of DynamicControl SystemsMr. Kuan-Yu Chou, National Chiao Tung University Kuan-Yu Chou received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan in 2010. M.S. degree in computer science and information engineering from National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan in 2012. He is currently working toward the Ph.D. degree in Institute of Electrical Control Engineering from National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan. His research interests include
ment of the stuudent learninng in the couurse throughhseven couurse learning g objective (CLO) ( was in place. Thee qualitative aspects meaasured using theCLOs aree presented below. b • CLO 1: Hand C ds-on experieence. o Studen nts developeed simulationn models off the airport operations o ussing Arena® ® simulaation environnment. Arenna is a geneeral discrete--event systemms simulatioon softwaare which is appropriatee for modelinng and simullating the typpe of problem m
AC 2011-725: SE CAPSTONE: A PILOT STUDY OF 14 UNIVERSITIESTO EXPLORE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING LEARNING AND CAREER IN-TEREST THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROBLEMSElisabeth W McGrath, Stevens Institute of Technology Elisabeth McGrath is Senior Research Associate at Stevens Institute of Technology and Executive Director of the Stevens Center for Innovation in Engineering & Science Education, Hoboken, NJ.Susan Lowes, Institute for Learning Technologies, Teachers College/Columbia University Susan Lowes, Ph.D., is Director of Research and Evaluation, Institute for Learning Technologies, Teach- ers College/Columbia University.Chris Jurado, Stevens Institute of Technology Chris Jurado is involved in the development of research
Jing Guo, "A Systems Engineering Approach for Implementing An Electrical or Computer Engineering Master’s Capstone Course," in ASEE Rocky Mountain Section Conference, Cedar City, Utah, 2016.[2] S. B. Blachard and W. Frabrycky, Systems engineering and Analysis” (Fifth Edition), New York: Prentice Hall, 2011.[3] D. Buede, The Engineering Design of Systems – Models and Methods (Second Edition), Wiley, 2009.[4] A. P. Sage and J. James E. Armstrong, Introduction to Systems Engineering, Wiley, 2009.[5] yyy, Information retrieved from student deliverables for EE 692, Electrical Engineering Capstone,, 2015.[6] ASPCA, "Shelter Intake and Surrender," 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.aspca.org/animal- homelessness/shelter-intake-and
Paper ID #7226A Tool for ABET AccreditationDr. Ravi T. Shankar, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL Ravi Shankar is a professor in the computer and electrical engineering and computer science (CEECS) department in the college of engineering and computer science (COECS) at Florida Atlantic University (FAU), Boca Raton, FL. He is the director of a college-wide center on systems integration. He has a PhD from the University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, and an MBA from FAU. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of FL, a Senior member of IEEE, and a Fellow of the American Heart Association. Email
skills working with many engineering disciplines for testing vari- ous hardware and software interfaces between the U.S. and international elements on the Space Station. Her duties included extensive travel to Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Marshall Space Flight Center, Canada and Japan. Ms. Murphy joined the Launch Services Program in 2003 as an integration engineer for Pegasus and Taurus missions. In this position, she concentrated on the interfaces between the launch vehicle and the spacecraft. Ms. Murphy joined the Education Office in 2007 where she continues to serve as the project manager for the Lunabotics Mining Competition. Ms. Murphy earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Psychology from the University of
is also supported by Rehmann et al.’s [27] note that the creation ofbehavior over time graphs can be supported by tracing a loop in a causal loop diagram.RQ3: Affordances of Different Approaches to Assessing Systems ThinkingTwo main themes were identified that represent tensions between different types of affordancesseen across assessments. First was the tension between (a) having less structure so there arefewer constraints on the students’ visualization and (b) the potential for ambiguity whenevaluating a visualization. Another was the tension between (a) the time it takes to administer anassessment and (b) how much an evaluator can learn about a student’s or a group of students’understanding of a problem. These two tensions overlap. For
Paper ID #6524Engineering Management Creating Individuals with a Mind for Business anda Heart for EngineeringDr. Saeed D. Foroudastan, Middle Tennessee State University Saeed Foroudastan is the Associate Dean for the College of Basic and Applied Sciences (CBAS). The CBAS oversees 10 departments at Middle Tennessee State University. He is also the current Director for the Master’s of Science in Professional Science program and a professor of engineering technology at MTSU. Foroudastan received his B.S. in civil engineering, his M.S. in civil engineering, and his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Tennessee Technological
AC 2012-5133: INSTRUCTOR’S PERSPECTIVES OF TRANSFORMINGA TRADITIONAL ENGINEERING ECONOMICS COURSE INTO A FULLYONLINE DELIVERYMs. Pil-Won On, University of Missouri, Columbia Pil-Won On is am Instructional Designer/E-learning Specialist at the College of Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia. On holds an M.S. in instructional systems technology from Indiana University, Bloomington.Dr. Luis Occena, University of Missouri, Columbia Page 25.787.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Instructor’s Perspectives of Transforming a Traditional Engineering
Paper ID #26050Hypermodeling: A Profile for Teaching SysML ModelingMr. Michael J. Vinarcik P.E., University of Detroit Mercy Michael J. Vinarcik is a Chief Solutions Architect at SAIC and an adjunct professor at the University of Detroit Mercy. He has nearly thirty years of automotive and defense engineering experience. He received a BS (Metallurgical Engineering) from the Ohio State University, an MBA from the University of Michigan, and an MS (Product Development) from the University of Detroit Mercy. Michael has presented at National Defense Industrial Association, International Council on Systems Engineering, and
Paper ID #29768Treadstone: A Process for Improving Modeling Prowess Using ValidationRulesMr. Michael J. Vinarcik P.E., University of Detroit Mercy Michael J. Vinarcik is a Chief Systems Engineer at SAIC and an adjunct professor at the University of Detroit Mercy. He has thirty years of automotive and defense engineering experience. He received a BS (Metallurgical Engineering) from the Ohio State University, an MBA from the University of Michi- gan, and an MS (Product Development) from the University of Detroit Mercy. Michael has presented at National Defense Industrial Association, International Council on Systems
Paper ID #20248Lean Six Sigma Case Study within a Public School DistrictMs. Emily M Salmon, Mississippi State University Emily Salmon is a recent graduate of Mississippi State University (MSU) with a bachelor’s in Industrial and Systems Engineering. She is a Research Engineer for MSU’s Institute for Systems Engineering Research (ISER) located in Vicksburg, MS. Her current research involves lean six sigma practices and applications, manufacturability, and modeling and simulations. She received her Six Sigma Black Belt from MSU’s CAVS Extension Center in June 2016 and is currently pursuing her Masters of Engineering at MSU
AC 2012-4299: INTRODUCING SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CONCEPTSIN A SENIOR CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSEDr. Michael W. Prairie, Norwich University Michael Prairie is an Electrical Engineer who spent 15 years in the U.S. Air Force, managing R&D programs and developing various optical sensor technologies, and then ten years in industry developing infrared system concepts for DoD clients. In 2008, he returned to Norwich University, his alma mater, to teach electrical and computer engineering. His current interests include integrating sensors into embedded systems for controlling processes in various applications that support the courses he teaches.Prof. Ronald Lessard, Norwich University
AC 2012-4451: A REVIEW OF CAPSTONE COURSE DESIGNS USED ININDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING PROGRAMSDr. Denise H. Bauer, University of Idaho, Moscow Denise H. Bauer received her Ph.D. in industrial engineering from Pennsylvania State University in 2007. She received a M.S. in industrial engineering as well as a B.S. in engineering dcience from the University of Tennessee. Bauer’s research in engineering education centers around the use of technology mainly as a means of communication for remote engineering group work. She received a NAE CASEE postdoctoral fellowship to study what communication methods students used to communicate with group members during online classes and their feelings on their importance. She is also
AC 2012-3138: WHEN TO START COLLECTING SOCIAL SECURITY:DESIGNING A CASE STUDYDr. Ted Eschenbach P.E., University of Alaska, Anchorage Ted Eschenbach, P.E., is the principal of TGE Consulting, an Emeritus Professor of engineering man- agement at the University of Alaska, Anchorage, and the Founding Editor Emeritus of the Engineering Management Journal. He is the author or coauthor of more than 200 publications and presentations, in- cluding 15 books. With his coauthors, he has won best paper awards at ASEE, ASEM, ASCE, and IIE conferences, and the 2009 Grant Award for the best article in The Engineering Economist. He earned his B.S. from Purdue in 1971, his doctorate in industrial engineering from Stanford University
Paper ID #7785Systems Engineering Graduate Education for Veterans - A Pilot ProgramDr. Michael C Smith, University of Virginia Mike Smith earned his B.S. and M.S. at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville and Ph.D. from the Uni- versity of Missouri - Columbia. He has worked across a variety of application domains including man- ufacturing, transportation, defense, and health care. His 20+ years in the private sector and ten years in academia give him the combined perspective of academic rigor and pragmatic problem solving that helps bring solid solutions to challenging problems. Mike and his wife. Amanda, have four
Paper ID #18405Design & Development of a 3D-Printed Quadcopter Using A System Engi-neering Approach in an Electrical Engineering Master’s Capstone CourseProf. John M Santiago Jr, Colorado Technical University Professor John Santiago has been a technical engineer, manager, and executive with more than 26 years of leadership positions in technical program management, acquisition development and operation research support while in the United States Air Force. He currently has over 16 years of teaching experience at the university level and taught over 40 different graduate and undergraduate courses in electrical engineer
Paper ID #19541A Laboratory-based Course in Systems Engineering Focusing on the Designof a High-speed Mag-lev Pod for the SpaceX Hyperloop CompetitionDr. Dominic M. Halsmer P.E., Oral Roberts University Dr. Dominic M. Halsmer is a Professor of Engineering and former Dean of the College of Science and Engineering at Oral Roberts University. He has been teaching science and engineering courses there for 25 years, and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Oklahoma. He received BS and MS Degrees in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from Purdue University in 1985 and 1986, and a PhD in Mechanical
AC 2011-2832: A ”HIGH TOUCH, HIGH VALUE” APPROACH TO A PRACTICE-ORIENTED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MASTER’S DEGREE PROGRAMFOR WORKING PROFESSIONALSMichael C Smith, University of Virginia Michael C. Smith, Ph.D. University of Virginia Department of Systems and Information Engineering Box 400747 151 Engineers Way Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22904-4747 434-924-0320 mcs5f@virginia.edu Currently Executive Director of the Accelerated Masters Program in Systems Engineering at the Univer- sity of Virginia, Dr. Smith’s experience involves teaching, research, and application of a broad spectrum of systems engineering techniques with emphasis on systems analysis, design, and evaluation problems in public and private sector
Paper ID #13273Enhancing Systems Engineering Content in Aerospace Courses: CapstoneDesign and Senior Technical ElectivesProf. John Valasek, Texas A&M University John Valasek is Director, Center for Autonomous Vehicles and Sensor Systems (CANVASS), Director, Vehicle Systems & Control Laboratory, Professor of Aerospace Engineering, and member of the Honors Faculty at Texas A&M University. He teaches courses in Aircraft Design, Atmospheric Flight Mechanics, Modern Control of Aerospace Systems, Vehicle Management Systems, and Cockpit Systems & Displays. John created the senior/graduate level course AERO 445
the UAV experience is executed to advance the time in the experience.The learner is then presented with the results of their decisions in the form of project statusupdates that arrive in email and are displayed on the project dashboard. Experience Accelerator UAV Project Experience Starting Phase Phase 1 Phase 2 Final Phase Sub Phase A Sub Phase B Sub Phase C Each Cycle Event Event Event Event Figure 6: Typical SEEA Experience Structure DesignWithin each phase/sub-phase
. The survey items, along with descriptive statisticsand frequency data for each item, can be found in Appendices A and B. It should be noted thatitems 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, and 10 were reverse coded such that the correct answer is disagree or stronglydisagree, not agree or strongly agree. This was designed to control for response sets (i.e., thetendency for the student to respond systematically to items without considering item content). Page 22.1276.9The pre-survey was completed by 17 of the 17 students (100%) enrolled in the systemsengineering interdisciplinary design course. The post-survey was completed by 14 of the 17(82%) students enrolled
Paper ID #33445Evaluation of Targeted Systems Thinking and Systems EngineeringAssessments in a Freshmen-Level Mechanical Engineering CourseDr. Cassandra M. Birrenkott, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Cassandra (Degen) Birrenkott received her B.S. degree in Metallurgical Engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology in 2007. She received her Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering in 2012 from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, studying mechanochemical reactions of a spiropyran mechanophore in polymeric materials under shear loading. She is currently an Assistant