, and environmental engineering help to providesome of the solutions to the underlying problems associated with bad weather such as resilienttechnologies [35, 36, 37]. Together, engineering and nursing offer a V-shaped solution to a betterfuture which supports the economic success and health of local communities. Students in thecourse are exposed to the additional policy benefit of improving conditions of immigration anddrug trafficking that impact the U.S., which is an example of a systems engineeringconceptualization of sustainable development and life-cycle assessment.MethodsInstitutional context. Founded in 1870 in Rolla, Missouri, the Missouri University of Science andTechnology, or S&T, is a technological research university offering
ofstakeholder awareness skills and identify the area(s) of development (gaps). The results provide us withinsights to develop effective teaching strategies to address these gaps.Study participants were tasked to complete a scenario-based assessment proposed by Grohs, et al. [1] thatfocuses on systems thinking and problem-solving as engineers by responding to a scenario that addressedtechnical and social contexts. The activity focuses on participants’ responses to a given scenario and theprompts intended to guide respondents in a systems-thinking approach. Data were collected electronicallyand analyzed using qualitative coding methods by applying the assessment tool rubric to evaluate studentresponses using systems thinking constructs from the framework
7 17 300 30 G 2 3 6 20 210 4 1 S 10 200 Targets/Waypoints 5
balanced strategy for success. While it may be evident to develop short-termtechnological solutions, it is equally crucial to incorporate long-term structural and functional solutions intothe planning process. This holistic approach ensures a more robust and sustainable outcome for the project[2].Based on Gibson et al.'s analysis of data from Anderson Consulting (1993) [1], the goal developmentrepresents a small part of the total lifetime cost of a system (less than 1% in a typical software system), yet"it results in a critical commitment of recourses." When the first 8% of the project budget is spent, 80% ofthe cost of the project/system is determined.Competitiveness in professional practice requires engineers to participate in and accomplish
Paper ID #41979Decolonizing Stakeholder Analysis for Engineered SystemsDr. Shamsnaz Virani Bhada, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Shamsnaz S. Virani, Assistant Professor of Systems Engineering at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute, earned her Ph.D.in industrial and systems engineering from the University of Alabama, Huntsville. She also holds a M.S. in human factors engineering from Wright State University, Dayton.Sarah E. Stanlick, Worcester Polytechnic Institute ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Decolonizing stakeholder analysis for engineered systemsAbstractIn systems
consideration of the open book examination," Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 11, no. 4-1, pp. 597-602, 1951.[3] A. Gharib, W. Phillips, and N. Mathew, "Cheat Sheet or Open-Book? A Comparison of the Effects of Exam Types on Performance, Retention, and Anxiety," Online Submission, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 469-478, 2012.[4] Y. Song and D. Thuente, "A quantitative case study in engineering of the efficacy of quality cheat-sheets," in 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015: IEEE, pp. 1-7.[5] W. Chang and R. S. Shieh, "Exploration of the value of using a formula sheet for physics examinations," European Journal of Physics, vol. 34, no. 6, p. 1411, 2013.[6] I.-H. Hsiao and C. López, "Lessons
learning environments [18].References[1] M. Castells and C. Blackwell, “The information age: economy, society and culture. Volume 1. The rise of the network society,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 25, pp. 631–636, 1998.[2] H. V. Haraldsson, Introduction to system thinking and causal loop diagrams. Department of chemical engineering, Lund University Lund, Sweden, 2004.[3] M. A. Dolansky, S. M. Moore, P. A. Palmieri, and M. K. Singh, “Development and validation of the systems thinking scale,” Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 35, pp. 2314–2320, 2020.[4] K. E. Dugan, E. A. Mosyjowski, S. R. Daly, and L. R. Lattuca, “Systems thinking assessments in engineering: A systematic literature review,” Systems
. Architectural toolsdeveloped for digital engineering and model-based systems engineering offer a structuredapproach for introducing systems thinking skills and training the future workforce forcompetency in digital transformation. Given the complex interdisciplinary nature of these topics,we propose a modular approach for introducing these skills in engineering courses using UAFand SysML platforms. The modules are designed to introduce and reinforce systems thinkingusing scenarios and systems that students are familiar with in their day-to-day lives. They aredesigned to be scalable across different courses and help build a foundation that can be applied tocourse-specific projects.References[1] N. Hutchison and H. Y. S. Tao, “The Digital Engineering
-Release: The latest incremental release of SysML v2., 2023. URL https://github.com/Systems-Modeling/SysML-v2-Release. [6] Christian Nigischer, S´ebastien Bougain, Rainer Riegler, Heinz Peter Stanek, and Manfred Grafinger. Multi-domain simulation utilizing sysml: state of the art and future perspectives. Procedia CIRP, 100:319–324, 2021. [7] Joe R Gregory. A Model-Based Framework for Early-Stage Analysis of Spacecraft. PhD thesis, University of Bristol, 2022. [8] Azad M Madni and Michael Sievers. Model-based systems engineering: Motivation, current status, and research opportunities. Systems Engineering, 21(3):172–190, 2018. [9] Joe Gregory, Lucy Berthoud, Theo Tryfonas, Alain Rossignol, and Ludovic Faure. The long and winding
," in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2020.[22] S. Cotner and C. Ballen, "Can mixed assessment methods make biology classes more equitable?," PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 12, 2017.[23] C. Rogers and R. Valdez, "Designing for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Systems Engineering Education," in American Society for Engineering Education, 2021.[24] H. Handley and A. Marnewick, "A Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Model for Engineering Curriculums," in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Recent Advances in Systems Science and Engineering (RASSE), 2022.[25] ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Effective for Reviews during the 2022-2023 Accreditation Cycle," 2021. [Online].